Re: [google/4.7]mark expected failures for ppc64 (issue 6932046)
As suggested by Doug, this patch is aimed to google/integration, google/main, and google/gcc-4_7. https://codereview.appspot.com/6932046/
Re: [google/google-main] Fix regression - SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS overridden by LINUX_GRTE_EXTRA_SPECS (issue 6016047)
I suspect this patch would change specs of non-i386 platform. For example, LINUX_GRTE_EXTRA_SPECS is not part of SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS for darwin. Can you tell where SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS is firstly defined for chromeos toolchain? On 2012/05/14 18:32:17, shenhan wrote: On 2012/04/12 21:14:29, shenhan wrote: > Hi, the newest chrome gcc (from google-main) fails to linking anything, by > looking into specs file, it seems that 'link_emulation' section is missing in > specs. > > The problem I found is that SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS, which is not empty for > chromeos, is overridden by "LINUX_GRTE_EXTRA_SPECS". > > Please review the proposed a patch. (Tested by buildit bootstrap). > > -Han Hi Jing and Rong, could you take a look at this? Thanks, -Han http://codereview.appspot.com/6016047/
Re: [google/gcc-4_6_3-mobile] Port r187569 from google/gcc-4_6 branch (issue 6210060)
In my opinion, gcc/ChangeLog is for upstream commits only. It is fine that you want to port upstream gcc/ChangeLog as well. Just remove your identities +2012-05-11 Han Shen + + Backported r187569 from branches/google/gcc-4_6. LGTM On 2012/05/16 22:54:19, asharif1 wrote: On 2012/05/16 22:11:08, shenhan wrote: > On 2012/05/16 17:27:59, asharif1 wrote: > > On 2012/05/16 01:02:26, shenhan wrote: > > > Hi Amhad and Jing, could you take a look at this CL at > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6210060/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Han > > > > Shouldn't this have a corresponding ChangeLog entry and a > > ChangeLog.google-gcc-4_6 entry? > > Hi Ahmad, thanks! > > Done recreating the patch from "svn merge -c". > > Regards, > -Han Thanks a lot, shenhan. lgtm. http://codereview.appspot.com/6210060/
Re: [google/gcc-4_6] Added dejagnu base line for x86_64-cros-linux-gnu. (issue 5990044)
On 2012/04/06 00:35:12, asharif1 wrote: On 2012/04/05 17:25:44, shenhan wrote: > Hi Jing and Ahmad, > > This adds a new test base line for x86_64-cros-linux-gnu. Please take a look. > > Thanks, > Han lgtm. ok http://codereview.appspot.com/5990044/
Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue 5453050)
http://codereview.appspot.com/5453050/
Re: Merged r182417 from branches/google/gcc-4_6. (issue 5491078)
On 2011/12/19 22:09:18, asharif1 wrote: This merges xur's patch to our mobile release branch. LGTM and I will submit it. OK http://codereview.appspot.com/5491078/
Re: [google]Skip target-libiberty for arm*-*-linux-androideabi (issue4564050)
The trunk version has been approved and committed as r174710. Backport it to google/main. The google/main version has the same logic but is slightly different since trunk has a different code structure here. OK for google/main? 2011-06-06 Jing Yu Backport trunk r174710: * configure.ac: Skip target-libiberty for arm*-*-linux-androideabi. * configure: Regenerated. http://codereview.appspot.com/4564050/
Re: [google] Backport r175347 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue4835041)
ok http://codereview.appspot.com/4835041/