> > Maybe that view thing as been changed along the years. > > My proposal would be allow two switches, inclusion and exclusion with a > wildcard. Where exclusion would override any inclusion. > > I guess that would satisfy most of the use cases. How that sounds? >
As I already stated before, filtering using wildcards is not going to make it for me, because in my case I don't get a list of available tables in the first place (because the current introspection mechanism doesn't return tables not owned by the user). -- José Tomás Tocino García http://www.josetomastocino.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAAOwDo7J33ScxGvQ3UZe2HLMLbc1Eim1TPGwqFDap6Xdp%2BJkFw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
