[Bug 244341] Re: Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-MPlayer-1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15698358/Screenshot-MPlayer-1.png -- Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 244341] Re: Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Ekiga.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15698333/Screenshot-Ekiga.png -- Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 244341] [NEW] Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ekiga I am using a Philips SPC620NC webcam using the v4l2 driver. Ekiga's configuration druid successfully performs all the tests. I can also access the webcam using e.g. mplayer and get a correct picture. In ekiga however, the video display is mangled. It is solely in green and has horizontal stripes all over. I have attached a screenshot of both the correct mplayer and the mangled ekiga video. I am a bit surprised by the fact that there are a couple of bugs that describe similar effects for other video players, regardless of the source: Bug #236179, Bug #182532, Bug #163930. Note that I have neither a Intel nor a VIA graphics card but an ATI Radeon M300 and that I have disabled Compiz. I have found a message describing a similar problem with the v4l2 driver and the Creative Live! Cam Optia: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2007-March/msg00013.html In that case the fix was apparently pretty simple, so maybe the same solution can be applied here. The same problem with the Philips SPC620NC has also been reported in http://markmail.org/message/ulxctvbsshjiyf4p by a different person. ** Affects: ekiga (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 244341] Re: Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #540974 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540974 ** Also affects: ekiga via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540974 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Mangled video (only green + stripes) with SPC620NC and v4l2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203985] Re: evince-thumbnailer often hangs until killed
What kind of example do you mean? There is already a complete backtrace available. -- evince-thumbnailer often hangs until killed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253560] Re: PDF Checkboxes are shown checked when unchecked and vice versa
** Attachment added: "DS 157 Niko.pdf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16437557/DS%20157%20Niko.pdf ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #545649 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545649 ** Also affects: evince via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545649 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- PDF Checkboxes are shown checked when unchecked and vice versa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253560] [NEW] PDF Checkboxes are shown checked when unchecked and vice versa
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Please take a look at the attached PDF file. If you open it in evince, the "Yes" checkboxes in 11, 14 and 16 are marked, and the "No" checkboxes are not marked. If you open the same file in Acrobat Reader, the "No" checkboxes are marked and the 'Yes' checkboxes are unmarked. Something seems wrong here. ** Affects: evince Importance: Unknown Status: New ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- PDF Checkboxes are shown checked when unchecked and vice versa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralph Corderoy wrote: >> It is a bug in that, under Unix, by design, that should *never* happen >> to a process running as root. > > Maybe 20 years ago, but these days being root does NOT mean you can do > anything ( take a look at SELinux ). Heck, even 20 years ago root ran > into issues like this with NFS. .gvfs is working as designed. There is a difference between being able to impose specific restrictions even on the root account (SELinux) and the root account in general not being able to access all files in /home (as happening with gvfs). In other words, using SELinux does not prevent you from accessing /home/* (or any other directory) unless you chose to *configure* it that way. The fact that NFS has its bug is not a justification for not fixing similar bugs in gvfs. >> Nikolaus Rath and S B, take a look at my earlier comment >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/225361/comments/11 I >> understand this configuration of FUSE has been chosen because of >> security concerns, as opposed to using its allow_users or allow_root >> options. However, I'm not sure those concerns remain valid given Ubuntu >> automatically mounts the filesystems on a USB flash drive I insert, and >> I doubt every piece of filesystem code in the kernel is robust against >> maliciously concocted corrupt filesystems. > > AFAIK, the allow_root option does not work because .gvfs requires the > kernel keyring for authentication. I don't quite understand what you mean. In which way does the passing of an option to the FUSE library effect authentication? gvfs will run exactly the same way. > Same goes for ecryptfs mounted > ~/private. Root can't access it because the process doesn't have the > decryption key on its keyring. I don't know about ecryptfs, but a fuse filesystem does not need to run as root in order for --allow-root to work (is this what you assume?). > At the end of the day programs simply have to deal with access > denied errors, even when run as root. This bug was marked as invalid > both here and upstream because this point will not change. I would probably agree with you here. But the thing is that programs don't get a simple access denied error. If I have rx permissions on a directory, then I ought to be able to stat() everything in it. This does not work if there is a fuse mounted .gvfs in there. Changing the behavior to allowing root to stat() the directly (but not granting read- or execute permissions) would probably also fix most of the issues. Best, -Nikolaus -- »It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.« -J.H. Hardy PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ Should root be able to access everything? ] BUGabundu is right, this discussion probably belongs somewhere else. So let my just state my main point again: using --allow-root does not have any negative side effects and would prevent many applications from needing fixing. > I believe the gvfs uses the kernel keyring for authentication to > remote network resources and such, ergo simply being root can not > grant you access. gvfs does not need to be root in order for --allow-root to work. So this shouldn't be a problem. >> Changing the behavior to allowing root to stat() the directly (but not >> granting read- or execute permissions) would probably also fix most of >> the issues. > > Hrm it does seem like you should be able to stat the mount point > itself. How would this solve the problem though? find often > complains that it can't stat() temporary files that have been > unlinked between the readdir() call and the stat(). Any calling > script should not be upset by such errors. Yes, but here the situation is different: readdir() returns an entry that cannot be stat()ed. In the above case, we simply have a race condition between stat() and readdir(). But this does not belong here either, so I will try to get this change into FUSE. Best, -Nikolaus -- »It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.« -J.H. Hardy PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 26986] Re: Remote syslog logging paralyzes system
Why should syslog perform a dns lookup when I'm logging in on the *local* machine? I don't see any connection, but I'm going to try your suggestion anyway. -- Remote syslog logging paralyzes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] Re: Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
Does it really have to be run under intrepid? I run the same script under hardy and already attached it above. -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #560658 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560658 ** Also affects: gvfs (ALT Linux) via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560658 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
I am not going to argue about the definition of a bug. But why was this particular design chosen? It seems to me that it only causes the problems described above and does not have any positive effects. -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161820] Re: gnus summary skips over articles
Yes. Actually it has been confirmed upstream: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/100181/focus=67094 ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- gnus summary skips over articles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
Ralph Corderoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nikolaus Rath and S B, take a look at my earlier comment > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/225361/comments/11 I > understand this configuration of FUSE has been chosen because of > security concerns, as opposed to using its allow_users or allow_root > options. This is not a valid concern. In Ubuntu, allow_root is by default enabled in /etc/fuse.conf. So even if gvfs does not use --allow-root, a malicious user can simply mount a filesystem of his choice manually and with --allow-root. If --allow-root poses a security risk, it has to be disabled in /etc/fuse.conf and not in individual applications that happen to call fuse. Best, -Nikolaus -- »It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.« -J.H. Hardy PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 225361] Re: ~/.gvfs causes various errors
Ralph Corderoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nikolaus wrote: >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/225361/comments/11 >> > I understand this configuration of FUSE has been chosen because of >> > security concerns, as opposed to using its allow_users or allow_root >> > options. >> >> This is not a valid concern. In Ubuntu, allow_root is by default >> enabled in /etc/fuse.conf. > > In my untouched 8.04 /etc/fuse.conf, both mount_max and > user_allow_other are commented out, meaning the file has no active > options. Hmm. I'm running 8.04 as well, and here it is enabled. I don't remember changing it either. However, this is not a fresh install but has been upgraded several times, so maybe the setting survived from an older release. >> So even if gvfs does not use --allow-root, a malicious user can simply >> mount a filesystem of his choice manually and with --allow-root. > > It's my understanding that Ubuntu have set up automounting of user > filesystems (non-FUSE ones) so a malicious user can have root mount > their concocted filesystem anyway, so I'm not sure what the current > troublesome, non-Unix, FUSE configuration is protecting us from? Yes, I don't see any point in that either. Best, -Nikolaus -- »It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.« -J.H. Hardy PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- ~/.gvfs causes various errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 26986] Re: Remote syslog logging paralyzes system
I can't really believe it, but adding the fake entry to /etc/hosts really fixed the problem. So there seems to be something wrong with the way syslogd does the DNS lookups. -- Remote syslog logging paralyzes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] [NEW] Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center 1. Right click on on the desktop, choose "Change Desktop Background" 2. Make sure that there are some decently sized background pictures available for selection. If not, add them from somewhere. I tested this with 1280x1024 jpeg's 3. Click on 3 different wallpapers in sequence 4. Observe how your system becomes totally unusable for about 10 seconds while the desktop background fades from one picture to another This also happens when you only switch the background once, but the above procedure shows the problem more clearly. I understand that the fading effect might take some CPU time, but surely it should not take *that* much (tested with Dual Core 2.7 Ghz). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26674539/Dependencies.txt -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
Graphics card is onboard intel Intel(R) G45/G43, driver is intel. ** Attachment added: "xorg.conf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26685994/xorg.conf ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26686039/Xorg.0.log -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26686043/dmesg.txt -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
The process that's consuming the CPU time is /usr/X11R6/bin/X11. I'm using Compiz. If I disable compiz, is there a way to reenable it without losing my customized configuration (created with compiz settings manager)? I think if I set the Visual Effects (in the Appearance panel) to "None" and then back to "Normal", I will loose them. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375087] Re: Can't select current directory in open directory dialog
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #582616 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582616 ** Also affects: gtk via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582616 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Can't select current directory in open directory dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 8357] Re: Allow to set DPI resolution
Please also consider the points in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives /ubuntu-desktop/2008-December/001887.html -- Allow to set DPI resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359836] Re: Should prevent hibernation with mounted usb devices
chdir into the mountpoint before hibernating. -- Should prevent hibernation with mounted usb devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387462] Re: 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size
Almost. I'm saying that it happens even if openoffice.org-gnome is not installed. I have not tried to completely uninstall gnome on this system. The previous comment was probably badly put. I do not want to change the gnome dpi settings because it affects so many other applications (which all rely on it being set to 96dpi) and I think there should be a way to make openoffice ignore the gnome setting without completely uninstalling gnome. ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230627] Re: Firefox cannot open some PDF files
Yes, I am prompted to open the file with the Document Viewer as well. But have you tried to actually open it? This is when it fails. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Firefox cannot open some PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230627 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388453] [NEW] [Radeon X300] Console only monochrome
Public bug reported: When booting the Jaunty Alternative Installation CD with standard options, the screen flickers and goes blank about 2 times per second and the computer is effectively unusable. When booted with vga=792, this problem disappears and I can install the system. However, now I only have monochrome fonts on the text console. Everything that normally shows up in color is now in shades of grey (e.g. ls --color output). If I add vga=792 to the boot options of the *installed* system, then the screen goes totally blank (and stays that way) as soon as the kernel boots. I'm still able to restart with Ctrl-Alt-Del though. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=5f31041c-4857-472b-8195-1bef33d421f6 MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D810 Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.42 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=bea95951-d327-4837-81df-5159dc3f1178 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.42-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- [Radeon X300] Console only monochrome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388453] Re: [Radeon X300] Console only monochrome
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024660/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024661/CurrentDmesg.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024662/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024663/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024664/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024665/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024666/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024667/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28024668/ProcModules.txt -- [Radeon X300] Console only monochrome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388756] Re: Kernel resumes from Hibernation but X11 doesn't
** Attachment added: "/var/log/kern.log from hibernate & resume" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043772/kern.log ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043774/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043775/CurrentDmesg.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043776/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043777/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043778/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043779/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043780/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043781/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28043782/ProcModules.txt -- Kernel resumes from Hibernation but X11 doesn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388756 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388756] [NEW] Kernel resumes from Hibernation but X11 doesn't
Public bug reported: I can hibernate and resume Ubuntu Jaunty on a Dell Vostro 220s. But although the system seems to be fully operating after the resume, I regularly loose any X11 sessions, i.e. if I hibernate with several X11 applications running, I end up on the GDM login screen with all previously running applications killed after resume. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=/dev/mapper/vg0-swap_crypt MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 220s Series Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.42 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/vg0-root ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.42-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Kernel resumes from Hibernation but X11 doesn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388756 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359836] Re: Should prevent hibernation with mounted usb devices
It happens whenever there is a process running which has opened files or directories from the mountpoint, i.e. whenever umount fails. -- Should prevent hibernation with mounted usb devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114212] Re: fusermount: failed to open /dev/fuse: Permission denied
The problem reappeared in jaunty. Although fuse.conf has correct permissions, it still cannot be read: $ python /usr/share/doc/python-fuse/examples/hello.py -s -f -o allow_other ~/tmp fusermount: failed to open /etc/fuse.conf: Permission denied fusermount: option allow_other only allowed if 'user_allow_other' is set in /etc/fuse.conf Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/doc/python-fuse/examples/hello.py", line 92, in main() File "/usr/share/doc/python-fuse/examples/hello.py", line 89, in main server.main() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/fuse.py", line 713, in main main(**d) fuse.FuseError: filesystem initialization failed $ dir /etc/fuse.conf -rw-r- 1 root fuse 212 2009-05-26 12:34 /etc/fuse.conf ** Changed in: fuse (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - fusermount: failed to open /dev/fuse: Permission denied + REGRESSION: fusermount: failed to open /dev/fuse: Permission denied -- REGRESSION: fusermount: failed to open /dev/fuse: Permission denied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230627] Re: Firefox cannot open some PDF files
Here is an update of this bug.
It is still present in Jaunty and can be reproduced with the Jaunty
LiveCD. An updated test link is www.rath.org/output.pdf
The crucial trigger for the bug seems to be that the server delivers the
PDF document as application/x-download. I guess that this causes firefox
to try guess the actual content type, which it gets only halfway right
("PDF document" instead of the working "PDF file).
Here are the requested debugging information (note that the bug appears
without acroread installed):
[0] vostro:~$ apt-cache policy evince
evince:
Installed: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.26.0-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
[0] vostro:~$ apt-cache policy acroread
acroread:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 9.1.0-7jaunty2
Version table:
9.1.0-7jaunty2 0
500 http://archive.canonical.com jaunty/partner Packages
[0] vostro:~$ apt-cache policy firefox-3.0
firefox-3.0:
Installed: 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
Candidate: 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1
Version table:
*** 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Firefox cannot open some PDF files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230627
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84880] Re: firefox uploads files with wrong mimetype
Yes, it is still an issue with 3.0.11 from Jaunty. For me, PDFs are uploaded with mime type application/x-download. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- firefox uploads files with wrong mimetype https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84880 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387462] Re: 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27960911/Dependencies.txt -- 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387462] [NEW] 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org If Zoom is set to 100%, dimensions on the screen are not physically correct (as they should be). For example, an A4 page in OpenOffice Writer on the screen is much smaller than an actual A4 page held next to it. I suspect this is because OpenOffice does not use the dpi value as reported by X11 (127 dpi in this case) but the one set in Gnome Font properties (96 dpi by default) - thereby rendering everything too small. Applications like evince use the X11 dpi and display dimensions correctly. OpenOffice should follow suit. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-writer 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387462] Re: 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size
Uninstalling openoffice.org-gnome does not fix the problem. I'm setting status to new - it should be possible to have openoffice use correct dpi values without installing gnome-control-panel (which pulls in half the gnome desktop). ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- 100% Zoom does not correspond to physical size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 8357] Re: Allow to set DPI resolution
Can we please set this bug to a different priority than wishlist? It might be just a missing feature in gnome-control-center, but it causes bugs in other applications which then (probably rightly) blame gnome- control-center for providing wrong dpi values (e.g. bug 387462). I think this whole dpi issue should really be bumped up a bit in priority. -- Allow to set DPI resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
I just discovered that (in Jaunty), changing the acceleration method to UXA considerably reduces the impact of this bug (the above sequence only takes about 3 seconds now). I'm going to try the Karmic image soon. -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376030] Re: Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time
I tried to test this with Karmic, but I couldn't really get any conclusive results. Basically, the screen is broken at all times. Windows "loose" their decorations randomly, moving them around produces artifacts, and the whole system behaves really sloppy. So there was no real way to tell if things got worse while changing the background. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Changing desktop background eats up all available CPU time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393887] [NEW] evdev.xml lacks entry for geometry/kinesis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xkeyboard-config The Kinesis keyboard is defined in /usr/share/X11/xkb/geometry/kinesis, and also listed in /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev. However, it is not present in evdev.xml and can therefore not be chosen in the gnome keyboard preferences. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xkb-data 1.5-2ubuntu11 [modified: usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev.xml usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/pc] PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-13-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #44-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 2 07:57:31 UTC 2009 SourcePackage: xkeyboard-config Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 XorgConf: ** Affects: xkeyboard-config (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- evdev.xml lacks entry for geometry/kinesis https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393887] Re: evdev.xml lacks entry for geometry/kinesis
** Attachment added: "LsHal.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550131/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: "LsMod.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550132/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: "LsPci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550133/LsPci.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550134/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550135/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550136/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550137/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550138/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550139/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "system.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550140/system.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550141/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28550143/xkbcomp.txt -- evdev.xml lacks entry for geometry/kinesis https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381306] [NEW] New upstream version available for a long while
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-fuse The current fuse-python package has some obscure bugs in it that were fixed upstream quite a while ago. Citing Csaba Henk: | Yeah, I was able to reproduce with the Jaunty LiveCD. I bisected the | issue and found out that it occurs due to the bug fixed here: | | http://mercurial.creo.hu/repos/fuse-python-hg/index.cgi/rev/92f3f49abbc5 | | which has been committed just after the 0.2-pre3 release; cf. | Debuntu uses 0.2-pre3 for some mystical reason (as 0.2 is out there | since a long while...). | | So it's a Debuntu issue, ping Seb! (from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.fuse.devel/7903) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: python-fuse 1:0.2-pre3-9build1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: python-fuse Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: python-fuse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- New upstream version available for a long while https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381306 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381306] Re: New upstream version available for a long while
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27239428/Dependencies.txt ** Changed in: python-fuse (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- New upstream version available for a long while https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381306 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381507] [NEW] GUI doesn't show which packages are going to be removed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude Until some time ago, aptitude always showed a list of "packages being removed because they are no longer used" when pressing 'g' in GUI mode. This list is now no longer shown. I can only see the packages that are going to be upgraded and installed. Please make this list appear again. It is really a nasty surprise to see aptitude remove a big bunch of packages, when originally one only wanted to install a package. ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GUI doesn't show which packages are going to be removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381507] Re: Install / Remove Packages should ignore display limits
** Summary changed: - GUI doesn't show which packages are going to be removed + Install / Remove Packages should ignore display limits ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: aptitude + With a display limit of "!~M" (which is very useful to see only those packages you are actually interested in), + aptitude does not show which packages are going to be automatically removed in GUI mode. This can result in nasty surprises when aptitude continues to remove a big bunch of packages when originally one only wanted to install a package. - Until some time ago, aptitude always showed a list of "packages being - removed because they are no longer used" when pressing 'g' in GUI mode. - This list is now no longer shown. I can only see the packages that are - going to be upgraded and installed. - - Please make this list appear again. It is really a nasty surprise to see - aptitude remove a big bunch of packages, when originally one only wanted - to install a package. + I think the display limit should apply only to the "ordinary" package + listings, but not to the previews of what aptitude is going to do. -- Install / Remove Packages should ignore display limits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 380059] Re: Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition
** Attachment added: "First 512 bytes of /dev/sdb6" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27123713/sdb6 -- Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 380059] [NEW] Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer I have (or rather: had) a working LUKS device on /dev/sdb6. The partition type was set to x8E (LVM) since the encrypted volume was used as an LVM physical volume. Now I wanted to set up a second installation on the same system. I created partitions /dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3, both with type LVM. I did not perform any initialization. Then I booted the Jaunty alternate installation cd. I chose "Manual Partitioning" and directly switched into the LVM setup. There I added the /dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3 partitions as volume groups. I never touched /dev/sdb6. I created some logical volumes and saved this setup. Back in the partitioning menu, I noted that the logical volumes were set as "linear" rather than "striped". Since I had not seen any option to change this, I decided to do the LVM setup in the existing system and rebooted the computer. Unfortunately the system does not boot anymore, since it cannot find the encrypted source device. When booting from the Live CD, I found that the volume has apparently been damaged: # cryptsetup luksDump /dev/sdb6 Command failed: /dev/sdb6 is not a LUKS partition Any ideas on how to recover the data are also greatly appreciated. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 380059] Re: Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition
It turns out that /dev/sdb6 has also been initialized as a physical LVM volume. pvdisplay reports: "/dev/sdb6" is a new physical volume of "97.56 GB" --- NEW Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/sdb6 VG Name PV Size 97.56 GB Allocatable NO PE Size (KByte) 0 Total PE 0 Free PE 0 Allocated PE 0 PV UUID ZWv4zG-vNIR-pdvd-59Kw-TJ1F-xCsm-GWMf22 Can someone please step forward so that I can kick his ass for this? ** Summary changed: - Installer garbled unrelated LVM partition + [DATALOSS] Unrelated LVM partitions are initialized as PVs -- [DATALOSS] Unrelated LVM partitions are initialized as PVs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395859] Re: Does not advertise PLAIN on unencrypted connections
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28715713/Dependencies.txt -- Does not advertise PLAIN on unencrypted connections https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395859] [NEW] Does not advertise PLAIN on unencrypted connections
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cyrus-imapd-2.2 I have "allowplaintext: yes" in imapd.conf, but imapd still does not advertize PLAIN on unencrypted connections: Reported capability : ID QUOTA ANNOTATEMORE NAMESPACE MULTIAPPEND SASL- IR IDLE UNSELECT SORT BINARY NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UIDPLUS THREAD=REFERENCES IMAP4 IMAP4REV1 AUTH=PLAIN THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT ACL LITERAL+ CHILDREN ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: cyrus-common-2.2 2.2.13-14ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cyrus-imapd-2.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 ** Affects: cyrus-imapd-2.2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Does not advertise PLAIN on unencrypted connections https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395859 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191514] Re: Kernel upgrades may leave system unbootable
Ensuring that unattended-upgrades is finished when shutting down only partially fixes this bug. The problem still exists when hibernating. ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- Kernel upgrades may leave system unbootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276369] Re: Cannot print in landscape orientation
At least in jaunty, printing a landscape PDF in portrait mode indeed produces a correct landscape printout. (I think that's what you mean with "print as usual", right?). But why do I have to tell the printer to do the opposite of what I want? The current logic works fine if the PDF is in portrait mode, but if the PDF is already in landscape mode, things get very confusing. Also, when I set the output to landscape (in case I actually want to print in portrait mode), the PDF is still cut off rather than scaled down. ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Summary changed: - Cannot print in landscape orientation + Problems with printing landscape PDFs -- Problems with printing landscape PDFs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396136] [NEW] Message source view reformats headers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Problem: Evolution applies some sort of reformatting to the message headers when showing the message source view (Ctrl-U). Please compare the two attached screenshots of how the message headers actually look like, and how evolution formats them. Expected behaviour: The source view should show the message exactly as it is. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: evolution 2.26.1-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Message source view reformats headers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396136] Re: Message source view reformats headers
** Attachment added: "evolution message source.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28732949/evolution%20message%20source.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28732950/Dependencies.txt -- Message source view reformats headers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396136] Re: Message source view reformats headers
** Attachment added: "correct message source.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28732957/correct%20message%20source.png -- Message source view reformats headers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 203782] Re: Support low color depth to improve speed
xvnc4viewer works with Vino and is already in main. And, of course, it's much less bandwidth-demanding. -Nikolaus -- »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- Support low color depth to improve speed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355743] Re: [GMA X4500HD] Video mode changes freeze system
** Summary changed: - [GMA X4500HD] Periodically freezes system when X11 is (re-)initialized + [GMA X4500HD] Video mode changes freeze system ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel - On average every second X11 startup freezes my Dell Vostro 220s with - GMA X4500HD. The screen goes blank and the system is completely frozen. - Changing to a text console with Strg-Alt-F1 or killing the server with - Ctrl-Alt-Backspace does not work. A mouse pointer is not shown. The - keyboard leds are not changing when pressing Caps or NumLock. I can not - ssh into the system since apparently it does not even have time to - request an IP address from the DHCP server before it freezes. A soft - power down does not work either, the only way to shut down the computer - is to press the power button for several seconds. + On average every second video mode change completely freezes my system. + The screen just stays blank and the system is completely unresponsive. + The keyboard leds are not changing when pressing Caps or NumLock and ssh + access into the system times out. A soft power down does not work + either, the only way to shut down the computer is to press the power + button for several seconds. - This habens both for normal startups and for resume from hibernation. - Quitting usplash and changing to text mode with Alt-F1 during boot does - not prevent the problem. + The behaviour can be triggered by starting X11, resuming from + hibernation, switching to a text console, or switching to a different + user in X11. - Although it does not happen on every boot, the problem tends to stick - for a while once it is there: I usually get around 3 crashes in a row - before I can boot properly again. - - I'm using Intrepid. + I'm using Intrepid on a Dell Vostro 220s with GMA X4500HD onboard + graphics. -- [GMA X4500HD] Video mode changes freeze system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355743] apport-collect data
Architecture: i386 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: linux None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux.list] PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video -- [GMA X4500HD] Video mode changes freeze system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375087] [NEW] Can't load DVD from current directory
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ogmrip 1. Change into the directory containing the VIDEO_TS directory, open OGMRip 2. Try to open this directory in OGMRip: click on "Open", "Browse into the directory that contains VIDEO_TS (you should already be in there), click on "Open" --> nothing happens, the open dialog stays open. 3. Quit OGMRip, change into a different directory, start OGMRip from there 4. Do step 2 again, this time it works. ** Affects: ogmrip Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: ogmrip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't load DVD from current directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375087] Re: Can't load DVD from current directory
According to upstream, this is a GTK+ bug. ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2789755 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2789755 ** Also affects: ogmrip via http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2789755 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Package changed: ogmrip (Ubuntu) => gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Can't load DVD from current directory + Can't select current directory in open directory dialog -- Can't select current directory in open directory dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229952] Re: firefox opens files read-only
It seems to me that what you are actually complaining about is the way Openoffice handles read-only files. The proper way to fix this is to change the OpenOffice behaviour. Making firefox pretend to OpenOffice that the file is writeable may work around this particular problem, it it is bound to introduce new ones. So personally I would report this as a bug in OpenOffice. Many other programs allow to edit read-only files. -- firefox opens files read-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225361] Re: other users don't have access to .gvfs
No, that's not true. The above command only reinstalls the packages, so this won't change anything. -- other users don't have access to .gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365668] Re: Rhythmbox scans music library at startup, but then asks "Search for suitable plugin?" every time it opens
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 204566 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204566 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 343707 Rhythmbox tries to find a codec for a m3u/html file ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 204566 Rhythmbox keeps trying to install codecs -- Rhythmbox scans music library at startup, but then asks "Search for suitable plugin?" every time it opens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365668 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343707] Re: Rhythmbox tries to find a codec for a m3u/html file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 204566 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204566 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 204566 Rhythmbox keeps trying to install codecs -- Rhythmbox tries to find a codec for a m3u/html file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368267] [NEW] Crashes when opening Preferences
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot F-Spot crashes with the following console output when I try to open the Preferences. If I remove the photos.db file in .gnome2/f-spot, the crash does not happen. But of course, in that case I lose all my pictures metadata. The photos.db file was last (successfully) opened by F-Spot in Intrepid. [Info 18:14:07.119] Initializing DBus [Info 18:14:07.202] Initializing Mono.Addins [Info 18:14:07.335] Starting new FSpot server [Info 18:14:08.337] Starting BeagleService [Info 18:14:08.337] Hack for gnome-settings-daemon engaged (f-spot:27615): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: GdkPixbufLoader finalized without calling gdk_pixbuf_loader_close() - this is not allowed. You must explicitly end the data stream to the loader before dropping the last reference. Marshaling activate signal Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.LoadPreference (System.String key) [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog..ctor () [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.Show () [0x0] at MainWindow.HandlePreferences (System.Object sender, System.EventArgs args) [0x0] at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoMethod:InternalInvoke (object,object[],System.Exception&) at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x0] --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x0] at System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke (System.Object obj, System.Object[] parameters) [0x0] at System.Delegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x0] at System.MulticastDelegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x0] at System.Delegate.DynamicInvoke (System.Object[] args) [0x0] at GLib.Signal.ClosureInvokedCB (System.Object o, GLib.ClosureInvokedArgs args) [0x0] at GLib.SignalClosure.Invoke (GLib.ClosureInvokedArgs args) [0x0] at GLib.SignalClosure.MarshalCallback (IntPtr raw_closure, IntPtr return_val, UInt32 n_param_vals, IntPtr param_values, IntPtr invocation_hint, IntPtr marshal_data) [0x0] at GLib.ExceptionManager.RaiseUnhandledException(System.Exception e, Boolean is_terminal) at GLib.SignalClosure.MarshalCallback(IntPtr raw_closure, IntPtr return_val, UInt32 n_param_vals, IntPtr param_values, IntPtr invocation_hint, IntPtr marshal_data) at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.Run() at Gnome.Program.Run() at FSpot.Driver.Main(System.String[] args) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: f-spot 0.5.0.3-1ubuntu6 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: f-spot Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Crashes when opening Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368267] Re: Crashes when opening Preferences
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26046033/Dependencies.txt -- Crashes when opening Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368275] [NEW] Hash for Duplicates does nothing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot When I select "Hash for Duplicates" from the Menu, f-spot tells me that it first needs to analyze my image collection and that it may take a long time. Below that there is in Execute and a Stop button. Unfortunately clicking the Execute button results in no activity at all (no visible feedback from F-Spot, no console output, no CPU usage according to top). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: f-spot 0.5.0.3-1ubuntu6 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: f-spot Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Hash for Duplicates does nothing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368275] Re: Hash for Duplicates does nothing
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26046248/Dependencies.txt -- Hash for Duplicates does nothing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368267] Re: Crashes when opening Preferences
I have attached the database. Note that I have manually emptied the exports, jobs, photo_tags, photo_versions, photos & tags tables (DELETE FROM [table]; VACUUM;). I hope this isn't a problem for debugging. The database still triggers the original problem. ** Attachment added: "photos.db" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26085446/photos.db ** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Crashes when opening Preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88213] Re: Feisty does not mount encrypted partition
Marking as new since the problem resurfaced. JFTR: I am receiving similar messages here, but the volume is actually mounted correctly. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- Feisty does not mount encrypted partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366531] [NEW] FATAL: Could not load modules.dep
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usb-creator The created usb volumes are not bootable here. The Ubuntu splashscreen is displayed with the box running from left to right for a *very* long time, afterwards I'm thrown in the console with a modprobe error message (see screenshot). I'm using Jaunty. ** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- FATAL: Could not load modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366531] Re: FATAL: Could not load modules.dep
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of Error Message" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25951423/P1010921.JPG -- FATAL: Could not load modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] Re: Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
I can reproduce the problem in intrepid. I assume the "auto" setting is equivalent to simply not giving a specified model? Yes, I already tried that (it was actually the default configuation). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240855] Re: F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled
** Changed in: gnome-volume-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77541] Re: After hibernation ekiga says registration failed.
I'd like to petition for this bug being fixed in hardy as well please. -- After hibernation ekiga says registration failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240855] Re: F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled
Is there a specific reason why the same settings can also be configured independently in the Nautilus preferences? Actually I never tried disabling this in the Nautilus preferences before I read the above post. -- F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] [NEW] Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
Public bug reported: With Dell Inspiron 1526, the sound volume is way too low. With all mixer controls set to maximum, the volume is still below normal. Loading the snd-hda-intel module with different parameters (model set to 3stack, 5stack, ref or dell-3stack) does not make a difference. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] Re: Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
Output of alsa-info.sh is available at http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=156e0c114df489566677ae175decf4717af0bb9d Output of lspc -vvn, asoundconf list and amixer attached. ** Attachment added: "amixer" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19091164/amixer -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] Re: Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
** Attachment added: "asoundconf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19091171/asoundconf.txt -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291240] Re: Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526
** Attachment added: "lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19091177/lspci.txt -- Sound volume too low with STAC9228 / Dell Inspiron 1526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287879] [NEW] cryptsetup does not understand UUID= in fstab and conf.d/resume
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cryptsetup Hello, When UUID= syntax is used in /etc/fstab or /etc/initramfs- tools/conf.d/resume, cryptsetup is not correctly set up in initrd. The file conf/conf.d/cryptroot in the initrd is lacking the appropriate entries and booting hangs with "Waiting for root filesystem..." . If /dev/mapper/[name] is used instead of UUID= in either file, the correct entries end up in conf/conf.d/cryptroot. ** Affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- cryptsetup does not understand UUID= in fstab and conf.d/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240855] Re: F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled
"Import digital photographs when connected" is disabled in "System -> Preferences -> Removable Media". ** Changed in: gnome-volume-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- F-Spot opens even if automatic import is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229932] Re: Hibernation broken when using USB devices (Latitude D810)
ethanay: I got the messages from running dmesg after the failed hibernation attempt. -- Hibernation broken when using USB devices (Latitude D810) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76424] Re: Kernel upgrades without reboot break resume from hibernation
I'm adding hal as affected as well. According to comment 21, the behaviour could also be fixed by applying the patch included in the comment. Fixing this bug *somewhere* should really be possible now. ** Summary changed: - Hibernation uses old kernel after kernel upgrade causing resume failure + Kernel upgrades without reboot break resume from hibernation ** Description changed: 1) Apply kernel update (but don't immediately reboot, as you're working) 2) have to move somewhere, hibernate laptop 3) power on laptop to restore from hibernate - 4) look at the login screen, not your resumed desktop. + 4) since the hibernated image does not correspond to the current kernel version, the image will be discarded and a regular boot is done - proposed fix: boot old kernel if hibernate exists. + Result: All data that hasn't been saved is lost, filesystems can be + corrupted and need fsck. In severity this corresponds to a hard system + crash. + + proposed fix: boot old kernel if hibernate exists or prevent hibernation + when a new kernel version has been installed. ** Also affects: hal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kernel upgrades without reboot break resume from hibernation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76424] Re: Hibernation uses old kernel after kernel upgrade causing resume failure
The kernel's postinst script already provide a way to prevent
hibernation:
# Let programs know not to hibernate if the kernel that would be used for
# resume-from-hibernate is likely to differ from the currently running kernel.
system("mountpoint -q /var/run");
if ($? eq 0) {
system("touch /var/run/do-not-hibernate");
}
I therefore think that this bug is actually in the gnome UI and/or the
hibernate script, which both ignores the file created by the kernel and
allow the user to hibernate the system anyway.
** Also affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Kernel upgrades without reboot break resume from hibernation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242302] Re: Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed
I am not quite sure how this bug can apply to gedit. Could you give me more detailed instructions on how to (try to) reproduce it with gedit? The text in gedit doesn't really have a prescribed size, so how can I determine if it has been scaled or not? But I think the upstream bug is about the same issue, yes. -- Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276369] [NEW] Cannot print in landscape orientation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince 1. Open the attached PDF 2. Select File -> Print Setup 3. Set Orientation to Landscape 4. Select File -> Print -> Print Preview 5. Preview shows a page in Portrait format with the "overlapping" part of the landscape PDF cut off. Exactly the same happens when actually printing. I am not sure if the result ought to be (a) a portrait printout containing the *rotated* landscape PDF or (b) a landscape printout containing the unrotated landscape PDF, but clearly the current behaviour is very wrong. It also seems to me that variant (a). is more likely to produce the desired result with all printers, but I might be wrong. I'm using hardy. ** Affects: evince Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: Triaged -- Cannot print in landscape orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276369] Re: Cannot print in landscape orientation
** Attachment added: "Example landscape PDF" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18087291/foo.pdf ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #554451 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554451 ** Also affects: evince via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554451 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Cannot print in landscape orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276369] Re: Cannot print in landscape orientation
I also observe the symptoms described in bug 172664, but it seems to me that this has to be fixed at least partially in evince: the print preview is generated entirely by evince and not by cups, isn't it? -- Cannot print in landscape orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172664] Re: Landscape PDF prints in truncated portrait
I can confirm this on hardy. ** Changed in: cupsys (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Landscape PDF prints in truncated portrait https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245068] Re: apt-get doesn't say why build-dependencies cannot be satisfied
Confirmed, this really is annoying. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- apt-get doesn't say why build-dependencies cannot be satisfied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars
Yes, this is still an issue here. Where you not able to reproduce it? ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars
Which perl version are you using? Hardy or intrepid? Is there an updated hardy version available somewhere, so that I can test it as well? -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242302] [NEW] Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince When I print PDF documents whose pages are smaller than the paper in my printer (A4), evince always scales them up so that cover the whole page it at least one dimension. This is also visible in the print preview. I have set "Scale" to 100% and "Shrink Page" to "Crop". ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242302] Re: Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed
** Attachment added: "Sample PDF file" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15520673/test.pdf -- Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242302] Re: Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed
** Attachment added: "PDF file is displayed in correct size" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15520683/evince.png -- Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242302] Re: Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed
** Attachment added: "Print Preview, PDF has been scaled up" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15520690/print-preview.png -- Small PDF files are scaled up to papersize when printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
