On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Maybe this can be an informal BOF session? >> > > or maybe a formal BoF? after all, how formal do they get? > > Anyway, it was my understanding that we really needed to do some > significant refactoring of how numpy deals with dtypes in order to do this > kind of thing cleanly -- so where has that gone since last year? > > Maybe this conversation should be about how to build a more flexible dtype > system generally, rather than specifically about unit support. (though unit > support is a great use-case to focus on) > > So Thursday's options seem to be in the standard BOF slot (up against the Numfocus BOF), or doing something that evening, which would overlap at least part of multiple happy hour events. I lean towards evening. Thoughts? Ryan -- Ryan May
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
