[Bug 48213] Re: Ubuntu 6.06: no GUI support for NFS shares

2007-08-02 Thread Rechner-Tester
I can confirme this bug/missing feature.

Also I don't know the status of gui support for nfs in later ubuntu
releases, i suggest setting the severity to high since this maybe an
criticial cirteria for buisness enviroments and an major problem for
usability.

Grettings

Rechner-Tester

PS: Thx for this bug report. It saved me much time in searching like
insane for a solution and installing many packages ;-)

-- 
Ubuntu 6.06: no GUI support for NFS shares
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 94020] Re: [needs packaging] seamonkey

2007-04-23 Thread Rechner-Tester
I need seamonkey too.
And for the next LTS version of ubuntu  please don't forget a way to  emigrate 
mozilla (suit) profils to seamonkey 

THX

-- 
[needs packaging] seamonkey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92778] mozilla-locale-de-at: conflicting dependencies

2007-03-16 Thread Rechner-Tester
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: mozilla-locale-de-at

Hi there,
my first bugreport so please be kind :-)


Problem:
mozilla-locale-de-at has the following dependencies:
  
  Depends: mozilla-browser (>= 2:1.7.12)
  Conflicts: mozilla-browser (>= 2:1.7.12.0)

apparently this can't be solved.


Conditions:
After dist-upgrading from 6.06 to 6.10

Effect:
After dist-upgrading mozilla suit (package mozilla-browser) appears with 
english gui instead of german gui.
Package mozilla-locale-de-at is removed (but not purged) and can't be 
reinstalled without removing the following packages: mozilla, 
mozilla-chatzilla, mozilla-mailnews, mozilla-psm.
(It's unnecessary to stat removing this packages to install their translation 
makes no sense at all, is it? :-)


Greetings

Rechner-Tester

** Affects: mozilla-locale-de-at (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
mozilla-locale-de-at: conflicting dependencies
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92778

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424863] Re: reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution

2009-11-23 Thread Rechner-Tester
** Changed in: x11-xserver-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424863] Re: reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution

2009-11-23 Thread Rechner-Tester
How can i add the output from ubuntu-bug to this report? I copy 'n pasted the 
title/description and he askes me:
"Is "reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution" one of these bugs?" but this 
one dosent shows up. Thought this was about the status invalid but changing 
dosen't find my bug anyway :-(
Most userfriendly would be: ubuntu-bug xorg -add  or an option in the 
webinterface: This are additional informations. Add to bug 

-- 
reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461864] Re: [FFe] Update Seamonkey to 2.0.x

2010-04-15 Thread Rechner-Tester
Am I getting this right? There is a chance for SM 2 in lucid? That would
be great news ^_^

Nikola M: Yes, I thought about "doing something". But since I have to do
an internship (May be I should write to canoical?) and write my diploma
thesis this year I'm very cautious with this.

-- 
[FFe] Update Seamonkey to 2.0.x
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461864] Re: [FFe] Update Seamonkey to 2.0.x

2010-04-15 Thread Rechner-Tester
BTW: What does the tag [FFe] stands for?

-- 
[FFe] Update Seamonkey to 2.0.x
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-04 Thread Rechner-Tester
As I allready wrote in #542750

Since SM 2.0 is out since month, lucid definitly should ship the newer version!
 -SM 1.1.17 isn't up to date. The last 1.1 is 1.1.19
 -SM 1.1 at all is completely outdated since at least 1/2 year. There are many 
unfixed security issues and we won't see any fixes.
 -SM2 is technically much closer to FF. So maintenance should be much easier
 -Is it a good idea to ship such an old software like SM 1.1 for the next 2-3 
years? (lucid is a LTS version)

I hate to say this: If we can't ship with SM 2.x, SM 1.1 should be
removed for security, image and maintanance reasons.

Grettings

-- 
Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-04 Thread Rechner-Tester
What won't happen? SM 2.0 in lucid? 
Yes I know there is nearly now chance because feature freeze is reached. But 
what is the alternative? Shipping SM 1.1.x for the next 3 years? I think it's 
better not shipping SM at all. That's my point.

-- 
Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-05 Thread Rechner-Tester
Wladimir: Also I'm afraid you're right saying 1.1.17 is going to ship with 
lucid, just saying "process is King" without any further arguments isn't enough 
to solve a problem.
And "it's the truth" that there is a problem with SM in Ubuntu:

- SM 2.0.0 was released on 27. oct 09, 2 days before carmic was released. So SM 
2 was available from the first day of lucid development 
- This bugreport was filled at the same day SM 2 was released.
- There is a debian package since 4. nov 09 like correctly stated from 
suspicous1 at the end of november.
- Lucid is still shipping with SM 1.1.17 which was released on 22.06.2009. The 
Update to 1.1.18 from 3.09.09 is still missing.

My question is: What's going wrong here with the "process", and is there 
something we can do to fix it?
And that's the way my posting should be read: As a suggestion for a fix (add SM 
2) or workarround (remove SM 1.1.x) for a bug i found when i was playing 
arround with Lucid Beta1.

-- 
Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 542750] Re: package seamonkey-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/seamonkey/components/libnecko.so'

2010-03-20 Thread Rechner-Tester
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41420861/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41420862/Df.txt

** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41420863/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41420864/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
package seamonkey-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: failed in 
buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during 
`./usr/lib/seamonkey/components/libnecko.so'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 542750] Re: package seamonkey-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/seamonkey/components/libnecko.so'

2010-03-20 Thread Rechner-Tester
Ah, thanks. Seems lieke 512Mb Ram isn't enough.
What about my considerations about SM2?


Since SM 2.0 is out since month, shouldn't lucid ship the newer version?
 -SM 1.1.17 isn't up to date. The last 1.1 is 1.1.18
 -SM 1.1 at all is completely outdated since at least 1/2 year. There are many 
unfixed security issues and we won't see any fixes.
 -SM2 is technically much closer to FF. So maintenance should be much easier
 -Is it a good idea to ship such an old software like SM 1.1 for the next 2-3 
years? (lucid is a LTS version)

-- 
package seamonkey-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: failed in 
buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during 
`./usr/lib/seamonkey/components/libnecko.so'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424863] [NEW] reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution

2009-09-05 Thread Rechner-Tester
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: x11-xserver-utils

runing "systemtest" xserver reports 1400x1400 as maximum resolution. Maybe this 
is only a typo.
I'm not sure if "systemtest" added all details. If not drop me a message.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Sep  5 14:55:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Alpha i386 (20090902.1)
MachineType: LENOVO 2007ZT6
Package: x11-xserver-utils 7.4+2ubuntu1
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed 
boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet --  debian-installer/language=de 
console-setup/layoutcode?=de
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5
 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3
 libdrm2 2.4.12+git20090801.45078630-0ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090825.fc74e119-0ubuntu1
SourcePackage: x11-xserver-utils
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686
XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
XorgLogOld: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
'/var/log/Xorg.0.log.old'
dmi.bios.date: 09/12/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 79ETE3WW (2.23 )
dmi.board.name: 2007ZT6
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr79ETE3WW(2.23):bd09/12/2008:svnLENOVO:pn2007ZT6:pvrThinkPadT60:rvnLENOVO:rn2007ZT6:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 2007ZT6
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T60
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
fglrx: Not loaded
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 architecture:   i686kernel: 2.6.31-9-generic

** Affects: x11-xserver-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424863] Re: reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution

2009-09-05 Thread Rechner-Tester
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367228/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367229/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367230/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367231/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367232/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367233/PciDisplay.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367234/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367235/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367236/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367237/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367243/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367253/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367262/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367274/glxinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367284/setxkbmap.txt

** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367285/xdpyinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31367299/xkbcomp.txt

-- 
reporting 1400x1400 as maximum resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg

2010-11-16 Thread Rechner-Tester
Thank you for your feedback Luca, but I'm quite sure this bug here never 
affected you. This bug is about:
 "Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg"
but you wrote:"SOLVED for my INTEL 4965..."

Maybe your was affected by an other bug?

-- 
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 579300] Re: Please disable CONFIG_SOUND_OSS* and CONFIG_SND_*OSS*

2010-12-03 Thread Rechner-Tester
As yota (ironical) wrote in comment #89:

> Fix potential issue with multi-channel ordering when seeking/pausing
if using OSS [25878] <- LOOK: ACTIVE OSS DEVELOPMENT IN 2010!!! THIS IS
MADNESS! ;-)


...and clarified  in comment #102:
>Moreover I'm not an audio expert but it comes to mind also that OSS is 
>portable while ALSA is linux only, and so this choice damages various BSD 
>flavours and fragment the opensource sound landscape.

ALSA is Linux only, while OSS - shabby as it may be compared to ALSA - is much 
more portable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Sound_System says OSS is 
available on "11 major Unix-like operating systems"). 
So maybe we don't need OSS, but we (optional) need the ALSA OSS-emulation.
  - To not break the whole *nix Sound landscape in to a Linux and a Unix part
  - To not break many applications and games
  - To not harm the end user experience
  - To not be offensive to application/game developers which want to develop 
multi platform programs 

Blacklisting sounds like a compromise for me. But how does removing with no or 
only short-term announcing fits to the ubuntu 
philosophy to be "people's allegiances and relations with each other" 
(https://help.ubuntu.com/10.10/about-ubuntu/C/about-ubuntu-name.html)? In my 
opinion it's offensive to users and developers.

Don't get me wrong: I'm sure there are reasons to drop OSS Support but please 
do it a long-term way to give developers and users the chance to prepare.
Compiling but blacklisting dosn't harm anybody or anything, but gives an option 
for an easy workaround while still bringing the plans to drop OSS support into 
focus.

regards

Rechner-Tester

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579300

Title:
  Please disable CONFIG_SOUND_OSS* and CONFIG_SND_*OSS*

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742517] Re: [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

2011-04-04 Thread Rechner-Tester
The process mentioned in comment #3 is kondemand/2
There is no day without at least 1-3 crashes and with every crash I'm loosing a 
few minutes of work. Please have a look at this problems. Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742517

Title:
  [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742517] Re: [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

2011-03-30 Thread Rechner-Tester
I've missed some information which might be relevant:

- I'm using a dual display setup
- I can restart Xorg with kill -9 PID but not with kill, kill -2, kill -14 or 
kill -15
- Xorg "only" uses about 90% CPU time, 10% are used by an other process which 
name I will report as soon as xorg hangs again (hopefully never ^^)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742517

Title:
  [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669223] Re: tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot

2011-08-13 Thread Rechner-Tester
Hi Evgeni,

I can not figure out to much use cases where someone wants to install this 
module without permanently using it.
Further more I can't remember having read a warning. (It has been a long time 
since then. So maybe I just forgot about it)

Anyway: if you really feel it's necessary to warn users about the
possibility of hardware damages, here a few suggestions to do so while
still improving the usability:

- Show the warning and a question if tp_smapi should be loaded
permanently using the dpkg capabilities to configure packages after
installation

- Put both, the warning and the module, as comment in /etc/modules.

- Add the warning to the package description.

cheers
Rechner-Tester

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669223

Title:
  tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tp-smapi/+bug/669223/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742517] [NEW] [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

2011-03-25 Thread Rechner-Tester
Public bug reported:

xorg freezes randomly with 99% cpu usage on one cpu core. I can still move the 
mouse and use ssh to login/restart. Switching to a console with CTRL + ALT +Fx 
or using CTRL + ALT + BACKSPACE (after enabling of course) doesn't work. 
Compize is disabled (no 3D support for the integrated graphics).
I believe (but I'm not sure) this happens when switching to an other 
application, showing the desktop or switching to an other virtual desktop.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.49-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 5497f10b27f332e9d439670f32142daf
CheckboxSystem: edda5d4f616ca792bf437989cb597002
DRM.card0.DP.1:
 status: disconnected
 enabled: disabled
 dpms: Off
 modes: 
 edid-base64:
DRM.card0.DP.2:
 status: disconnected
 enabled: disabled
 dpms: Off
 modes: 
 edid-base64:
DRM.card0.DP.3:
 status: disconnected
 enabled: disabled
 dpms: Off
 modes: 
 edid-base64:
DRM.card0.HDMI.A.1:
 status: connected
 enabled: enabled
 dpms: On
 modes: 1280x1024 1280x1024 1152x864 1024x768 1024x768 1024x768 832x624 800x600 
800x600 800x600 800x600 640x480 640x480 640x480 640x480 720x400
 edid-base64: 
AP///wA4o95lAQEBARUNAQOAJh6M6iyVplhKmiYhUFS/74BxT4GAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBMCoAmFEAKkAwcBMAeC0RAAAe/QAySx5SDgAKICAgICAg/ABORUMgTENEMTkyME5Y/wAzNTMxMjY4UUIKICAgAGY=
DRM.card0.HDMI.A.2:
 status: disconnected
 enabled: disabled
 dpms: Off
 modes: 
 edid-base64:
DRM.card0.HDMI.A.3:
 status: connected
 enabled: enabled
 dpms: On
 modes: 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 720x400
 edid-base64: 
AP///wAVw4kWAQEBASwNAQKAIht46u6Vo1RMmSYPUFShCACBgAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBMCoAmFEAKkAwcBMAUQ4RAAAe/wBCMjU0NjExMwogICAg/QA7PR9ACwAKICAgICAg/ABMNTU3CiAgICAgICAgAIU=
DRM.card0.VGA.1:
 status: disconnected
 enabled: disabled
 dpms: Off
 modes: 
 edid-base64:
Date: Fri Mar 25 15:42:30 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/Xorg
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007.1)
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-28-generic 
root=UUID=26dabed2-6396-44e0-9a54-890093452029 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: xorg-server
dmi.bios.date: 02/11/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1305
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P8H67-M EVO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1305:bd02/11/2011:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP8H67-MEVO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 codename:   maverick
 architecture:   x86_64
 kernel: 2.6.35-28-generic

** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742517

Title:
  [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742517] Re: [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

2011-03-25 Thread Rechner-Tester
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742517

Title:
  [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742517] Re: [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

2011-05-17 Thread Rechner-Tester
Sorry, but I can not upgrade to natty for various reasons, so I can not test 
this bug with natty.
It would be hard to reproduce it anyway, if at all:
- the GPU driver will change from VESA to intel with the upgrade.
- I still don't know how to reproduce this for sure.

But the situation improved very much:
In the last few weaks (maybe 5-7) my desktop only froze two times.
I suspect an update as the reason for this improvement.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742517

Title:
  [sandy bridge] xorg freezes with 100% cpu usage

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439448] Re: Visual corruption affecting several panel applets

2011-01-20 Thread Rechner-Tester
Indeed, I've enabled the weather report on every machine I installed.

** Description changed:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439448

Title:
  Visual corruption affecting several panel applets

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg

2010-11-07 Thread Rechner-Tester
What a mistake: "802.11a/g" in my last posting is wrong, it's "802.11a/n" . 
(802.11g is not 5GHz but 2,4GHz)
Sorry

-- 
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669176] [NEW] hdapsd: dependencies shout reflect package information

2010-10-31 Thread Rechner-Tester
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: hdapsd

hdapsd package information says:
"It is recommended that you use this daemon with the hdaps module provided
by tp-smapi rather the one in the kernel" 
The dependencies shout reflect this by adding tp-smapi-dkms as recommended.
This would also make hdapsd conform to the Debian Policy Manual (which says 
"The 'Recommends' field should list packages that would be found together with 
this one in all but unusual installations"). (The last sentences was party 
copied from Intrepid release notes :-)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: hdapsd (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 31 18:43:25 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: hdapsd

** Affects: hdapsd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
hdapsd: dependencies shout reflect package information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669176
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669176] Re: hdapsd: dependencies shout reflect package information

2010-10-31 Thread Rechner-Tester
Sorry, I missed to say that I really much would like to fix this bug on
my own. But couldn't find the necessary file (I looked here:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/i386/hdapsd/filelist ) to edit. Any
advices? Thanks

-- 
hdapsd: dependencies shout reflect package information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669176
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 158909] Re: smartmontools recommends mailx

2010-10-31 Thread Rechner-Tester
I can confirm the situation (bug?) for maverick. As a workaround I used:
sudo apt-get --no-install-recommends install smartmontools
as stated here: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseNotes#Recommended%20packages%20installed%20by%20default

-- 
smartmontools recommends mailx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158909
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669223] [NEW] tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot

2010-10-31 Thread Rechner-Tester
Public bug reported:

Installing tp-smapi-dkms doesn't result in loading tp_smapi at boot
time. I have to manually add tp_smapi to /etc/modules to take advantage.
This problem also exists with lucid installed on an other ThinkPad T60.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: tp-smapi-dkms 0.40-7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 31 21:04:49 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: tp-smapi

** Affects: tp-smapi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669223] Re: tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot

2010-10-31 Thread Rechner-Tester

-- 
tp-smapi-dkms: tp_smapi not loaded at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg

2010-11-03 Thread Rechner-Tester
I installed maverick on the above mentioned T60. Networkmanager shows me 
between 6-54 Mbit/s (and it recovers back to 48-54 Mbit/s even if it showed 
6Mbit/s before). Download speeds with synaptic are at ~2500kbyte/s, as 
expected. 
Maybe it's because I'm ruining my AP with 802.11a/g (5Ghz) only? Encryption is 
set to WPA2-Personal/AES only too.

-- 
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 347711] Re: Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller Unstable on Jaunty

2010-10-24 Thread Rechner-Tester
I could lately "fix" this problem by deactivating the energy saving option for 
the corresponding LAN port in the Router/Modem/Switch/AP-Box (AVM FritzBox 
3270, FW: 96.04.80).
Since I have no other operating system installed I unfortunately can not say if 
this is a problem with the FritzBox or if the kernel tries reducing the power 
consumption to aggressive

-- 
Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller Unstable on Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg

2010-10-27 Thread Rechner-Tester
I have a ThinkPad T60 here for installation, it has a 3945ABG and a Mobile 
Radeon X1300.
Just checked the maverick release notes because the lucid kernel doesn't 
support the Radeon power-management (at least not very well)
So I can choose between low network speed or high power consumption. Since this 
not my notebook maybe it would be better to go with the pre-installed windows 
than giving some one a bad impression of linux/ubuntu. Seems like a show 
stopper for me. :-(

-- 
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621265] Re: Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg

2010-10-28 Thread Rechner-Tester
Donny: Thank you for sharing your experience with me, but you got me wrong:
lucid (Kernel 2.6.32) doesn't support the *powermanagment for Radeon GPUs* very 
well (if you're using KMS).
My own T60 with Mobile Radeon X1400 takes about 18 watts with an installed 
lucid but only 12 watts with maverick rc live or this well known "other OS" 
;-), (all with lowest brightness to be comparable)
With maverick on the other hand I'll have my 12 watts but slow WiFi.

Greetings

-- 
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599849] Re: [SRU] Add Openbravo, Skype, Adobe Reader German and UEX to app-install-data-partner

2010-08-20 Thread Rechner-Tester
Just for information: 
I installed skype on lucid x86 before it was in the partner repro.by adding the 
repository http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ 
(see:https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Skype) 

After i get into notice that skype was included in the partner repro I
- purged skype and it's dependencies
- removed the skype repro
- reinstalled skype and it's dependencies from partner repro

 Was this really necessary to keep my installation clean and prober? How
is this (conflict?) case resolved if it is not done manually?

Thx

Rechner-Tester

-- 
[SRU] Add Openbravo, Skype, Adobe Reader German and UEX to 
app-install-data-partner
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599849
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 347711] Re: Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller Unstable on Jaunty

2010-06-24 Thread Rechner-Tester
Same problem here with lucid x86 on an asus P5B board.

lspci:
[...]
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI 
Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01)
[...]

-- 
Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller Unstable on Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs