On 3/24/25 21:07, m...@sergej.pp.ru wrote:
On 3/24/25 3:22 PM, nl6720 wrote:
rp-pppoe
As I understand dropping PPPoE support is bad idea while ADSL modems
exist. I adopted it.
Hi,
FYI that the ppp package already contains a (Linux-only) PPPoE client
plugin, which is enough for most users.
Hello,
I would like to add vagrant[0] to the list of packages to drop.
I just disowned it and it is not required by anything.
The reason being that first of all it is currently incompatible[1] with
ruby3.4 which we are working on bringing into the repos[2] and it has a
long list of being inco
On 3/22/25 11:50, Antonio Rojas wrote:
Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you
want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is
attached (but this may vary if packages are adopted/disow
Am Samstag, dem 22.03.2025 um 11:50 +0100 schrieb Antonio Rojas:
> Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
> https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt
> packages you want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list
> of packages is attached (but this may vary
On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 12:19 +0100, gromit wrote:
> I have now also orphaned the packages from farseerfc, see the full
> list
> below. Not all of these are unnededed orphans , but it might still
> make
> sense to look at all of them since some may need new maintainers to
> retain a bus factor > 1 :D
On 25/03/22 11:50AM, Antonio Rojas wrote:
> Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
> https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you
> want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is
> attached (but this may vary if packages are adop
On 3/24/25 3:22 PM, nl6720 wrote:
rp-pppoe
As I understand dropping PPPoE support is bad idea while ADSL modems exist. I
adopted it.
On Saturday, 22 March 2025 12:50:11 EET Antonio Rojas wrote:
> b43-fwcutter
> reflector
> rp-pppoe
Seeing as some of the listed packages are included in the ISO [0], I kindly
ask that they are not dropped before the next month's ISO is out.
[0]:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archiso/-/b
.
[...]
reflector
[...]
Re: Spring cleanup '25 [1]: Aside from being quite popular among our
users (probably for historical reasons and because it's currently the
only solution offered in the official repo as far as I can tell),
`reflector` is included and used in our ISO [2].
A
Antonio Rojas on Sat, 2025/03/22 11:50:
> perl-config-simple
At least this one is used in our own infrastructure...
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/blob/master/roles/postfix/files/bouncehandler.pl?ref_type=heads#L5
Actually I use it myself, but I would like to avoid goin
Den 22.03.2025 kl. 11.50 skrev Antonio Rojas:
Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you
want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is
attached (but this may vary if packages are adop
Antonio Rojas 於 2025年3月22日 週六 下午6:50寫道：
>
> Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
> https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you
> want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is
> attached (but this may vary if packages are ado
cleanup '25 [1]: Aside from being quite popular among our
users (probably for historical reasons and because it's currently the
only solution offered in the official repo as far as I can tell),
`reflector` is included and used in our ISO [2].
As such, it should *not* be dropped in the curren
Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to
https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you
want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is
attached (but this may vary if packages are adopted/disowned). If you adopt a
package from the li
14 matches
Mail list logo
