[Rd] terminating R code evalutation asynchronously

2009-04-21 Thread Christian Ledergerber
Hi, 

I am new to this mailing list. Hence brief a introduction: I am working for
Comerge, developing an online trading platform (interacting with brokers
over the internet in realtime) which is mostly written in Pascal. We are
using R-embedded to offer the user a way to implement strategies in R and
test them. 

Currently we are facing the following problem: We need to implement an
emergency exit procedure. The idea is that we send the process a signal
(like Crtl-C) and do all the necessary cleanup after the signal has been
caught. There are a number of constraints and wishes: 

1. The signal handler should take only very little time. E.g. set a number
of flags etc. and then return and leave the rest of the work to the main
program. 
2. The signal handler is asynchronous by nature. 
3. We would like that this works even if the user is hanging in an infinite
loop in the R code. E.g. we need to kill the current R code evaluation in
the signal handler. 
4. The main program needs to keep running to finish the cleanup. 

I found that the following function which seems to do the trick:
jump_to_toplevel() however, I am unsure whether this is safe - e.g. is this
function "thread safe" or do we risk that the application crashes when the
signal handler is invoked? Is there another, safer way to terminate the
current R execution? Furthermore this function seems to crash if the R
engine is not currently inside a R_tryEval call.

Thanks! 

Christian Ledergerber

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] sprintf limits output string length with no warning/error message

2009-04-21 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
sprintf has a limit on the length of a string produced with a '%s'
specification:

   nchar(sprintf('%1s', ''))
   # 8191

   nchar(sprintf('%*s', 1, ''))
   # 8191

This is sort of documented in ?sprintf:

" There is a limit of 8192 bytes on elements of 'fmt' and also on
 strings included by a '%s' conversion specification."

but it should be a good idea for sprintf to at least warn when the
output is shorter than specified.

vQ

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)

2009-04-21 Thread waku
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk
Version: 2.10.0 r48365
OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32bit
Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.110.141)


sprintf has a documented limit on strings included in the output using the
format '%s'.  It appears that there is a limit on the length of strings included
with, e.g., the format '%d' beyond which surprising things happen (output
modified for conciseness):

   gregexpr('1', sprintf('%9000d', 1))
   # [1] 9000 9801

   gregexpr('1', sprintf('%9000d', 1))
   # [1]  9000  9801 10602

   gregexpr('1', sprintf('%9000d', 1))
   # [1]  9000  9801 10602 11403

   gregexpr('1', sprintf('%9000d', 1))
   # [1]  9000  9801 10602 11403 12204

   ...

Note that not only more than one '1' is included in the output, but also that
the same functional expression (no side effects used beyond the interface) gives
different results on each execution.  Analogous behaviour can be observed with
'%nd' where n > 8200.

The actual output above is consistent across separate sessions.

With sufficiently large field width values, R segfaults:

   sprintf('%*d', 10^5, 1)
   # *** caught segfault ***
   # address 0xbfcfc000, cause 'memory not mapped'
   # Segmentation fault


   sessionInfo()
   # R version 2.10.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-04-20 r48365) 
   # i686-pc-linux-gnu

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Sharing variables in seperate workspace

2009-04-21 Thread Martin Morgan
Philip  writes:

> Hi all.

Hi Philip -- I think this thread

  https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-March/052867.html

addresses your issue. Basically, create an environment or closure in
which you can modify variables.

HTH,

Martin

>
>
> I'm for the first time trying to make a library in R 2.8.1 on Ubuntu
> Linux. The library is very simple, R functions just need to share a
> variable (that is defined in the R code) and maybe functions and export
> functions for the user to .GlobalEnv. This variable should only be
> directly accessible from the global workspace (without change of
> environment) via a hereto dedicated function. It only consists of R
> code. I'm not sure if I should rather ask R-help. If so, just tell me.
>
> The package source is available at
> http://www.delff.dk/~philip/bdplot/
> the check output at
> http://www.delff.dk/~philip/bdplot.Rcheck/
>
> The package code was checked and stopped because of lack of examples.
> Until that, everything is OK.
>
>> ### ** Examples
>>
>> ~~ simple examples of the most important functions ~~
> Error: unexpected symbol in "~~ simple examples"
> Execution halted
>
> I would like to get the code issue solved before moving the
> documentation from the R scripts and have proceeded the to building and
> installation. These two last steps gave no warnings or errors.
>
> My problem is that I cannot change the mentioned variable (from now on
> called .FOO) that belongs to the namespace of the package. I think it is
> because .FOO variable in some locked state, maybe by default created as
> read-only. It is called .FOO because I use exportPattern("^[[:alpha:]]+")
> as NAMESPACE file. I don't import anything.
>
> I have a function (bar) that, like par does with .Pars from the graphics
> namespace, modifies the contents of a list. This function has in the
> bottom (when the function name is called without () from the R command
> line) a line
>
> 
>
> This is like par() has the graphics namespace mentioned, and therefore,
> as I would expect. I can via this function read the contents of the
> variable just by print(.FOO). This cannot be done from .GlobalEnv which
> is as intended. The surprise is that I cannot write to it. If I do
>
> .FOO$x <<- "value"
> (names and values are arguments to the function, like with par().), I
> get the error:
>
> cannot change value of locked binding for '.FOO'
>
> The double arrow, I use because <- does not affect the contents of .FOO
> after the function has run. I don't know how I can use assign in this
> case. I don't know a name for my package's environment. I have tried
> with my package's name in both assign() and unlockBinding(), but my
> package's name is not recognized as an environment (neither beginning
> with a dot.). I also tryed unlockBinding() in the NAMESPACE file.
>
> I don't know if this is normal, but I get
> 
> from print(parent.frame()) and things like
> 
> from print(environment())
> This is surprising to me. I would expect
> 
> from environment().
>
> How can I get to write to .FOO via bar()?
>
>
> Thank you very much
> Philip.
>
> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

-- 
Martin Morgan
Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N.
PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109

Location: Arnold Building M1 B861
Phone: (206) 667-2793

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] print.closure at the R level

2009-04-21 Thread Martin Maechler
> "MM" == Martin Maechler 
> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:23:23 +0200 writes:

> "RF" == Romain Francois 
> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:42:22 +0200 writes:

RF> Hello,

RF> Sorry if I have waisted any time of people truing this
RF> patch.

MM> yes, you did waste (sic)   but thank you for the
MM> code suggestions anyway.

RF> There was an issue with debugging (use of debug and
RF> browser that caused an infinite recursion). I think this
RF> is now fixed.

MM> [ actually I had found even simpler bugs in it, e.g.
MM> you accidentally called C-level "print.function()" on
MM> "language", some may have been fixed by your new patch
MM> too, but others are not {e.g., print() *must* return its
MM> argument !}  ]

MM> However, I've already changed your old patch too much
MM> (notably by using *our* C coding standards) to want to
MM> look at your new patch in detail.

MM> If you want we can communicate off-list about this,
MM> tomorrow...
{and we did}

It turns out to be considerably more tricky than I had
anticipated...

Note that we also really want auto-printing and print()ing to be
equivalent,
and that is not even the case for .Primitives in current R :

  > c
  function (..., recursive = FALSE)  .Primitive("c")
  > print(c)
  function (..., recursive = FALSE)  
  > 

{for "obvious" reasons, but needing even more work ...}

Also, Romain was "right" insofar as he would have wanted to only
deal with closure, whereas of course Duncan was right that the
corresponding class is 'function' and that comprises other types
(in the 'typeof' sense).

[story to be continued ...]

Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich


RF> At the R level, I have now this :

>>> print.function
RF> function (x, useSource = TRUE, ...)  {
RF> invisible(.Internal(print.function(x, useSource, ...)))
RF> } 

RF> and the PrintValueRec dispatches like this at the C
RF> level:

RF> case LANGSXP: PrintLanguage(s, FALSE) ; break; case
RF> CLOSXP: { SEXP call; PROTECT( call =
RF> lang2(install("print.function"), s)); eval(call,env);
RF> UNPROTECT(1); break; }

RF> so that LANGSXP are printed using the PrintLanguage
RF> function and CLOSXP are printed using the R function
RF> print.function which in turns calls the PrintClosure
RF> function (unless it is masked in R)

RF> Romain


RF> Romain Francois wrote:
>>> Yesterday's patch did not print the attributes. This one
>>> seems fine:
>>> 
>>> > f <- function(){} > attr( f, "yada" ) <- function( )
>>> "lobster bisk" > f function(){} attr(,"yada") function(
>>> ) "lobster bisk"
>>> 
>>> Romain
>>> 
>>> Romain Francois wrote:
 Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 18/04/2009 10:12 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Could the code that auto prints a function/closure be
>> extracted from print.c so that there would be a
>> print.closure function.  I would like to be able to
>> mask a print.closure function so that I have a custom
>> auto-print. One reason for that is I plan to have
>> syntax highlighting within the R console.
> 
> The class of a closure is "function", so you'd want
> the method to be print.function.  Currently that
> doesn't work for auto printing, so your suggestion is
> still interesting.  (I'm not sure why auto printing is
> special here...)
> 
> Duncan Murdoch
 The attached patch implements exposing the
 print.function at the R level.
 
 Romain
 
 

 
 __
 R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> __
>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


RF> -- Romain Francois Independent R Consultant +33(0) 6 28
RF> 91 30 30 http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr

MM> __
MM> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
MM> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Sharing variables in seperate workspace

2009-04-21 Thread Philip
Hi Martin

Thank you very much. That solved my problem, and the package is now working!

Best regards. Philip.


Martin Morgan wrote:
> Philip  writes:
> 
>> Hi all.
> 
> Hi Philip -- I think this thread
> 
>   https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-March/052867.html
> 
> addresses your issue. Basically, create an environment or closure in
> which you can modify variables.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Martin
> 
>>
>> I'm for the first time trying to make a library in R 2.8.1 on Ubuntu
>> Linux. The library is very simple, R functions just need to share a
>> variable (that is defined in the R code) and maybe functions and export
>> functions for the user to .GlobalEnv. This variable should only be
>> directly accessible from the global workspace (without change of
>> environment) via a hereto dedicated function. It only consists of R
>> code. I'm not sure if I should rather ask R-help. If so, just tell me.
>>
>> The package source is available at
>> http://www.delff.dk/~philip/bdplot/
>> the check output at
>> http://www.delff.dk/~philip/bdplot.Rcheck/
>>
>> The package code was checked and stopped because of lack of examples.
>> Until that, everything is OK.
>>
>>> ### ** Examples
>>>
>>> ~~ simple examples of the most important functions ~~
>> Error: unexpected symbol in "~~ simple examples"
>> Execution halted
>>
>> I would like to get the code issue solved before moving the
>> documentation from the R scripts and have proceeded the to building and
>> installation. These two last steps gave no warnings or errors.
>>
>> My problem is that I cannot change the mentioned variable (from now on
>> called .FOO) that belongs to the namespace of the package. I think it is
>> because .FOO variable in some locked state, maybe by default created as
>> read-only. It is called .FOO because I use exportPattern("^[[:alpha:]]+")
>> as NAMESPACE file. I don't import anything.
>>
>> I have a function (bar) that, like par does with .Pars from the graphics
>> namespace, modifies the contents of a list. This function has in the
>> bottom (when the function name is called without () from the R command
>> line) a line
>>
>> 
>>
>> This is like par() has the graphics namespace mentioned, and therefore,
>> as I would expect. I can via this function read the contents of the
>> variable just by print(.FOO). This cannot be done from .GlobalEnv which
>> is as intended. The surprise is that I cannot write to it. If I do
>>
>> .FOO$x <<- "value"
>> (names and values are arguments to the function, like with par().), I
>> get the error:
>>
>> cannot change value of locked binding for '.FOO'
>>
>> The double arrow, I use because <- does not affect the contents of .FOO
>> after the function has run. I don't know how I can use assign in this
>> case. I don't know a name for my package's environment. I have tried
>> with my package's name in both assign() and unlockBinding(), but my
>> package's name is not recognized as an environment (neither beginning
>> with a dot.). I also tryed unlockBinding() in the NAMESPACE file.
>>
>> I don't know if this is normal, but I get
>> 
>> from print(parent.frame()) and things like
>> 
>> from print(environment())
>> This is surprising to me. I would expect
>> 
>> from environment().
>>
>> How can I get to write to .FOO via bar()?
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much
>> Philip.
>>
>> __
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] Patch for tk/GUI

2009-04-21 Thread jdeisenberg

On 15 Feb 2009, I uploaded a patch to tkGUI.r that allows Linux users to
load/save their workspace history from the GUI. There was no response, so I
presume I did not submit the code correctly. What is the correct mechanism
for submitting a patch/new feature to R?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-tk-GUI-tp23165645p23165645.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Patch for tk/GUI

2009-04-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard

jdeisenberg wrote:

On 15 Feb 2009, I uploaded a patch to tkGUI.r that allows Linux users to
load/save their workspace history from the GUI. There was no response, so I
presume I did not submit the code correctly. What is the correct mechanism
for submitting a patch/new feature to R?


Well, it's still in my r-devel folder labeled "important". It is just 
that important things get run over by important things with deadlines.


I'll get around to it eventually.

--
   O__   Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark  Ph:  (+45) 35327918
~~ - (p.dalga...@biostat.ku.dk)  FAX: (+45) 35327907

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Dan Kelley

This may be new to 2.9.0, but I'm not sure, since I no longer have the older
version.

I notice that  R CMD check  has no problem with .svn directories, but it
dislikes .git directories.  That seems a bit of a problem, for folks like me
who sometimes use git. Perhaps this behaviour could be changed?

Dan.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/R-CMD-check-dislikes-.git-directories-tp23166614p23166614.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 21/04/2009 7:59 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:

This may be new to 2.9.0, but I'm not sure, since I no longer have the older
version.

I notice that  R CMD check  has no problem with .svn directories, but it
dislikes .git directories.  That seems a bit of a problem, for folks like me
who sometimes use git. Perhaps this behaviour could be changed?


According to the R Extensions manual, it excludes dirs named CVS, .svn, 
.arch-ids, .bzr, and git.  Is .git the right thing to exclude instead of 
git, or are both possible?


The same section points out the workaround:  use the .Rbuildignore file 
to say what isn't really part of your package.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 21/04/2009 8:10 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

On 21/04/2009 7:59 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:

This may be new to 2.9.0, but I'm not sure, since I no longer have the older
version.

I notice that  R CMD check  has no problem with .svn directories, but it
dislikes .git directories.  That seems a bit of a problem, for folks like me
who sometimes use git. Perhaps this behaviour could be changed?


According to the R Extensions manual, it excludes dirs named CVS, .svn, 
.arch-ids, .bzr, and git.  Is .git the right thing to exclude instead of 
git, or are both possible?


Actually, that looks like a typo in the manual:  the code excludes .git, 
not git.  I'll fix the typo, but it means I don't know what error you're 
talking about.  Could you post instructions for reproducing?


Duncan Murdoch



The same section points out the workaround:  use the .Rbuildignore file 
to say what isn't really part of your package.


Duncan Murdoch




__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Dan Kelley
I think what I'm pasting below will illustrate.  (The git repo is  
behind a firewall, so I can't invite folks to download the repo to  
test locally.  I could tar up the source and put it on a website if  
that would help.)


* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking for executable files ... WARNING
Found the following executable file(s):
  .git/objects/01/9002df908b9c97f98e6ad3dd079bee436a2d66
  .git/objects/08/ac4fdd57a77afe2f8071c2e697cbda02b276b7
  .git/objects/13/49be3ed32dd801eacbdf1cc96a7577dcdfa2d7
  .git/objects/14/45d1188fcd949bd77d5c1117906c7987fe15a7
  .git/objects/18/756ad87b639ad2123a0ac78d04daa613d16966



On 2009-04-21, at 9:24 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:


On 21/04/2009 8:10 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

On 21/04/2009 7:59 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:
This may be new to 2.9.0, but I'm not sure, since I no longer have  
the older

version.

I notice that  R CMD check  has no problem with .svn directories,  
but it
dislikes .git directories.  That seems a bit of a problem, for  
folks like me

who sometimes use git. Perhaps this behaviour could be changed?
According to the R Extensions manual, it excludes dirs named  
CVS, .svn, .arch-ids, .bzr, and git.  Is .git the right thing to  
exclude instead of git, or are both possible?


Actually, that looks like a typo in the manual:  the code  
excludes .git, not git.  I'll fix the typo, but it means I don't  
know what error you're talking about.  Could you post instructions  
for reproducing?


Duncan Murdoch

The same section points out the workaround:  use the .Rbuildignore  
file to say what isn't really part of your package.

Duncan Murdoch




Dan Kelley, PhD
Associate Professor and Graduate Coordinator
Dept. Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS B3H 4J1
kelley@gmail.com (1-minute path) or dan.kel...@dal.ca (2-hour path)
Phone 902 494 1694;  Fax  902 494 3877

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 21/04/2009 8:37 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:
I think what I'm pasting below will illustrate.  (The git repo is  
behind a firewall, so I can't invite folks to download the repo to  
test locally.  I could tar up the source and put it on a website if  
that would help.)


* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking for executable files ... WARNING
Found the following executable file(s):
   .git/objects/01/9002df908b9c97f98e6ad3dd079bee436a2d66
   .git/objects/08/ac4fdd57a77afe2f8071c2e697cbda02b276b7
   .git/objects/13/49be3ed32dd801eacbdf1cc96a7577dcdfa2d7
   .git/objects/14/45d1188fcd949bd77d5c1117906c7987fe15a7
   .git/objects/18/756ad87b639ad2123a0ac78d04daa613d16966


Okay, that helps.  I don't think the problem is git versus svn, it's 
that you've got executable files in a directory where check shouldn't be 
looking.  I don't think .Rbuildignore would help you.


I'll pass this on as a bug...

Duncan Murdoch





On 2009-04-21, at 9:24 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:


On 21/04/2009 8:10 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

On 21/04/2009 7:59 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:
This may be new to 2.9.0, but I'm not sure, since I no longer have  
the older

version.

I notice that  R CMD check  has no problem with .svn directories,  
but it
dislikes .git directories.  That seems a bit of a problem, for  
folks like me

who sometimes use git. Perhaps this behaviour could be changed?
According to the R Extensions manual, it excludes dirs named  
CVS, .svn, .arch-ids, .bzr, and git.  Is .git the right thing to  
exclude instead of git, or are both possible?
Actually, that looks like a typo in the manual:  the code  
excludes .git, not git.  I'll fix the typo, but it means I don't  
know what error you're talking about.  Could you post instructions  
for reproducing?


Duncan Murdoch

The same section points out the workaround:  use the .Rbuildignore  
file to say what isn't really part of your package.

Duncan Murdoch


Dan Kelley, PhD
Associate Professor and Graduate Coordinator
Dept. Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS B3H 4J1
kelley@gmail.com (1-minute path) or dan.kel...@dal.ca (2-hour path)
Phone 902 494 1694;  Fax  902 494 3877






__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread hadley wickham
> Okay, that helps.  I don't think the problem is git versus svn, it's that
> you've got executable files in a directory where check shouldn't be looking.
>  I don't think .Rbuildignore would help you.
>
> I'll pass this on as a bug...

I've complained about this in the past, and I was told that "good
practice" was to run R CMD check on the file created by R CMD build.

Hadley

-- 
http://had.co.nz/

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] R CMD check dislikes .git directories

2009-04-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 21/04/2009 9:32 PM, hadley wickham wrote:

Okay, that helps.  I don't think the problem is git versus svn, it's that
you've got executable files in a directory where check shouldn't be looking.
 I don't think .Rbuildignore would help you.

I'll pass this on as a bug...


I've complained about this in the past, and I was told that "good
practice" was to run R CMD check on the file created by R CMD build.


That's true, and it would solve the problem, which may be why it hasn't 
been a high enough priority to fix.  I won't fix it:  check is written 
in Perl, and I don't know Perl well enough to want to mess with it.  But 
maybe a second complaint about it will motivate someone who does know 
Perl to put together a fix.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] RFC: Ability to suppress 'locale' from sessionInfo

2009-04-21 Thread Kevin W
The printing of the locale information from sessionInfo is not very tidy.
Using toLatex(sessionInfo) pretty much guarantees "badness" from breaking
the margin boundary (though my version of TeX no longer reports such
errors).  A random example is here:
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Matrix/vignettes/Design-issues.pdf

I find the locale information unnecessary and right now I hack this with
si = sessionInfo()
si$locale = "US"
toLatex(si)

I would like to be able to do something a bit cleaner, for example
sessionInfo(locale=FALSE)

For what it's worth, I don't think that early versions of sessionInfo
printed information about the locale.

Discussion welcome.

Kevin Wright

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel