Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
Hi, We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU regressions to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it may be buried by normal test results. Any suggestions. Thanks. -- H.J.
Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Hi, > > We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 > on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to > report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU > regressions to > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ > > But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ > > is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it > may be buried by normal test results. > > Any suggestions. Put it on a website and link to it from http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ Richard. > Thanks. > > -- > H.J. >
Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 >> on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to >> report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU >> regressions to >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ >> >> But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ >> >> is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it >> may be buried by normal test results. >> >> Any suggestions. > > Put it on a website and link to it from > http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ > My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests failed. -- H.J.
Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther > wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 >>> on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to >>> report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU >>> regressions to >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ >>> >>> But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ >>> >>> is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it >>> may be buried by normal test results. >>> >>> Any suggestions. >> >> Put it on a website and link to it from >> http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ >> > > My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since > I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests > failed. I see. I agree that gcc-regression is appropriate for FAILs then. Is it important to have PASSes available somewhere? (you can assume PASSes if there are no FAIL reports). Richard. > > -- > H.J. >
Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Hi, We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU regressions to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it may be buried by normal test results. Any suggestions. >>> >>> Put it on a website and link to it from >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ >>> >> >> My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since >> I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests >> failed. > > I see. I agree that gcc-regression is appropriate for FAILs then. Is it > important to have PASSes available somewhere? (you can assume PASSes > if there are no FAIL reports). > But you won't know what exactly the last passing revision is and you can't tell if my SPEC CPU machines are running normally. -- H.J.
PATCH for Re: New mirror
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, i...@onlinedirect.bg wrote: > Hello, we decided to run new GCC mirror in Bulgaria. Here are the details. > Country: Bulgaria > City: Sofia > Bandwidth: 2 gbps aggregated link to the Bulgarian Peering, 500 mbps > international > Contact: i...@onlinedirect.bg > URL: http://gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg/ > FTP: ftp://gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg/others/gcc/ > 1000 connections limit. Gets synced every 6 hours. Thanks for mirroring our gcc.gnu.org site and letting us know about it, Igor! I just committed the patch below and http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html now lists your mirror site. Gerald Index: mirrors.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/mirrors.html,v retrieving revision 1.188 diff -u -3 -p -r1.188 mirrors.html --- mirrors.html25 Jan 2009 17:00:01 - 1.188 +++ mirrors.html25 Jan 2009 19:59:14 - @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Key fingerprint = 90AA 4704 69D3 965A 87 Austria: ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/gnu/gcc/";>gd.tuwien.ac.at, thanks to Antonin dot Sprinzl at tuwien dot ac dot at +Bulgaria: http://gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg/";>gcc.igor.onlinedirect.bg, thanks to igor at onlinedirect dot bg Canada, Toronto: http://gcc-ca.internet.bs";>http://gcc-ca.internet.bs, thanks to Internet.bs (info at internet dot bs) China: ftp://linuxforum.net/ftp.gcc.gnu.org/";>ftp://linuxforum.net/ftp.gcc.gnu.org/, thanks to David Deng (david99deng at yahoo dot com) China, Hong Kong: http://gcc-hk.internet.bs";>http://gcc-hk.internet.bs, thanks to Internet.bs (info at internet dot bs)
Re: Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]
Dave Korn wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > >[ ... snip ... ] > > Sorry, the conclusion of that post evolved a bit while I was writing it, > but I forgot to update the subject. This is what I should have posted it as. > I'll start a fresh thread when I know more about the cause of the failure. So, I started a fresh thread :-) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg01258.html cheers, DaveK
