Bug#1064140: imagemagick: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Hi, Go ahead ASAP Bastien Le sam. 17 févr. 2024 à 17:40, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > Source: imagemagick > Version: 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5 > Severity: important > Tags: patch pending sid trixie > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: time-t > > NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded t

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Hi all I have done some work here https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-long/ Yadd could you get a glimpse why the webassembly is not strictly identical ? Bastien Le ven. 16 févr. 2024 à 19:16, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Hi, > > . > > > > I've give

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Hi all I have done some work here https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-long/ Yadd could you get a glimpse why the webassembly is not strictly identical ? Bastien Le ven. 16 févr. 2024 à 19:16, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Hi, > > . > > > > I've give

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Hi, . > > I've given access to the js salsa team. > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/node-esm2umd/ It is not the node-long tree... >

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Hi, . > > I've given access to the js salsa team. > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/node-esm2umd/ It is not the node-long tree... >

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

t do some repackaged sources. > > Il giorno ven 9 feb 2024 alle ore 21:33 Bastien ROUCARIES > ha scritto: > > > > > > > > Le ven. 9 févr. 2024 à 04:42, Marco Trevisan a écrit : > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > &

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

t do some repackaged sources. > > Il giorno ven 9 feb 2024 alle ore 21:33 Bastien ROUCARIES > ha scritto: > > > > > > > > Le ven. 9 févr. 2024 à 04:42, Marco Trevisan a écrit : > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > &

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Le ven. 9 févr. 2024 à 04:42, Marco Trevisan a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Marco Trevisan (Treviño) > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > * Package name: node-long > Version : 5.2.3 > Upstream Author : Daniel Wirtz > * URL : http

Bug#1063508: ITP: node-long -- Class for representing 64-bit two's-complement integer value

Le ven. 9 févr. 2024 à 04:42, Marco Trevisan a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Marco Trevisan (Treviño) > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > * Package name: node-long > Version : 5.2.3 > Upstream Author : Daniel Wirtz > * URL : http

[SECURITY] [DLA 3650-1] audiofile security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3650-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès November 12, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3646-1] open-vm-tools security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3646-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès November 05, 2023

Bug#1038637: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Bastien Roucariès ) (Bug#1038637: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-4)

Le lun. 30 oct. 2023 à 11:54, Thomas a écrit : > > This is great, but it looks like the change uses libraw-bin, and not > libraw-dev? I may be mistaken, but I believe the latter is required for > compilation? it already use libraw-dev for compilation since last unstable upload. I have only change

[SECURITY] [DLA 3629-1] ceph security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3629-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès October 23, 2023

Bug#1020358: libmagickcore-6.q16-7: transition gsfonts/gsfonts-x11 --> fonts-urw-base35

Le lun. 23 oct. 2023 à 11:45, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > Control: found -1 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-2 > > On 2022-09-20 18:18:23 +0200, fab...@debian.org wrote: > > you are receiving this bug report, because your package declares a > > relationship with the gsfonts and/or gsfonts-x11 packages. Both > >

[SECURITY] [DLA 3527-1] sox security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3527-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès August 13, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3526-1] libreoffice security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3526-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès August 13, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3495-2] php-dompdf regression update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3495-2debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès August 10, 2023

Bug#990028: /usr/bin/mogrify-im6.q16: raw support requires ufraw-batch which is no longer in Debian

Hi, Help is welcome on the imagemagick side. You could step in as a maint or test salsa tree Le lun. 24 juil. 2023 à 17:21, Darshaka Pathirana a écrit : > > Hi, > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 22:00:12 + Debian FTP Masters > wrote: > > Source: imagemagick > > Source-Version: 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1 >

[SECURITY] [DLA 3495-1] php-dompdf security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3495-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès July 13, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3481-1] libusrsctp security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3481-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès July 06, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3480-1] ruby-redcloth security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3480-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès July 06, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3473-1] docker-registry security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3473-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès June 29, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3466-1] avahi security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3466-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès June 21, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3459-1] libxpm security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3459-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucariès June 20, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3457-1] maradns security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3457-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès June 19, 2023

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

Le jeu. 8 juin 2023 à 05:31, Paul Wise a écrit : > > On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > 2. i386 as a multiarch foreign architecture to run legacy binaries on > >modern x86_64 systems > >2a. legacy native Linux i386 binaries > >2b. legacy Windows i386 binarie

Bug#1037176: ITP: typesense -- Fast, typo-tolerant search engine

Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 08:00, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > Package name: typesense > Version : 0.24.1 > Upstream Contact: TypeSense team > URL :

Bug#1037176: ITP: typesense -- Fast, typo-tolerant search engine

Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 08:00, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > Package name: typesense > Version : 0.24.1 > Upstream Contact: TypeSense team > URL :

[SECURITY] [DLA 3428-1] node-nth-check security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3428-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucariès May 20, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3429-1] imagemagick security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3429-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucaries May 21, 2023

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 19:08, Helmut Grohne a écrit : > > Hi Luca, > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 01:06:18PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 11:50, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > After Bookworm ships I plan to

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 19:08, Helmut Grohne a écrit : > > Hi Luca, > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 01:06:18PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 11:50, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > After Bookworm ships I plan to

[SECURITY] [DLA 3401-1] apache2 security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3401-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès April 24, 2023

Apache2 => slow progress

Hi, In order to avoid a semi automatic unclaim, I work on apache2 trying to reproduce the CVE or at least creating autopkgtest avoiding regression. Bastien

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023 à 11:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > Control: tags -1 pending patch > > On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5 > > Please find the debdiffs attached. Go ahead > > Paul > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023 à 11:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > Control: tags -1 pending patch > > On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5 > > Please find the debdiffs attached. Go ahead > > Paul > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023 à 11:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > Control: tags -1 pending patch > > On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5 > > Please find the debdiffs attached. Go ahead > > Paul > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023 à 11:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > Control: tags -1 pending patch > > On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5 > > Please find the debdiffs attached. Go ahead > > Paul > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

[SECURITY] [DLA 3373-1] json-smart security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3373-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès March 30, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3373-1] json-smart security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEXQGHuUCiRbrXsPVqADoaLapBCF8FAmQlx7MACgkQADoaLapB CF/c1g//XoJXkqDmTEAjzj/USr6O8dyX8sF1wvm0d2Y8HJwgdqLuJB5zevtUDBWT ODnbRfw3l4lViBVpUQIUiMll0T1rHCR03/PxDIBhfs/c86umZbyr1/1emfp630mk vDJwgqS27n3udfuMroZ3KcP

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le dim. 26 mars 2023 à 21:39, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Hi Graham, > > Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Hi Markus > > > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected > by the

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le dim. 26 mars 2023 à 21:39, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Hi Graham, > > Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Hi Markus > > > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected > by the

Bug#977027: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le dim. 26 mars 2023 à 21:39, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Hi Graham, > > Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Hi Markus > > > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected > by the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977027: Bug#977027: rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo" of null to "[object Object]"

Le dim. 26 mars 2023 à 21:39, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Hi Graham, > > Am Sonntag, dem 26.03.2023 um 19:28 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Hi Markus > > > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:34, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > 1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected > by the

[SECURITY] [DLA 3368-1] libreoffice security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3368-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucaries March 26, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3357-2] imagemagick regression update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 From: imagemagick <> To: debian-lts-announce@lists.debian.org Subject: [SECURITY] [DLA 3357-2] imagemagick regression update - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3357-2de

[SECURITY] [DLA 3357-1] imagemagick security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3357-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucariès March 11, 2023

[SECURITY] [DLA 3350-1] node-css-what security update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3350-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Bastien Roucaries March 03

Bug#903158: Multi-Arch: foreign and -dbgsym: too weak dependency

Le sam. 8 oct. 2022 à 11:00, Niels Thykier a écrit : > Hi, > > I have BCC'ed debian-devel on this email to ask for input on this bug > (#903158) and ask parties that are interested to follow up there. I am > considering to remove the dependencies for -dbgsym packages on the > grounds that: > >

Re: Idea: autopkgtest on big-endian for 'Architecture: all' packages to catch endian bugs

Le lun. 29 août 2022 à 03:30, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 04:56:26PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dixit: > > >If these tests are run at build-time, errors halt the build and that > provides > > > > That may not be enough, though; there are cases whe

Bug#993301: prototypejs: FTBFS

Le mer. 17 nov. 2021 à 13:02, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:23:22 + "=?utf-8?q?Bastien_Roucari=C3=A8s?=" > wrote: > > Source: prototypejs > > Severity: serious > > Justification: 4 > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > The source is https://githu

Bug#993301: prototypejs: FTBFS

Le mer. 17 nov. 2021 à 13:02, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:23:22 + "=?utf-8?q?Bastien_Roucari=C3=A8s?=" > wrote: > > Source: prototypejs > > Severity: serious > > Justification: 4 > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > The source is https://githu

Bug#996909: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996909: acorn: Invalid package section for node-debbundle-acorn

Go nmu I will be far from a computer a few days... Do no t forger to apply to salsa or at least do a merge request Thanks Le mer. 20 oct. 2021 à 18:06, Steve Langasek a écrit : > Package: acorn > Version: 8.5.0+ds+~cs24.17.6-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996909: Bug#996909: acorn: Invalid package section for node-debbundle-acorn

Go nmu I will be far from a computer a few days... Do no t forger to apply to salsa or at least do a merge request Thanks Le mer. 20 oct. 2021 à 18:06, Steve Langasek a écrit : > Package: acorn > Version: 8.5.0+ds+~cs24.17.6-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu

Bug#996836: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996836: node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component

Le mar. 19 oct. 2021 à 16:12, Yadd a écrit : > Source: node-webpack > Version: 5.58.2+~cs5.11.7-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: DFSG > > webpack 5.58 uses es-module-lexer. For now, this component is downloaded > including some binary files (WASM,...). This should be fixed before > going to

Bug#996836: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996836: node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component

Le mar. 19 oct. 2021 à 16:12, Yadd a écrit : > Source: node-webpack > Version: 5.58.2+~cs5.11.7-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: DFSG > > webpack 5.58 uses es-module-lexer. For now, this component is downloaded > including some binary files (WASM,...). This should be fixed before > going to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996836: Bug#996836: node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component

Le mar. 19 oct. 2021 à 16:12, Yadd a écrit : > Source: node-webpack > Version: 5.58.2+~cs5.11.7-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: DFSG > > webpack 5.58 uses es-module-lexer. For now, this component is downloaded > including some binary files (WASM,...). This should be fixed before > going to

Bug#994451: golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer syscall used by stable kernel/glibc on arm

Le lun. 27 sept. 2021 à 16:08, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Bastien Roucariès > wrote: >> >> Package: golang-github-containers-common >> Version: 0.33.4+ds1-1 >> Severity: critical >> Tags: upstream >> Forwarded: >> https://github.com/containers/common/commit

Bug#994451: golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer syscall used by stable kernel/glibc on arm

Le lun. 27 sept. 2021 à 16:08, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Bastien Roucariès > wrote: >> >> Package: golang-github-containers-common >> Version: 0.33.4+ds1-1 >> Severity: critical >> Tags: upstream >> Forwarded: >> https://github.com/containers/common/commit

Bug#994974: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994974: node-define-property: Please deembed and fix vulnereability

Le ven. 24 sept. 2021 à 08:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Hi Bastien, > > Quoting Bastien Roucariès (2021-09-24 09:49:37) > > Package: node-define-property > > Severity: serious > > Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream > > Justification: security bug > > Forwarded: https://github.com/jonschl

Bug#994974: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994974: node-define-property: Please deembed and fix vulnereability

Le ven. 24 sept. 2021 à 08:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Hi Bastien, > > Quoting Bastien Roucariès (2021-09-24 09:49:37) > > Package: node-define-property > > Severity: serious > > Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream > > Justification: security bug > > Forwarded: https://github.com/jonschl

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994974: Bug#994974: node-define-property: Please deembed and fix vulnereability

Le ven. 24 sept. 2021 à 08:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Hi Bastien, > > Quoting Bastien Roucariès (2021-09-24 09:49:37) > > Package: node-define-property > > Severity: serious > > Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream > > Justification: security bug > > Forwarded: https://github.com/jonschl

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 08:58, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Tuesday 21 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 07:55, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > > Le lun

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 08:58, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Tuesday 21 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 07:55, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > > Le lun

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 07:55, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Le lundi 20 septembre 2021, 19:32:52 UTC Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Could you try one by one the following untested patch. Please compile and > > run &g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le mar. 21 sept. 2021 à 07:55, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Le lundi 20 septembre 2021, 19:32:52 UTC Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Could you try one by one the following untested patch. Please compile and > > run &g

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Could you try first to apply https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/c60780ff52 And see if the reject are bad ? Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 19:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021 19:31:56 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Could you try first to apply https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/c60780ff52 And see if the reject are bad ? Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 19:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021 19:31:56 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17:28, Jérémy Lal a écrit : > > > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 19:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021 16:56:18 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17:28, Jérémy Lal a écrit : > > > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 19:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021 16:56:18 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > >

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021 16:56:18 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > > Co

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 17:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021 16:56:18 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > > Co

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 15:00, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Could you try to apply > > > > &g

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 15:00, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Could you try to apply > > > > &g

Bug#994767: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994767: rails ftbfs in experimental with The following packages have unmet dependencies: node-debbundle-acorn : Depends: nodejs:any (>= 10.12.0~dfsg~)

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 16:36, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > Package: apt-cudf > Version: 6.0.1-2 > Severity: important > X-debbugs-cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Control: affected -1 rails > > The following command fails to build rails from experimental (salsa > master), > > DE

Bug#994767: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994767: rails ftbfs in experimental with The following packages have unmet dependencies: node-debbundle-acorn : Depends: nodejs:any (>= 10.12.0~dfsg~)

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 16:36, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > Package: apt-cudf > Version: 6.0.1-2 > Severity: important > X-debbugs-cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Control: affected -1 rails > > The following command fails to build rails from experimental (salsa > master), > > DE

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Could you try to apply > > > > https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/aa4611cccbcb197df51a9f7056d019005d91acf4 > > > > I think it desc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 14:24, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > On Monday 20 September 2021, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Could you try to apply > > > > https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/aa4611cccbcb197df51a9f7056d019005d91acf4 > > > > I think it desc

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Could you try to apply https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/aa4611cccbcb197df51a9f7056d019005d91acf4 I think it describe that you see Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 12:51, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > Ok are you on IRC ? I am as rouca on #debian-js channel > > No, I'm not. > > > Install the d

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Could you try to apply https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/aa4611cccbcb197df51a9f7056d019005d91acf4 I think it describe that you see Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 12:51, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > Ok are you on IRC ? I am as rouca on #debian-js channel > > No, I'm not. > > > Install the d

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Ok are you on IRC ? I am as rouca on #debian-js channel Install the debug symbols of nodejs and libuv (if available) and try to run valgrind with --smc-check=all --read-var-info=yes --track-origins=yes Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 11:57, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > And try to rebuild the w

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Ok are you on IRC ? I am as rouca on #debian-js channel Install the debug symbols of nodejs and libuv (if available) and try to run valgrind with --smc-check=all --read-var-info=yes --track-origins=yes Bastien Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 11:57, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > And try to rebuild the w

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:39, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > Ok now try to run the whole thing against valgrind... > Seems that valgrind does not work with asan: > > $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5.0.0 valgrind yarnpkg install > ==752== Memcheck, a memory error detector > ==752== C

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:39, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > Ok now try to run the whole thing against valgrind... > Seems that valgrind does not work with asan: > > $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5.0.0 valgrind yarnpkg install > ==752== Memcheck, a memory error detector > ==752== C

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:20, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > libuv libuv1:i386 1.24.1-1+deb10u1 with -fsanitize=address,undefined: > > > > yarn install v1.13.0 > > [1/5] Validating package.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:20, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > libuv libuv1:i386 1.24.1-1+deb10u1 with -fsanitize=address,undefined: > > > > yarn install v1.13.0 > > [1/5] Validating package.

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > libuv libuv1:i386 1.24.1-1+deb10u1 with -fsanitize=address,undefined: > > yarn install v1.13.0 > [1/5] Validating package.json... > [2/5] Resolving packages... > [3/5] Fetching packages... > [-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 10:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > libuv libuv1:i386 1.24.1-1+deb10u1 with -fsanitize=address,undefined: > > yarn install v1.13.0 > [1/5] Validating package.json... > [2/5] Resolving packages... > [3/5] Fetching packages... > [-

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 12:02, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > I'm unable to compile node with -fsanitize=address,undefined. Seems that > compiler hits 32-bit memory space limit: > cc1plus: out of memory allocating 65536 bytes after a total of 3356393472 > bytes > Libuv only will be Nice Node is not cro

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 12:02, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > I'm unable to compile node with -fsanitize=address,undefined. Seems that > compiler hits 32-bit memory space limit: > cc1plus: out of memory allocating 65536 bytes after a total of 3356393472 > bytes > Libuv only will be Nice Node is not cro

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 08:02, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > Rebuilt Debian libuv1 1.24.1 with -fno-stack-protector - still segfaults. > Rebuilt Debian libuv1 1.42.0 (from unstable) in Buster - still segfaults. Please rebuild both nodejs and libuv with asan (adresse sanitizer) After, I think it i

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 08:02, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > Rebuilt Debian libuv1 1.24.1 with -fno-stack-protector - still segfaults. > Rebuilt Debian libuv1 1.42.0 (from unstable) in Buster - still segfaults. Please rebuild both nodejs and libuv with asan (adresse sanitizer) After, I think it i

Bug#994678: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994678: Bug#994678: pkg-js-tools: MA status

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 06:03, Yadd a écrit : > Le 19/09/2021 à 12:35, Bastien Roucariès a écrit : > > Package: pkg-js-tools > > Version: 0.9.66 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > According to a few cross build test (see for instance > > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994678: Bug#994678: Bug#994678: pkg-js-tools: MA status

Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 06:03, Yadd a écrit : > Le 19/09/2021 à 12:35, Bastien Roucariès a écrit : > > Package: pkg-js-tools > > Version: 0.9.66 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > According to a few cross build test (see for instance > > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:57, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > try to pass > -fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags > > If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES > a écrit : > &g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:57, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > try to pass > -fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags > > If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES > a écrit : > &g

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

try to pass -fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES > a écrit : > > > > Le dim.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

try to pass -fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES > a écrit : > > > > Le dim.

Bug#922075: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:36, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > I've reinstalled nodejs and libnode64 back to original Buster > > 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 and upgraded libuv1 to > > libuv1

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#922075: Bug#922075: Bug#922075: npm: segfault during extract on i386

Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:36, Ondrej Zary a écrit : > > > > I've reinstalled nodejs and libnode64 back to original Buster > > 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 and upgraded libuv1 to > > libuv1

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >