[Bug 1702550] [NEW] Several files on ddebs.ubuntu.com have bogus content
Public bug reported: The following files contain bogus content: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com//pool/main/h/heimdal/libkadm5clnt7-heimdal-dbgsym_1.7~git20150920+dfsg-4ubuntu1_i386.ddeb http://ddebs.ubuntu.com//pool/universe/libs/libspiro/libspiro-dev-dbgsym_0.5.20150702-4_i386.ddeb http://ddebs.ubuntu.com//pool/main/libv/libvdpau/libvdpau-dev-dbgsym_1.1.1-3ubuntu1_i386.ddeb Each of these contains an html error page generated in mirroring. This has happened multiple times in the past. The launchpad server seems to be returning these error pages under load, and either is sending them as 200, or the mirroring job is not properly checking the status. Regardless, can you please fix the files so we can have proper access to them? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: archive ** Tags added: archive -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702550 Title: Several files on ddebs.ubuntu.com have bogus content To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1702550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1702550] Re: Several files on ddebs.ubuntu.com have bogus content
The bot's comment is fascinating, but indicates that the bot didn't read the report very carefully. It's not clear how to report bugs against infrastructure as opposed to packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702550 Title: Several files on ddebs.ubuntu.com have bogus content To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1702550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] [NEW] openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
Public bug reported: in version 1.0.1-4ubuntu2, we see: openssl (1.0.1-4ubuntu2) precise-proposed; urgency=low * Backport more upstream patches to work around TLS 1.2 failures (LP #965371): ... - Truncate the number of ciphers sent in the client hello to 50. Most broken servers should now work. ... -- Colin Watson Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:03:56 +0100 We have a server which offers a very small number of ciphers. When this change hit, suddenly our hosts could no longer contact this server, getting the error: $ openssl s_client -connect HOSTNAME:9140 CONNECTED(0003) 139736292189856:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:s23_clnt.c:724: The problem here was tracked down to a failure to find a matching cipher. If we specify -cipher RC4-SSH (the only one essentially which the server permits) or -ssl3, the connection succeeds. The problem is this truncation of the number of ciphers sent. RC4-SSH shows up at something like #74 on our list, so it is getting truncated. When we specify exactly the cipher to use, of course it works, and if we say -ssl3, then that also reduces the number which would be sent, and now RC4-SSH is in the top fifty again. This is a pretty disastrous change, in fact; it means that openssl basically now supports only fifty ciphers at a time, and then an essentially random and unpredictable set. Not only does this mean a loss of functionality, it could be a loss in security if clients get pushed to less secure ciphers because the more secure ones happened to be after number fifty in the list. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
Colin, I hope you'll reconsider this change and revert it. I understand that there are buggy servers which fail when they get offered too many ciphers by clients, but they *always* failed; that's nothing new. So in order to expand the use cases for the library, this change has caused a regression. It's much worse to take correctly- working server/client pairs and deliberately break them than to fail to support incorrectly-working server/client pairs. It's not just us; Jordon Bedwell above had the same problem. It's going to break a *lot* of people. Moreover, it is really an important security issue as well as an interoperability one. I have a right to expect that I will get the most secure cipher from the set formed by the intersection of the client's and the server's supported sets; with this change, I do not, because the client has artificially eliminated some of its supported set. This is a serious, serious regression, both in security and in interoperability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
One of our engineers says this: FWIW, looking at the code, the problematic chunk, added to ssl/s23_clnt.c by tls12_workarounds.patch, was @@ -467,6 +469,15 @@ SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL23_CLIENT_HELLO,SSL_R_NO_CIPHERS_AVAILABLE); return -1; } +#ifdef OPENSSL_MAX_TLS1_2_CIPHER_LENGTH + /* Some servers hang if client hello > 256 bytes +* as hack workaround chop number of supported ciphers +* to keep it well below this if we use TLS v1.2 +*/ + if (TLS1_get_version(s) >= TLS1_2_VERSION + && i > OPENSSL_MAX_TLS1_2_CIPHER_LENGTH) + i = OPENSSL_MAX_TLS1_2_CIPHER_LENGTH & ~1; +#endif s2n(i,p); p+=i; OPENSSL_MAX_TLS1_2_CIPHER_LENGTH is defined to 50, and is actually the number of bytes to use for the cipher list in the handshake, not the number of ciphers. Each cipher uses 2 bytes, so we actually get only 25 ciphers. And somebody that knows openssl might want to double-check that call to TLS1_get_version(s) - right before this chunk, there's a call to the function that actually adds the ciphers to the handshake buffer (ssl_cipher_list_to_bytes). That function compares the return value of TLS1_get_client_version(s) with TLS1_2_VERSION and then decides to skip the TLS1.2-only ciphers, which puts RC4-SHA among the first 50. Either changing OPENSSL_MAX_TLS1_2_CIPHER_LENGTH to 100 (which actually means 50 ciphers) or changing the TLS1_get_version(s) to TLS1_get_client_version(s) fixes things, though I have no idea what this last change means. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
Other things that would save us: 1) Any way to disable this regression from configuration files or the like. (Merely adding an option in the library interface wouldn't help unless puppet also can be told to pass that option.) 2) Any way from configuration files to tell SSL to use the equivalent of the -tls1, or -cipher, switches to openssl s_client. 3) Any way from configuration files or command line options to tell puppet to tell SSL the equivalent of (2). Sadly, this one change has forced us to probably miss our target release of our precise distro by a month. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817269] Re: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS
In our case, the problem was traced to lockd and portmap. Specifically, without access to lockd, NFS can only do the 30 second fallback method of retrying locks. We had restricted portmap to listen only on localhost, which is why lockd was unable to function properly. Once we unrestricted portmap appropriately, the problem was solved. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817269 Title: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/817269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956848] Re: pam_mkhomedir.so fails to create homedir in precise
I can confirm that the fix works for us as well. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956848 Title: pam_mkhomedir.so fails to create homedir in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/956848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
Colin: I think I understand now much better; thanks. The upgrade to 1.0.1 increased the number of ciphers, which in turn broke communication with bad servers (of which there may be an important number). What a thorny little knot of a problem. Short of fixing these bad servers (which might be a hard and many-year problem), perhaps the only real solution is to have our clients sort the ciphers by security preference, and then attempt multiple connections. Obviously that's not a quick fix! I see 1.0.1-4ubuntu5 has hit proposed, so I'll give that a try right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
I'm pleased to report that 1.0.1-4ubuntu5 seems to resolve our symptoms. Many thanks Martin and Colin for that! It only kicks the can down the road a bit, but it does give some breathing room. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988072] [NEW] Can't remove user if they're not in /etc/passwd
Public bug reported: Thanks to nss, there are many ways for a user account to exist. If you have user accounts authenticated with LDAP (say), and use nss tables other than passwd to store user information, then you find that the system automatically creates an entry in the user account database on login. This is handy: it means the user gets listed by lightdm in the greeter, for example, and things like background and keyboard prefs can be known to the greeter. It's all good. However, these users cannot be deleted. If you use the accounts-daemon from the control center to remove them, you get this error: Failed to delete user GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.Accounts.Error.Failed: running '/usr/sbin/userdel' failed: /usr/sbin/userdel returned an error (1): userdel: cannot remove entry 'tbushnell' from /etc/passwd And alas, the user then stays in the system database. Please make it possible to remove users from the system database even if deluser and userdel don't work on them. ** Affects: accountsservice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988072 Title: Can't remove user if they're not in /etc/passwd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/988072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988079] [NEW] Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor
Public bug reported: On my Z600, with a fresh Precise installation, after installing the NVIDIA driver 295.40 (same version as in gPrecise), glxgears runs extremely slowly full-screen. When running on Precise, Chrome's GPU accelerated rendering path produces correct results, albeit extremely slowly. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079 Title: Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/988079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988079] Re: Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor
Quadro FX 380, which is based on the GeForce 9400, so it's not the bug that affects performance on the older cards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079 Title: Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/988079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988079] Re: Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor
We block the normal operation of apport. Can you describe exactly what you want from it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079 Title: Dismal performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/988079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963533] Re: opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems
ping -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963533 Title: opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963533] Re: opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems
Yes, we know for sure that purge & reinstall fixes the problem...that's our advice to affected users. But the packaging system is supposed to work automatically, and we rely on that to maintain tens of thousands of machines. (Though obviously not that much is running precise right now.) This issue will automatically become irrelevant in a short amount of time; my real question is that I'd like to understand how it could happen. A lucid=>precise upgrade shouldn't produce this problem; I think it's specific to the 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 package which was momentarily available on precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963533 Title: opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963565] Re: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running
Are you sure that every old version of the package correctly stopped the daemon in the prerm? (Hey, that might explain why the other bug I noted was happening.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963565 Title: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 972721] [NEW] unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to unity
Public bug reported: unity --reset is great if you've broken your configuration. However. If you've broken it so much that it doesn't even start sensibly, or you can't find a terminal, then you need to use a VT or ssh to run it. And then you get this error: % unity --reset WARNING: no DISPLAY variable set, setting it to :0 GConf-WARNING **: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS daemon: //bin/dbus-launch terminated abnormally with the following error: No protocol specified No protocol specified Autolaunch error: X11 initialization failed. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/unity", line 222, in reset_unity_compiz_profile () File "/usr/bin/unity", line 84, in reset_unity_compiz_profile except (GError, AttributeError), e: NameError: global name 'GError' is not defined [1]8838 exit 1 unity --reset It should definitely work in this case, restoring your config so that you can log in! ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972721 Title: unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/972721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933870] Re: libnfsidmap2 fails to install
ping? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933870 Title: libnfsidmap2 fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnfsidmap/+bug/933870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 972721] Re: unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to any unity session
It's not a critical issue, by all means work on other things first. Please leave it open, and it might be addressable by a bug fix later, or closed if it becomes moot with gsettings. The case is when a user's session is broken and they *cannot* login successfully to unity or gnome, so they are logging in on a vt or via ssh, and trying to repair whatever damage there is to their dotfiles. The problem is not that it tries to relaunch unity (per se), the problem is that it won't reset the configuration if it can't also launch it. The user *is* logged in, but only via ssh or vt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972721 Title: unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to any unity session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/972721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 972721] Re: unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to any unity session
I'm much more interested in the weird white Chrome/Compiz boxes getting fixed than this. :) And if it becomes a big issue for us, we can just write our own script that does what unity --reset does. So let's leave it dormant for now, and if lots of people want it, SRU after sufficient testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972721 Title: unity --reset doesn't work if you're not logged in to any unity session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/972721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940603] Re: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it
So we see this consistently, and it seems to happen (sometimes) when Chrome pops up a new window (I see it when gchat creates a mole, or when a link opens in a new tab, though not always). The size of the white box is the size of whatever window was being created. The white box is not a window; X events go to whatever is "underneath" as if it weren't there, and xwininfo doesn't see it. Restarting compiz reliably makes it go away (but has other annoying side effects, like making the upper-right icons no longer responsive to input). As you can imagine, we have a lot of Chrome users, and this is a very significant usability problem for us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 Title: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953404] [NEW] ia32-libs in precise is missing libgconf-2-4:i386
Public bug reported: In lucid, ia32-libs contains the 32-bit version of libgconf-2-4: $ dpkg -L ia32-libs | grep gconf /usr/lib32/pkgconfig /usr/lib32/pkgconfig/gtk-engines-2.pc /usr/lib32/gio/modules/libgiogconf.so /usr/lib32/libgconf-2.so.4.1.5 /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4 /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/gconfd-2 /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2 /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/2 /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/2/libgconfbackend-evoldap.so /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/2/libgconfbackend-oldxml.so /usr/lib32/libgconf2-4/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so /usr/lib32/libgconf-2.so.4 /usr/lib32/libgconf-2.so But on precise, there is no dependency on libgconf-2-4:i386. # apt-get install ia32-libs [installs a lot] # dpkg -l libgconf-2-4:i386 No packages found matching libgconf-2-4:i386. This creates a regression against packages which depended on ia32-libs to get this library, and the compat package ia32-libs should now include that dependency. ** Affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953404 Title: ia32-libs in precise is missing libgconf-2-4:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/953404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954303] [NEW] opencryptoki 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 has self-conflict
Public bug reported: Version 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 of opencryptoki includes /usr/lib/opencryptoki/stdll/PKCS11_SW.so in both the libopencryptoki0 and opencryptoki packages: $ dpkg-deb --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/opencryptoki_2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb | grep PKCS11 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2012-03-13 09:03 ./usr/lib/pkcs11/PKCS11_API.so -> ../opencryptoki/libopencryptoki.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2012-03-13 09:03 ./usr/lib/opencryptoki/stdll/PKCS11_SW.so -> libpkcs11_sw.so $ dpkg-deb --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/libopencryptoki0_2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb | grep PKCS11 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2012-03-13 09:03 ./usr/lib/opencryptoki/PKCS11_API.so -> libopencryptoki.so lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2012-03-13 09:03 ./usr/lib/opencryptoki/stdll/PKCS11_SW.so -> libpkcs11_sw.so While they are both symlinks, and they are the same symlink, dpkg still doesn't like it. :) ** Affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954303 Title: opencryptoki 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 has self-conflict To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/954303/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877904] Re: Top panel visible in locked screen
We've seen this as well on Precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877904 Title: Top panel visible in locked screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/877904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931967] Re: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears
An additional data point, consistent with what's been said here, is that our users with lightdm and unity-greeter who log in to a gnome-shell session instead of a unity session see exactly the same sort of corruption. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967 Title: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/931967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934799] [NEW] trousers start script has exit status 137
Public bug reported: trousers version 0.3.7-2 can't start $ sudo /etc/init.d/trousers start * Starting Trusted Computing daemon tcsd [fail] $ echo $? 137 ** Affects: trousers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934799 Title: trousers start script has exit status 137 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/trousers/+bug/934799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
Stefan says "While in the case we test, the request is seen as success but then the authentication flavours do not match and the client does an explicit umount request (probably the same happens when the authentication methods are supported but the authentication fails)." I spent a lot of time staring at this yesterday myself. The umount doesn't do much: it doesn't involve any local state manipulation. I also chased the aliases for the filehandle and such on the mount, and I didn't see any leaks of the pointer to something that might manipulate it after it gets freed (which happens in all the failing mount cases). However, if repeated mounts fail, it is odd that the original manifestation of this bug is that a *single* chase through the symlink is sufficient to produce an (eventual) crash. I wonder if a single failing mount is really sufficient to produce a crash. That would be odd, because you'd think that would happen a lot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
What lies behind the comment on the umount call is this: the NFS protocol requests that clients tell servers when they unmount partitions, so that servers can stop reporting it in tools like showmount. The client doesn't care at all if the server ever gets it, and even if you do an unmount RPC, the server is not allowed to stop handling the filehandles, which are (officially) permanent. So since the client doesn't care beans about the umount call, or even if it works or gets blackholed, the code in mount_clnt.c does minimal retransmits and short timeouts. When it says that it doesn't expect data back, that doesn't mean that the RPC has no return (the server does follow the usual sunrpc semantics and does send back a reply) but the client doesn't care what the return is in any way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
I've been busy this morning with other responsibilities, but I can report now that I agree that no automount involvement is necessary; merely repeating the mount request eventually provokes the failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
Removing the umount attempt seems to make the problem go away. Not a fix, but it's nice to have a workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 686834] [NEW] metacity gets confused about which window to move
Public bug reported: Using metacity on gnome in lucid: Steps to reproduce: Before everything, make sure you turn of compiz (desktop effects). 1) Open a terminal 2) Maximize it 3) Open another terminal, overlaying on top of the first one 4) Try to grab the title bar of the second terminal, and you'll see the grabbing cursor falls through onto the first window 5) Move your mouse, you'll see the first window is de-maximized, and moves with your cursor. 6) This may not be reproducable on other computers, but is pretty deterministic on the desktop where it appears This seems to be the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533066. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686834 Title: metacity gets confused about which window to move -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 686834] Re: metacity gets confused about which window to move
I'll do some more checking here to see about it. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Fabio Marconi wrote: > I assign to metacity, but i cannot reproduce this issue > > ** Package changed: ubuntu => metacity (Ubuntu) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686834 > > Title: > metacity gets confused about which window to move > > Status in “metacity” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Using metacity on gnome in lucid: > > Steps to reproduce: > Before everything, make sure you turn of compiz (desktop effects). > 1) Open a terminal > 2) Maximize it > 3) Open another terminal, overlaying on top of the first one > 4) Try to grab the title bar of the second terminal, and you'll see the > grabbing cursor falls through onto the first window > 5) Move your mouse, you'll see the first window is de-maximized, and moves > with your cursor. > 6) This may not be reproducable on other computers, but is pretty > deterministic on the desktop where it appears > > This seems to be the same as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533066. > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/686834/+subscribe > ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #533066 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533066 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686834 Title: metacity gets confused about which window to move -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
Awesomeness! I'll give it a try today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683938] Re: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount
This is not quite right. The second one should use ARRAY_SIZE(mnt3_procedures). The value happens to be the same, but still...let's not make a new bug if someone implements another part of the protocol someday. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683938 Title: kernel crash on symlink chased from NFS to failing automount -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1157943] Re: apt-get update fails hash checks on https repositories when file size changes
The current code completely corrupts things. It's definitely got a bug. Dropping If-Range entirely at least gets *correct* behavior. David, people *have* read your previous comments, *and responded to them*. If you don't want to "do https stuff", then apt needs a maintainer who does. So, since the current code *definitely* has a bug, and since you've decided that the proposed patch is incorrect, what is your plan for fixing the bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157943 Title: apt-get update fails hash checks on https repositories when file size changes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1157943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466223] [NEW] ibus out of order keystrokes
Public bug reported: In some circumstances (see https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=410649 for details) ibus ends up giving keystrokes to Chromium and other programs with out- of-order timestamps, resulting in mangled input. This can happen even under light load. https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/b58351ec2f7c057dcfe0aff883064039702a56d7 is the committed fix from ibus. Can this please be pulled into trusty and a new package included in updates? ** Affects: ibus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466223 Title: ibus out of order keystrokes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1466223/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979477] [NEW] ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure
Public bug reported: Recently we see the following when ttf-mscorefonts-installer is installed, after accepting licensing terms, a popup appears with the following contents: The following packages requested additional data downloads after package installation, but the data could not be downloaded or could not be processed. . . ttf-mscorefonts-installer . . The download will be attempted again later, or you can try the download again now. Running this command requires an active Internet connection. It happens repeatedly if you do apt-get install --reinstall ttf- mscorefonts-installer. Something is wrong in the move of the download from /usr/lib/msttcorefonts/update-ms-fonts to wherever it is supposed to live now. ** Affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979477 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/979477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979477] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure
BTW, I should add for completeness that I can verify that removing the proxy setting allows the download to proceed without incident. How can we tell this package to download without using the proxy as it used to (for this non-apt transaction)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979477 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/979477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979477] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure
There is an apt proxy, in fact. This is a regression; the old script before the change simply fetched the files directly. We set the proxy with Acquire::http::Proxy "http://internal-hostname:PORT/"; (where "internal-hostname" is a hostname, and "PORT" is a decimal for the correct port on which the proxy runs. If I remove the proxy specification, it works fine. I think this is a bad way to go; the Apt proxy specifies specifically where apt looks, and should not be specifying where downloads in general happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979477 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer installation popup and probable failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/979477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940603] Re: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it
ping? this is such a critical issue, and we would like to be able to test it before precise launches. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 Title: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 940603] Re: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it
The build failed, did it not? On Apr 13, 2012 1:50 AM, "Sebastien Bacher" wrote: > Thomas, the new compiz is in precise, you should be able to test from > there or did I overlook something? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 > > Title: > white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications > from using stuff under it > > Status in Compiz Animations Plugin: > Fix Committed > Status in Compiz Core: > Invalid > Status in Compiz Main Plugins: > Fix Committed > Status in Unity: > Fix Released > Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “compiz” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in “compiz-plugins-main” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > I've had this happen 3 times now. I've gotten a white rectangular box > show up in the corner of the screen. The box is of varying sizes, and > only goes away after a reboot. > > I've been using chrome every time it's happened, but I don't know that > it's caused by chrome specifically. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 > Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 > Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic i686 > .tmp.unity.support.test.0: > > ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 > Architecture: i386 > CompizPlugins: > [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,vpswitch,move,mousepoll,gnomecompat,snap,compiztoolbox,wall,regex,resize,imgpng,place,animation,resizeinfo,grid,fade,session,workarounds,expo,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,ezoom,unityshell] > CompositorRunning: compiz > Date: Fri Feb 24 14:27:47 2012 > DistUpgraded: Log time: 2012-02-17 15:21:15.462721 > DistributionChannelDescriptor: > # This is a distribution channel descriptor > # For more information see > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor > canonical-oem-dell-lucid-une-20100427-1 > DistroCodename: precise > DistroVariant: ubuntu > GraphicsCard: > Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller > (primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) > Subsystem: Dell Latitude D630 [1028:01f9] > Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:01f9] > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid" - Build i386 LIVE Binary > 20100427-14:29 > MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D630 > PccardctlIdent: > Socket 0: > no product info available > PccardctlStatus: > Socket 0: > no card > ProcEnviron: > TERM=xterm > PATH=(custom, user) > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-17-generic > root=UUID=fa8d2464-5942-4868-877b-6bed2f9b7c15 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > SourcePackage: unity > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-18 (6 days ago) > dmi.bios.date: 01/11/2008 > dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.bios.version: A06 > dmi.board.name: 0KU184 > dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.chassis.type: 8 > dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA06:bd01/11/2008:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD630:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0KU184:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: > dmi.product.name: Latitude D630 > dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. > version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5 > version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A > version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev > 1:2.6.99.901+git20120126-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati > 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel > 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 Title: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 940603] Re: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it
We've got it now, and reports are coming in from our users that they are no longer seeing the white boxes. Good news indeed, and thanks! On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz-plugins- > main/1:0.9.7.0~bzr19-0ubuntu10 > > seems not? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 > > Title: > white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications > from using stuff under it > > Status in Compiz Animations Plugin: > Fix Committed > Status in Compiz Core: > Invalid > Status in Compiz Main Plugins: > Fix Committed > Status in Unity: > Fix Released > Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “compiz” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in “compiz-plugins-main” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > I've had this happen 3 times now. I've gotten a white rectangular box > show up in the corner of the screen. The box is of varying sizes, and > only goes away after a reboot. > > I've been using chrome every time it's happened, but I don't know that > it's caused by chrome specifically. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 > Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 > Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic i686 > .tmp.unity.support.test.0: > > ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 > Architecture: i386 > CompizPlugins: > [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,vpswitch,move,mousepoll,gnomecompat,snap,compiztoolbox,wall,regex,resize,imgpng,place,animation,resizeinfo,grid,fade,session,workarounds,expo,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,ezoom,unityshell] > CompositorRunning: compiz > Date: Fri Feb 24 14:27:47 2012 > DistUpgraded: Log time: 2012-02-17 15:21:15.462721 > DistributionChannelDescriptor: > # This is a distribution channel descriptor > # For more information see > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor > canonical-oem-dell-lucid-une-20100427-1 > DistroCodename: precise > DistroVariant: ubuntu > GraphicsCard: > Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller > (primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) > Subsystem: Dell Latitude D630 [1028:01f9] > Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:01f9] > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid" - Build i386 LIVE Binary > 20100427-14:29 > MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D630 > PccardctlIdent: > Socket 0: > no product info available > PccardctlStatus: > Socket 0: > no card > ProcEnviron: > TERM=xterm > PATH=(custom, user) > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-17-generic > root=UUID=fa8d2464-5942-4868-877b-6bed2f9b7c15 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > SourcePackage: unity > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-18 (6 days ago) > dmi.bios.date: 01/11/2008 > dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.bios.version: A06 > dmi.board.name: 0KU184 > dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.chassis.type: 8 > dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA06:bd01/11/2008:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD630:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0KU184:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: > dmi.product.name: Latitude D630 > dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. > version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5 > version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A > version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev > 1:2.6.99.901+git20120126-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati > 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel > 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 Title: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm
Sorry for the churn here. I'm not actually concerned about the bug in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662141. I agree that's user error, and there's nothing particularly crucial about improving the error reporting here. The bug at this point is that when the file does exist, and is zero- length, you get a crash in gvdb_table_is_valid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm
Also, on Ubuntu, there is no system table at all by default, so a failure to open one that's configured probably doesn't degrade the system much. ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm
When we crash, table->data is in fact null. I presume this is the expected behavior of g_mapped_file_get_contents for an empty file. Fixing the erroneous extra * will turn this into a check whether table->data is null. But that's still going to have a bug. If it returns zero, then dconf_engine_refresh_system will deconfigure that table, and that's wrong, because we want to use the .d directory for a textual definition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm
I submit that the importance of this bug is High. It completely prevents creating a system configuration as far as I can tell. There is no way to create a non-zero binary database. And zero-length binary databases are broken. (And the obvious fix also prevents loading of the textual ones in .d.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm
Please remove the reference to gnome-bugs #662141. This is NOT that bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 638498] Re: Contents files are not listed with checksums
** Summary changed: - debmirror ignores --getcontents + Contents files are not listed with checksums -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638498 Title: Contents files are not listed with checksums To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/638498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990740] Re: upgrading from lucid to precise fails
We have this problem too in doing in-place upgrade testing. Using -o APT::Immediate-Configure=false seems to work around it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990740 Title: upgrading from lucid to precise fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/990740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 990740] Re: upgrading from lucid to precise fails
I should be able to get the requested info on Monday. On May 18, 2012 6:30 PM, "Steve Langasek" wrote: > Still need someone to run the command Colin asked for in comment #16 so > we have enough information to reproduce this. > > ** Changed in: python-defaults (Ubuntu) > Status: Confirmed => Incomplete > > ** Changed in: python-defaults (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => High > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990740 > > Title: > upgrading from lucid to precise fails > > Status in “python-defaults” package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > Trying to "apt-get dist-upgrade" from lucid to precise I get the > following error: > > E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'python- > minimal'.Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for > details. (2) > > So I tried to upgrade just python-minimal and it failed the same: > > root@linux:/var/tmp# apt-get install python-minimal > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer > required: >libtext-csv-xs-perl libdbd-csv-perl libgs8 cpp-4.1 > Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. > The following extra packages will be installed: >libapt-inst1.4 libcurl3-gnutls librtmp0 lsb-release python > python-apport python-apt python-apt-common python-gdbm python-lxml > python-mysqldb python-pkg-resources python-problem-report >python-pycurl python-pysqlite2 python-simplejson > python-software-properties python-support python-twisted-bin > python-twisted-core python-zope.interface python2.7 python2.7-minimal > Suggested packages: >lsb python-doc python-tk python-apt-dbg python-gtk2 python-vte > python-apt-doc python-gdbm-dbg python-lxml-dbg python-egenix-mxdatetime > python-mysqldb-dbg python-distribute python-distribute-doc >libcurl4-gnutls-dev python-pycurl-dbg python-pysqlite2-doc > python-pysqlite2-dbg python-twisted-bin-dbg python-glade2 python-qt3 > python-wxgtk2.8 python2.7-doc binfmt-support > Recommended packages: >xz-lzma python-openssl python-pam python-serial > The following packages will be REMOVED: >python2.5 python2.5-minimal > The following NEW packages will be installed: >libapt-inst1.4 librtmp0 python-apt-common python2.7 python2.7-minimal > The following packages will be upgraded: >libcurl3-gnutls lsb-release python python-apport python-apt python-gdbm > python-lxml python-minimal python-mysqldb python-pkg-resources > python-problem-report python-pycurl python-pysqlite2 >python-simplejson python-software-properties python-support > python-twisted-bin python-twisted-core python-zope.interface > 19 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 2 to remove and 718 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/7,492kB of archives. > After this operation, 3,121kB disk space will be freed. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y > E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'python-minimal'.Please > see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) > > Clearly this is an acceptable situation when trying to upgrade from > one LTS to another. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 > Package: python-minimal 2.6.5-0ubuntu1 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 > Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 > Architecture: i386 > Date: Sat Apr 28 16:43:25 2012 > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcEnviron: > LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: python-defaults > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/990740/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990740 Title: upgrading from lucid to precise fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/990740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963533] [NEW] opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems
Public bug reported: In the ongoing version churn of opencryptoki and libopencryptoki0, we have users who are in the following state: Our archive (and apt-cache policy agrees) has version 2.3.1+dfsg- 3ubuntu4 for both opencryptoki and libopencryptoki0. But installed on the system are libopencryptoki0 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu4 and and opencryptoki 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1. apt-get dist-upgrade fails: You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: opencryptoki : Depends: libopencryptoki0 (= 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1) but 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu4 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. and apt-get -f install fails: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: opencryptoki The following packages will be upgraded: opencryptoki 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 518 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/49.7 kB of archives. After this operation, 1,024 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of opencryptoki: opencryptoki depends on libopencryptoki0 (= 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1); however: Version of libopencryptoki0 on system is 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu4. dpkg: error processing opencryptoki (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Errors were encountered while processing: opencryptoki E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is particularly bad because it cannot be automatically fixed. Our normal procedure (dpkg --configure -a, apt-get -f install, apt-get dist-upgrade) is unable to resolve the problem. ** Affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963533 Title: opencryptoki version churn has broken some systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963565] [NEW] opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running
Public bug reported: Version 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu4. opencryptoki postinst does invoke-rc.d opencryptoki start || exit $? In turn, /etc/init.d/opencryptoki [start] does start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile "/var/lib/opencryptoki/.slotid --exec /usr/sbin/pkcsslotd -- But if pkcsslotd is already running, this fails. # /etc/init.d/opencryptoki stop Stopping PKCS#11 slot daemon: pkcsslotd. # echo $? 0 # /etc/init.d/opencryptoki start Starting PKCS#11 slot daemon: # echo $? 1 Note as well that when it fails, it fails badly (no newline or error message). Here is the error from pkcsslotd: # ps augxw | grep pkcsslotd root 6351 0.0 0.0 20164 896 pts/0S+ 16:35 0:00 grep --color=auto pkcsslotd # /usr/sbin/pkcsslotd # echo $? 0 # /usr/sbin/pkcsslotd ERROR pkcsslotd[6395.755480320]: Shared memory creation failed (0x11) ERROR pkcsslotd[6395.755480320]: perform ipcrm -M 0x62000E67 # echo $? 1 ** Affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963565 Title: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963565] Re: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running
It is possible that this is the root cause underlying https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963533. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963565 Title: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 963565] Re: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running
Whoops, error in editing. the transcript of the failing init.d script should look like this: # /etc/init.d/opencryptoki stop Stopping PKCS#11 slot daemon: pkcsslotd. # echo $? 0 # /etc/init.d/opencryptoki start Starting PKCS#11 slot daemon: pkcsslotd. # echo $? 0 # /etc/init.d/opencryptoki start Starting PKCS#11 slot daemon: # echo $? 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963565 Title: opencryptoki postinst fails when pkcsslotd is already running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/963565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter
I'm frustrated that we have no time for delay and this information is in the bug. When I create an empty .d directory and no file, I get told that it cannot open the DB and an abort. On Apr 16, 2012 7:25 AM, "Sebastien Bacher" wrote: > Thomas, why did you wrote "There is no way to create a non-zero binary > database."? How did you try to create it? > > the "Key File Directories" section of the wiki Ryan pointed should cover > that, did you try to create a "/etc/dconf/db/local.d/something", what > did you put it in? Did you run "sudo dconf update" then? Do you get a > file /etc/dconf/db/local in result? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 > > Title: > Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter > > Status in A simple key-based configuration system: > New > Status in “d-conf” package in Ubuntu: > Triaged > Status in “d-conf” source package in Precise: > Triaged > > Bug description: > I'm trying to create a system dconf configuration, and it's causing > lightdm to crash. > > In /etc/dconf/profile/user I have > user-db:user > system-db:local > system-db:site > > Then I create empty files /etc/dconf/db/local and /etc/dconf/db/site. > > On start, lightdm crashes, and x-0-greeter.log has this: > > /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-greeter-session: line 35: 5782 > Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped) exec $@ > > If I remove the system configs, it works fine. > > If I don't have the empty files in /etc/dconf/db, I get a warning that > the local one can't be found, and then the crash (I don't get a > warning about the site one). > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter
I have tried update but I do not recall in what order. I could find no documentation for it and I do not recall seeing it mentioned on the sysadmin's guide page mentioned. On Apr 16, 2012 7:31 AM, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > I'm frustrated that we have no time for delay and this information is in > the bug. When I create an empty .d directory and no file, I get told that > it cannot open the DB and an abort. > On Apr 16, 2012 7:25 AM, "Sebastien Bacher" wrote: > >> Thomas, why did you wrote "There is no way to create a non-zero binary >> database."? How did you try to create it? >> >> the "Key File Directories" section of the wiki Ryan pointed should cover >> that, did you try to create a "/etc/dconf/db/local.d/something", what >> did you put it in? Did you run "sudo dconf update" then? Do you get a >> file /etc/dconf/db/local in result? >> >> -- >> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu >> Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 >> >> Title: >> Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter >> >> Status in A simple key-based configuration system: >> New >> Status in “d-conf” package in Ubuntu: >> Triaged >> Status in “d-conf” source package in Precise: >> Triaged >> >> Bug description: >> I'm trying to create a system dconf configuration, and it's causing >> lightdm to crash. >> >> In /etc/dconf/profile/user I have >> user-db:user >> system-db:local >> system-db:site >> >> Then I create empty files /etc/dconf/db/local and /etc/dconf/db/site. >> >> On start, lightdm crashes, and x-0-greeter.log has this: >> >> /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-greeter-session: line 35: 5782 >> Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped) exec $@ >> >> If I remove the system configs, it works fine. >> >> If I don't have the empty files in /etc/dconf/db, I get a warning that >> the local one can't be found, and then the crash (I don't get a >> warning about the site one). >> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions >> > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter
Note that I need to be able to have an empty DB so that I can have a site one I create and an empty one for the machine owner, as in the suggested config. On Apr 16, 2012 7:33 AM, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > I have tried update but I do not recall in what order. I could find no > documentation for it and I do not recall seeing it mentioned on the > sysadmin's guide page mentioned. > On Apr 16, 2012 7:31 AM, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" > wrote: > >> I'm frustrated that we have no time for delay and this information is in >> the bug. When I create an empty .d directory and no file, I get told that >> it cannot open the DB and an abort. >> On Apr 16, 2012 7:25 AM, "Sebastien Bacher" wrote: >> >>> Thomas, why did you wrote "There is no way to create a non-zero binary >>> database."? How did you try to create it? >>> >>> the "Key File Directories" section of the wiki Ryan pointed should cover >>> that, did you try to create a "/etc/dconf/db/local.d/something", what >>> did you put it in? Did you run "sudo dconf update" then? Do you get a >>> file /etc/dconf/db/local in result? >>> >>> -- >>> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu >>> Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 >>> >>> Title: >>> Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter >>> >>> Status in A simple key-based configuration system: >>> New >>> Status in “d-conf” package in Ubuntu: >>> Triaged >>> Status in “d-conf” source package in Precise: >>> Triaged >>> >>> Bug description: >>> I'm trying to create a system dconf configuration, and it's causing >>> lightdm to crash. >>> >>> In /etc/dconf/profile/user I have >>> user-db:user >>> system-db:local >>> system-db:site >>> >>> Then I create empty files /etc/dconf/db/local and /etc/dconf/db/site. >>> >>> On start, lightdm crashes, and x-0-greeter.log has this: >>> >>> /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-greeter-session: line 35: 5782 >>> Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped) exec $@ >>> >>> If I remove the system configs, it works fine. >>> >>> If I don't have the empty files in /etc/dconf/db, I get a warning that >>> the local one can't be found, and then the crash (I don't get a >>> warning about the site one). >>> >>> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions >>> >> -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981053] Re: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter
Ok, thank you very much (sorry for my impatience in the hastily written messages above while I was logging in to vpn). If I create an empty .d directory, and run "dconf update" it creates 61-byte database files and all is ok. So this bug is similar to the other one mentioned, in that it is a real bug (there should be an error message and not SIGSEGV for an improper database file), but it is not urgent and can wait just like the other for release. I notice that if the file is corrupted, there is all kinds of logic to detect this, and I'd suggest something similar to detect databases in which the initial header information can't be read should produce a warning of some kind and not a crash--much confusion would have been eliminated with that. I'd also strongly urge either writing a manpage for the "dconf" tool, or else some real in-tool documentation via the "help" command. "dconf help update" says only "update the system dconf databases", but if you don't already know what it does, this doesn't explain it. Perhaps "update system database files from information in key file (.d) directories" or something like that at least. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981053 Title: Creating system dconf configuration crashes Unity greeter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dconf/+bug/981053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 940603] Re: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it
Compiz and compiz-plugins-main are different packages with separate versioning. What version of compiz-plugins-main do you have, and when did you last log in? On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Lane wrote: > It just happened again to me this morning When trying to open chrome and > visit a G+ hangout. apt-cache says I have 0.9.7.6: > > bladernr@klaatu:~$ apt-cache policy compiz > compiz: > Installed: 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 > Candidate: 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 > Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 > > Title: > white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications > from using stuff under it > > Status in Compiz Animations Plugin: > Fix Committed > Status in Compiz Core: > Invalid > Status in Compiz Main Plugins: > Fix Committed > Status in Unity: > Fix Released > Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > Status in “compiz” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in “compiz-plugins-main” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > I've had this happen 3 times now. I've gotten a white rectangular box > show up in the corner of the screen. The box is of varying sizes, and > only goes away after a reboot. > > I've been using chrome every time it's happened, but I don't know that > it's caused by chrome specifically. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 > Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 > Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic i686 > .tmp.unity.support.test.0: > > ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 > Architecture: i386 > CompizPlugins: > [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,vpswitch,move,mousepoll,gnomecompat,snap,compiztoolbox,wall,regex,resize,imgpng,place,animation,resizeinfo,grid,fade,session,workarounds,expo,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,ezoom,unityshell] > CompositorRunning: compiz > Date: Fri Feb 24 14:27:47 2012 > DistUpgraded: Log time: 2012-02-17 15:21:15.462721 > DistributionChannelDescriptor: > # This is a distribution channel descriptor > # For more information see > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor > canonical-oem-dell-lucid-une-20100427-1 > DistroCodename: precise > DistroVariant: ubuntu > GraphicsCard: > Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller > (primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) > Subsystem: Dell Latitude D630 [1028:01f9] > Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:01f9] > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid" - Build i386 LIVE Binary > 20100427-14:29 > MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D630 > PccardctlIdent: > Socket 0: > no product info available > PccardctlStatus: > Socket 0: > no card > ProcEnviron: > TERM=xterm > PATH=(custom, user) > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-17-generic > root=UUID=fa8d2464-5942-4868-877b-6bed2f9b7c15 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > SourcePackage: unity > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-18 (6 days ago) > dmi.bios.date: 01/11/2008 > dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.bios.version: A06 > dmi.board.name: 0KU184 > dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.chassis.type: 8 > dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA06:bd01/11/2008:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD630:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0KU184:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: > dmi.product.name: Latitude D630 > dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. > version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5 > version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A > version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev > 1:2.6.99.901+git20120126-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati > 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 > version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel > 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 > version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603 Title: white box randomly shows up at top left corner blocking applications from using stuff under it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-animation-plugin/+bug/940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
[Bug 984379] [NEW] d-conf profile parser has painful line-length bug
Public bug reported: In engine/dconf-engine.c, the parser in dconf_engine_load_profile has a seekrit requirement that profile lines be less than eighty characters long, and generates an abort if it finds a longer line. This is entirely undocumented. For lines which specify databases, this establishes an entirely undocumented limitation on the length of the filenames for databases (much much less than the system limit). If it cannot be fixed (but really, it can easily be fixed), then the limitation needs to be documented. Worse, the line-length limitation is applied even to comment lines. That causes a disaster for sites which use version-control identity strings. Such strings are often the most important reason for a comment in a file like this, and often expand to quite long pathnames. Because the limitation is not documented at all, it is easy to test that comments in this file work (they do), and not see a problem until code is checked in and the version control system expands the comment into something more than eighty characters long. Fixing this is even more important than fixing it for lines which specify databases, actually. ** Affects: d-conf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984379 Title: d-conf profile parser has painful line-length bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-conf/+bug/984379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 984477] [NEW] unity-2d has no --reset option
Public bug reported: The existence of unity --reset is crucial, and the lack of it in unity- 2d is a serious shortcoming. Moreover, because unity-2d is silently substituted for unity if the screen doesn't support 3d acceleration, we have users who do not even know they are running unity-2d. (This is a tribute to the quality of the unity-2d work, by the way, so congrats!) That means that probably unity --reset should do it. But the bug here is that unity-2d cannot be sanely recovered if one's configuration becomes corrupted. ** Affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984477 Title: unity-2d has no --reset option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/984477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933870] Re: libnfsidmap2 fails to install
ping? running out of time on this... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933870 Title: libnfsidmap2 fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnfsidmap/+bug/933870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 788670] Re: segfault in screen/byobu in natty
It would be awesome if this fix can be released for precise to avoid an SRU. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788670 Title: segfault in screen/byobu in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/788670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 985884] [NEW] cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start)
Public bug reported: Similar symptom to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup- lite/+bug/929381, but obviously a different issue: $ sudo apt-get install cgroup-lite Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: cgroup-lite 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/3,490 B of archives. After this operation, 46.1 kB of additional disk space will be used. Selecting previously unselected package cgroup-lite. (Reading database ... 241656 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking cgroup-lite (from .../cgroup-lite_1.1_all.deb) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Setting up cgroup-lite (1.1) ... start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript cgroup-lite, action "start" failed. dpkg: error processing cgroup-lite (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: cgroup-lite E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) $ sudo start cgroup-lite start: Job failed to start $ ls -ld /usr/bin/cgroups-mount -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 850 Feb 9 00:56 /usr/bin/cgroups-mount $ ls -ld /sys/fs/cgroup drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 13:37 /sys/fs/cgroup $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup $ echo $? 32 $ mount | grep cgroup none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,uid=0,gid=0,mode=0755) $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-umount umount: cpu: not mounted umount: cpuacct: not found umount: memory: not found umount: devices: not found umount: freezer: not found umount: net_cls: not found umount: perf_event: not found $ mount | grep cgroup none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup $ echo $? 32 ** Affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985884 Title: cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/985884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 985899] [NEW] Item stops showing up on taskbar after being trashed and restored
Public bug reported: 1) Create a desktop shortcut 2) Launch it - this should create a specific entry on the left taskbar. 3) Lock the task to the taskbar. 4) Close it. 5) Move the desktop shortcut to the trash. (This should also get rid of the locked item in the taskbar, and does.) 6) Move the trashed shortcut back to the desktop. 7) Launch the process. Note that the application--which is now running--should show up in the launcher, but it doesn't. This does not *always* happen, but it almost always does; repeat the steps and it happens 3 out of 4 times. Step 1) is being done in the following way: 1) Launch Chrome. 2) Navigate somewhere. 3) Find the File menu; not in Chrome, but in the top bar, mac-style. 4) Create an Application shortcut on the desktop (NOT the launch bar). If this doesn't show up (and it comes and goes), try switching application focus. If it's grayed out, navigate to a different site. 5) Right-click on the new application shortcut and select Properties. 6) Change the icon to one of the ones under /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome. 7) Rename the shortcut 8) Delete the portion of the command that navigates to the site you don't care about 9) Set the command as desired (eg, --user-data-dir=something) 10) Close ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985899 Title: Item stops showing up on taskbar after being trashed and restored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/985899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 985884] Re: cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start)
I assume so. But I'm pretty sure we didn't do it. I'll grep when I'm back at a keyboard in the morning. Still, package installation should never fail for such a reason; this is a general problem with reflecting errors in unit scripts back to postinst. On Apr 19, 2012 7:40 PM, "Steve Langasek" wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Does this mean something else on your system had already mounted > cgroups? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985884 > > Title: > cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start) > > Status in “cgroup-lite” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Similar symptom to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup- > lite/+bug/929381, but obviously a different issue: > > $ sudo apt-get install cgroup-lite > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > The following NEW packages will be installed: >cgroup-lite > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0 B/3,490 B of archives. > After this operation, 46.1 kB of additional disk space will be used. > Selecting previously unselected package cgroup-lite. > (Reading database ... 241656 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking cgroup-lite (from .../cgroup-lite_1.1_all.deb) ... > Processing triggers for ureadahead ... > Setting up cgroup-lite (1.1) ... > start: Job failed to start > invoke-rc.d: initscript cgroup-lite, action "start" failed. > dpkg: error processing cgroup-lite (--configure): > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status > 1 > Errors were encountered while processing: > cgroup-lite > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > $ sudo start cgroup-lite > start: Job failed to start > > $ ls -ld /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 850 Feb 9 00:56 /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > > $ ls -ld /sys/fs/cgroup > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 13:37 /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy > mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ echo $? > 32 > > $ mount | grep cgroup > none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) > none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) > cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,uid=0,gid=0,mode=0755) > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-umount > umount: cpu: not mounted > umount: cpuacct: not found > umount: memory: not found > umount: devices: not found > umount: freezer: not found > umount: net_cls: not found > umount: perf_event: not found > > $ mount | grep cgroup > none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) > none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy > mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ echo $? > 32 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/985884/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985884 Title: cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/985884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 985884] Re: cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start)
Ah yes. We do have something that has already mounted them. So it seems that the start script should make sure things are mounted properly, but not fail because they are already mounted...unless it's in the wrong place, or in a conflicting manner. I don't think that's the case here, however. On Apr 19, 2012 10:40 PM, "Steve Langasek" wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Does this mean something else on your system had already mounted > cgroups? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985884 > > Title: > cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start) > > Status in “cgroup-lite” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Similar symptom to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup- > lite/+bug/929381, but obviously a different issue: > > $ sudo apt-get install cgroup-lite > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > The following NEW packages will be installed: >cgroup-lite > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0 B/3,490 B of archives. > After this operation, 46.1 kB of additional disk space will be used. > Selecting previously unselected package cgroup-lite. > (Reading database ... 241656 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking cgroup-lite (from .../cgroup-lite_1.1_all.deb) ... > Processing triggers for ureadahead ... > Setting up cgroup-lite (1.1) ... > start: Job failed to start > invoke-rc.d: initscript cgroup-lite, action "start" failed. > dpkg: error processing cgroup-lite (--configure): > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status > 1 > Errors were encountered while processing: > cgroup-lite > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > $ sudo start cgroup-lite > start: Job failed to start > > $ ls -ld /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 850 Feb 9 00:56 /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > > $ ls -ld /sys/fs/cgroup > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 13:37 /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy > mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ echo $? > 32 > > $ mount | grep cgroup > none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) > none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) > cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw,uid=0,gid=0,mode=0755) > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-umount > umount: cpu: not mounted > umount: cpuacct: not found > umount: memory: not found > umount: devices: not found > umount: freezer: not found > umount: net_cls: not found > umount: perf_event: not found > > $ mount | grep cgroup > none on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup (rw,cpu,cpuacct) > none on /dev/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,devices) > > $ sudo /usr/bin/cgroups-mount > mount: cgroup already mounted or /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu busy > mount: according to mtab, cgroup is mounted on /sys/fs/cgroup > > $ echo $? > 32 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/985884/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985884 Title: cgroup lite postinst fails (init script doesn't start) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/985884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993694] [NEW] unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1) Create new user. 2) Log in as that user to a Unity session. 3) Log out. 4) Log in as the same user to a Unity-2D session. I see a pointer on a background with no panel or notification area. Right-click brings up the expected menu. Ctrl-Alt- seems to be switching between (empty) workspaces: the UI responds at least. Attached is the .xsession-errors, which shows that unity-2d-panel has crashed repeatedly. ** Affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694 Title: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/993694/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993694] Re: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity
** Attachment added: "xsession-errors" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694/+attachment/3126833/+files/xsession-errors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694 Title: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/993694/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1078697] Re: Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages
I'm not so sure. It's true that the known attacks are collision attacks. Yet, collision attacks can be used to mount data-integrity attacks that replace specific files in archives, at least, with the trick at http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/356.pdf. That depends on having the colliding blocks happen to have enough bytes in them that the choice of colliding block functions as a jump table for a self-extracting archive. It obviously doesn't directly map to a .dsc. Generally people regard it as dead as soon as collisions are *found *even if nobody knows how to generate them. (Note that in the paper I cite above, they simply used the colliding blocks published by the original Chinese researchers, who at the time had not made public their strategy for finding collisions.) Someone interested in pwning md5 could well have built an extremely large library of colliding blocks by now, including with ones that look like tar headers and the like. I'm just not so confident. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:22 PM, William Grant wrote: > This needs fixing in apt-ftparchive before Launchpad can do anything. > > Also, MD5 collisions aren't hugely concerning here. It's a preimage that > would be more of a problem, and there's no serious preimage attack known > on MD5 today. I agree that this isn't a good situation, but it's not > "everything is broken with a few hours of computation" bad. > > ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided >Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078697 > > Title: > Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages > > Status in Launchpad itself: > Triaged > Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > As part of the Debian derivatives census, we are doing some checks on > all derivatives. We noticed that a number of source packages are missing > SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes. You may have inherited this issue from Debian, we > had the same issue until recently. Here are some sample messages from > the report below, which is generated daily. > > WARNING: source cvstrac 2.0.1-3: SHA-256 hashes but no hash for the dsc > file > WARNING: source cvstrac 2.0.1-3: SHA-1 hashes but no hash for the dsc > file > WARNING: source diveintopython 5.4-2ubuntu2: no SHA-256 hash > WARNING: source diveintopython 5.4-2ubuntu2: no SHA-1 hash > > http://dex.alioth.debian.org/census/Ubuntu/check-package-list > > Please ignore the warnings about GPG and InRelease stuff, they are due > to python-apt not supporting some things in Debian squeeze. > >affects launchpad >subscribe ubuntu-archive > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1078697/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078697 Title: Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1078697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1078697] Re: Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages
Yeah, I wouldn't worry about old releases, just the current ones (but that does include lucid, precise, and quantal, and oneiric unless it takes a while to sorto ut). On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, William Grant wrote: > It certainly should be regarded as entirely broken, but it's not world- > burningly critical to fix the old releases. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078697 > > Title: > Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages > > Status in Launchpad itself: > Triaged > Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > As part of the Debian derivatives census, we are doing some checks on > all derivatives. We noticed that a number of source packages are missing > SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes. You may have inherited this issue from Debian, we > had the same issue until recently. Here are some sample messages from > the report below, which is generated daily. > > WARNING: source cvstrac 2.0.1-3: SHA-256 hashes but no hash for the dsc > file > WARNING: source cvstrac 2.0.1-3: SHA-1 hashes but no hash for the dsc > file > WARNING: source diveintopython 5.4-2ubuntu2: no SHA-256 hash > WARNING: source diveintopython 5.4-2ubuntu2: no SHA-1 hash > > http://dex.alioth.debian.org/census/Ubuntu/check-package-list > > Please ignore the warnings about GPG and InRelease stuff, they are due > to python-apt not supporting some things in Debian squeeze. > >affects launchpad >subscribe ubuntu-archive > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1078697/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078697 Title: Ubuntu archive is missing SHA-1/SHA-256 hashes for some packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1078697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008344] Re: [Precise] Language selector won't allow me to install languages
Gunnar, the point here is that the code is checking the wrong thing. Nobody sat down and designed the current behavior. I believe that, in fact policykit *is* the way Ubuntu handles these things. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008344 Title: [Precise] Language selector won't allow me to install languages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/1008344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1135163] [NEW] d-i can't install against an https mirror
Public bug reported: It happens that d-i uses the wget from busybox, and as a result, it can't install against an https mirror. This is clearly not intended behavior, because apt-config is able to deal with https. Perhaps there should be a wget udeb that includes the right bits to have ssl support, or alternatively, busybox should support it. ** Affects: busybox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135163 Title: d-i can't install against an https mirror To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/1135163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125726] [NEW] boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start"
Public bug reported: We're seeing a race between if-up.d/ntpdate and the ntp startup script. 1) if-up.d/ntpdate starts. 2) if-up.d/ntpdate acquires the lock "/var/lock/ntpdate-ifup". 3) if-up.d/ntpdate stops the ntp service [which isn't running anyway]. 4) if-up.d/ntpdate starts running ntpdate, which bids UDP *.ntp 5) /etc/init.d/rc 2 executes "/etc/rc2.d/S20ntp start" 6) /etc/init.d/ntp acquires the lock "/var/lock/ntpdate". 7) /etc/init.d/ntp starts the ntp daemon. 8) The ntp daemon logs an error, complaining that it cannot bind UDP *.ntp. 9) if-up.d/ntpdate now starts the ntp service. The result is a weird churn, though ntpd does end up running at the end. Should these not be using the same lock file? ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125726 Title: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1125726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125726] Re: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start"
In addition, /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/ntp is *also* getting in on the act, doing an ntp restart when it sees ntp service information from the DHCP server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125726 Title: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1125726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125726] Re: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start"
We're seeing a possibly related problem on first boot, with more painful consequences. Our install process does a puppet run in the late_command, and then a reboot, and then another puppet run happens on boot. In that first boot to the installed system, we're seeing ntp start once and fail, reporting that it cannot bind UDP *.ntp, and then it doesn't run at all. This is different from the symptom I noticed above. I agree that bug 246203 was a real bug with the old way; that certainly explains why simply using the same lock file will not be good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125726 Title: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1125726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882685] Re: lucid linux-firmware lacks ath3k driver update
Our user confirms that 1.34.13 solves the problem on lucid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882685 Title: lucid linux-firmware lacks ath3k driver update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/882685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828319] [NEW] shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported
Public bug reported: /sbin/shadowconfig from the passwd package uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p". On some other Linux systems, the -p flag to these programs says to silently fix problems found in those files. But the Ubuntu Lucid versions do not actually do that. The Ubuntu Lucid versions ignore the -p option, and then go ahead and prompt for confirmation before making changes. This can be dangerous at install time. If the install image has problems in the group or passwd files (for example, mention of an unknown user in the group file), then finish-install's postinst will call 06user-setup, which calls user-setup-apply, which calls shadowconfig. When that prompts for input, the install will hang. This with passwd version 1:4.1.4.2-1ubuntu2.2, which includes shadowconfig, grpck, and pwck. ** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828319 Title: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/828319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828319] Re: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported
[Not sure why launchpad is insisting on labelling this package "shadow", but on lucid it's "passwd".] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828319 Title: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/828319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828319] Re: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported
Oh, that's the source package name. This bug is also in the Debian stable version of the package as well. ** Also affects: shadow (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828319 Title: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/828319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828319] Re: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported
Reported to Debian bts as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638263. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #638263 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638263 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828319 Title: shadowconfig uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p" which aren't actually supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/828319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817269] Re: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS
The following patch solves the problem. ** Attachment added: "use-read-locks" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/817269/+attachment/2290468/+files/use-read-locks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817269 Title: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/817269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817269] Re: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS
Thank you, David. I've joined that list and added my thoughts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817269 Title: Pulseaudio lock of pulsecookie file is pessimal on NFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/817269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377367] Re: gnome-terminal doesn't handle colons in URLs
This affects lucid; can the patch be pulled in to an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377367 Title: gnome-terminal doesn't handle colons in URLs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/377367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Marc Deslauriers < marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote: > Actually, we do want a reboot notification when we issue security > updates. When we issue security updates, we don't enter the major > upgrade section, as we don't want the update to automatically restart > services, but we do want the sysadmin to perform a planned > reboot/service restart as the running services will be using a > vulnerable openssl. > > I'm upload a fix to move the notification to the upgrade section instead > of the major upgrade section. No, this is fundamentally incorrect. This would be ok *only *if you had some sensible isolation between servers and clients. It is ridiculous that user workstations running no servers at all get told to reboot because of a security change to ssl. We had to engineer a whole system to prevent the reboot notifications from being honored on our workstations because the have been so sloppily and carelessly set, with incorrect reasoning like this. *Any *library could need a security update; *any *library could have a security update which is relevant to running services, and it is *not *correct to force reboots on every package install merely because *sometimes *on *some *systems it might be necessary for the security fix. We do not force reboots when firefox gets a security fix, or sh, or ... and that's the right thing. openssl is *not *different than the rest of these. Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 Title: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
How do you distinguish a server from a desktop, and what about servers that don't run ssl-using daemons? Thomas On Oct 4, 2011 2:05 PM, "Marc Deslauriers" wrote: > We've already removed reboot notifications from openssl on desktops, I'm > just talking about servers. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Goobuntu > Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 > > Title: > Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. > > Status in “openssl” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > The postinst script for libssl0.9.8 currently has a bug where it sends > a reboot notifcation whenever libssl is configured. So reconfiguring > libssl0.9.8 or even just installing libssl0.9.8 will result in a > reboot notification. Sending of the reboot notification should > definitely be moved inside the upgrading guard. The correct fix is > likely to move it inside a version comparison guard for particular > important updates like Colin suggests below -- this is what every > other standard package using notify-reboot-required does. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 Title: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Marc Deslauriers < marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote: > Right now, the best way we have of determining if we're a server or a > desktop is to check if X is running. It's not ideal, and suggestions are > welcome. > I think my question is suggesting that there really isn't a principled distinction between "desktop" and "server" for things like this. > We need a way for sysadmins to get notifications that some of the major > automatic updates they are installing, such as openssl and the kernel, > require services and/or the system to get restarted after a security > update. The mechanism we have now is the reboot notification tool. > It's the right tool, but the correct approach is the standard one: Debian packages should do in-place upgrades, except the kernel. With libc much work was spent figuring out what to restart and how, and it works. openssl should do the same thing. > I agree that a lot of libraries can have security issues also, and in > fact, most of the server packages will gracefully restart when they get > security updates. For openssl, and a few other select libraries, things > are different. Security issues in openssl usually are of importance for > network servers, and automatically restarting all the running daemons > isn't an option, especially since the server could be running software > that wasn't installed from packages in the archive. In this case, the > reboot notification indicates to the sysadmin that manual intervention > is needed. If the sysadmin decides that nothing on his server is > affected, he can simply remove the reboot notification file. Yes, this > solution is far from perfect, but the alternative is to disable > notifications completely, which is not a viable option. Not running X doesn't mean that someone is running ssl servers, right? Why not look for ssl servers, specifically, and only if there are ssl servers running, call for the reboot? Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 Title: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988079] Re: [nvidia] Dismal compiz performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor
Daniel, this isn't only a performance bug; it's a correctness bug. One consequence of this is, for example, outright rendering errors in chrome. (IOW, we need this in an SRU for precise). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079 Title: [nvidia] Dismal compiz performance on HP Z600 with 30" landscape monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/988079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032831] [NEW] zgrep - doesn't work if is two digits or greater
Public bug reported: Create a gzipped file: $ for i in $(seq 1 100); do echo $i; done > file.txt $ gzip file.txt Then: $ zgrep -9 17 file.txt.gz 8 9 ... 25 26 works. But: $ zgrep -10 17 file.txt.gz gzip: 17.gz: No such file or directory fails. Note that "grep -9 17 file.txt" and "grep -10 17 file.txt" work just fine. ** Affects: gzip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032831 Title: zgrep - doesn't work if is two digits or greater To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gzip/+bug/1032831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032831] Re: zgrep - doesn't work if is two digits or greater
Given the easy workaround and the lack of urgency, I'd be happy for this to just get rolled out in the ordinary course of events. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032831 Title: zgrep - doesn't work if is two digits or greater To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1032831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993694] Re: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity
Yes, I can confirm that these packages work for us. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694 Title: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-conf/+bug/993694/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1040358] [NEW] please make bash-completion do nothing in non-interactive shells
Public bug reported: A wishlist item: bash_completion is only sensible in interactive shells. Using it in non-interactive shells slows down startup and makes it possible for a chatty completion (something which echoes output) to break things like rsync. Would make things more robust. ** Affects: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040358 Title: please make bash-completion do nothing in non-interactive shells To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/1040358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925421] Re: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
What needs to happen for the SRU here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421 Title: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/925421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933943] Re: rsyslogd please apply patch for large group handling
Why does this say "Fix Released" if it's not released in Ubuntu? What package should I wait for? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933943 Title: rsyslogd please apply patch for large group handling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsyslog/+bug/933943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993694] Re: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity
I'd be happy to Didier, but I don't know the best way to generate one. I'll be happy to try if you provide instructions. However, I'm not sure why you expect to see a stack trace; it looks as though the program is getting a BadWindow error from the X Server and exiting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694 Title: unity-2d does not start if user has logged in on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/993694/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925421] Re: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
I just tried following the instructions here and it happened the very first time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421 Title: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/925421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925421] Re: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
And this is indeed with unity 5.12-0ubuntu1.1. I did exactly what was described: - start something (let's say gedit) from the dash - right click on the launcher icon and pick "lock to launcher" - close it - click on the launcher icon - right click on the launcher icon and pick "unlock from launcher" The icon disappeared from the launcher and was not visible in Alt-Tab. [Bug] Then I did this: - close gedit - open a new gedit from the dash The problem is still there: not in launcher and not in Alt-Tab. [Bug] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421 Title: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/925421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925421] Re: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
So I thought, "hey, I wonder if the gimp case is fixed". I did this: - start gimp from terminal - notice launcher icon - close gimp - launcher icon goes away - start gimp from launcher icon - and *two* copies of the gimp icon appear, both with three buttons. - Alt-Tab likeways sees two instances, each with the same windows. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421 Title: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/925421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925421] Re: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
So now this one says "Fix Committed" for unity-distro-priority, but AFAIK, nobody has fixed it anywhere. (If that's incorrect, I would dearly like to have a package to test.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421 Title: sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/925421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
