On 2016-12-24 20:18, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > I'd like to see some improvements in the maintenance of pyalpm. The last > update of pyalpm added pacman 5 compatibility support although several > improvements patches where posted from October 2015 till 2016. [1] [2] > [3] [4] [5]. > > I would love to see a more active maintenace of pyalpm, since it's > vital for the arch-security tracker and namcap. I've mailed Remy about > these patches but so far haven't gotten any response. > > [1] https://git.archlinux.org/users/remy/pyalpm.git/ > [2] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-October/004413.html > [3] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-October/004424.html > [4] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-October/004420.html > [5] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2015-October/004309.html > ~ >
Let's move it to top level (to "Arch Linux Projects") as opposed to Remy's project and give you push access. I don't see any reason not to. Let's wait +/- 3 days and I will proceed with this. Bartłomiej
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
