On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:38 AM David Runge via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> The `qemu` package now only carries a few common files and tracks all of > its leaf packages as optional dependencies. > I'm still unhappy with `pacman -S qemu` not doing anything useful. Maybe we could name that `qemu-misc` or `qemu-common` instead and have our various metapackages provide `qemu`, so the user at least gets to select a provider?
