[Bug 385962] Re: libg2c0 package is missing a link to root name of library: libg2c.so
Huh? you are not making sense. All I am saying is that the logical link libg2c.so pointing to the libg2c.so.0 library from the package is *missing*. Without that link, any runtime, or otherwise, linking to the library WILL FAIL. This is how you fix it: ln -s libg2c.so.0 libg2c.so ** Changed in: gcc-3.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- libg2c0 package is missing a link to root name of library: libg2c.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364615] [NEW] [Needs packaging] Gebabbel
Public bug reported: http://gebabbel.sourceforge.net/ depends on gpsbabel ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Needs packaging] Gebabbel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364613] [NEW] [Needs packaging] QLandkarte GT
Public bug reported: "QLandkarte" project has been terminated. New project is "QLandkarte GT". Please replace old package with new package. http://www.qlandkarte.org ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Needs packaging] QLandkarte GT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364613] Re: [Needs packaging] QLandkarte GT
According to http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/QLandkarte+GT?content=77463 "License: GPL" -- [Needs packaging] QLandkarte GT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364615] Re: [Needs packaging] Gebabbel
Package gebabbel is available in universe, thank you very much! -- [Needs packaging] Gebabbel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366977] [NEW] Plasma crashes when right-click on filename in Folder View
Public bug reported: In kubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope (I use the 32bit build) I found the following bug: On a Folder View within the KDE Desktop - select a file - press F2 in order to rename the file - press the right mouse button on the file name Plasma crashes, the Desktop becomes black. (I found this bug when I wanted to copy a file name into the clipboard.) According to discussions in forums, other users can reproduce this bug, too. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Plasma crashes when right-click on filename in Folder View https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366977] Re: Plasma crashes when right-click on filename in Folder View
** Description changed: In kubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope (I use the 32bit build) I found the following bug: On a Folder View within the KDE Desktop - select a file - press F2 in order to rename the file - press the right mouse button on the file name Plasma crashes, the Desktop becomes black. (I found this bug when I wanted to copy a file name into the clipboard.) - According to discussions in forums, other users can reproduce this bug, + According to discussions in forums other users can reproduce this bug, too. -- Plasma crashes when right-click on filename in Folder View https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281470] [NEW] missing 32bit library links in x86_64 kubuntu version 8.04
Public bug reported: There are multiple missing linkd in /usr/lib32 in the x86_64 version of Kubuntu 8.04. Some examples of the links I had to create to have my 32 bit apps correctly compiled: libX11.so -> libX11.so.6 libXmu.so -> libXmu.so.6 there are multiple others. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- missing 32bit library links in x86_64 kubuntu version 8.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385962] [NEW] libg2c0 package is missing a link to root name of library: libg2c.so
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libg2c0 The libg2c0 package in jaunty is missing a link to the root library libg2c.so. The package 1:3.4.6-8ubuntu2 installs teh library libg2c.so.0 but not the link libg2c.so, making programs that link with "-lg2c" to fail. Noticed in x86_64 ** Affects: gcc-3.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libg2c0 package is missing a link to root name of library: libg2c.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
My strategy is to go to each major computer store, i.e. CompUSA and the like, and ask "where are your Linux computers?." When they say they don't have them, then I leave disgusted. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55001] stellarium package description is plain wrong!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stellarium Load adept, type stellarium, and instead of the astronomy software description you will get something about an SMTP (or was it SNMP?) package. Very confusion for somebody looking for the astronomy software. The description of stellarium-package seems to be right ** Affects: stellarium (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- stellarium package description is plain wrong! https://launchpad.net/bugs/55001 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55001] RE: [Bug 55001] Re: stellarium package description is plain wrong!
Sorry. I thought that adept's was extracting it form the package itself. >From: Dennis Kaarsemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 55001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 55001] Re: stellarium package description is plain wrong! >Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:17:45 - >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from adelie.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.139]) by >bay0-mc8-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Thu, 3 >Aug 2006 01:25:10 -0700 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.179])by adelie.ubuntu.com >with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))id 1G8YVx-0005Zr-V8for ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:25:09 +0100 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by >gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6F7318202for ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:25:09 +0100 (BST) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3qXa9XTOWw03wNH6gKcAaRU3joKPQBI5A= >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; sourcepackage=adept; >component=main;status=Unconfirmed; importance=Untriaged; assignee=None; >Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com) >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Aug 2006 08:25:10.0634 (UTC) >FILETIME=[55DB74A0:01C6B6D6] > >The description of the package is correct. If adept shows it wrong, then >it's adepts fault. > >** Changed in: stellarium (Ubuntu) >Sourcepackagename: stellarium => adept > >-- >stellarium package description is plain wrong! >https://launchpad.net/bugs/55001 -- stellarium package description is plain wrong! https://launchpad.net/bugs/55001 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55001] RE: [Bug 55001] Re: stellarium package description is plain wrong!
Nevermind this bug. I can't reproduce it now (maybe one of my updates took care of it) Thanks, Anibal Morales, MSCpE[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Andreas Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 55001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 55001] Re: stellarium package description is plain wrong! >Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 13:36:43 - >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from adelie.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.139]) by >bay0-mc2-f17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 5 >Aug 2006 06:45:06 -0700 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.179])by adelie.ubuntu.com >with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))id 1G9MSf-0001u0-Fvfor ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:45:05 +0100 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by >gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69206318240for ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 14:45:05 +0100 (BST) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1V4zxjPdUA2I9DXGMj3ZX90Dck8+NCaf0= >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; sourcepackage=adept; >component=main;status=Unconfirmed; importance=Untriaged; assignee=None; >Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com) >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2006 13:45:06.0952 (UTC) >FILETIME=[5C94A080:01C6B895] > >I am not able to reproduce this with adept version 2.1.1ubuntu1. > >What version of adept are you running? > >-- >stellarium package description is plain wrong! >https://launchpad.net/bugs/55001 -- stellarium package description is plain wrong! https://launchpad.net/bugs/55001 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58411] Dapper64: /usr/lib32/libGLU.so is really 64 bits, breaking compilations
Public bug reported: In Kubuntu x86_64, the libGLU.so located in /usr/lib32 links to the 64 bits version of libGL.so, not to a 32 bits version as expected. This breaks and confuses linking. Reproduce by doing ldd /usr/lib32/libGLU.so nvidia_glx package was installed. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Dapper64: /usr/lib32/libGLU.so is really 64 bits, breaking compilations https://launchpad.net/bugs/58411 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47079] Re: Programs can't find libraries.
As a Dapper64 user I have confirmed this. In Dapper64 there's no 32 bits version of libXcursor.so. It prevents applications such as google earth from running... GoogleEarth This needs to be fixed ASAP! -- Programs can't find libraries. https://launchpad.net/bugs/47079 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60445] Dual FX4500 in SLI on an HP XW9300, not detected in any kernel for Dapper
Public bug reported: Tested all avalable amd64 kernels in Dapper: 2.6.15.23, 2.6.15-25, 2.6.15-26. None of them will show the second PCIe card (of course it doesn't matter what nvidia driver I have if the device does not show). NVIDIA engineers suggest compiling a new kernel... not an option in Dapper. As a reference, Mandriva kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp can detect it. Maybe the PCI bridges detction is wrong..? This is the output of lspci. There's supposed to be another identical "VGA" card at :81:00.0. :00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3) :00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) :00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) :00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2) :00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) :00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control :00:19.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration :00:19.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map :00:19.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller :00:19.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control :05:05.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB22/A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) :0a:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 009d (rev a1) ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Tested all avalable amd64 kernels in Dapper: 2.6.15.23, 2.6.15-25, 2.6.15-26. None of them will show the second PCIe card (of course it doesn't matter what nvidia driver I have if the device does not show). - NVIDIA engineers suggest comipling a new kernel As a reference, - Mandriva kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp can detect it. Maybe the PCI bridges - detction is wrong..? + NVIDIA engineers suggest compiling a new kernel... not an option in + Dapper. As a reference, Mandriva kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp can detect it. + Maybe the PCI bridges detction is wrong..? This is the output of lspci. There's supposed to be another identical "VGA" card at :81:00.0. :00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3) :00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) :00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) :00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2) :00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) :00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control :00:19.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration :00:19.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map :00:19.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller :00:19.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control :05:05.0 FireWire (
[Bug 60449] Adding a library to newly created ld.so.conf and re-running ldconfig does not make it visible
Public bug reported: I installed freeglut 32 bits in /usr/local/lib32. I created an /etc/ld.so.conf with this content: /usr/lib64 /usr/lib32 /usr/X11R6/lib64 /usr/X11R6/lib32 /usr/lib/qt3 /usr/local/lib64 /usr/local/lib32 /lib64 /lib32 Even after running ldconfig (with -v), my compiler does not find libglut unless I create links to it in /usr/lib32 Am I missing something ? ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Adding a library to newly created ld.so.conf and re-running ldconfig does not make it visible https://launchpad.net/bugs/60449 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60450] freeglut3 not available in 32 bit version on Dapper64. Multiarch
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: freeglut3 Forced compilation to 32 bits (with gcc -m32) will fail unless your provide libglut.so 32 bits version. I downloaded source, compiled it for 32 bits, added it to /usr/lib32 and now my apps are compiling. BTW, I had to add -L/lib32 to the configure command to make it compile. Let me know if you need specifics. ** Affects: freeglut (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: freeglut3 Forced compilation to 32 bits (with gcc -m32) will fail unless your provide libglut.so 32 bits version. I downloaded source, compiled it for 32 bits, added it to /usr/lib32 and - now my apps are compiling. + now my apps are compiling. BTW, I had to add -L/lib32 to the configure + command to make it compile. Let me know if you need specifics. -- freeglut3 not available in 32 bit version on Dapper64. Multiarch https://launchpad.net/bugs/60450 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60452] Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multiarch compile in Dapper64
Public bug reported: I was having trouble compiling 32 bits apps under Dapper64 until I created these links that were missing in /usr/lib32. The links are to the root name of various libraries. I haven't checked al libraries, just the ones I needed. /usr/lib32: ln -s libX11.so.6 libX11.so ln -s libXxf86vm.so.1 libXxf86vm.so ln -s libGL.so.1 libGL.so ln -s libGLU.so.1 libGLU.so ln -s libXmu.so.6libXmu.so ln -s libXext.so.6libXext.so ln -s libXi.so.6libXi.so This should be an easy bugfix that should make it to Edgy. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Changed in: freeglut (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: freeglut => None -- Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multiarch compile in Dapper64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/60452 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 68666] Re: kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in PCIbus on
But then I lose SLI capabilit, I can still have 2 cards, but they are not usable in SLI mode. Thanks, Anibal Morales, MSCpE[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: ChuckShort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 68666 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 68666] Re: kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in >PCIbus on an HP xw9300 with SLI >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:17:19 - >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from adelie.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.139]) by >bay0-mc12-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Fri, >10 Nov 2006 12:25:07 -0800 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.179])by adelie.ubuntu.com >with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))id 1Gicvz-0006la-3cfor ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:25:07 + >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by >gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7A131890Ffor ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:25:07 + (GMT) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2lxNg2ODBgMC2qehjg0GNk0t5fkDE3KME= >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; >sourcepackage=linux-source-2.6.17;component=main; status=Fix Released; >importance=Undecided;assignee=None; Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com) >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2006 20:25:07.0958 (UTC) >FILETIME=[505D4160:01C70506] > >According to the forum this looks like it was resolved by using >acpi=off. > >** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu) >Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released > >-- >kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in PCI bus on an HP xw9300 >with SLI >https://launchpad.net/bugs/68666 _ Use your PC to make calls at very low rates https://voiceoam.pcs.v2s.live.com/partnerredirect.aspx -- kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in PCI bus on an HP xw9300 with SLI https://launchpad.net/bugs/68666 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130058] feisty x86_64 does not include 32 bit GSL libraries
Public bug reported: feisty does not include the 32 bit version of the libgsl0 libraries. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- feisty x86_64 does not include 32 bit GSL libraries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117131] Re: 32bit development libraries missing for amd64 systems systems
You obviously do not have the responsibility of compiling 32 bits apps while under x86_64. Lucky you. chroot is too complex for normal users as well. I guess this is the same old holy war between camps. Meanwhile Windows plows away without hiccups in this area. Please create a new package. I like the idea of ia32-libs-dev. Here are my candidates to include: mesagl (restricted drivers already come with 32 bits libs) freeglut fftw3 gsl -- 32bit development libraries missing for amd64 systems systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182190] How my company and MSFT are killing Linux - Please Fix!!!!
Public bug reported: So a few knuckleheads have at my company have had their laptops stolen, some with important information. What's the company reaction? Encryption. OK so far. They require encryption for USB disks and laptops. OK so far. Now here are the killers: 1- they require hardware encryption for USB disks. BAD FOR UBUNTU (No support anywhere). 2- They also require Whole Disk Encryption from PGP corporation (BAD FOR UBUNTU - no Support) - which has centralized key management. So they basically have shunted the growing community of engineers using LInux for development by only allowing WIndows with PGP Corp's software, and Sandisk USB sticks (and others) with Windows software nice move. Any Linux work that we need is replied with "install virtual machine" --- not an option for hardware development or serious work. So please, someone from Canonical please contact PGP Corp and make WDE available for Linux now!!! ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: encryption pgp usb wde ** Summary changed: - How my company and MSFT are killing Linux - Please Fix + How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix ** Tags added: encryption pgp usb wde -- How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182190] Re: How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix!!!!
"Invalid" is not really the status here ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid => New -- How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182190] Re: How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix!!!!
Corey: you misunderstood. I am asking for COMPATIBILITY, not equivalent functionality, with: 1- hardware encryption of USB keys (only supported by a couple companies, both using WIndows software for the passwords) 2- Whole Disk Encryption (WDE), a product from PGP Corporation that enables centralized management of keys, only via Windows obviously. Both these are liked by big companies because the lawyers can argue that even if a company laptop with financial or health records is lost (read the news lately!!), since the information is still encrypted they can claim that there is not really a loss. They also want to be able to manage the keys in a centralized fashion. Both the above functions are usually only available through Windows software, so foresee a bleak future for UBUNTU laptops in the corporate world once all big companies get scared and succumb to the MSFT-only "solution". Please note that a Windows with WDE will not support bootable Linux. Just my request/suggestion to improve UBUNTU. -- How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182190] Re: How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix!!!!
I would love to help create specs if I knew exactly what was required. I am not familiar with the implementation details of the products mentioned. I figured that this is something that Canonical can negotiate and maybe create 'Restricted Drivers". >From my perspective, all I know is that the small but [formerly] growing community of Linux laptop engineering users at my (Forbes 100) company has been essentially wiped out by two requirements: 1- Use WDE from PGP Corp. 2- Use encrypted USB drives from this list: * SanDisk Cruzer Enterprise * Kingston Data Traveler Secure Privacy Edition Both of these only work for Windows, so we are dead in the water, with only virtual machines as alternatives. They will not relinquish the specific encryption requirement due to the previously discussed concerns, which I completely understand. I think the time is ripe for Linux to join the enterprise game and support these particular technologies. -- How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32042] Re: OpenGL subroutine man pages missing
Other distributions, like Fedora, include them. ??? -- OpenGL subroutine man pages missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182190] Re: How my company and MSFT are killing Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix!!!!
** Summary changed: - How my company and MSFT are Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix + How my company and MSFT are killing Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix -- How my company and MSFT are killing Ubuntu Linux - Please Fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47538] Re: Package should not install over existing tar installation
Followed instructions by Jazz above. It works, and I played some virtual machines. Clearly there something very broken with this package. Please fix!!! On another subject, each time I run it, it tells me of a newer version and requests to go to their website. I will wait for the new .deb package. Can I disable this message? -- Package should not install over existing tar installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130058] Re: feisty x86_64 does not include 32 bit GSL libraries
It is still an issue. I had to download source and figure out all the parameters to compile to 32 bits and then put it in the same directory as all the 32 bit libraries. It would be so mush simpler if it was available as a package. -- feisty x86_64 does not include 32 bit GSL libraries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60445] Re: Dual FX4500 in SLI on an HP XW9300, not detected in any kernel for Dapper
This bug still exist on 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14 and others. The only way to have both cards appear is to do acpi=off kernel parameters, but that makes me lose a lot of other features I want (like RT timers) ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Dual FX4500 in SLI on an HP XW9300, not detected in any kernel for Dapper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86666] Re: Feisty crashes after grub if usplash enabled (amd64)
I can confirm this bug on several AMD64 installations of Feisty. Booting the install CD with kernel parameter splash is a no-go. PLEASE FIX IT. -- Feisty crashes after grub if usplash enabled (amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112977] [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xemacs21 While editing a 900MB text file, selected a huge chunk form the end. Pressing DELETE key made it segfault. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 6 19:31:56 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.19-mule Package: xemacs21-mule 21.4.19-2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: xemacs 20070404_flight.ccs_p4.txt ProcCwd: /home/user01/IFS/src/tmtools ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games:/home/user01/bin:/home/user01/IFS/run/bin:.:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/bin LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: xemacs21 Stacktrace: #0 0x081d in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () ThreadStacktrace: Uname: Linux mcqueen 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev scanner video ** Affects: xemacs21 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112977] Re: [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573640/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573641/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573642/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573643/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573644/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7573645/Registers.txt -- [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112977] Re: [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xemacs21 While editing a 900MB text file, selected a huge chunk form the end. Pressing DELETE key made it segfault. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 6 19:31:56 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.19-mule Package: xemacs21-mule 21.4.19-2 PackageArchitecture: i386 - ProcCmdline: xemacs 20070404_flight.ccs_p4.txt - ProcCwd: /home/user01/IFS/src/tmtools + ProcCmdline: xemacs file.txt + ProcCwd: /home/user01/src/tools ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash - PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games:/home/user01/bin:/home/user01/IFS/run/bin:.:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/bin + PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games:/home/user01/bin:.:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/local/bin LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: xemacs21 Stacktrace: #0 0x081d in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () ThreadStacktrace: Uname: Linux mcqueen 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev scanner video -- [apport] xemacs-21.4.19-mule crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68666] kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in PCI bus on an HP xw9300 with SLI
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 6.10 AMD. HP XW9300 workstation with dual graphics cards in SLI mode, used for development and gaming. Running 'lspci' shows that the second graphics card is being missed completely, which prevents SLI from working at all. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1043290&posted=1#post1043290 ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- kernel 2.6.17 AMD is not detecting all devices in PCI bus on an HP xw9300 with SLI https://launchpad.net/bugs/68666 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88526] x86_64 does not include 32bit libboost in /usr/lib32
Public bug reported: It would be nice to include the 32bit version of libboost-* in /usr/lib32 I use my x86_64 do develop both 32 and 64 bit versions of my apps. I had to manually download the i386 .deb package, extract it, copy the 32 bit libraries to /usr/lib32 and run ldconf. I only did it with libboost-filesystem... I would have to do the same with all the rest. It's doable but painful. Can yo include them in Edgy / Feisty / etc. Thank you! ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: It would be nice to include the 32bit version of libboost-* in /usr/lib32 - I use my x86_64 do develop both 32 and 64 bit versions on my apps. + I use my x86_64 do develop both 32 and 64 bit versions of my apps. I had to manually download the i386 .deb package, extract it, copy the 32 bit libraries to /usr/lib32 and run ldconf. I only did it with libboost-filesystem... I would have to do the same with all the rest. It's doable but painful. Can yo include them in Edgy / Feisty / etc. Thank you! -- x86_64 does not include 32bit libboost in /usr/lib32 https://launchpad.net/bugs/88526 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65858] Re: windows flicker when using "focus follows mouse" policy
Just installed edgy, my home dir setting unchanged. This flicker almost made me remove edgy, until I tried changing "focus follows mouse". BTW this was fine on dapper. Any idea when will it be released ? -- windows flicker when using "focus follows mouse" policy https://launchpad.net/bugs/65858 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77987] Missing links in Edgy 64 /usr/lib32 - easy to fix !
Public bug reported: A lot of missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents 32 bit compiles under Edgy x86_64. Some of the links I had to create: cd /usr/lib32 ln -s libGLU.so.1 libGLU.so ln -s libXext.so.6 libXext.so ln -s libX11.so.6 libX11.so ln -s libXmu.so.6 libXmu.so ln -s libXi.so.6 libXi.so There are lots of others. This is an easy fix. Please make Feisty have it ! Related to bug #60452 but this is Edgy 64, not Dapper 64 ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: A lot of missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents 32 bit compiles under Edgy x86_64. Some of the links I had to create: cd /usr/lib32 ln -s libGLU.so.1 libGLU.so ln -s libXext.so.6 libXext.so ln -s libX11.so.6 libX11.so ln -s libXmu.so.6 libXmu.so ln -s libXi.so.6 libXi.so - There are lost of others. This is an easy fix. Please make Feisty have + There are lots of others. This is an easy fix. Please make Feisty have it ! Related to bug #60452 but this is Edgy 64, not Dapper 64 ** Summary changed: - Missing links in Edgy 64 /usr/lib32 - easy to fix ! + Missing links in Edgy 64 /usr/lib32 - easy to fix. (please fix on Feisty!) -- Missing links in Edgy 64 /usr/lib32 - easy to fix. (please fix on Feisty!) https://launchpad.net/bugs/77987 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60452] Re: Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multiarch compile in Dapper64
Instead of "multiarch" it must read "multilib" -- Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multlib compile in Dapper64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/60452 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60452] Re: Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multlib compile in Dapper64
** Summary changed: - Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multiarch compile in Dapper64 + Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multlib compile in Dapper64 -- Missing links in /usr/lib32 prevents multlib compile in Dapper64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/60452 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78226] Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64
Public bug reported: Confirmed in two Edgy installations: 32 bits ABIT AN832X SLI motherboard, and x86_64 HP xw9300 (TYAN K8W3 motherboard). If I copy a big file from command-prompt to USB stick, and then go to the icon and select "Safely Remove", the USB stick will immediately unmount, instead of popping up a dialog like it did in Dapper. Even worse, the directory entry for the file is written (the file shows as full size), but the file will of course be truncated, causing corruption on the disk. Please Fix !!! In Dapper, when I copied a big file from the console prompt, and rapidly went to the desktop icon and selected Safely Remove, a dialog box will pop-up saying something like "waiting...". Then it will dissapear and my copy and unmount will be complete. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/78226 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 78226] Re: Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64
Thanks! I was going crazy wondering why nobody else noticed. How can we raise the awareness of this Thanks, Anibal Morales, MSCpE[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Martijn de Nerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 78226 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 78226] Re: Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and >x86_64 >Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:30:07 - >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from adelie.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.139]) by >bay0-mc5-f5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 13 >Jan 2007 05:40:07 -0800 >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.179])by adelie.ubuntu.com >with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))id 1H5j79-0005Tg-1Pfor ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:40:07 + >Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by >gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10CC318197for ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:40:06 + (GMT) >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1qbvEWpFQpZiivFBNYzy3qMjpQRu6NxHo= >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; sourcepackage=None; >component=None;status=Unconfirmed; importance=Undecided; assignee=None; >Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com) >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2007 13:40:07.0898 (UTC) >FILETIME=[56D65BA0:01C73718] > >Yup, I can confirm this, very annoying and potentially dangerous bug. >When I copy stuff to sdcard or usb stick (both automounted by kde) it >goes very quick. Then I click safely remove and assume everything is >done when the device icon has disappeared. It's not! On my usb-stick >there is a flashing light indicating it is still busy, my sdcard however >shows nothing, so i don't even know when it's safe to remove it. >Consequently, I often mis some files (or have corrupted ones) when I >check later. > >Two things are wrong here in my opinion; >- there should be a clear indication when safely remove is really done >(apparently already available in dapper) >- write cache should be switched of completely for removable devices. >people (like me) tend to be sloppy and remove sticks whenever they please >to ...without safely removing them. > >-- >Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64 >https://launchpad.net/bugs/78226 _ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme002001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview -- Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/78226 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78226] Re: Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64
Thanks for confirming this. I was going crazy wondering why nobody is complaining. I figured that this is a very common usage. Did you try Dapper ? In Dapper it worked great. Also, what is your hardware ? I can confirm on at least 3 diff computers, 2 of them x86_64 (AMD) and a Dell E1705 with dual-core Intel centrino. -- Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/78226 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78226] Re: Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 61946 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 61946 [Edgy Data Loss] umount progress dialog missing -- Edgy corrupts USB memory stick - both i386 and x86_64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/78226 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61946] Re: [Edgy Data Loss] umount progress dialog missing
I can confirm this happening in x86_64 as well. Please fix ASAP. I cannot keep recommending Kubuntu Edgy with this problem, I will make a fool of myself. Also see bug #1. -- [Edgy Data Loss] umount progress dialog missing https://launchpad.net/bugs/61946 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61946] Re: [Edgy Data Loss] umount progress dialog missing
First of all, let me tank you for taking the time to explain this. Based on what you said, I am willing to manually fix this problem in all the installations I have access to, until a ditribution fix is ready. Are there instructions to implement "Make HAL policy as sync" for just a particular device or USB bus ? -- [Edgy Data Loss] umount progress dialog missing https://launchpad.net/bugs/61946 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 662712] Re: Audio adjustment-Dell Inspiron E1705
This bug affects me. Exact description as OP ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662712 Title: Audio adjustment-Dell Inspiron E1705 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 662712] Re: Audio adjustment-Dell Inspiron E1705
This solution (read #33) solves this problem in Maverick Meerkat with Dell E1705 (Kubuntu and Ubuntu) http://www.uluga.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10343584 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662712 Title: Audio adjustment-Dell Inspiron E1705 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573396] Re: BUG: soft lockup booting Lucid amd64 CD
VERY frustrating, as I cannot setup Lucid in a very powerful computer as i was planning to. HP Z800 workstation, Kubuntu 10.04 AMD64 -- BUG: soft lockup booting Lucid amd64 CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573396] Re: BUG: soft lockup booting Lucid amd64 CD
The only version I have been able to install in my Z800 is Karmic AMD64. It is ridiculous that I cannot run Lucid on it... and Kubuntu keeps reminding me "there is a new version available, do you want to update?"... yeah right, and never be able to boot again. How can we raise the attention to this one? The Z800 are the top of the line HP workstations... there must be thousands of potential Lucid users out there. We cannot be the only ones... or are we?? -- BUG: soft lockup booting Lucid amd64 CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
