On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther >> <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006 >>>> on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to >>>> report pass and regressions. We may send SPEC CPU >>>> regressions to >>>> >>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/ >>>> >>>> But for passes, there is no suitable place to report. >>>> >>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ >>>> >>>> is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it >>>> may be buried by normal test results. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions. >>> >>> Put it on a website and link to it from >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ >>> >> >> My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since >> I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests >> failed. > > I see. I agree that gcc-regression is appropriate for FAILs then. Is it > important to have PASSes available somewhere? (you can assume PASSes > if there are no FAIL reports). >
But you won't know what exactly the last passing revision is and you can't tell if my SPEC CPU machines are running normally. -- H.J.
