On 2022-04-22 11:07:26 (+0200), David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 2022-04-22 10:52:06 (+0200), Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) wrote:
> > I'm still unhappy with `pacman -S qemu` not doing anything useful. Maybe we
> > could name that `qemu-misc` or `qemu-common` instead
> > and have our v
On 2022-04-22 10:52:06 (+0200), Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:38 AM David Runge via arch-dev-public <
> arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > The `qemu` package now only carries a few common files and tracks all of
> > its leaf packages as optional
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:38 AM David Runge via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> The `qemu` package now only carries a few common files and tracks all of
> its leaf packages as optional dependencies.
>
I'm still unhappy with `pacman -S qemu` not doing anything usef
On 2022-04-21 23:20:32 (+0200), David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> with qemu 7.0.0 now in [staging] we have a more extensive split package
> setup (see accompanying TODO [1]). Under certain circumstances this will
> require manual intervention (or rather a specific upgrade) to regain the
> pr
Hi all,
with qemu 7.0.0 now in [staging] we have a more extensive split package
setup (see accompanying TODO [1]). Under certain circumstances this will
require manual intervention (or rather a specific upgrade) to regain the
previous functionality:
```
With the update to qemu 7.0.0 the package h
