Re: Feature proposal: selection of views and tables for inspectdb

2015-11-06 Thread José Tomás Tocino García
>
> Maybe that view thing as been changed along the years.
>
> My proposal would be allow two switches, inclusion and exclusion with a
> wildcard. Where exclusion would override any inclusion.
>
> I guess that would satisfy most of the use cases. How that sounds?
>

As I already stated before, filtering using wildcards is not going to make
it for me, because in my case I don't get a list of available tables in the
first place (because the current introspection mechanism doesn't return
tables not owned by the user).

-- 
José Tomás Tocino García
http://www.josetomastocino.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAAOwDo7J33ScxGvQ3UZe2HLMLbc1Eim1TPGwqFDap6Xdp%2BJkFw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Feature proposal: selection of views and tables for inspectdb

2015-11-06 Thread Jani Tiainen



On 06.11.2015 10:54, José Tomás Tocino García wrote:


Maybe that view thing as been changed along the years.

My proposal would be allow two switches, inclusion and exclusion
with a wildcard. Where exclusion would override any inclusion.

I guess that would satisfy most of the use cases. How that sounds?


As I already stated before, filtering using wildcards is not going to 
make it for me, because in my case I don't get a list of available 
tables in the first place (because the current introspection mechanism 
doesn't return tables not owned by the user).




Well maybe extending queries to do that. Wonder is there similiar issues 
with postgresql?



--
José Tomás Tocino García
http://www.josetomastocino.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To post to this group, send email to 
django-developers@googlegroups.com 
.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAAOwDo7J33ScxGvQ3UZe2HLMLbc1Eim1TPGwqFDap6Xdp%2BJkFw%40mail.gmail.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/563C820E.9060606%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.