[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
Like CylnZ said, my fan seems to not spin as fast as it used to. I don't have a way to get actual numbers, but I can tell by the sound the fan makes that it doesn't reach its maximum speed now when at 100% cpu for a couple of mins. -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370173] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown
My laptop has not reached a critical temp yet, but I can feel alot of heat coming from the keyboard when idle. This was not the case with hardy-32bit (Clean install of jaunty-32bit currently) AMD Turion 64 ML-32 ATI 200m (currently using xorg-ati drivers, while in hardy I was using fgrlx, which is no longer available for my video card now) -- Ubuntu 9.04 laptop overheat and shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 336108] Re: Notification is blanked on mouse over in vmware
With no compositing, if my mouse is in the region originally I get a quick flicker (<100ms) of the notification. This does not seem to be the expected behavior per David's link: "Whenever the pointer moves into a bubble, whatever is behind the bubble should instantly become no longer blurred" I know it wont have blurring, but it should display notifications if the user is not actively moving the mouse into that region. notify-osd: Installed: 0.9.11-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 0.9.11-0ubuntu3 This bug-report looks to be the same issue. Should this be filed as a different bug? -- Notification is blanked on mouse over in vmware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336108 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow
This seems to be still an issue in jaunty. I scrolled down the update list using the down key, and when it got to the bottom, the update panel was displaying change logs for every package. Also it gets stuck on kernel packages for a second, but causes 100% cpu on one core. (most likely because of the size of the kernel changelogs) This issue doesn't care if the description panel is hidden either. I would recommend not loading the changelog, or description unless the description panel is displayed. -- update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] [NEW] Dialogs steal focus during update
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager During an update, I was writing an email. A window came up just as I pressed the spacebar. The window disappeared before I could read it. The window was most likely asking about what to do about menu.lst since there was a kernel update. This can not be proper behavior. Either, 1) dialogs should not steal focus, or 2) dialogs should not have a default button selected so that a user pressing enter, or spacebar at the wrong time doesn't break a system. I suspect that #2 would be a better option, since the update is incomplete until the user makes a selection. If the user fails to notice the window for an extended time, the system might crash or be rebooted before the update is completed. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: update-manager 1:0.111.9 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26492120/Dependencies.txt -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 244110] Re: python2.5-dev cannot be installed
Why is this marked as invalid? If manually installing the deb file fixes this shouldn't this be an easy fix to correct the repositories? -- python2.5-dev cannot be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349084] Re: Soft reset failed, AMD SB750
I have the same errors: Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H rev 1.0 (ATI 780G chipset) There is a bios update that I can do, I will give that a try and see if there are any changes. ** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25234073/lspci-vnvn.log -- Soft reset failed, AMD SB750 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349084] Re: Soft reset failed, AMD SB750
uname -a: Linux Shredder 2.6.28-11-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 8 04:39:23 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux (don't know how to post multiple files in one comment) ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25234095/dmesg.log -- Soft reset failed, AMD SB750 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
Looking at load-graph.cpp: load_graph_expose() looks to be using cairo_curve_to() for every point on every refresh. This interpolation seems to me to be wasteful when there is no change in data. Memory usage tends to be a straight line. I propose doing a quick check in the for loop to compare the current data with previous and if the difference is less than a certain amount, use cairo_line_to() instead. The other option would be to offer a preference to use lines instead of curves. Both options should be easy to implement. -- System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning
It has happened a couple of times on two of my computers. I can't seem to recreate the issue. It has only happened on the automatically launched update manager, and it seems like it only happens when it sits for a while. My update settings are: All 4 Ubuntu updates are checked Check for updates: Daily Only notify about available updates Show new distribution releases -- update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369650] Re: gtk_spin_button bugs in gnumeric
looks like this bug was caused by this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323228 -- gtk_spin_button bugs in gnumeric https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398552] Re: longhaul is loaded despite being reported broken
I would like to request loading it as a module. According to VIA: http://www.viaarena.com/displaydownload.aspx?PageID=1&DSCat=32&DCatType=3 "The Power Saver feature is considered experimental at this time and users are advised to visit VIA Arena regularly for the latest update. An IDE lockup issue occurs on some VIA EPIA Mini-ITX mainboards when the Power Saver feature is enabled. A patch to resolve this issue is available for Fedora Core 3.0/4.0/.50 in the drivers section." VIA has a bios beta update that might address this issue: http://www.viaarena.com/displaydownload.aspx?PageID=1&DSCat=155&DCatType=3 Since this bios is listed as a beta, users shouldn't be expected to use it. -- longhaul is loaded despite being reported broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43233] Re: "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future
This has been a problem on my server at work. It turned out that a hard drive was corrupting the hwclock. I don't know how it was doing this but every time the machine rebooted with the hd connected the date in cmos would reset to 00/1/1983. With the any other drive in its place it works fine. The issue with sudo -K not working is very annoying because the server only gets reset when I am doing some sort of maintenance where I will need to use sudo. It seems that the only way I can use sudo -K is to open another tty. If this is by design, then shouldn't the man page be revised? -- "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43233] Re: "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future
edit to previous post: Actually I am not able to use sudo -K at all through ssh I had to go into /var/run/sudo/username/ as root using sudo su where i had: -rw--- 1 root root 0 2008-04-20 12:05 0 -rw--- 1 root root 0 2007-09-24 13:59 1 -rw--- 1 root root 0 2007-09-24 13:58 tty1 then i just touch 0 and that fixed it. I wonder if sudo -K only works with tty# (the 0 and 1 are ssh sessions) -- "sudo -k" fails when timestamp is in the future https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)
I have the same card in some of my computers...the past couple of drivers have been very buggy for this card. The bar code thing was fixed in last months ATI driver, but you won't be able to get it in the gusty repositories...you have to get the driver directly from ATI. I think the best solution would be to give it a try and see if it fixes the issue. A good how-to is on this website: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Gutsy_Installation_Guide>http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Gutsy_Installation_Guide -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)
Sorry, wasn't sure how to a link: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Gutsy_Installation_Guide also by any chance are you using the ubuntu ati restricted driver and if so what version? -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)
You should probably change the status of this bug report. The ATI restricted driver is not maintained by AMD not Ubuntu developers. you can find out what version you are using by typing in a terminal: dmesg | grep 'fglrx' you should see a line that looks like this: [ 52.012785] [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.45.4 [Jan 16 2008] on minor 0 where the 8.45.4 would be where your version number is. Another thing you could try is to disable the restricted driver and try the vesa driver or the non-restricted driver -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] [NEW] changes to indention options require restart
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: geany Steps to recreate: open preferences>editor>indentation tab Change type (tabs to spaces or spaces to tabs) click OK The change doesn't take effect until geany is restarted. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: geany 0.18-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Mar 28 16:30:46 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: geany ** Affects: geany Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: geany (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42316282/Dependencies.txt -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550623] Re: hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333874/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333875/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333876/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333877/ProcAttrCurrent.gz ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333878/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333879/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333880/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333881/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333883/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Visibility changed to: Private -- hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart
Could some sort of notice be displayed since other options take effect without reloading or restarting. The current behavior appears broken when there is no feedback of any kind. -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@james79: if the issue is that you are low on memory, you can release the trace buffer with: echo 1|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb I wrote a init script that does this automatically after a trace. I can clean it up and post it if it will help. If the issue is that you run out of memory during boot, your only option is to disable ureadahead. Ureadahead is only useful if you have the memory for caching the files. I suspect fixing this bug would be counter productive if the goal is to change the way tracing is accomplished. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I am attempting to install Lubuntu, but I am getting the same behavior with the live cd (there is no alt install yet). The problem here is that clicking install causes the screen to flicker and the installation dialog keeps moving down...I suspect this to be caused by this bug since I have experienced similar issues when running ubuntu with kvm and vmmouse active. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
What image format is the base image? I just tested with qcow2 format and increased the size from 6g to 10g just fine (of course the file system size remained the same) kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 -f qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G If you don't specify a format I think raw is used: kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G Unknown option 'backing_file' qemu-img: Backing file not supported for file format 'raw' Try using kvm-img info [imagefile] to see what format is being used. -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
I am sure it is taken seriously. The dev is likely tending to more important issues at the moment. The issue isn't a security issue, and it doesn't seem to cause any data loss. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
I noticed that the first lines of dumping the pack file show the size of the pack which is pretty close to the size of the missing memory: Fri Jan 22 10:22:38 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 444560 577208 0 22568 106268 -/+ buffers/cache: 315724 706044 Swap: 329292 0 329292 - Fri Jan 22 10:58:27 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 344036 677732 0 37752 119860 -/+ buffers/cache: 186424 835344 Swap: 329292 0 329292 /var/lib/ureadahead/pack: created Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:23:23 + for hdd 8:1 16 inode groups, 1819 files, 1793 blocks (114844 kB) 315724-186424=129300 I am not getting anymore segfaults in X when I remove the pack file. (this is a lucid test machine so there were many updates since then.) -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319146] Re: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.
I am affected by this. I have installed Ubuntu on many computers for people that just wanted a basic computer. Ubuntu was perfect for them, and I rarely get any calls for help. Many of these users would want me to handle any major upgrades. I shouldn't have to keep records of who has what version. The user should have an early warning about end of life. Technically this could be considered a security issue since the user is not made aware that they are vulnerable to exploits. The current notification that a new distribution is available does not inform the user that they must upgrade. Some users do not want to perform the upgrade themselves. An early warning can let them notify the person that will handle the upgrade for them in advance. I would suggest giving the user 3 months notice: "Support for this version of Ubuntu will expire in _ months. Please take measures to upgrade soon." The implementation of this shouldn't require internet access since EOL is determined prior to the release, and some users don't have an always on connection. This check can also be independent of the update-manager in case the automatic update checks are disabled. Security should be pro-active. Informing users on how to perform upgrades after EOL is retro-active. I don't understand why anyone would argue against this. I am sure implementing this would be a simple task, and would not interfere with users that keep up with their upgrades. -- When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile
This may need to fall under another bug report: Today I booted into recovery mode to recover some data from a failed drive, then resumed the normal boot into a console. I then moved a large number of files from one drive to another. During the transfer I thought that the system was acting sluggish so I switched to console 2 and started htop. Htop showed that all of my memory (4g) was in use and my swap was pretty much full (994/996M.) using df I saw that /var/lib/ureadahead/debugfs was listed so apparently ureadahead was profiling my actions while in single user mode. Maybe ureadahead should not run in single mode. -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update
This seems to have become worse: Both the "Downloading Updates" and "Applying Updates" windows steal focus. This might fix itself if the update manager is going to be replaced by the software center. -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
>From what I have learned about SMART over the past 2 years is that SMART >doesn't fail until the Normalized value falls below the threshold. In my case my reallocated sector count is: Normalized: 179 Worst: 179 Threshold: 140 Value: 161 palimpsest is giving me a warning that my disk has many bad sectors, and reporting that there are 161 bad sectors. The question is what is a bad sector? The smart label is reallocated sector count...not bad sector count. It is common for a hard drive to reallocate sectors that have read errors...this happens transparently by the firmware. Drive manufacturers design the drives with reserve sectors for this behavior. Only when there are no more reserve sectors do bad sectors start appearing. Furthermore, a hard drive manufacturer is not going to exchange my drive just because Ubuntu is saying that is is failing. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Looking at atasmart.c in libatasmart-0.17: is this the section that causes the warning: starting at line 1269 if ((!strcmp(a->name, "reallocated-sector-count") || !strcmp(a->name, "current-pending-sector")) && a->pretty_value > 0) a->warn = TRUE; --- What is the logic behind this? Wouldn't the OR part always be true? it is kind of like using (( x != 1 ) || ( x != 2 )) this would be true with x equaling any number. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
disregard my above comment: strcmp returns 0 for match. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483847] [NEW] Search history cleared after an install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic Search for a package using the search button or ctrl-f. Then install a package. The panel on the left that shows the recent searches is cleared, and the user needs to redo the search. The panel acts as a search history, but fails to keep the history after installing a single package. This bug is minor, and may be irrelevant if synaptic is to be replaced in future versions of ubuntu. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 16 15:38:37 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/synaptic NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: synaptic 0.62.7ubuntu6 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic SourcePackage: synaptic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Search history cleared after an install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483847] Re: Search history cleared after an install
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761369/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761370/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35761371/ProcStatus.txt -- Search history cleared after an install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562774] [NEW] (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp When starting yelp from the command line I get the following: --- (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed --- Yelp seems to be functioning properly otherwise. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: yelp 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 23:32:54 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562774] Re: (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44114436/Dependencies.txt -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@Petar: I don't think this bug is your issue if uninstalling ureadahead didn't help. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
It was mentioned in this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 that once online profiling is implemented, this issue will go away. I am wondering if a bug needs to be filed for the kernel because there is nothing to indicate that the memory is being used for tracing memory. Using tools like ps just shows that memory isn't being accounted for. -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
I see 128000 kb was hardcoded into the source of ureadahead. I also see in mmiotrace.txt where this is used as an example: --- Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, or use $ dmesg to view your kernel log and look for "mmiotrace has lost events" warning. If events were lost, the trace is incomplete. You should enlarge the buffers and try again. Buffers are enlarged by first seeing how large the current buffers are: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb gives you a number. Approximately double this number and write it back, for instance: $ echo 128000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb Then start again from the top. --- The size of the trace buffer actually used can be determined with wc -c /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace (The size will be in bytes) So far I have seen sizes range from 2-30Mb I have yet to check some of my larger systems, but it seems possible that 128M could be necessary in some cases. ... I have found a hackish solution for recovering the memory after the profile. First ensure the profile is complete (it waits a while even after you log in) by checking that the pack files exist. You should also check that they are somewhat recent too since I don't know if a reprofile triggered by age will remove these files. You can then recover the memory by reducing the buffer size: echo 2048|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 2048 was just an arbitrary size. You can use 1 if you really want to save memory. I do not know of the consequences of resizing the buffer afterwards, but it seems to work fine. @Scott: Could you provide some feedback if this is a reasonable solution for the time being? -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552165] Re: ureadahead should be disabled by default
Disabling ureadahead by default does not seem like a reasonable solution. There might be another problem that is compounded by ureadahead. It might help if you post a bootchart. You might want to look at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 -- ureadahead should be disabled by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
Could ureadahead have something to do with this? I noticed this on my laptop when fooling around with ureadahead. After testing in a vm I can do the following: sudo touch /forcefsck reboot. fsck stalls at 70% for a sec, and the screen jumps directly to the desktop. ls / shows forcefsck still exists for about 40 secs. After removing the pack file for ureadahead and touching /forcefsck again...rebooting gets me a disk check to 70% and the screen goes blank, and it doesn't seem to ever bring up the desktop. host cpu usage is idle. I can ctrl-alt-f1 and log in. /var/lib/ureadahead/pack was created. /forcefsck is never removed next reboot, disk check appears again (because forcefsck wasn't removed), and the desktop is loaded. /forcefsck is removed. It is possible that the above users have been experiencing issues because many updates trigger a reprofile (such as installing/removing the nvidia driver) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
also after a successful reboot, I get a crash report for plymouthd (#553745) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck
Nevermind about ureadahead. I uninstalled it and got the same behavior. -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557887] [NEW] URL in description ends with a period
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notification-daemon Viewing the information for popup notifications with ubuntu software center: The hyperlink includes the final period in the description. This is minor, but should be an easy fix. The simple solution is to remove the period. A better solution would be to use the Homepage field. ** Affects: notification-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- URL in description ends with a period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559525] [NEW] Trace should ignore files in /var/log
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Looking at the dump of my pack file, I see many log files listed. These files are constantly changing so it doesn't make much sense to store their information in the pack file. The files are more likely stored in more distant locations of the filesystem, which could increase unwanted head movement. Also since they get rotated more frequently than the pack file is updated, the trace information will be invalid anyway. Solution: add /var/log to the list of ignored paths (trace.c:ignore_path) if (! strncmp (pathname, "/var/log/", 9)) return TRUE; ** Affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Trace should ignore files in /var/log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
kvm /storage/greg/vm/Lucid_64.qcow2 -m 1024 -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I get the same result booting from the live cds: kvm -m 1024 -cdrom ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso kvm -m 1024 -cdrom lucid-desktop-amd64.iso lucid-desktop-amd64.iso is the daily-cd md5sums: d88edd4c3640e2c90dd2bce16dbe86ae lucid-desktop-amd64.iso 7341b637218cf9a9b2334293c3df7e94 ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso Host info: *-cpu product: AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e vendor: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] physical id: 1 bus info: c...@0 size: 2500MHz capacity: 2500MHz width: 64 bits capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp x86-64 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good extd_apicid pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch cpufreq uname -a Linux Shredder 2.6.31-21-generic #59-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 24 07:28:27 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 Codename: karmic -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
If I attempt to move the mouse from one end of the screen to the other, it pauses half way in between and cpu usage goes to 80% - 100% (measured in htop) The lack of responsiveness makes it unusable. I will try jaunty and see...I don't recall having this issue with it. Removing vmmouse is a solution for me, but I don't think this should be ignored. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
vmmouse_detect; echo $? produces 1, should that mean something? -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
If I am using kvm-qemu and not VMware, should the vmmouse driver be active? I will double check with the vmmouse_detect thing, but xorg is logging: (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_INIT (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_ON (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enabled ... (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode My version of kvm-qemu on the host is: QEMU PC emulator version 0.11.0 (qemu-kvm-0.11.0) -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized
The issue seems to be fixed now. -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137388] Re: LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be
I just noticed this in a qemu vm with lucid. Desktop effects is not enabled, but launching the terminal with ctrl-alt-T I get direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) If I launch from the menu or alt-f2 then gnome-terminal I get yes. I am trying to troubleshoot some other weirdness and thinking the I didn't have direct rendering really threw me off track. Why is this the normal behavior? -- LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] [NEW] [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse Running lucid beta1 64bit in kvm-qemu vm: Sometime prior to beta1, system was responsive. Now I can barely move the mouse without causing one of the cpus on the host machine to peg out. And /usr/bin/X using all of the cpu resources on the guest machine. After removing the xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse package and rebooting, the system becomes responsive again. Subsequent reboot was responsive too. After reinstalling the package, the system became sluggish again. I notice in the changelog that 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu2 through ubuntu4 were released 2010-03-02 to 05. This is about the time this issue occurred. 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu3 had a change regarding kvm detection: * debian/patches/enable-detect-in-kvm.patch: add iopl() back so vmmouse_detect will work in kvm again. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-18.27-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-18-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDmesg: [ 16.901084] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Thu Apr 1 01:53:32 2010 DkmsStatus: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318) Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1: ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-18-generic root=UUID=38e6f1bb-c94a-4683-9951-fc0b49f6f23e ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: QEMU dmi.bios.version: QEMU dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnQEMU:bvrQEMU:bd01/01/2007:svn:pn:pvr:cvn:ct1:cvr: system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-18-generic ** Affects: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754836/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754837/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754838/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog1.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754839/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog2.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754840/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754841/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754842/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754843/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754844/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754845/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754846/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754847/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754848/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754849/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754851/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754852/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754853/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754854/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754856/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754857/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754858/xkbcomp.txt -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
I removed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 and installed 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4 from launchpad, and the system was responsive after reboot. Then, I installed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 back and the system had poor response again after reboot. What I don't understand though is that prior to today I had 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4, but I had responsiveness issues then too. I could try a fresh install tomorrow and see if I get the same results. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 18661] Re: Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp
/tmp was a subdir of / in Karmic on my systems. -- Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)
This could be a bug with the drive itself. 32MB/s seems really slow for a SSD. Maybe it would help if you post the specifics about your drive: sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)
According to this site: http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2008/05/asus-eee-pc-ssd-read-and-write-tests-4g.html 32MB/s seems about right for a 16g 900. The 4g version reaches 44MB/s. I thought kerneloops was disabled in the final release, but it is shown in your bootcharts. Are you sure you are running the latest updates? -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582102] [NEW] Provide a method to ignore certain files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Wishlist: I noticed that dropbox can have a significant impact on boot time. I personally do not consider it to be essential to the boot loading experience, but if I happen to have the daemon set to start automatically, ureadahead will trace many files read by it. (The largest entries in my home.pack are dropbox files.) I can work around this issue by manually retracing with dropbox disabled, or delay the start of it. What happens if I play a movie right after boot? Or transmission starts seeding a torrent while ureadahead profiles? Will those files be included in a pack file? Hardcoding an ignore list is not practical for every circumstance. Maybe a config file could be read by ureadahead, with a list of rules to follow such as ignoring files by size, extension, and path. Another option could be to use a separate program to purge pack file entries based on a config file. ** Affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Provide a method to ignore certain files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582432] [NEW] update manager should cache changelog information by url
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Currently update-manager will download the same changelogs multiple times if there are multiple packages with the same changelog. Example: Today I started wireshark to capture packets. Started update manager The first package listed was apt and it downloaded the changelog automatically wireshark caught this request: 48 8.591803192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 63 8.923160192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 Then I selected the next package: apt-transport-https wireshark reported: 95 13.335957 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 110 13.665300 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 The next package: apt-utils 144 17.995672 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/NEWS.Debian HTTP/1.1 159 18.331389 192.168.1.104 91.189.90.132 HTTPGET /changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9/changelog HTTP/1.1 This is a waste of bandwidth and server resources. update-manager could cache each changelog in a dictionary by url key. Doing this could greatly reduce the number of requests the changelog server receives. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 18 13:15:52 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582432] Re: update manager should cache changelog information by url
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48674263/Dependencies.txt -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575877] Re: gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup
There are three bugs here: - Keyring is not unlocked when user logs in with password. - Keyring steals focus with always on top dialog (frustrating when you are in the middle of typing something) - Keyring doesn't provide information about what application is requiring the keyring. This should be considered a security flaw since the dialog is asking the user to blindly provide a password without reason. If mimicked by a web popup, a user can have their password phished. -- gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
Setting the live cd to run in safe mode works around the issue. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse
The high cpu usage was on the host only when the mouse on the guest was being moved rapidly. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow
I cannot recreate the issue in lucid. -- update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning
Refreshing the package list by clicking "Check" button in update-manager allows the installation of the updates with the "Install Updates" Button. -- update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363550] Re: mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup
Just running mountmanager clears all comments from my fstab without asking the user about saving any changes. Combined with running with admin privileges without the users knowledge, this is very dangerous. -- mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590455] [NEW] mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountmanager If sudo has been used for another program within the sudo time limit, starting mountmanager will automatically run with root privileges. For example the following commands will cause fstab to be rewritten without user consent: sudo ls mm The command should be considered a destructive command since it makes changes to the system immediately on startup. The mm script should either require an admin password, require the user to use the sudo command, or not make changes to the system. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mountmanager 0.2.6-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 6 11:56:56 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: mountmanager ** Affects: mountmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590455] Re: mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49775389/Dependencies.txt -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301203] Re: slabtop --once seems to exit without output
This appears to still be an issue in Lucid slabtop -V procps version 3.2.8 slabtop --once > slabtop.txt cat slabtop.txt shows nothing, but the file size is 1518 bytes. head slabtop.txt will show the file as long as the last line isn't displayed. top -n 1 > top.txt creates a readable file -- slabtop --once seems to exit without output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345374] Re: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet
Why is this bug marked incomplete? Doesn't incomplete mean that more information is needed? -- Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears
A couple of my family members liked the timer for the same reason Hellenion mentioned. It would seem that allowing the user to configure this behaviour would be the best way to go about this even if it is only configurable with gconf. -- Shutdown timer no longer appears https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577592] Re: qemu-kvm dependencies require X
The guest is not required to use SDL though. The guest could use a vnc connection (I don't think audio is available when using a vnc connection either.) Although I am not sure of the actual issue with having X installed though. Is the issue the extra space used? If so, wouldn't the extra space be small in comparison to any vm images on the machine? -- qemu-kvm dependencies require X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
@Petar: I replied to your comment at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1363165 I do not think this bug is related to your issue. I would like to help you figure out what is going on, but not here. To everyone else: The cause of the bug is known. Maybe Scott can give us some insight on when or how it will be addressed, but the forums might be a better place for discussions. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
"should really raise a warning if ../base-dont-touch.img is smaller than 10GB" Here you are saying if the forked image is larger than the base image. "If QEmu doesn't handle a differnent size, even a bigger one, I don't see why qemu-img create -b ... should take a size argument at all." I just showed that there is a reason why there is a size argument. If the issue is when the forked image is smaller than the base, I suspect that the issue is that the filesystem was not reduced in size first, kvm-img is not responsible for this. Did you remember to shrink your partitions before shrinking the image size? Also, you do not need to include a size when using -b with the kvm-image create. Are you intentionally trying to reduce the disk size? Why? If you are trying to recover space on the host system, you can zero out the free space on the guest (bleachbit can do this) then convert your image using -c to compress the image...then use that image as a base image. Qcow2 images only use up what is needed. -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
I posted a upstart script that can recover the memory used after a profile: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9271524&postcount=9 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling
This bug exists in karmic also. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU
I don't think the space makes a difference: Without the space: ionice -p 3477 idle with the space: ionice -p 3525 idle -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU
some commands don't really need a space for values: ps aux|head -n1 is the same as ps aux|head -n 1 -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563076] Re: apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache
If you delete the index, does it automatically rebuild itself, or does the user have to manually initiate the updater? The information is automatically generated on a weekly basis. Also it isn't a cache file, so why should it be stored in the cache folder? -- apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579523] [NEW] update should avoid being run when on the battery
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index Currently apt-xapian-index uses a significant amount of cpu while updating. If the battery level is low at the time of the update, the sudden increase in cpu usage could lead to a loss of the users data. I propose doing a check for if the system is running on battery, and postponing the job until a later time. /etc/cron.daily/mlocate checks for if on the battery, and could be used as a basis. It could be a better idea to request anacron implement a battery check instead. ** Affects: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579523] Re: update should avoid being run when on the battery
I stand corrected, anacron does avoid running when on battery. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528543] Re: Optimize battery lifespan option
The 40% limit is for if you plan to store your battery. I would not recomend operating a portable device at such a low capacity. Most manufactures seem to agree that charging a battery to the full capacity can reduce the life expectancy of the battery, but this seems to be in 80-95% area. Should software override the manufacturer's implementation? -- Optimize battery lifespan option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523072] Re: No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel
I am having the same problem except I am using the open source radeon driver. enabling pm_trace yielded this result: [0.601249] Magic number: 0:523:740 [0.601295] hash matches /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/base/power/main.c:471 Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 Codename: lucid -- No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile
Just found out about /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb It reads 128000 on my vm which is currently showing about 322M (tracing on) 182M (tracing off) diff=140M so it looks like it is the tracing buffer. Some questions: 1. Why is it that no application can differentiate memory used by the tracing buffer...it just looks like missing memory to everything. Is this because the tracing feature of the kernel is still new? 2. What determines the tracing buffer size? Is this a preset value? 3. Is there a way to determine how much of the tracing buffer is getting used? Being that the minimum memory requirement for Xubuntu is 256M and 384M for Ubuntu...does it seem wise to use half of the memory for boot optimization? Maybe a temporary fix could be to have ureadahead do nothing on systems with less than 512M of memory. Systems with this restriction would likely be old and too slow for a user to care about boot speeds anyway...especially if using ureadahead is causing the system to swap. I am curious if ureadahead would still work if the tracing buffer size was something like 32M. 32M would be small enough for users to ignore. I don't know a lot about how tracing works, but it might be nice to have a kernel option to set the buffer size, or even control tracing. -- ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears
Looking at the source of gtk-logout-helper.c from indicator-session-0.2.7:
in session_action():
if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_LOG_OUT) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy, "Logout",
INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_UINT, 1, G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
} else if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_SHUTDOWN) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy,
"RequestShutdown", INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
} else if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_RESTART) {
res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy,
"RequestReboot", INT_MAX, &error,
G_TYPE_INVALID, G_TYPE_INVALID);
---
why use dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout () if there isn't supposed to be a
timeout?
I did notice that there was a switch to use dialog.c instead of logout-
dialog.c where logout-dialog.c sets the timeout value and dialog.c
doesn't.
The only thing in the changelog is for 0.2.5:
* New logout dialogs.
What was this change for?
--
Shutdown timer no longer appears
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
Just noticed this today on my lucid -32bit machine. Open software center, maximize the window, choose a package and click more info. Cpu usage jumps really high until you restore the window size or get out of the info page. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
I guess my issue requires a separate bug report. The issue I have only occurs when you view details of a package when the package doesn't have a screenshot and the window is maximized. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more
Strike my last comment, it does it with packages that do have a screenshot. Openoffice.org Word Processor is one. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548911] [NEW] package details shows a shadow when no image is available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Find a package that doesn't have a screenshot such as Biloba or 7zip. Click on "more info" to go to view the package details. A blank white screenshot is displayed with a drop shadow. The drop shadow gives the appearance that something is broken. Since clicking on the blank screenshot displays an Ubuntu logo, it seems that this is supposed to be the image displayed instead of the blank image. Displaying anything but a blank image will correct this bug. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 10:44:06 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: software-center 1.1.21 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: software-center Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548911] Re: package details shows a shadow when no image is available
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42064045/Dependencies.txt -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] [NEW] resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center If I resize the left pane back and forth, the forward and back buttons get distorted. I tested this on my laptop which is using the opensource radeon driver, and also using a qemu vm. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 11:06:07 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: software-center 1.1.21 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: software-center Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066220/Dependencies.txt -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons
** Attachment added: "screenshot of button corruption" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066750/Screenshot-Ubuntu%20Software%20Center.png -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548937] [NEW] image not saved correctly on close
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot Steps to reproduce: Take a screenshot. Note the file size (mine were usually about 560k) Open the file in f-spot. Crop the image as small as possible. Exit f-spot, and click save. Look at the file size of the image: It didn't change. (560k for a 15x23 png) Repeat the above steps except save the file prior to exiting, and the resulting file size is more reasonable. (< 1k) I also tested this with a jpeg and got the same results. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26 11:21:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: f-spot 0.6.1.5-2ubuntu5 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: f-spot Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548937] Re: image not saved correctly on close
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42067469/Dependencies.txt -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537418] Re: Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen
Something to also note is that clicking on the empty box displays an Ubuntu logo. So it seems that the logo should be displayed here, and not a blank image. -- Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548386] Re: Wrong Ubuntu Icon used
Isn't it still the official logo? -- Wrong Ubuntu Icon used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
