Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. ~ David On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh > > wrote: > > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs, > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > > > > Another quick update. > > > > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks close > to > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants > this > > > in 9.4 > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > > > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > check. > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few > days. > > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >>> : > > >>> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > > Since we > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Just a quick status update > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if > > >> there > > is more work pending > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to > make > > >> sure > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone > > else > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I > > >> need to > > do Monday morning. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > > >> necessity > > > to ask permission. > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, > since > > it > > >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy > > warning > > >> is > > >> generated. > > >> > > >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the > > Lucene > > >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not > > work > > >> out, I > > >>> will go ahead with the release. > > >>> > > >>> best, > > >>> alex > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene > 9.8 > > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > > >> low-ish. > > > > Jan > > > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta < > > ans...@anshumgupta.net > > >> : > > > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > > > many > > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > > >> Lucene > > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and > > moving > > forward > > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan@cominvent.com > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions and so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script to guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while waiting for others. best, alex On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley wrote: > Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. > Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but > just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > ~ David > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on > > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > eyeballs, > > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > > > > > > Another quick update. > > > > > > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs > to > > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > close > > to > > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants > > this > > > > in 9.4 > > > > > > > > best, > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > > check. > > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few > > days. > > > >> > > > >> Jan Høydahl > > > >> > > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > > >>> : > > > >>> > > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > > > Since we > > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just a quick status update > > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure > if > > > >> there > > > is more work pending > > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no > more > > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to > > make > > > >> sure > > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in > the > > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone > > > else > > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > > > > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what > I > > > >> need to > > > do Monday morning. > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > > > >> necessity > > > > to ask permission. > > > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, > > since > > > it > > > >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy > > > warning > > > >> is > > > >> generated. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the > > > Lucene > > > >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not > > > work > > > >> out, I > > > >>> will go ahead with the release. > > > >>> > > > >>> best, > > > >>> alex > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in folder '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y . changing version to 9.5.0... File "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", line 91, in update_file infile = open(filename, 'r') ^^^ FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' it looks like this class moved to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. any thoughts? On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions and > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script to > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > waiting for others. > > best, > alex > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. >> ~ David >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning >> on >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and >> eyeballs, >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Another quick update. >> > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs >> to >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks >> close >> > to >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants >> > this >> > > > in 9.4 >> > > > >> > > > best, >> > > > alex >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please >> > check. >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few >> > days. >> > > >> >> > > >> Jan Høydahl >> > > >> >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com >> > > >>> : >> > > >>> >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. >> > > Since we >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Just a quick status update >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not >> sure if >> > > >> there >> > > is more work pending >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no >> more >> > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to >> > make >> > > >> sure >> > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in >> the >> > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If >> anyone >> > > else >> > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. >> > > >> > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! >> > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see >> what I >> > > >> need to >> > > do Monday morning. >> > > >> > > best, >> > > alex >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < >> > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no >> > > >> necessity >> > > > to ask permission. >> > > > >> > > > ~ David >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the way to go. - Houston On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due > to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: > > Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in folder > '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y > . > changing version to 9.5.0... > File > > "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", > line 91, in update_file > infile = open(filename, 'r') > ^^^ > FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' > > it looks like this class moved > to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. > any thoughts? > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some > > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions > and > > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script > to > > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me > > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > > waiting for others. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > > wrote: > > > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. > >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but > >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > >> ~ David > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning > >> on > >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com > >> > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > >> eyeballs, > >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Another quick update. > >> > > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this > needs > >> to > >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > >> close > >> > to > >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he > wants > >> > this > >> > > > in 9.4 > >> > > > > >> > > > best, > >> > > > alex > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > >> > check. > >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next > few > >> > days. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > >> > > >>> : > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends > up > >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > >> > > Since we > >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > Just a quick status update > >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not > >> sure if > >> > > >> there > >> > > is more work pending > >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no > >> more > >> > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just > to > >> > make > >> > > >> sure > >> > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade > in > >> the > >> > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If > >> anyone > >> > > else > >> > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > >> > > > >> > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > >> > > I
New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.4.0
NOTICE: Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable the branch. Please observe the normal rules: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into the current release branch. * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual. However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch may become more difficult. * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.4 and priority "Blocker" will delay a release candidate build.
Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.4.0
Please update the draft release notes if you have any suggestions: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_4_0 best, alex On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:26 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > NOTICE: > > Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable the > branch. > > Please observe the normal rules: > > * No new features may be committed to the branch. > * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be > committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you > want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review > and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our > main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed > to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into > the current release branch. > * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual. > However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch > while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the > addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch > may become more difficult. > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.4 and priority "Blocker" will delay > a release candidate build. >
404 page in 8.11 ref guide online
Just discovered that this page is 404 https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/rule-based-replica-placement.html. Anyone know how this happened? It's the destination for SolrCloud > Rule-based Replica Placement in the left menu in the 8.11 ref guide -Gus -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
Re: 404 page in 8.11 ref guide online
Hmm this may be related to me trying to fix the headers. Let me revert that On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:13 PM Gus Heck wrote: > Just discovered that this page is 404 > https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/rule-based-replica-placement.html. > > Anyone know how this happened? It's the destination for SolrCloud > > Rule-based Replica Placement in the left menu in the 8.11 ref guide > > -Gus > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >
Re: 404 page in 8.11 ref guide online
Yep that was it, the page is back online now! Sorry about that. - Houston On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:21 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hmm this may be related to me trying to fix the headers. Let me revert that > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:13 PM Gus Heck wrote: > >> Just discovered that this page is 404 >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/rule-based-replica-placement.html. >> >> Anyone know how this happened? It's the destination for SolrCloud > >> Rule-based Replica Placement in the left menu in the 8.11 ref guide >> >> -Gus >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >> >
Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.4.0
I think this is missing a some words: "A new Always-On trace id generator and the rid parameter is being deprecated” Maybe “…generator has been added and…”? As it stands, it looks like the new trace id generator is being deprecated. The circuit breaker descriptions are accurate, but probably do not need to be capitalized. In general, there seem to be extra capitalizations, like “Always-On” and “Backup, Restore, and Split”. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Oct 3, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > Please update the draft release notes if you have any suggestions: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_4_0 > > best, > alex > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:26 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> NOTICE: >> >> Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable the >> branch. >> >> Please observe the normal rules: >> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch. >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be >> committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you >> want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review >> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our >> main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed >> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into >> the current release branch. >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual. >> However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch >> while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the >> addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch >> may become more difficult. >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.4 and priority "Blocker" will delay >> a release candidate build. >>
Re: Change suggestion: more efficient replica state tracking
> > I wonder if ZK session expiration and re establishment works nicely for > others? The code handling this is in ZkController.onReconnect(). Answering my own question: the issue was specific to our fork so I assume ZK session expiration and re establishment does work nicely in general. On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 6:57 PM Mark Miller wrote: > Oh I’m not referring to your proposal, just what happens with the current > system and what I had done around DOWN state to address it. The problem > there is the missing replica state when you come up as the live node can’t > cover for it. How you cover for that state could be done in a lot of ways, > it’s just not covered currently. >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Thanks Alex, I've merged the changes for SOLR-16852 On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:51 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the > way to go. > > - Houston > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure > due > > to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: > > > > Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in > folder > > '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y > > . > > changing version to 9.5.0... > > File > > > > > "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", > > line 91, in update_file > > infile = open(filename, 'r') > > ^^^ > > FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > > 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' > > > > it looks like this class moved > > to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. > > any thoughts? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > > > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > > > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in > some > > > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions > > and > > > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > > > > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script > > to > > > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > > > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got > me > > > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > > > waiting for others. > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > > >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release > branch. > > >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > > >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... > but > > >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > > >> ~ David > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > > >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm > planning > > >> on > > >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > > >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > > >> eyeballs, > > >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Another quick update. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be > a > > >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this > > needs > > >> to > > >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the > priority. > > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > > >> close > > >> > to > > >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he > > wants > > >> > this > > >> > > > in 9.4 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > best, > > >> > > > alex > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan@cominvent.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. > Please > > >> > check. > > >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next > > few > > >> > days. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >> > > >>> : > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends > > up > > >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into > 9.4…. > > >> > > Since we > > >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu < > > stilla...@apache.org> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > > > >> > > Just a quick status update > > >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not > > >> sure if > > >> > > >> there > > >> > > is more work pending > > >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are > no > > >> more > > >> > > failures (still running one single te
Re: 404 page in 8.11 ref guide online
Cool, glad it was simple to identify and fix. :) On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:23 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Yep that was it, the page is back online now! Sorry about that. > > - Houston > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:21 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > > Hmm this may be related to me trying to fix the headers. Let me revert > that > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:13 PM Gus Heck wrote: > > > >> Just discovered that this page is 404 > >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/rule-based-replica-placement.html. > >> > >> Anyone know how this happened? It's the destination for SolrCloud > > >> Rule-based Replica Placement in the left menu in the 8.11 ref guide > >> > >> -Gus > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) > >> > > > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
