Excerpts from Santiago Torres-Arias's message of janeiro 28, 2025 2:20 pm:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:20:15AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>> I have concerns with putting a WSL image into the official store but I am
>> fine with us offering an easy way to setup WSL.
>
> Speaking of the store,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:20:15AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> I have concerns with putting a WSL image into the official store but I am
> fine with us offering an easy way to setup WSL.
Speaking of the store, wasn't a previous attempt by shibumi to do this
get blocked on some sort of store
On 1/28/25 10:20 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hi,
Hey Jelle,
On 28/01/2025 00:59, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail to collect thoughts and interests about
providing an official Arch Linux image for WSL (Windows Subsystem for
Linux) [1].
Indeed, after a quick relat
On 1/28/25 11:52 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On 27/01/2025 23:59, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail to collect thoughts and interests about
providing an official Arch Linux image for WSL (Windows Subsystem for
Linux) [1].
Hello,
Hey,
Thanks for bringing this
On 1/28/25 1:45 PM, kpcyrd wrote:
On 1/28/25 12:59 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
Anyway, sorry for the long read 0:)
Just to clarify, the actual purpose of this mail is to collect
thoughts, concerns, questions, interests (both regarding using such an
"official" Arch Linux WSL image and / or helping
Le 28 janvier 2025 12:40:04 GMT+01:00, "Jakub Klinkovský"
a écrit :
>On 28.01.25 at 10:21 (UTC+0100), Robin Candau wrote:
>> On 1/28/25 9:58 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
>> > On 1/28/25 9:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> > > 1) Importing from the docker image is good, but it strips a lot of files
On 1/28/25 12:59 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
Anyway, sorry for the long read 0:)
Just to clarify, the actual purpose of this mail is to collect thoughts,
concerns, questions, interests (both regarding using such an "official"
Arch Linux WSL image and / or helping maintaining it), ...
Please, share
On 28.01.25 at 10:21 (UTC+0100), Robin Candau wrote:
> On 1/28/25 9:58 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
> > On 1/28/25 9:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > > 1) Importing from the docker image is good, but it strips a lot of files
> > > (i.e. all documentation). It took me ages to work out why there was no
On 27/01/2025 23:59, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail to collect thoughts and interests about providing
an official Arch Linux image for WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) [1].
Hello,
Thanks for bringing this up for discussion.
My experience with WSL is limited as my
On 1/28/25 9:58 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 1/28/25 9:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> 1) Importing from the docker image is good, but it strips a lot of files
> (i.e. all documentation). It took me ages to work out why there was no
> man pages! I do not think a WSL install should do that.
>
Hi,
On 28/01/2025 00:59, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail to collect thoughts and interests about providing
an official Arch Linux image for WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) [1].
Indeed, after a quick related discussion over on IRC, I started
tinkering with this and I
On 1/28/25 9:50 AM, Alexander Epaneshnikov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:59:05AM +0100, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hello Robin and others.
I support this idea. And if you need any help, then I am ready to spend my time
on WSL
Hey Alexander,
Alright! Thanks for sharing interest
Forwarding Allan's mail at his request, and answering it :)
On 1/28/25 9:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
Hi Allan,
> Can you forward this to arch-dev-public? I am not subscribed.
>
>
> I have been using Arch almost exclusively in WSL for the past months. My
> Arch machine died and I ha
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:59:05AM +0100, Robin Candau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hello Robin and others.
I support this idea. And if you need any help, then I am ready to spend my time
on WSL
>
> I'm writing this mail to collect thoughts and interests about providing an
> official Arch Linux image
On 1/28/25 7:58 AM, George Rawlinson wrote:
Hi George,
Thanks for sharing thoughts!
If I remember correctly, this was suggested before and shot down because WSL is
its own can of beans, and mainly because having this “official” implies that we
will “support” this in the way of bug reports et
Hi, George!
> If I remember correctly, this was suggested before and shot down because WSL
> is its own can of beans, and mainly because having this “official” implies
> that we will “support” this in the way of bug reports etc etc.
>
> My feelings remain the same, I have zero interest in spendi
16 matches
Mail list logo
