[Bug 229314] Re: Hard-coded line breaks (i18n, accessibility)
Wrappable text is of course good, but I think the main window could also be resizable. A larger window might make reading the texts easier or more convenient for large fonts. -- Hard-coded line breaks (i18n, accessibility) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270185] Re: sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not
According to http://www.sane-project.org/cgi- bin/driver.pl?manu=&model=&bus=any&v=04b8&p=0130 , your scanner is supported by the epkowa backend, which is not part of the sane-backends package, but of libsane-extras. Do you have the latter package installed? -- sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354810] Re: Duplicate warning remains on the comment form after un-marking as a duplicate
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354811 No diacritics! ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 354811 No diacritics! ** Changed in: malone Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Duplicate warning remains on the comment form after un-marking as a duplicate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu (via bug 354811). -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208405] Re: [needs-packaging] iscan
Pander, > I have an Epson Perfection V10 with which I can test. > > Can Ubuntu cross reference its hardware registration database > and active Launchpad users to come up with a list of potential > testers for hardware like this? Perhaps good to start working on > a mechanism like this, or is it normal that Ubuntu has a huge > stock of all the hardware it supports? Asking users if the would be willing to run some tests hardware-related software packages is exactly one of the applications of our hardware database we have in mind :) Kiko, regarding the problems packaing the proprietary drivers: I know Olaf Meeuwissen, the maintainer of the iscan software, from the Sane developer mailing list as being very responsive to any questions -- simply contact him! -- [needs-packaging] iscan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208405] Re: [needs-packaging] iscan
>> Asking users if the would be willing to run some tests hardware-related >> software packages is exactly one of the applications of our hardware >> database we have in mind :) > > Cool. How do we do query to see which users have this scanner then? At present, we don't have the "perfect" solution, but if you are curious, you could start this way, using Launchpad's webservice API. No mechanism to send emails, but you get a list of owners, provided that they have a LP account: - get the USB vendor and product ID of a scanner (best done right now by looking at the "lsusb" output.) - get the h_w_device record for this device, by calling device = lp.hwdb.devices(bus='USB', vendor_id=0x124, product_id=0x5678)[0] - get the set of HWDB submissions containing this device: submissions = device.getSubmissions() - Users must specify an email address when they submit their HWDB report; if this address matches a LP user account, the field "owner" of a submission is set to this account. >> Kiko, regarding the problems packaing the proprietary drivers: I know >> Olaf Meeuwissen, the maintainer of the iscan software, from the Sane >> developer mailing list as being very responsive to any questions -- >> simply contact him! > > Well, if you know him, could you point him to this bug and see if he can > give us some advice? Done -- [needs-packaging] iscan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208405] Re: [needs-packaging] iscan
sigh, the "3" key of my keyboard is slightly broken... Also, I forgot the quotes around two parameter values: device = lp.hwdb.devices(bus='USB', vendor_id='0x1234', product_id='0x5678')[0] is better. USB IDs must be specfied as hex number, prefixed with '0x' -- [needs-packaging] iscan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208405] Re: [needs-packaging] iscan
...to avoid misunderstandings: we don't expose the email addresses -- [needs-packaging] iscan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30910] Re: Hardware Database not browseable
** Changed in: malone Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: malone Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: malone Importance: Medium => Undecided ** Changed in: malone Status: Triaged => New ** Changed in: malone Assignee: (unassigned) => Abel Deuring (adeuring) -- Hardware Database not browseable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192784] another comment
file attached: a PNG image -- OpenOffice auto correct notification is a persistant annoyance. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 530380] Re: checkbox writes to .cache/checkbox/submission before submission completes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02.03.2010 00:17, Brian Murray wrote: > Abel - what will happen in the case that an invalid or non-existent > HWDB-Submission is used when reporting a bug in Launchpad? > unfortunately, nothing... The line "CheckboxSubmission: fee5e196cb921cbd36888f428b38b488" is at present simply not processed... I filed bug 530556 about it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLjNbOekBPhm8NrtARAm+xAJ4mulliIMVnG/tx5LQdHsEidMiiWQCgnzzJ EIB3K8QqoJhSctU1wzxPzYI= =EV4U -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- checkbox writes to .cache/checkbox/submission before submission completes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 530380] Re: checkbox writes to .cache/checkbox/submission before submission completes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02.03.2010 10:14, Abel Deuring wrote: > On 02.03.2010 00:17, Brian Murray wrote: >> Abel - what will happen in the case that an invalid or non-existent >> HWDB-Submission is used when reporting a bug in Launchpad? > > > unfortunately, nothing... The line > "CheckboxSubmission: fee5e196cb921cbd36888f428b38b488" is at present > simply not processed... > > I filed bug 530556 about it. ...and this is complete nonsense -- I was too stupid to find the code when I wrote the answer. lp.bug.browser.bugtarget.FileBugViewBase.submit_bug_action does indeed create links between bugs and HWDB submissions: for submission_key in extra_data.hwdb_submission_keys: submission = submission_set.getBySubmissionKey( submission_key, self.user) if submission is not None: bug.linkHWSubmission(submission) (line 648). So: A link between a bug and a HWDB submission is created, if the the HWDB submission exists. If doesn't for whichever reason (mostly likely because checkbox did create a submission ID but nothing was uploaded or an error like a timeout occurred during the upload), the invalid / non-extistent submission key is silently ignored. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFLjjryekBPhm8NrtARAsmwAJY6m31N9lwmSYMi8HaOrEVDxEQcAJ98rq0r bp0H3NEemAkQnnZHIbqNSg== =gXiC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- checkbox writes to .cache/checkbox/submission before submission completes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 492339] Re: kdm.conf and failsafe-x.conf compete to start X session
I had exactly the same problem, on two machines (running Karmic), both wth Gnome and KDE,and kdm being the default display manager. Disabling /etc/init/failsafe-x.conf helped indeed. -- kdm.conf and failsafe-x.conf compete to start X session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553113] [NEW] swap partition not automatically formatted
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: partman-auto I'm installing Lucid from the alternate CD, 64 bit version on a Lenovo x200. CD image download on 2010-04-01, ca. 7:30UTC. I selected "encrypt whole disk"; automatic partionining otherwise (i.e., one non-encrypted partition for /boot; one encxprted volume for /, one encrypted volume for swap). When the "disk setup" (initializing the encypted partition, formatting the volumes for / and swap) finished, I got the error "swap could not be mounted". Manually running "mkswap /dev/mapper/https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 553113] Re: swap partition not automatically formatted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01.04.2010 13:09, Colin Watson wrote: > You mentioned the date on which you downloaded the CD, but not the URL > (which is more useful). Did you download beta-1? This sounds very much > like bug 539324, a known bug in beta-1 fixed since then. > Sorry, I even did not write down the URL anywhere... Trying to reproduce the way I clicked me to the download page, I _think_ it was indeed the beta 1 disk: http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/10.04/ubuntu-10.04-beta1-alternate-amd64.iso -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLtJ54ekBPhm8NrtARAuXtAKCiBziEjPUSqwzuQd6cvGWiNTiH2QCePCyf 4YvQUVSVpLmhVoHw8oDv+Qs= =AjZ5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- swap partition not automatically formatted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424382] Re: FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport
Martin, you can test the new header on staging.launchpad.net once its revision number is >= 8449. This is a sample MIME message I used for tests: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=boundary HWDB-Submission: sample-submission, non-existing-submission-key --boundary Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 This should be added to the description. --boundary-- -- FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 379393] Re: add checkbox submission reference
On 03.09.2009 20:09, Martin Pitt wrote: > Sorry, it just occurred to me that in the general case we can't link the > hwdb submission key, we can just add the key value to the description > field. This is because Apport's job ends with opening a browser window > to file a bug, and never gets back the ID. > > So either developers need to grab the key and fetch the corresponding > hwdb object manually, or LP needs to be extended to accept a checkbox > submission key in the +storeblob area (in the MIME headers, similar to > the Private:, Subscribers:, and Tags: fields). The latter would > obviously be preferrable, but needs further changes in LP. > > Abel, what do you think? > > For now I'll just add the reference key to the description. > I think adding a header like HWDB-Submission: submission-key is fine. (Actually, a user might have run checkbox more than once on a machine, so we should also allow HWDB-Submission: submission-key, submission-key... ) I opened bug 424382 for the Launchpad side. > Ah, and adding the actual key is already done by /usr/share/apport > /general-hooks/checkbox.py, so there's nothing to do in Apport right > now. I'll reopen this if/when LP extends the +storeblob API accordingly. Not sure what this means. Do we already have they submission keys somewhere in the data sent by Apport to +storeblob? -- add checkbox submission reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424382] Re: FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport
** Changed in: malone Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424382] Re: FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport
** Changed in: malone Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486091] Re: Confusing button placement/description in software update tab
I find the UI quite confusing too. The problem is even worse. If you want to perform the default action for the notification "updates are available", i.e., install the available updates, you _must_ click the right buttons in the right order: First "Select all updates", then "Apply". If you forget one of these clicks, nothing happens at all: - If you forget to click "Select all updates", "Apply" is disabled. You can nevertheless click on "OK". A warning popup like "Are you sure that you don't want to install the available updates? If you want so, please click 'seelct all updates first and then click 'apply'" would be useful, I think. - if you click "OK" instead of "Apply" after selecting the packages to update, nothing happens either. Thjis makes the automatic update notification, a security affecting feature, unnecessarily fragile. -- Confusing button placement/description in software update tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424382] Re: FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport
** Changed in: malone Milestone: None => 3.1.10 -- FileBugViewBase should detect the header HWDB-Submission in data sent by Apport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931055] [NEW] menu texts missing
Public bug reported: Alle libreoffice apllication are shown without menu texts; other texts are missing too, for example, the font size selection. See the attached screenshots. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: libreoffice 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Feb 12 18:19:43 2012 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64+mac (20111011) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931055 Title: menu texts missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/931055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931055] Re: menu texts missing
** Attachment added: "lo-1.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931055/+attachment/2733631/+files/lo-1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931055 Title: menu texts missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/931055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931055] Re: menu texts missing
** Attachment added: "lo-2.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/931055/+attachment/2733633/+files/lo-2.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931055 Title: menu texts missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/931055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1344889] Re: 64-bit Vagrant cloud images use 32-bit OSType
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Abel Deuring (adeuring) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1344889 Title: 64-bit Vagrant cloud images use 32-bit OSType To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1344889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1344889] Re: 64-bit Vagrant cloud images use 32-bit OSType
** Branch linked: lp:~adeuring/vmbuilder/jenkins_kvm-fix-vbox-ostype -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1344889 Title: 64-bit Vagrant cloud images use 32-bit OSType To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1344889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768685] Re: searching for exact title prefix gets no matches (text search issue)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 29713 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29713
Searching for the "versioned package names" like "blcr-dkms
0.8.2-15ubuntu1" should work, once the fix for ug 29713 lands. The main
issue was probably the bad processing of '-' in ftq().
select to_tsvector('blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1');
to_tsvector
---
'-15':5 '0.8.2':4 'blcr':2 'blcr-dkms':1 'dkms':3 'ubuntu1':6
(1 row)
select ftq('blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1');
ftq
-
'blcr-dkms' & 'blcr' & 'dkms' & '0.8.2' & '-15' & 'ubuntu1'
(1 row)
select to_tsvector('blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1') @@ ftq('blcr-dkms
0.8.2-15ubuntu1');
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
So, the version string is cut into three parts: '0.8.2', '-15',
'ubuntu1'. It might make sense to add a special tokenizer for these
version strings.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768685
Title:
searching for exact title prefix gets no matches (text search issue)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/768685/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1034248] Re: 8564:4000 Transcend RDF8 Card Reader not working with 8GB SanDisk Extreme III 30MB/sec CF card
I have the same problem, using this Transcend card reader and a Samsung 8GB SD card when it is connected to the USB3 port of a Lenovo X220, running quantal, and when conencted to a Gigabyte Z77D3H running oneiric. WHen the device is connected to USB2 port, everything is fine. Alo, a quick test to write two files to the card via the USB3 port of the Z77D3H worked fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034248 Title: 8564:4000 Transcend RDF8 Card Reader not working with 8GB SanDisk Extreme III 30MB/sec CF card To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1034248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927195] [NEW] akonadi related processes can make the KDE desktop unusable
Public bug reported: I installed yesterday the 11.10 version of Kubuntu on a 2.5GHz Core2Duo laptop with 4GB RAM. The install went without any problems, but after I copied ca 200GB data (lots of plain text files -- developer machine --, and a decent amount of PDF files, (Libre|Open)Office files and a smaller amount of music and image files) to my home directory, the KDE desktop becomes literally unusable maybe 20 or 30 seconds after starting a KDE session. When I logged in via ssh from another machine and invoked "top" before starting the KDE session, it turned out that four or five akonadi processes consumed between 500MB and over 1 GB each. Well, these are the last values I was able to see: soon after, top stopped to refresh its display; typing "q" (for a subsequent "sudo halt") had no effects. OK, I did not wait for hours for a response from the SSH shell, but gave up after two or three minutes and hit the power button, assuming that the memory consumption exploded further and that there was no point to wait for hours that something visible happens. "top" did not display the full program names; it were akonadi_nepomuk_whatever and akonadi_mail_something (not 100% sure about the latter though). This is not a new issue (I had similar problems with older kubuntu versions, and it is telling that Google shows a few links "how to disable nepomuk in akonadi" on the first result page for the search term "akonadi nepomuk"), but ISTM that there is no Ubuntu bug for this issue, so I'm filing this bug. I think these resource hogs should be disabled by default. I see the point to have these so-called "Semantic Desktop Ontologies" at hand -- but there is a risk that "ontology", defined in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology as "the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence, or reality as such, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations", may mean in practise that a computer is too busy introspecting itself to serve the user of the machine... ** Affects: akonadi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927195 Title: akonadi related processes can make the KDE desktop unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akonadi/+bug/927195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 958586] [NEW] package libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libreoffice-common/copyright] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installat
Public bug reported: happened during "do-release-upgrade -d " ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libreoffice-common/copyright] Uname: Linux 3.1.4-030104-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 18 15:42:59 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 134 zurück InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64+mac (20111011) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libreoffice-common/copyright] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 134 zurück UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-18 (0 days ago) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958586 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc /libreoffice-common/copyright] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 134 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/958586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 958586] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libreoffice-common/copyright] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installatio
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958586 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc /libreoffice-common/copyright] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 134 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/958586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797281] [NEW] LP API broken in oneiric with python-httplib2 0.7.0-1
Public bug reported: In oneiric today, someone landed python-httplib2, merged from debian (0.6.0-5 -> 0.7.0-1). Now, all my scripts are broken: ... File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/launchpadlib/launchpad.py", line 373, in login_anonymously version=version) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/launchpadlib/launchpad.py", line 198, in __init__ credentials, service_root, cache, timeout, proxy_info, version) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lazr/restfulclient/resource.py", line 460, in __init__ self._wadl = self._browser.get_wadl_application(self._root_uri) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lazr/restfulclient/_browser.py", line 299, in get_wadl_application response, content = self._request(url, media_type=wadl_type) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lazr/restfulclient/_browser.py", line 242, in _request str(url), method=method, body=data, headers=headers) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lazr/restfulclient/_browser.py", line 211, in _request_and_retry url, method=method, body=body, headers=headers) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1406, in request (response, new_content) = self._request(conn, authority, uri, request_uri, method, body, headers, redirections, cachekey) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/launchpadlib/launchpad.py", line 126, in _request LaunchpadOAuthAwareHttp, self)._request(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lazr/restfulclient/_browser.py", line 130, in _request redirections, cachekey) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1188, in _request (response, content) = self._conn_request(conn, request_uri, method, body, headers) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1123, in _conn_request conn.connect() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py", line 890, in connect self.disable_ssl_certificate_validation, self.ca_certs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py", line 76, in _ssl_wrap_socket cert_reqs=cert_reqs, ca_certs=ca_certs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 372, in wrap_socket ciphers=ciphers) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 132, in __init__ ciphers) ssl.SSLError: [Errno 185090050] _ssl.c:340: error:0B084002:x509 certificate routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system lib Is it a Launchpad issue? or is python-httplib2 really broken? please advise. ** Affects: python-httplib2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797281 Title: LP API broken in oneiric with python-httplib2 0.7.0-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-httplib2/+bug/797281/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797281] Re: LP API broken in oneiric with python-httplib2 0.7.0-1
Converted from https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- httplib2/+question/161415. I don't have yet oneiric installed. Fabien Tassin, who asked the question may be able to provide more information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797281 Title: LP API broken in oneiric with python-httplib2 0.7.0-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-httplib2/+bug/797281/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854200] [NEW] processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load
Public bug reported: The processor speed of my X220 is, according to /proc/cpuinfo, 800MHz. That's fin when the machine is idling, but if I run a program which needs more procssor powr, I would xpect that the clock speed is increased to 2.7GHz. As a naive test, I ran this little Python script: s = 0 for i in xrange(5000): s += i*i On the X220, this needs -- with an 800MHz clock, 36 seconds. On another machine, with a 2.4GHz Cor2Duo processor, it needs 14 seconds. When the script is running, the proceso speed increases to 2.4 GHz. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 19 22:11:25 2011 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64 (20110901) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug kubuntu oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854200 Title: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/854200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854200] Re: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854200 Title: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/854200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854200] Re: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load
well, this is obviously not an xorg bug... I used ubuntu-bug to report the problem, and it decided to ignore my selection -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854200 Title: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/854200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854200] Re: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load
Turned out to be a BIOS problem: My machine had a Bios with a build date sometimes in May 2011; I updated to version 1.21 (2011-09-07), and everything is fine. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854200 Title: processor sped not increasd for "heavy" load To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/854200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
