Re: [Numpy-discussion] Custom Dtype/Units discussion
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum > wrote: > >> >> Maybe this can be an informal BOF session? >> > > or maybe a formal BoF? after all, how formal do they get? > > Anyway, it was my understanding that we really needed to do some > significant refactoring of how numpy deals with dtypes in order to do this > kind of thing cleanly -- so where has that gone since last year? > > Maybe this conversation should be about how to build a more flexible dtype > system generally, rather than specifically about unit support. (though unit > support is a great use-case to focus on) > > So Thursday's options seem to be in the standard BOF slot (up against the Numfocus BOF), or doing something that evening, which would overlap at least part of multiple happy hour events. I lean towards evening. Thoughts? Ryan -- Ryan May ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Custom Dtype/Units discussion
Evening would work for me. Dinner? On Jul 13, 2016 2:43 PM, "Ryan May" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Barker > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Maybe this can be an informal BOF session? >>> >> >> or maybe a formal BoF? after all, how formal do they get? >> >> Anyway, it was my understanding that we really needed to do some >> significant refactoring of how numpy deals with dtypes in order to do this >> kind of thing cleanly -- so where has that gone since last year? >> >> Maybe this conversation should be about how to build a more flexible >> dtype system generally, rather than specifically about unit support. >> (though unit support is a great use-case to focus on) >> >> > So Thursday's options seem to be in the standard BOF slot (up against the > Numfocus BOF), or doing something that evening, which would overlap at > least part of multiple happy hour events. I lean towards evening. Thoughts? > > Ryan > > -- > Ryan May > > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Custom Dtype/Units discussion
I have something at lunch, so dinner would be good for me too. On Jul 13, 2016 7:46 PM, "Charles R Harris" wrote: > Evening would work for me. Dinner? > On Jul 13, 2016 2:43 PM, "Ryan May" wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Barker >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum >>> wrote: >>> Maybe this can be an informal BOF session? >>> >>> or maybe a formal BoF? after all, how formal do they get? >>> >>> Anyway, it was my understanding that we really needed to do some >>> significant refactoring of how numpy deals with dtypes in order to do this >>> kind of thing cleanly -- so where has that gone since last year? >>> >>> Maybe this conversation should be about how to build a more flexible >>> dtype system generally, rather than specifically about unit support. >>> (though unit support is a great use-case to focus on) >>> >>> >> So Thursday's options seem to be in the standard BOF slot (up against the >> Numfocus BOF), or doing something that evening, which would overlap at >> least part of multiple happy hour events. I lean towards evening. Thoughts? >> >> Ryan >> >> -- >> Ryan May >> >> >> ___ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
