[Bug 174369] Re: Lilypond fonts should be installed automatically

2009-06-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
There clearly is a difference between fonts being on the hard drive and
usable by lilypond and the same fonts being installed so that they are
also usable in other apps such as Lyx, Ooffice, scribus etc. They have
not been installed, in this sense, on my system (Ubuntu 9.04, lilypond
2.12.1-0ubuntu1). Whether you consider this to be a bug is debateable.
Some people might not like extra fonts that they will never use
cluttering up their font lists. It is quite easy to install them by hand
but it would be kind of nice if automatic installation were an option.

-- 
Lilypond fonts should be installed automatically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174369
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] Re: feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2009-06-18 Thread Bernard Hurley
Here is the png that shoud have been generated by snippet above. This is
the png that occurs in lilypond documentation.

** Attachment added: "lily-e9448a7f.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28052582/lily-e9448a7f.png

-- 
feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] Re: feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2009-06-18 Thread Bernard Hurley
The attached png is generated by the following snippet (from the
lilypond documentation) on my system. This suggests that the \number
font idoes not choose the correct font.

== begin snippet ===

%% Generated by lilypond-book.py
%% Options: [quote,alt=[image of music],indent=0\mm,verbatim]
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"


% 
% Start cut-&-pastable-section 
% 


\paper {
  #(define dump-extents #t)
  
  line-width = 160\mm - 2.0 * 0.4\in
  indent = 0\mm
  force-assignment = #""
  line-width = #(- line-width (* mm  3.00))
}

\layout {
  
}


% 
% ly snippet:
% 
\sourcefileline 407
\markup {
  \number {
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . ,
  }
}


% 
% end ly snippet
% 


** Attachment added: "lily-e9448a7f.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28052545/lily-e9448a7f.png

-- 
feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] Re: feta-alphabet font not used for time signatures by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2009-06-18 Thread Bernard Hurley
** Summary changed:

- feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
+ feta-alphabet font not used for time signatures by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in 
ubuntu 9.04

-- 
Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] Re: Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2009-06-18 Thread Bernard Hurley
** Summary changed:

- feta-alphabet font not used for time signatures by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in 
ubuntu 9.04
+ Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: lilypond
  
  Ubuntu version: 9.04
  package LilyPond 2.12.1-0ubuntu1
  
- Final lilypond output does not use the feta-nummer font for numbers.
- Instead one of the other fonts on my machine is used. This is most
- obvious in time signatures.
+ Final lilypond output does not use the feta-alphabet font for numbers in time 
signatures. Instead one of the other fonts on my machine is used. Moreover 
setting the font with something like:
+ \override Score.TimeSignature #'font-name = #"Tarablus"
+ doesn't work. However the following does work:
+ \override Score.TimeSignature #'font-size = #2
  
- I noticed that the file /etc/texmf/dvips/lilypond.map does not exist and
- there is a broken symlink to it in /usr/share/lilypond/2.12.1/dvips.
- Could this have anything to do with the problem or is it a separate
- issue?
+ 
+ I noticed that the file /etc/texmf/dvips/lilypond.map does not exist and 
there is a broken symlink to it in /usr/share/lilypond/2.12.1/dvips. Could this 
have anything to do with the problem or is it a separate issue?

-- 
Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] [NEW] feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2009-06-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lilypond

Ubuntu version: 9.04
package LilyPond 2.12.1-0ubuntu1

Final lilypond output does not use the feta-nummer font for numbers.
Instead one of the other fonts on my machine is used. This is most
obvious in time signatures.

I noticed that the file /etc/texmf/dvips/lilypond.map does not exist and
there is a broken symlink to it in /usr/share/lilypond/2.12.1/dvips.
Could this have anything to do with the problem or is it a separate
issue?

** Affects: lilypond (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
feta-nummer font not accessed by GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 448027] Re: recordmydesktop not compiled with jack

2009-11-22 Thread Bernard Hurley
[Temporary Fix]
If you go back to version 0.3.7.3-1 of recordMyDesktop, which you can do by 
temporarily re-enabling the jaunty repositories in /apt/sources.list and using 
aptitude, you will find:

consult...@dell-laptop:~$ recordmydesktop --print-config

recordMyDesktop was compiled with the following options:

Jack:Enabled
Default Audio Backend   :ALSA

I also reverted gtkRecordMyDesktop to version 0.3.7.2-2ubuntu2, but I'm
not sure if that is neccessary. Suffice it to say that it all seems to
work OK.

If you have the multiverse repository enabled your system might keep
wanting to upgrade to the present vesrions which is a bit annoying.

-- 
recordmydesktop not compiled with jack
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 540035] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()

2010-05-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:24:12AM -, jcgs wrote:
> It seems like this bug has been fixed. I've installed the pango-graphite
> package, and it doesn't seem to be causing any problems.
> 
> ** Changed in: pango-graphite (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Invalid
> 
> -- 

Well I have just tried installing it and gdm didn't dispaly a logon
dialog. uninstalling the package solved the problem

-- 
gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387859] Re: Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04

2010-01-13 Thread Bernard Hurley
I have recently upgraded to karmic . The bug is not fixed.

-- 
Font handling for time signatures broken in GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 in ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2010-06-22 Thread Bernard Hurley

bojo42's solution seems to work. But may I suggest you copy 
/etc/pulse/daemon.conf to  ~/.pulse/daemon.conf and then edit that file, which 
will then take precedence over the system wide file.

-- 
PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs