On 4/3/21 8:13 am, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: >> Options realistically are: >> >> 1) bump the baseline >> 2) provide a second more optimized port. > > 3) defer this until better tooling is available to implement (2) > > Since the RFC is about bumping -march to x86_64-v2, it either gets > accepted and my desktop computer can no longer run Arch, or the RFC > gets rejected and another approach is proposed in the future. > Discussing alternative implementations seems out of scope. >
This is the discussion period to shape the RFC into a form that is acceptable. If (1) is not acceptable, it can transition to (2) if people want that approach. Allan
