[kdenlive] [Bug 427162] New: Error opening archived project - incorrect paths are created for the files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 Bug ID: 427162 Summary: Error opening archived project - incorrect paths are created for the files Product: kdenlive Version: 20.08.0 Platform: Other OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: User Interface Assignee: j...@kdenlive.org Reporter: chr...@yahoo.com Target Milestone: --- SUMMARY I am on Windows 10. If I archive a project into another folder, then try to open that project I get an error: The project file contains missing clips or files. These referenced files are in fact in the correct location. However, whoever wrote the code mixed Linux and Windows "paths". Look at the following referenced file from the error message... F:/Video Workbench/Electronics/E003 Raspberry Pi Camera Demonstrator/E003 P5 Camera Assembly\videos/MVI_0583_0.MP4 Notice that before the sub-directory videos, there is a \ instead of the appropriate / for a Windows computer. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Create archive on Windows computer with mp4 files (not sure if file type is important or not. 2. Open resulting project file in the archived directory - you will get error code. 3. Look at path shown with the associated error code/report. OBSERVED RESULT EXPECTED RESULT SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Windows: 10 KDE Plasma Version: KDE Frameworks Version: Qt Version: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I flagged this as critical because if someone archives a project and doesn't check it before deleting the original, they will have lost a LOT of work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdenlive] [Bug 427162] Error opening archived project - incorrect paths are created for the files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 --- Comment #3 from Chris D --- Hello, I believe I did the update following those directions. The version number is now 20.08.0 I did a quick test on a small file and it seemed to work okay. Thank you! Chris DeHut On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, 09:38:54 AM CDT, emohr wrote: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 --- Comment #2 from emohr --- Go to https://kdenlive.org/en/download/ scroll to the bottom. On the right side under Windows is the instruction how to install. Let me know if this instruction is OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 444394] Rejected face suggestions reappear for the same person the next time recognition is run
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394 Chris D changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sendchrissomej...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Chris D --- I agree, I have this problem too. I have stopped bothering to reject suggestions, since it is apparently a waste of time (the program doesn't do anything with the information that the suggestion is not a match, so there's no benefit to rejecting as far as I can tell). I just leave them as unknown, because they will end up that way again anyway next time I rescan everything (which the instructions say you should do once in a while for better accuracy). Same with ignoring, I tried ignoring false face IDs when rejecting didn't keep them from popping back up, but everything I've ignored resets on a new scan. So every face ID I've tried to ignore always pops back up on a rescan. So hopefully it's a bug (and not an oversight) that the program behaves this way...you would expect the information gained by ignoring and rejecting faces would not be temporary. If it's not used to improve the face recognition, at the least it should be stored to keep duplicate work from being created. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 444160] Facing matching is guess work at best
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160 Chris D changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sendchrissomej...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Chris D --- Not to pile on, but I agree with all this. The misidentifies are really outrageously not even close oftentimes (most of the time). I have tried every setting and variation I can think of and nothing seems to affect the accuracy. I have a large number of faces, too, and I have read that for some reason a large number of faces can affect things negatively, but I agree, the more faces I give digiKam, the better it should get. I understand that the documentation tells you the accuracy can take a hit if you have low-quality pictures or faces with sunglasses and so on, but if I've identified 100 pictures of a person, and 80 of the pictures are pretty good and 10 are fantastic, and the rest are bad, low resolution or wearing sunglasses or whatever, the program ought to be able to examine at all the pictures that I've identified as a certain person and compare all of them and figure for the ones that it doesn't see as similar that this must be an odd or bad or for whatever reason not a picture representative of the person and ignore it. The user shouldn't have to not identify a person as a person just because their face is partially obscured, and the program should certainly be able to recognize a low-pixel photo and ignore the identification if it's not helpful. I also agree that the program should group unknown people that you haven't identified yet. The program should be able to tell that a group of photos of the same person are most likely all the same person without me having to tell it what the person's name is If the program were to give matching but unknown faces a generic name like Unknown Person 001 or something, then I could just go in and delete or ignore or deselect the misidentifies and just rename the tag for all the rest, rather than me having to (possibly) sort through all my unknowns and find enough examples of this person before I can hope for the rest of them to be identified. Not coming down on you guys, honestly! I love this program and the innumerable things it does really really well! Just face recognition for some reason isn't one of them. Yet! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[digikam] [Bug 444394] Rejected face suggestions reappear for the same person the next time recognition is run
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394 --- Comment #12 from Chris D --- I have been using 8.5 for a couplea weeks, and it is MUCH improved, so thanks to everyone for the hard work. Many more faces in my collection have been identified, although still odd non-face results and such. Hopefully it's downhill from here! But I wonder, has the subject of this thread been addressed yet? Does this update make the rejection of wrong identifications helpful or meaningful? Or should we just continue to ignore wrong suggestions? Thanks! Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
