Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] pyalpm maintainership

2017-01-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2016-12-24 20:18, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm. The last > update of pyalpm added pacman 5 compatibility support although several > improvements patches where posted from October 2015 till 2016. [1] [2] > [3] [4] [5]. > > I would love

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] pyalpm maintainership

2016-12-28 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 12/24/16 at 09:28am, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2016-12-24 20:18:21 +0100] Jelle van der Waa: > > I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm. > > I'm not sure what improvements you have in mind but there's two things > called pyalpm: Remy's personal git repo (projects:users/rem

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] pyalpm maintainership

2016-12-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2016-12-24 20:18:21 +0100] Jelle van der Waa: > I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm. I'm not sure what improvements you have in mind but there's two things called pyalpm: Remy's personal git repo (projects:users/remy/pyalpm.git) and our package. I'm assuming you're thin

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] pyalpm maintainership

2016-12-24 Thread Jelle van der Waa
I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm. The last update of pyalpm added pacman 5 compatibility support although several improvements patches where posted from October 2015 till 2016. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. I would love to see a more active maintenace of pyalpm, since it's vit