On 4/14/22 8:54 AM, Javier via arch-general wrote:
I’m looking for upgrading to wifi 6 (802.11ax), but I’m not able to find
gnu+linux supported usb devices.
wifi 6 is already supported. From my laptop:
[3.411497] iwlwifi :00:14.3: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX201
160MHz, REV=0x351
How about:
pacman -Sl | grep
On 3/25/22 7:58 AM, Dan Sommers via arch-general wrote:
Greetings,
Is there a way to limit Pacman to search package names only, rather than
package names and descriptions?
On 2/11/22 11:44 AM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 2/11/22 9:21 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
Also it may be worthwhile running memcheck to be sure your memory is
not faulty.
Yeah that thought occurred to me as well. I ran a quick memtest86+ when
I first built
Thanks much for following up! Responses inline.
On 2/11/22 4:15 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
I suppose it could also be southbridge being annoying
It's a very new machine (Rocket Lake and PCIE4) so doesn't technically
use the traditional northbridge/southbridge model. But point
On 2/11/22 9:56 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
Another thought - if you can try a different network hardware that might
be useful as well.
And to be clear, this kernel is running on physical hardware not a VM
right? If you're running on VM please share which host and VM is used.
On 2/11/22 9:21 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
On 2/10/22 18:32, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
...
...
"rcu_preempt detected stalls on cpus/tasks". But searching on that
Since the CPU is stalled and unable to make further progress something
is inhibiti
vious you already illuminated it but some buffer not
clearing old data?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 09:32, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
wrote:
Following up on this crash issue I keep having with my Arch server.
Basically server just completely freezes up - doesn't respond to pings,
o
Following up on this crash issue I keep having with my Arch server.
Basically server just completely freezes up - doesn't respond to pings,
or keyboard/mouse input, and eventually has to just be rebooted.
Good news is:
a) after upgrading everything (including the router firmware) it no
longer
On 1/24/22 2:47 AM, Uwe Sauter via arch-general wrote:
Does your server support IPMI and thus SOL (serial over LAN)?
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately this is just a home/desktop
server, so I don't think its mobo supports IPMI.
Thanks,
DR
On 1/21/22 5:08 PM, Łukasz Michalski via arch-general wrote:
When it crashes, instead of reconnecting router connect any laptop with
arch booted from usb. If link comes up then use tcpdump to see what is
happening on the wire.
That's a good suggestion - thanks. (No better way to see if the
Tnx much for the reply! Responses inline below.
On 1/21/22 2:29 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
When you say server crashes - I assume kernel crashed and is not
functioning (as opposed to kernel is up and running but network is not
doing what I want)? Does server respond to any k
On 1/22/22 5:30 AM, Jeanette C. via arch-general wrote:
Hey hey,
I just updated my system yesterday and now I can't mount a VFAT filesystem.
Installed packages:
linux 5.16.2.arch1-1
util-linux 2.37.2-5
There is no mount.vfat or mount.fat program/script and apparently no kernel
module install
Been experiencing a weird issue several times recently that's got me
stumped.
A couple of weeks ago, my entire home network went dead right in the
middle of a zoom call. Same problem happened again late last night.
The problem is intermittent/occasional: everything runs without issue
for se
On 12/20/21 3:51 AM, Bjoern Franke via arch-general wrote:
At least I'm getting xfs filesystem being remounted at
/run/systemd/unit-root/var/tmp supports timestamps until 2038
(0x7fff) also on 5.15.x
Kind Regards
Bjoern
That's a different message. That means that your filesystem is *
On 12/14/21 11:32 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
So why am i still seeing this then
as i say i update the system virtually every day it makes no sense
You are seeing this message in your dmesg / journalctl?
"EXPERIMENTAL big timestamp feature in use. Use at your own risk!"
Are you usi
On 12/14/21 8:27 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:00:28 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
I still gt the experimental warning every now and then have to try forced
update of all XFS related progs
On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an
option to format with 64 bit
On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an option
to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being flakey somehow)
The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for
months w
On 12/6/21 10:54 AM, Iyán Méndez Veiga via arch-general wrote:
I have a GTX 1070 which is (in theory) fully supported by nvidia, and I don't
expect them to drop the support for a few more years. I mean, even the GeForce
700 Series are still supported (~8 years old) in the latest 495.44.
So,
On 11/26/21 2:06 PM, Ralph Corderoy via arch-general wrote:
I'm not sure what, if anything, has changed recently to start causing
this.
Have they something in common, e.g. all being bounced to
sendgrid.meetup.com which indicates it's a problem with what the remote
side is feeding fetchmail?
My email processing system has suddenly started throwing error messages
on line lengths recently:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 550 maximum allowed line length is 998 octets,
got 1047
fetchmail: mail from MAILER-DAEMON@ bounced to
bounces+11930396-d424-darose=darose@sendgrid.meetup.com
fetchmail
On 11/19/21 10:22 AM, Łukasz Michalski via arch-general wrote:
Hi,
All xorg apps that use hardware acceleration (i.e. chrome, skype)
filcker on current kernel 5.15.2.
lspci lists my graphic card as : NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX
1060 6GB] (rev a1)
I am using stock nouveau driver.
On 11/7/21 6:02 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
Anyone know what (if anything) gets written to the logs that would show
this change?
NM, I think I found it:
Nov 7 01:46:31 systemd[1]:
NetworkManager-dispatcher.service: Deactivated successfully.
Nov 7 01:01:43 FAHClient
We switched from Daylight Savings back to Standard time in my locale
last night. (EDT -> EST) My system did seem to update, as it has the
correct time. However, I was looking through the logs to see if it
wrote any messages regarding the time changing, but didn't see any. I
also don't see a
On 10/11/21 9:51 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
Hi Folks
Found myself with a rather awkward situation my / partition has only got 5%
free i need to enlarge it somewhat i have another drive i can throw at the job
my question is how do i go about moving "/" to another drive i have looked but
On 7/26/21 7:35 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
I'm not sure what changed, but for some reason I'm no longer able to
drop into rescue mode on my laptop (i.e. using "systemctl rescue") - or
to boot directly into single user mode.
This behavior has def
I'm not sure what changed, but for some reason I'm no longer able to
drop into rescue mode on my laptop (i.e. using "systemctl rescue") - or
to boot directly into single user mode.
When I try either of these, the kernel loads, and then looks like it's
entering single user mode, prompting me to
On 6/7/21 3:49 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I'll just live with it until I have time to dig into the pacman source and
find out what this supposed "new feature" is that screws up old terminals.
Or you could just switch to a modern terminal app! :-)
DR
On 6/3/21 4:59 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
escape somewhere. It was night/day different than the last time I updated and
I've proba
On 3/23/21 9:09 PM, riveravaldez via arch-general wrote:
Hi, I was using Wicd until a couple of weeks without problems,
but because it's been out of repos for a while and generally not
maintained/developed anymore I decided to make the switch and
start using systemd-networkd.
I followed the
On 3/9/21 11:58 AM, Henry-Joseph Audéoud via arch-general wrote:
Hi all,
Today, I discover two machines not having same version of one package.
Both are up-to-date (just did a `pacman -Suy`). But they do not use the
same mirror. Indeed:
I understand there may be a little time gap betwee
On 2/23/21 8:48 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I understood why it was done, I follow the kernel announcements, etc, but
was a bit bewildered by Arch moving LTS to 5.10 before Linux moved to 5.11.
Even today, we have:
linux 5.10.16.arch1-1
and
linux-lts 5.10.17-1
So the
On 2/17/21 3:48 AM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
Archdevs,
You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other distros).
See: https
On 1/29/21 12:20 PM, Łukasz Michalski via arch-general wrote:
Hi,
Just checked my servers and all were vulnerable:
Updating to the latest version (sudo-1.9.5.p2-1) closed this
vulnerability. Maybe this should be posted as arch news message?
It was already sent to the arch-security mailin
35 matches
Mail list logo
