------- Comment #15 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com 2006-07-15 18:00 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
http://en.fon.com/ On 15 Jul 2006 16:14:34 -0000 "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-07-15 16:14 > ------- > Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' > undeclared > > > On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect. > > Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting > patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them > be included. And I still say the patch is incorrect. I already > explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not > be included. Also the comment in your patch is incorrect > as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from > config/i386/linux.h. > > -- Pinski > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
