Bug#231863: klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails
Package: klipper Version: 4:3.1.3-1 Severity: normal When copying a URL in a KDE-Program (e.g. knode), klipper pops up, when I chose 'Open with Mozilla' klipper hands the URL over to mozilla. Mozilla then has 'http://example.com' (with single-quotes.) in the address field and alerts: "The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded". Seems to be a klipper problem, because opening URLs in Mozilla woks fine with xchat. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux yellow.uttenthaler.at 2.4.23-rc1 #10 Mon Nov 17 15:56:47 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages klipper depends on: ii kdelibs44:3.1.4-3KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.1-6Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxrender1 0.8.3-5 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Bug#231873: kmail: fails to send email
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.1.4-1 Severity: important When submitting an email (no authentication, no encryption) the SMTP-Server responds: "5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)" (of course there is one in the mail ..) When using authentication and encryption (Plain, TLS), kmail reports: "Could not connect to host example.com" Both setups work in Mozilla (same SMTP server, same username) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux yellow.uttenthaler.at 2.4.23-rc1 #10 Mon Nov 17 15:56:47 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.1.3-1KDE I/O Slaves ii kdelibs44:3.1.4-3KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio2 1.6b-1 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.2.1-13 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.1.4-1KDE Network (common libraries) ii libmimelib1 4:3.1.4-1KDE network mime library ii libpcre34.3-4Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.1-6Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxcursor1 1.0.2-4 X Cursor management library ii libxft2 2.1.2-5 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 0.8.3-5 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibmesa3-gl [libgl1] 4.2.1-12.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Bug#231863: Acknowledgement (klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails)
Sorry, the bug has already been reported and fixed. (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218673) The reportbug tool didn't show the list of outstanding bugs. regards tom smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
kdeartwork-theme-desktop kdeartwork-theme-icon
Hello, kdeartwork-theme-desktop and kdeartwork-theme-icon conflicts. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/icons/Locolor/index.theme', which is also in package kdeartwork-theme-icon libwmf0.2-7 has unfullfilled dependecies dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libwmf0.2-7: libwmf0.2-7 depends on libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1); however: Version of libfreetype6 on system is 2.0.9-1. MfG bmg -- "Des is völlig wurscht, was heut beschlos- | M G Berberich sen wird: I bin sowieso dagegn!" | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SPD-Stadtrat Kurt Schindler; Regensburg) | www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~berberic pgpMzzjuk9Ym6.pgp Description: PGP signature
kdebase build failure on s390 -- linux-kernel-headers again?
See the kdebase log on s390, at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.5-2&arch=s390&stamp=1076056706&file=log&as=raw : This looks like a glibc/linux-kernel-headers bug, since the problems are coming from sys/user.h, which is a perfectly legitimate header to include. I don't *think* it's been reported yet. I'm sending the message to this list in the hopes that the Qt/KDE maintainers can analyze this better than I can and file the glibc/linux-kernel-headers bug if necessary. :-) I notice the following: Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-11 ... Unfortunately, the linux-kernel-headers version isn't listed in the toolchain package versions line. (I'd file a wishlist bug -- but against what package?) >From the log: Making all in Linux make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux/ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux -I../../.. -I../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/../../CContLib -I../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/.. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -Wall -ansi -W -Wall -pedantic -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT ProcessList.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ProcessList.Tpo" \ -c -o ProcessList.o `test -f '../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/ProcessList.c' || echo '../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/'`../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/ProcessList.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/ProcessList.Tpo" ".deps/ProcessList.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/ProcessList.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from /usr/include/linux/ptrace.h:49, from /usr/include/asm/user.h:13, from /usr/include/sys/user.h:22, from ../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/ProcessList.c:29: /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:193: error: syntax error before "__u64" /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:199: error: syntax error before '}' token /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:199: error: ISO C forbids data definition with no type or storage class /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:204: error: syntax error before "freg_t" /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:205: error: ISO C forbids data definition with no type or storage class /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:448: error: syntax error before "s390_fp_regs" /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h:457: error: syntax error before '}' token In file included from /usr/include/sys/user.h:22, from ../../../../ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux/ProcessList.c:29: /usr/include/asm/user.h:55: error: field `regs' has incomplete type make[5]: *** [ProcessList.o] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux/ksysguard/ksysguardd/Linux' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux/ksysguard/ksysguardd' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux/ksysguard' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdebase-3.1.5/obj-s390-linux' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 -- Nathanael Nerode US citizens: if you're considering voting for Bush, look at these first: http://www.misleader.org/ http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/ http://www.house.gov/reform/min/politicsandscience/
Debian Background Image / Theming
Hello I am writing you because Volkan Yazici pointed me to a beautiful photography that would fit well into Debian. So I did contact the photographer (Hi Jakub) and asked him to release the photography under a free license which he did (artistic). The photography I am talking about is this here: http://www.linuks.mine.nu/jakub/ My Bandwith is limited if you want to download the large photography or the whole package, please download it from here: http://moo.hotsanic.org/jakub/ Now what about using that for the Sarge release? I found your names from propaganda-debian and window maker, desktop manager packages. Yours Gürkan Sengün you can find me on irc.gnu.org #debian with nickname tarzeau as well for comments and discussion. probably this should have went to a mailinglist of debian i didn't know to which so that's why i wrote you instead. -- Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it. --Chinese Proverb pgpTDwqmsJMBF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#231392: konqueror: Can't talk to klauncher
Hello Peter, On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote: > Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem happens > within kde itself? Mmh, that'll be difficult. Since it only happens sometimes, this would mean I would have to use KDE for a longer time which I really would like to avoid[1]. If you have anything which requires testing once, I could install KDE, try it out, and remove it again. About the load issue I am rather unsure. Friday I waited a while after booting, but just when starting X updatedb kicked in causing a higher load but konqueror worked fine. Greetings Helge [1] I don't like desktop environments, let them be called gnome or KDE; I only want to use certain applications. That's just very personal preference and has nothing to do with code quality. -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpC9TKI9LSRR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#231901: kdm: /etc/X11/default-display-manager filled wrongly
Package: kdm Version: 4:3.1.3-1 Severity: important Hi, after several "apt-get upgrade" (testing) kdm didnt start and executing "/etc/init.d/kdm start" results in "Not starting K Desktop Manager (kdm); it is not the default display manager." (As well as xdm -- no other window managers installed) After fiddling for a while i found out, that /etc/X11/default-display-manager contains the following line: 10 kdm/daemon_name doesn't exist which seems to be an error message of db_get or so. If found the following line in "/var/lib/dpkg/info/xdm.postinst" safe_debconf db_get "$DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER"/daemon_name So this might be a problem of xdm after all! I can reproduce the whole thing by starting "dpkg-reconfigure xdm" and switching to "kdm" there. Switching back and forth between xdm and kdm with "dpkg-reconfigure kdm" fixes the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux complexity 2.4.18-1-k7 #3 Sat Nov 29 10:23:13 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kdm depends on: ii debconf 1.3.20 Debian configuration management sy ii kdelibs44:3.1.4-3KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library ii libpam0g0.76-14 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.1-6Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxrender1 0.8.3-4 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xbase-clients 4.2.1-12.1 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-16 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * kdm/default_servers_nolisten_tcp: * kdm/default_servers_100dpi: * kdm/default_nolisten_udp: * shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm
Re: KDE 3.1.5 Status Update - 20040208
> If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to > persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE > 3.1.5 can go into sarge... > > Chris Actually, it looks to me like all of these packages have been building since Thursday or Friday. What happened to the mips buildd? All the kde packages were building, but now they are all set at Needs-Build with "Previous state was Building until 2004 Feb 09 00:19:52" - did the buildd crash? I don't see build logs for these, either. Package status with finished packages (and kdebindings) left out: kdebase 3.1.5-2 (Too young, only 9 of 10 days old) --- mipsel - Building s390- Building kdegames 3.1.5-1 arm - Building mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) kdegraphics 3.1.5-1 --- arm - Building mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) mipsel - Building s390- Building kdemultimedia 3.1.5-1 - arm - Building kdenetwork 3.1.5-1 -- arm - Building mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) kdepim 3.1.5-1 -- arm - Building mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) mipsel - Building kdeutils 3.1.5-1 mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) quanta 3.1.5-2 -- mipsel - Building Arch status (finished archs left out): arm - all Building -- kdegames kdegraphics kdemultimedia kdenetwork mips - all Needs-Build -- kdegames kdenetwork kdepim kdeutils mipsel - all Building -- kdebase kdegraphics kdepim quanta s390 - all Building -- kdebase kdemultimedia Josh
Processed: [Paul Sprakes] [Bug 70420] subscript tag causes render error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package konqueror Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror > tags 182067 +fixed-upstream Bug#182067: konqueror: subscript tag causes render error Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#231863: Acknowledgement (klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package klipper Ignoring bugs not assigned to: klipper > tags 231863 +confirmed, fixed-upstream Bug#231863: klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream > tags 218673 -patch Bug#218673: passes bad string when calling mozilla Tags were: fixed-upstream patch confirmed Tags removed: patch > merge 218673 231863 Bug#218673: passes bad string when calling mozilla Bug#231863: klipper: 'Open with Mozilla' fails Merged 218673 231863. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231392: konqueror: Can't talk to klauncher
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:46, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Peter, > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote: > > Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem happens > > within kde itself? > > Mmh, that'll be difficult. Since it only happens sometimes, this would > mean I would have to use KDE for a longer time which I really would > like to avoid[1]. If you have anything which requires testing once, I > could install KDE, try it out, and remove it again. > The reason I asked was becuase kde has this thing called DCOP which lets kde programs talk to each other (like IPC in a tty). I was thinking that it wasn't running in wmaker. (klauncher is part of this). You could check if it is running with the kdcop program, if you have konqi installed, then it should already be there. The problems you are descibing sound like a problem with the dcop system to me. - Peter Nuttall
Processed: -mieee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package konqueror Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror > tags 203722 -help,moreinfo Bug#203722: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha Tags were: help moreinfo Tags removed: help, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages
Hi, Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722. I'm currently looking at the following bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics. My question is about how to handle this bug: IIUC, there are the following options: 1 Fix upstream FP calculations to not trigger SIGFPEs. this is unfortunately not an option imho, because of lack of interest of developers. 2 make all KDE programs install a SIG_IGN SIGFPE handler. This can be done in kdelibs, and would be little work. 3 make upstream configure detect alpha and compile with -mieee if so. 4 wait for the gcc alpha patch to be included into gcc, which was posted on this list recently. What option would you suggest the Debian KDE packages take ? I don't think there is any very FP-intensive code in the KDE packages, so performance is not really that much of an issue. cheers domi
Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages
Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm currently looking at the following bug report > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a > frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause > of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics. > > 2 make all KDE programs install a SIG_IGN SIGFPE handler. This can be > done in kdelibs, and would be little work. That ain't working, since ev4/ev5 FP exceptions are unresumable, which is the root of all problems. > 4 wait for the gcc alpha patch to be included into gcc, which was > posted on this list recently. It has been added to the newest gcc (but not upstream), so the problem should magically go away all by itself. -- Falk
Bug#230209: foomatic-ppdfile broke backward compatibility by no longer providing a -t parameter
package kdeprint
retitle 230209 foomatic: foomatic-ppdfile broke BC by losing -t parameter
reassign 230209 foomatic-db-engine
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this bug to the package containing foomatic-ppdfile
because it's a pretty important bug to break BC imho.
cheers
domi
Eric Lavarde writes:
> Hi, as you can see below, I discussed with the kdeprint developer,
> and it looks like the problem is that foomatic lost the "-t"
> parameter. I have now a workaround (re-add the -t option to
> foomatic), so I don't see the bug as so important, but I don't know
> how you want to handle it.
> Cheers, Eric
> Original Message
>
> Subject: RE: Question on bug creation for kdeprint From: "Goffioul
> Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, February 3, 2004 10:33 am To:
> "Eric Lavarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
>> > getopts("d:p:ht:f");
>> Nope, it's: getopts("AP:d:p:hw") || help();
>>
>> Looks like, we have different versions of the script (mine is
>> 3.0.0-20040114), or the Debian maintainer has been doing some
>> cleaning. OK, I just added the -t option to the getopts line, and
>> it seems to work just fine.
> Looking at several foomatic packages, the same flags as you have are
> also used for 3.1. So it seems like backward compatibility has been
> broken in foomatic somewhere between 3.0 and 3.1. I'll contact
> foomatic developer about this.
> Michael.
> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231392: konqueror: Can't talk to klauncher
Hello, On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:35:39PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote: > The reason I asked was becuase kde has this thing called DCOP which lets kde > programs talk to each other (like IPC in a tty). I was thinking that it > wasn't running in wmaker. (klauncher is part of this). You could check if it > is running with the kdcop program, if you have konqi installed, then it > should already be there. The problems you are descibing sound like a problem > with the dcop system to me. Oh well, it is for sure running. I even killed it once (see #230213). Sometimes it complains (but not together with this bug) that it has some trouble setting up network connectivity (I wrote it down at home and can check it if you want), but konqueror just works fine nevertheless. Also the I/O-Slaves should not work withouth dcop, shouldn't they? But I fire up kdcop tonight and inform you of the results. Greetings Helge -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpBtvNojZcgh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#231529: X-Window-System can't be started with kernel 2.6.0
kdm or xserver-xfree86 can't be responsible for X-System not starting, because they do very well with kernel 2.4.24-2. I think the problem is due to the configuration of kernel-image-2.6.0-1-686 version: 2.6.0-2 and my report should better have been sent to Herbert Xu, its maintainer. Greetings, Georg.
Processed: foomatic-ppdfile broke backward compatibility by no longer providing a -t parameter
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package kdeprint Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kdeprint > retitle 230209 foomatic: foomatic-ppdfile broke BC by losing -t parameter Bug#230209: kdeprint: Can't add printer using printmgr, printer driver can't be found. Changed Bug title. > reassign 230209 foomatic-db-engine Bug#230209: foomatic: foomatic-ppdfile broke BC by losing -t parameter Bug reassigned from package `kdeprint' to `foomatic-db-engine'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231901: marked as done (kdm: /etc/X11/default-display-manager filled wrongly)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:36:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#231901: kdm: /etc/X11/default-display-manager filled wrongly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 14:43:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 06:43:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from netra27.desy.de [131.169.40.141] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqCcq-0002hW-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:43:04 -0800 Received: from mx2.desy.de (mx2.desy.de [131.169.69.102]) by netra27 (DesyMail_Map_27) with ESMTP id 776E6FA14 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:42:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from netra28.desy.de (netra28.desy.de [131.169.40.142]) by mx2.desy.de (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:42:31 +0100 Received: from complexity.desy.de (lb-40-253-floating.desy.de [131.169.40.253]) by netra28 (DesyMail_In_28) with ESMTP id C8688F0A07; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:42:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from root by complexity.desy.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AqCcI-0001PX-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:42:30 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mathias de Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kdm: /etc/X11/default-display-manager filled wrongly X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:42:30 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.1.3-1 Severity: important Hi, after several "apt-get upgrade" (testing) kdm didnt start and executing "/etc/init.d/kdm start" results in "Not starting K Desktop Manager (kdm); it is not the default display manager." (As well as xdm -- no other window managers installed) After fiddling for a while i found out, that /etc/X11/default-display-manager contains the following line: 10 kdm/daemon_name doesn't exist which seems to be an error message of db_get or so. If found the following line in "/var/lib/dpkg/info/xdm.postinst" safe_debconf db_get "$DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER"/daemon_name So this might be a problem of xdm after all! I can reproduce the whole thing by starting "dpkg-reconfigure xdm" and switching to "kdm" there. Switching back and forth between xdm and kdm with "dpkg-reconfigure kdm" fixes the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux complexity 2.4.18-1-k7 #3 Sat Nov 29 10:23:13 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kdm depends on: ii debconf 1.3.20 Debian configuration management sy ii kdelibs44:3.1.4-3KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library ii libpam0g0.76-14 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.1-6Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxrender1 0.8.3-4 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xbase-clients 4.2.1-12.1 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-16 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * kdm/default_servers_nolisten_tcp: * kdm/default_servers_100dpi: * kdm/default_nolisten_udp: * shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm --- Received: (at 231901-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 16:35:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 08:35:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim
Bug#188552: kmail '>From' problem: fixed in 3.1.95
package kmail tags 188552 +fixed-upstream thanks domi Adrian von Bidder writes: > tags +pending thanks > The "> From" signature verifying problem is fixed in KDE3.2 (at > least in the 3.1.95 pkgs from p.d.o/~ccheney/) Great, thanks for this extra information. By the way, if you want to change the tags of bugs, you need to 1 first read the definitions of the tags: pending is not appropriate here, because it's still unclear when KDE 3.2 will reach unstable. 2 CC "Debian Bugs Control <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" in your mail. cheers domi
Bug#231392: konqueror: Can't talk to klauncher
Peter Nuttall writes: > On Monday 09 February 2004 12:46, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >> Hello Peter, >> >> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25:10PM +, Peter Nuttall wrote: >> > Thanks for reporting the bug. can you tell be if the same problem >> > happens within kde itself? >> >> Mmh, that'll be difficult. Since it only happens sometimes, this >> would mean I would have to use KDE for a longer time which I really >> would like to avoid[1]. If you have anything which requires testing >> once, I could install KDE, try it out, and remove it again. >> > > The reason I asked was becuase kde has this thing called DCOP which > lets kde programs talk to each other (like IPC in a tty). I was > thinking that it wasn't running in wmaker. (klauncher is part of > this). You could check if it is running with the kdcop program, if > you have konqi installed, then it should already be there. The > problems you are descibing sound like a problem with the dcop system > to me. The dcopserver is supposed to be started by kde apps if it is not already running. The klauncher warning is probably unrelated to the bug, as it is issued by kded when it can't run the cache update program with klauncher. After this warning, it falls back to the system call for starting the program, and this is probably not a problem. cheers domi
Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:54:06PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote: > Please respect the Mail-Followup-To, as I'm not subscribed to this > list, and the discussion is relevant to #203722. > I'm currently looking at the following bug report > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 > about a frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the > cause of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics. > My question is about how to handle this bug: > IIUC, there are the following options: > 1 Fix upstream FP calculations to not trigger SIGFPEs. this is > unfortunately not an option imho, because of lack of interest of > developers. > 2 make all KDE programs install a SIG_IGN SIGFPE handler. This can be > done in kdelibs, and would be little work. > 3 make upstream configure detect alpha and compile with -mieee if so. > 4 wait for the gcc alpha patch to be included into gcc, which was > posted on this list recently. > What option would you suggest the Debian KDE packages take ? I don't > think there is any very FP-intensive code in the KDE packages, so > performance is not really that much of an issue. Even if gcc will soon adopt a patch to make -mieee the default, there will be older versions of gcc around for a while. This is a bug *now*, and there's no reason not to add the -mieee explicitly to the compiler flags for the time being: it will just become a no-op later once this is the gcc default. If you prefer to integrate this into the upstream configure rules, that's fine, though it's trivial to do it in debian/rules instead (see pseudopatch on one of the other bugs). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgpgJ7cvP8ecX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#188552: kmail '>From' problem: fixed in 3.1.95
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package kmail Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kmail > tags 188552 +fixed-upstream Bug#188552: kmail: Verifying gpg signatures: '>From' becomes 'From' and breaks signatures There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231284: marked as done (kwin: /etc/gdm/Sessions/KDE not executable)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:47:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#231284: kwin: /etc/gdm/Sessions/KDE not executable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 15:49:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 07:49:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cytosin.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.240.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Aolkf-00075w-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 07:49:13 -0800 Received: from viribus.rz.uni-konstanz.de (viribus.rz.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.240.50]) by cytosin.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C628A8EB94 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.viribus.rz.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABA21F8008 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from hamilton.physik.uni-konstanz.de (hamilton1.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.147.36]) by viribus.rz.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC631F8003 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from faraday.physik.uni-konstanz.de (faraday.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.147.52]) by hamilton.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC087F7A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by faraday.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix, from userid 1065) id 0B8EE866EB; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:48:39 +0100 From: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kwin: /etc/gdm/Sessions/KDE not executable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Mailservice RZ Uni-Konstanz Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: kwin Version: 4:3.1.3-1 Severity: normal Hi, the above script is not installed as executable. Therefore gdm doesn't allow to select it in the "Session" dialog. Cheers, -- Guido -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux faraday 2.4.22-faraday #1 SMP Fri Jan 9 14:30:30 CET 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kwin depends on: ii kdelibs44:3.1.5-1KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4GCC support library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-2Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxrender1 0.8.3-5 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 231284-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 16:47:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 08:47:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqEYp-0001Rd-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:47:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747211D7473; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:46:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3471D73A1; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:46:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC324C0D1; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:46:27 +0100
Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages
package konqueror reopen 203722 thanks Steve Langasek writes: >> I'm currently looking at the following bug report >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203722 about a >> frequent SIGFPE on an alpha machine. I guess we all know the cause >> of this bug, namely the non-standard alpha FPU semantics. > Even if gcc will soon adopt a patch to make -mieee the default, > there will be older versions of gcc around for a while. This is a > bug *now*, and there's no reason not to add the -mieee explicitly to > the compiler flags for the time being: it will just become a no-op > later once this is the gcc default. > If you prefer to integrate this into the upstream configure rules, > that's fine, though it's trivial to do it in debian/rules instead > (see pseudopatch on one of the other bugs). Ok, thanks, I already closed the bug report after Falk's reply, but I'm reopening it now, and will try to get the maintainer to use the flag or do it myself when the group maintenance gets up to speed. cheers domi
Bug#231339: marked as done ([kregexpeditor] Old package libkregexpeditor not removed on upgrade)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:12:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#231339: [kregexpeditor] Old package libkregexpeditor not removed on upgrade has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 22:42:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 14:42:46 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AosCs-0007CG-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:42:46 -0800 Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AosCM-Qf-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:42:14 +0100 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [kregexpeditor] Old package libkregexpeditor not removed on upgrade Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:42:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: kregexpeditor Version: 4:3.2.0-0woody1 Severity: serious The package kregexpeditor in the backports for Woody on download.kde.org has: Version: 4:3.2.0-0woody1 -> Replaces: libkregexpeditor Provides: libkregexpeditor Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.2.0), ... -> Conflicts: libkregexpeditor However, when I updated from the 3.1.4 backports, the old package libkregexpeditor_4:3.1.4-0woody1 was not removed and is now shown as obsolete in dselect. Maybe Replaces and Conflicts should be 'libkregexpeditor (<4:3.2)'? I successfully manually deleted the old package with 'dpkg -r libkregexpeditor'. --- Received: (at 231339-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 17:12:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 09:12:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqEx3-000451-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:12:05 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9FA137CEA; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:11:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB473137B66; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:11:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F7E4C0D1; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:11:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AqExt-0007yS-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:12:57 +0100 To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#231339: [kregexpeditor] Old package libkregexpeditor not removed on upgrade References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:12:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Frans Pop's message of "Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:53:23 +0100") Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Frans Pop writes: > On Sunday 08 February 2004 22:29, Dominique Devriese wrote: >> I thought the problem was about a package remaining installed while >> it should not have been, which is hardly going to cause an upgrade >> to abort. > Sorry, got confused. This is what caused the abort. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231406 > After solving that and finish
Bug#203722: marked as done (konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:07:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#203722: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2003 01:55:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 31 20:55:29 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gesundheit.complete.org [65.248.4.18] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19iP8j-00012a-00; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:29 -0500 Received: by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 15A941832033; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:33 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org Received: from erwin.complete.org (unknown [12.149.180.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "erwin.complete.org", Issuer "John Goerzen -- Root CA" (verified OK)) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BAF1832036 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by erwin.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F4127583E; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:09 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:55:09 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: konqueror Version: 4:3.1.3-1 Severity: important This package has, for the past several versions at least, caused SIGFPE for numerous sites. One example for me is www.dilbert.com. It is 100% repeatable for any such site. The backtrace tab yields: (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... In other words, nothing useful. -- John -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux erwin 2.4.20 #1 Sat Jun 7 16:26:40 CDT 2003 alpha Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages konqueror depends on: ii kate4:3.1.3-1KDE Advanced Text Editor ii kcontrol4:3.1.2-1KDE Control Center ii kdelibs44:3.1.3-1KDE core libraries ii kfind 4:3.1.2-1KDE File Find Utility ii libart-2.0-22.3.12-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6.1 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-1 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.3.1-0rc2 GCC support library ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkonq44:3.1.3-1Core libraries for KDE's file mana ii libpcre34.3-3Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.1.1-8Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.1-0rc2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxrender1 0.8.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 4.2.1-9 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-13 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * konqueror/crypto: --- Received: (at 203722-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 17:06:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 09:06:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.46] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqEs5-0002xl-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:06:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70CE34171; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by spoetnik.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF68340B9; M
Re: kdeartwork-theme-desktop kdeartwork-theme-icon
> kdeartwork-theme-desktop and kdeartwork-theme-icon conflicts. You can safely remove the -desktop package, it's just a dummy upgrade package. AIUI the woody backports were built with a slightly incorrect checkout of debian/, hence the problem. b.
Bug#230490: forwarded upstream: knode: Allow reordering of filtering rules
package knode tags 230490 upstream forwarded 230490 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74731 thanks domi Karsten M Self writes: > Package: knode Version: 4:2.2.2-14.6 Severity: wishlist > Currently it's not possible to reorder scoring rules from within the > scooring rules edit dialog. > As rules are applied in the order in which they appear in the > scoring file, this is missing functionality, and grossly affects > scoring utility. > It's not clear whether or not external edits to the scoreing file > can be made while a Knode session is open. Currently the only safe > workaround is to exit Knode, edit the scorefile manually, and > restart the application. > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux > superego 2.4.23-1-686 #1 Sun Nov 30 20:51:10 EST 2003 i686 Locale: > LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US > Versions of packages knode depends on: ii kdelibs3 > 4:2.2.2-13.woody.8 KDE core libraries (runtime files) ii libc6 > 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 > [libfam0] 2.6.10-6 client library to control the FAM ii libjpeg62 > 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkdenetwork1 > 4:2.2.2-14.6 Common libraries needed for KDE ne ii libpng2 1.0.15-4 > PNG library, older version - runti ii libqt2 3:2.3.2-14 Qt GUI > Library (runtime version) ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2. 1:2.95.4-19 The > GNU stdc++ library ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client > libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3 compression library - runtime > -- no debconf information > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: How to handle the -mieee SIGFPE problem in normal Debian packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package konqueror Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror > reopen 203722 Bug#203722: konqueror: *Frequent* SIGFPE on Alpha Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: forwarded upstream: knode: Allow reordering of filtering rules
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package knode Ignoring bugs not assigned to: knode > tags 230490 upstream Bug#230490: knode: Allow reordering of filtering rules There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 230490 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74731 Bug#230490: knode: Allow reordering of filtering rules Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74731. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: KDE 3.1.5 Status Update - 20040208
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote: > > If anyone wants to ever see KDE 3.2 get into sid someone will need to > > persuade the buildd admins to retry the packages below so that KDE > > 3.1.5 can go into sarge... > > > > Chris > > Actually, it looks to me like all of these packages have been building > since Thursday or Friday. What happened to the mips buildd? All the > kde packages were building, but now they are all set at Needs-Build with > "Previous state was Building until 2004 Feb 09 00:19:52" - did the > buildd crash? I don't see build logs for these, either. > > Package status with finished packages (and kdebindings) left out: Note the date those changed to building, many of them have been in building state for nearly a _month_. They failed long ago if you look at buildd.debian.org logs but have not been retried. Someone told me before that they get automatically retried if left in building state, but that doesn't appear to be the case. Regardless they have finally started being retried after sending out this last status report. Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
KDE 3.1.5 Status Update - 20040209
Some of the packages were changed to Needs-Build so hopefully they will be built soon. Maybe I will be able to upload KDE 3.2.0 by the end of the week. :) Chris kdebase 3.1.5-2 --- mipsel - failed - needs retry with unbuilt qt-x11-free (see below) (Feb 4) s390- failed - bad kernel headers? (Feb 6) kdegames 3.1.5-1 arm - Needs-Build (Feb 9) mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) kdegraphics 3.1.5-1 --- arm - Needs-Build (Feb 9) mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) mipsel - failed - needs recompile with current g++ (Jan 13) s390- failed - needs retry xpdf-utils dep problem (Feb 5) kdemultimedia 3.1.5-1 - arm - Needs-Build (Feb 9) kdenetwork 3.1.5-1 -- arm - Needs-Build (Feb 9) mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) kdepim 3.1.5-1 -- arm - Needs-Build (Feb 9) mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) mipsel - failed - needs recompile with current g++ (Jan 14) kdeutils 3.1.5-1 mips- Needs-Build (Feb 9) quanta 3.1.5-2 -- mipsel - failed - needs retry (qt-x11-free was uninstallable) (Jan 23) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: bug 227538
Itai Seggev writes: > Will this be fixed in the next upload of kdelibs (hopefully 3.2-1)? Prolly not, because we ( or at least: I ) have no idea what's causing it. Do you perhaps know ? cheers domi
