[Bug c++/28363] Default template parameter causes compiler segfault

2006-07-13 Thread wieseltux23 at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #1 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-13 15:08 ---
Subject: Re:  New: Default template parameter causes compiler segfault

http://earth.google.com/download-earth.html

On 7/13/06, DebianTux23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://earth.google.com/download-earth.html
>
>
> On 12 Jul 2006 21:18:46 -, eric dot lemings at roguewave dot com
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.0
> > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ cat test01.cpp
> >
> > template
> > <
> >   class T1, class T2,
> >   template < int > class T0 = T1,
> > >
> > struct A {
> > };
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ g++ -Wall -g test01.cpp -o test01
> > test01.cpp:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > for instructions.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$
> >
> >
> > --
> >Summary: Default template parameter causes compiler segfault
> >Product: gcc
> >Version: 4.1.0
> > Status: UNCONFIRMED
> >   Severity: major
> >   Priority: P3
> >  Component: c++
> > AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> > ReportedBy: eric dot lemings at roguewave dot com
> >
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363
> >
> >
>
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363

[Bug c++/28363] Default template parameter causes compiler segfault

2006-07-13 Thread wieseltux23 at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #2 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-13 15:09 ---
Subject: Re:  New: Default template parameter causes compiler segfault

http://earth.google.com/download-earth.html
https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=pages&continue=http%3A%2F%2Fpages.google.com%3A80%2F

On 7/13/06, DebianTux23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://earth.google.com/download-earth.html
>
>
> On 12 Jul 2006 21:18:46 -, eric dot lemings at roguewave dot com
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.0
> > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ cat test01.cpp
> >
> > template
> > <
> >   class T1, class T2,
> >   template < int > class T0 = T1,
> > >
> > struct A {
> > };
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ g++ -Wall -g test01.cpp -o test01
> > test01.cpp:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > for instructions.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$
> >
> >
> > --
> >Summary: Default template parameter causes compiler segfault
> >Product: gcc
> >Version: 4.1.0
> > Status: UNCONFIRMED
> >   Severity: major
> >   Priority: P3
> >  Component: c++
> > AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> > ReportedBy: eric dot lemings at roguewave dot com
> >
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363
> >
> >
>
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2006-07-15 Thread wieseltux23 at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #15 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 18:00 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error:
 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

http://en.fon.com/


On 15 Jul 2006 16:14:34 -
"pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> 
> --- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:14 
> ---
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
> 
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
> patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
> be included.  And I still say the patch is incorrect.  I already
> explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
> be included.  Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
> as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
> config/i386/linux.h.
> 
> -- Pinski
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2006-07-15 Thread wieseltux23 at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #16 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 18:01 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error:
 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

http://en.fon.com/

On 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -
"ams at gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> 
> --- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:25 ---
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
>> Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?
> 
>Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.
> 
> If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
> GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
> patches being neglected (mostly by me).
> 
> Happy hacking.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102