Hi,
this is revision 2 of my GSoC proposal for Amarok, slightly tweaked thanks to
suggestions by Philipp. Any feedback is as always welcome.
Matěj
--
Motivation
Amarok 2 has supported MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) devices and showed them
as coll
On 29.04.2013 00:58, Matěj Laitl wrote:
On 24. 4. 2013 Konrad Zemek wrote:
September 09 - 15:
Implementing two-way synchronization for remaining importers.
September 16 - 22:
Ironing out bugs, writing remaining tests. Cushion period in
case of delays.
On 24. 4. 2013 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> September 09 - 15:
> Implementing two-way synchronization for remaining importers.
> September 16 - 22:
> Ironing out bugs, writing remaining tests. Cushion period in
> case of delays.
> September 23 - 29: FINAL EVALUATI
Matej, it seems you are doing all the work around here and applying for
GSoC too
Kudos.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 28. 4. 2013 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> > Vedant Agarwala wrote:
> > > Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact
> that
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110150/#review31713
---
src/core-impl/collections/audiocd/FormatSelectionDialog.cpp
On 28. 4. 2013 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Vedant Agarwala wrote:
> > Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact that
> > you people must be very busy and in a different time-zone.
> > Thank-you for correcting first timers like me.
>
> Has Vedant gotten feedback by now?
N
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:39 AM, vedant agarwala wrote:
> Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact that
> you people must be very busy and in a different time-zone.
> Thank-you for correcting first timers like me.
Has Vedant gotten feedback by now?
Cheers
Lydia
--
I hope I'm not too late with this.This is following matej's idea for adding
m4b chapter and cue sheet support in amarok. Also, I don't have many bug
fixes to show for, I can see my chances of getting in are greatly hindered
by it. would any bug fix in the final few days make a change?
Any comments
> On April 25, 2013, 3:43 p.m., Edward Hades Toroshchin wrote:
> > Thanks for the fix. However, this is the approach, we've used originally,
> > and it didn't prove very reliable. I think we even went back and forth more
> > than once.
> >
> > So you should really have a look in the history of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110139/
---
(Updated April 28, 2013, 10:33 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110139/#review31695
---
This review has been submitted with commit
17f3e7a9cd2dbb201df
11 matches
Mail list logo