[Bug 284223] [NEW] failed to enable keyboard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image The keyboard works fine until the kernel has finished loading, then I get the error: failed to enable keyboard The hardware is this: http://www.fit-pc.com/new/fit-pc-slim-specifications.html Broken on Ubuntu Hardy and Ibex beta. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- failed to enable keyboard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284223] Re: failed to enable keyboard
Hm, booting from a usb cd drive instead of a usb stick makes this work.. -- failed to enable keyboard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291264] Re: [hardy->ibex upgrade] system is now unbootable
Solved. The installer has a bug. I have a separate boot partition which the installer did not mount or perhaps unmounted (it is in /etc/fstab) Anyway: * The new kernel was installed in the mountpoint directory. * The initrd image was missing from the grub menu.lst * The hd(0,0) line was wrong Running grub-install did give an error, so I expect it also gave an error on install which could have been caught. -- [hardy->ibex upgrade] system is now unbootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291264] [NEW] [hardy->ibex upgrade] system is now unbootable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image fter using the recommended (desktop gui) method to upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 I now have an unbootable system. The method I used is here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading After a reboot I see the message "Error 17: cannot mount selected partition". The boot entry is missing an initrd line. Adding it does not help. Booting the old kernel does not help. Changing hd(0,0) to hd(0,anything) does not help. This is a system originally installed with the 8.04 desktop alternative cd to use disk encryption. Disk encryption must be supported since no warning was given on the upgrade page, or (more importantly) in the system upgrade tool. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [hardy->ibex upgrade] system is now unbootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55645] mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 Apache documentation says: "To specify multiple, redundant LDAP servers, just list all servers, separated by spaces. mod_auth_ldap will try connecting to each server in turn, until it makes a successful connection." And although this works: AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.DOMAIN/ou=OUHERE,dc=DCHERE This does not: AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap1.DOMAIN ldap2.DOMAIN/ou=OUHERE,dc=DCHERE I get the error: "AuthLDAPURL takes one argument, URL to define LDAP connection.." ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers https://launchpad.net/bugs/55645 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55746] sshd should be mentioned
Public bug reported: "sshd" should be mentioned in the description for this package so that apt-cache search sshd does what people expect. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- sshd should be mentioned https://launchpad.net/bugs/55746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] does this package even work?
Public bug reported: # opcontrol --no-vmlinux # opcontrol --start # ls -R / >/dev/null # opcontrol --dump # opcontrol --shutdown # opreport opreport error: No sample file found: try running opcontrol --dump or specify a session containing sample files ** Affects: oprofile (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- does this package even work? https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] Re: does this package even work?
Interesting.. I'm using the server kernel here - you? -- does this package even work? https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
@Christian Aden "Before we even can think about making, Ubuntu Linux mainstream we MUST get all well know programs that work on a Windows PC to work on a Ubuntu PC." We need _equivalents_ of _popular_ applications on a Ubuntu PC, not _all_well-known_programs_. And for most applications, there is. "But a regular user just want to click and install. A regular user don't want to open a Package manager or a terminal to install a program." Well a user is going to have to open something to tell the computer that they want a particular piece of software on their computer. As long as that something is a piece of cake to use, the user will be happy. An "install software" icon, and a place to type is better than the Windows way: Find vendor website, register for download, click download link in e-mail, run installer, ignore all the questions and keep clicking next, now reboot. versus Linux: find package using apt, install using apt. An easy gui wrapper will improve this for users. "Windows is a easy thing to understand" It seems easier because people forget that they learnt Windows. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56337] latrine can't load freedict dictionaries
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: latrine latrine should work with the freedict- dictionaries in apt: # apt-cache show latrine .. The Free Dictionaries Project at http://sourceforge.net/projects/freedict/, provides dictionaries for about 50 language combinations, which can be used with LaTrine. These dictionaries are also available via the Debian dict-freedict-* packages. .. It doesn't seem to: # apt-get install latrine dict-freedict-eng-deu # dpkg -L dict-freedict-eng-deu|grep dz$ /usr/share/dictd/freedict-eng-deu.dict.dz # latrine /usr/share/dictd/freedict-eng-deu.dict.dz LaTrine: invalid or empty dictionary ** Affects: latrine (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- latrine can't load freedict dictionaries https://launchpad.net/bugs/56337 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] Re: does this package even work?
It doesn't work for me with 2.6.15-26-686 either. -- does this package even work? https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
@Christian Aden "Well it seams to me that this is the main problem, that developers of Linux and other open source OSes. And "We need _equivalents_ of _popular_ applications on a Ubuntu PC" Does not seam to have solved the problem." Well porting proprietary products to Linux would defeat the point of Linux. I don't see your point. "what happens if i the program I want to use don't exist in the apt-library? Than the Linux way is alot harder to understand." Yep. It has to be in apt, or they can't install it. "My mother for an example does not know how to use Windows, but she would chose Windows because of it's user friendly way of learning. It is essayer to learn Windows she think." She would chose what a technical person, or the shop recommends to her. Or what was available. "Windows being easier to learn" is an opinion, an opinion I disagree with. Compare Windows, with its cacophony of menus, with Gnome. Windows has a lot of strangeness. "Start" being used to shutdown the pc? Marvellous. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] Re: does this package even work?
2.6.15-26-386 too. This is running in VMware, and I get an error: "oprofile: P4 PMC not available" on the console. Maybe oprofile and VMware don't play together. -- does this package even work? https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48284] Re: Ubuntu Server LAMP 6.06 in VMWare on WinXP hangs after installation
> the virtual machine hangs right after the line "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." How long did you watch the hang? Longer than a few minutes, or less? -- Ubuntu Server LAMP 6.06 in VMWare on WinXP hangs after installation https://launchpad.net/bugs/48284 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51273] ldapscripts config file is world readable
Public bug reported: /etc/ldapscripts/ldapscripts.conf contains the attribute BINDPWD, which is the ldap admin's password. The file is installed world readable by default. I used this to fix: chmod o-rx /etc/ldapscripts/ldapscripts.conf chmod o-rx /etc/ldapscripts/ ** Affects: ldapscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- ldapscripts config file is world readable https://launchpad.net/bugs/51273 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] Re: oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMWare
I have VMware Tools installed. -- oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMWare https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55871] Re: oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMware
** Summary changed: - oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMWare + oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMware -- oprofile doesn't seem to work with VMware https://launchpad.net/bugs/55871 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51273] Re: ldapscripts config file is world readable
But if it doesn't find a password there, it uses BINDPWD from /etc/ldapscripts/ldapscripts.conf, which is world readable. -- ldapscripts config file is world readable https://launchpad.net/bugs/51273 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54140] base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string
Public bug reported: Calling base64_encode in php does not produce valid base64 encoded string. The lines are too long, there should be a line break every 76 characters. http://bugs.php.net/gifs/logo-bug.gif";) ); print base64_encode($file); ?> This produces a string with just one line, instead of 114 lines. ** Affects: php4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string https://launchpad.net/bugs/54140 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54140] Re: base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string
Are you sure? "newlines are inserted in the encoded data every 76 characters, the actual length of the encoded data is approximately 135.1% of the original. [..] For example[..]: TWFuIGlzIGRpc3Rpbmd1aXNoZWQsIG5vdCBvbmx5IGJ5IGhpcyByZWFzb24sIGJ1dCBieSB0aGlz IHNpbmd1bGFyIHBhc3Npb24gZnJvbSBvdGhlciBhbmltYWxzLCB3aGljaCBpcyBhIGx1c3Qgb2Yg dGhlIG1pbmQsIHRoYXQgYnkgYSBwZXJzZXZlcmFuY2Ugb2YgZGVsaWdodCBpbiB0aGUgY29udGlu dWVkIGFuZCBpbmRlZmF0aWdhYmxlIGdlbmVyYXRpb24gb2Yga25vd2xlZGdlLCBleGNlZWRzIHRo ZSBzaG9ydCB2ZWhlbWVuY2Ugb2YgYW55IGNhcm5hbCBwbGVhc3VyZS4=" -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64 -- base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string https://launchpad.net/bugs/54140 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54140] Re: base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string
True, but is it wrong? RFC 2045 seems to be the closest thing to a specification, and it mentions: "The 76 character limit does not count the trailing CRLF, but counts all other characters, including any equal signs." -- base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string https://launchpad.net/bugs/54140 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54140] Re: base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string
Perl and Python's base64 functions both follow the "put a new line after the 76th character" convention. It's unintuitive that php doesn't. Oh well. -- base64_encode produces invalidly encoded string https://launchpad.net/bugs/54140 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55645] Re: mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
Any news on this? -- mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers https://launchpad.net/bugs/55645 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218112] Re: hardy beta installer: grub fails to install
This is using the "install server" option. The box is in use now so I cannot retry with a different installer, but I can provide hardware info if you tell me which commands will give it to me. -- hardy beta installer: grub fails to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218112] [NEW] hardy beta installer: grub fails to install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub Installing Hardy beta from the DVD, everything works fine until grub tries to install. It fails. Trying again fails. Installing lilo works fine. What info do you need? How can I get it? ** Affects: grub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy beta installer: grub fails to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151942] Re: PANIC: CPU too old for this kernel
Shall we close this? We can fix this The Ubuntu Way (TM) - look the other way until Debian have it fixed, then tell people to upgrade. -- PANIC: CPU too old for this kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192932] Re: installation fails: post-install script failure
Broken for me since mailman security update today. All my mailing lists are now broken. -- installation fails: post-install script failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192932] Re: installation fails: post-install script failure
The problem is this: elif property == 'subject_prefix': # Convert any html entities to Unicode mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr( elif property == 'info': if val <> mlist.info: in /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Gui/General.py The line beginning "mlist" is completely wrong. A patch gone wrong? -- installation fails: post-install script failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192932] Re: installation fails: post-install script failure
This also affects 1:2.1.9-8ubuntu0.1 The workaround is to replace General.py with the unbroken version, for me t this was found in http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mailman/mailman-2.1.9.tgz -- installation fails: post-install script failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192932] Re: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'MEMBER_PASSWORD_LENGTH'
I upgraded in Gutsy without a problem. 1:2.1.9-8ubuntu0.2 wfm. -- AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'MEMBER_PASSWORD_LENGTH' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100050] Ubuntu LTS non-security bugs are ignored
Public bug reported: Bugs in Ubuntu LTS for non-security items (i.e. bugs that are not security bugs) are ignored. For example, these two bugs: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-image-canvas/+bug/52726 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/55645 Both are reports on broken functionality in packages in the distribution, but both have fallen on deaf ears. There needs to be at least an update of stagnant bugs like this, rather than ignoring them point blank. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Ubuntu LTS non-security bugs are ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55645] Re: mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
No I didn't, but now I have, and it works! You are excellent. How can we get this in the upstream documentation for other people? -- mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55645] Re: mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
> Have you tried to use multiple AuthLDAPUrl lines? ie: No I haven't, but I will. Before I do - does this syntax also guarantee that ldap1 (in your example) will be tried first? or do both have the same weighting? Thanks. -- mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers https://launchpad.net/bugs/55645 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55645] Re: mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
Specifying multiple servers seems to query both servers.
Because this package does not match the documentation for it ("redundant
server should be space separated"), please can this bug be fixed?
--
mod_auth_ldap does not support redundant servers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/55645
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
