On 2022-04-23 14:12, Tuhana GAYRETLİ via aur-general wrote:
I'm not pushing to jura-font directly because it maybe conflict with
ttf-jura, because it already exists.
This is correct, it will actually block you from pushing.
It sounds like you are on the right track with naming though. The next
On 2022-02-05 15:29, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 11:29:03 +0100, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote:
Thanks, guys! Everything is still functional with yay as it seems.
Hooray, yaourt has risen...
...or it will be a zombi for one month and then finally go to the
Ely
On 2022-01-01 14:48, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 05:33:08 +0100
* All packages built from pre-compiled sources in the AUR should
retain the
"-bin" suffix to indicate this, without exception.
Packages that cannot be built from source have always been an exception
Just put the tests in. Download the sources in the source array, do
whatever you need to do in prepare() to get them where they belong
relative to the other sources, and have a check() function by default.
If there are tests, having a check() function that runs them is almost
always the right d
On 2021-11-17 20:53, David C. Rankin via aur-general wrote:
I did delete the package_name repo in my AUR git directory, but I
still
cannot create the new clamav-LTS repo. I get the following error:
$ git clone ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/clamav-LTS.git
Cloning into 'clamav-LTS'...
git-upload
On 2021-08-24 21:55, Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general wrote:
What to do now with this, guys? — Maybe some of you know where to get
aforementined URxvt tarball (another URL, publicly advertised, or
someone hosted it on their website).
The current version of rxvt-unicode is 9.26. The upstream s
On 2021-08-24 19:11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera via aur-general wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, at 15:12, Mikhail f. Shiryaev via aur-general
wrote:
The same is valid for package ruby-rubocop-performance [6] that is
dependency for rubocop check and requires it to be built
There's not really much that ca
On 2021-08-19 23:24, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote:
I think I'm going to in fact commit that in as a new route for Python
dependencies within a few days; it'll at least remove a dependency on
unmaintained packages in the future.
That being said, I'd still vouch for the package in question f
On 2021-08-19 23:05, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
We shouldn't postpone upgrading the aurweb server because of this. If
some TU wants to maintain it, fine. But, for the actual deployment, I
wouldn't use repo packages.
How you choose to deploy is only a little bit related. I can se
On 2021-08-19 22:46, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote:
Hi aur-general,
I've come across a Python library which serves a nice purpose for
aurweb's FastAPI implementation, but noticed that it is not yet
maintained in the Arch official repositories. For aurweb, we'd like
to stick to packages whic
On 2021-07-27 23:10, Jason Ryan via aur-general wrote:
My bad: I had no idea that I needed to replace the chroot directory.
Birth: 2013-04-15 15:52:13.023713756 +1200
Hats off to you for using chroots to build even before the practice was
so strongly encouraged as it is now.
Perhaps updates
On 2021-07-27 21:26, Jason Ryan via aur-general wrote:
On 27/07/21 at 01:17pm, Archange via aur-general wrote:
No, you’re not, and systemd must be added to makedepends if required
at build time. The maintainer is wrong.
I'm the maintainer[0], and I'm not wrong. The package builds fine in a
ch
Without base you wouldn't be building the package on a system that can
be called Arch Linux. What's the point then?
Regards,
Marcin Wieczorek
This is actually an interesting question. I assumed this was the answer
at first too and even composed a message based on that and noting it as
an exce
Alad please also see my inline comments to Eli's later reply. I touched
on a couple of these package comments in there. I'll just skip those in
this email.
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
> * asterisk
>
> - Services should be managed by the user, not an .install scr
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 10:42 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 6/22/21 9:49 AM, alad via aur-general wrote:
> > let me note my appreciation of your recent activity on various Arch
> > community channels (e.g. IRC and mailing lists here). Whatever the
> > outcome of this application, I
My appologies on behalf of a unreleased devel version of Roundcube
combined with a browser extension based editor, Firenvim, that can't
agree on who handles line wrapping and make an egregious mess of things
if I forget to force the mode.
On 2021-06-21 18:58, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
It appears you've been agitating on the AUR comments for some
duplicates
of the community/audacity package:
Not "some duplicates", just one duplicate. ;-)
Given the purpose of the Trusted Users to whom you are applying, is not
just to
On 2021-06-11 03:16, Archange wrote:
> so let’s start the discussion period.
This message is a short public service announcement reminding all
current TUs that today is the halfway point of the discussion period on
my application. I know packagers tend to be the easily distracted types
that wander
On 2021-06-16 00:24, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
There's a lot that should be improved when it comes to the entire
Electron ecosystem. It's a concern that the maintenance of these
applications falls mostly on distribution packagers, seeing as some
upstream Electron apps won't accept b
On 2021-06-15 14:30, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
How do you stay on top of package updates? Do you have any hand rolled
scripts
to check for updates or do you use existing tooling?
To elaborate on what my initial posts said about this...
For the most part I am subscribed to upstrea
On 2021-06-15 04:19, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
Please remove me from your mailing list too. /s
I would be pleased to remove you from my mailing list, all I ask is two
small confirmations:
1. Send any small amount of BTC to 32LTd2RsnrgCbcn6TBunxNSgf1AHFz2ddK to
confirm your ema
On 2021-06-11 02:38, Tony G. via aur-general wrote:
In any case any pointer to what's the best approach is appreciated.
| Old package | New package |
| | |
| scaleft-client-tools | scaleft-client-tools-bin |
| scaleft-server-to
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 16:36 +0200, davidschi via aur-general wrote:
> please unsubscribe me from your mailing list
This list, like all the ones on lists.archlinux.org, is a self-managed
opt-in list. You can unsubscribe or change your subscription options at
any time from the list info page:
https
Hello all!
My name is Caleb Maclennan (AUR moniker “caleb”, most other places
“alerque”). I’m a long time Arch Linux user and AUR contributor looking
to get more involved, and specifically to join the TU group so that I
can help out with packages in [community]. I’m particularly interested
in the
24 matches
Mail list logo
