On 4/3/21 8:30 am, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I'll also back 3). I think having a general mechanism for this and not
> just bumping baseline and then being able to ship baseline, -v2, -v3,
> -v4 with that hypothetical general mechanism would make more sense and
> be less of a h
On 4/3/21 8:13 am, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> Options realistically are:
>>
>> 1) bump the baseline
>> 2) provide a second more optimized port.
>
> 3) defer this until better tooling is available to implement (2)
>
> Since
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:13, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
> > Options realistically are:
> >
> > 1) bump the baseline
> > 2) provide a second more optimized port.
>
> 3) defer this until better tooling is av
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Options realistically are:
>
> 1) bump the baseline
> 2) provide a second more optimized port.
3) defer this until better tooling is available to implement (2)
Since the RFC is about bumping -march to x86_64-v2, it either gets
On 4/3/21 6:38 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:11 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 9:00 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
I'd hate to be the dbscripts maintainer who implements that
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:11 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 9:00 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > I'd hate to be the dbscripts maintainer who implements that! Also,
> > > $arch in mirror URLs would
On 3/3/21 9:00 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 8:32 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-0
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:00:38AM +, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I'd hate to be the dbscripts maintainer who implements that! Also,
> > $arch in mirror URLs would likely have issues, as it would need
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 8:32 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via ar
On 3/3/21 8:32 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via a
On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > > I wonder, might this be an inte
On 3/3/21 11:23 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/2/21 8:10 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>> I wonder, might this be an interesting time to reintroduce multiple
>>> architectures?
>>>
>>> We used to offer
On 3/3/21 6:33 pm, NicoHood via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/2/21 12:51 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A new RFC has been opened here:
>> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2
>>
>> Summary:
>> Make -march=x86_64-v2 the default for our packages
On 3/2/21 12:51 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new RFC has been opened here:
> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2
>
> Summary:
> Make -march=x86_64-v2 the default for our packages. This assumes the
> following instruction sets which are ess
16 matches
Mail list logo
