Bug#404989: marked as done (gij-4.1: System.nanoTime() goes backwards)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:14:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gij-4.1: System.nanoTime() goes backwards
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-17
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gij-4.1 depends on:
ii gcj-4.1-base 4.1.1-17The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b
ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-19 GCC support library
ii libgcj7-04.1.1-17Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
gij-4.1 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
Sometimes System.nanoTime() reports time stamps that go backwards.
My test case is the following:
- test case 1 -
public class test1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long ts1;
long ts2;
do {
ts1 = System.nanoTime();
ts2 = System.nanoTime();
} while (ts1 <= ts2);
System.out.println("TS1: " + ts1 + ", TS2: " + ts2);
}
}
---
1) Compile the Java source using the Sun compiler on a Debian 'unstable' system
(i686).
$ javac test1.java
$
$ dpkg -l sun-java5-jdk
ii sun-java5-jdk 1.5.0-10-1.1 Sun Java(TM) Development Kit
(JDK) 5.0
$
$ java -version
java version "1.5.0_10"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_10-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_10-b03, mixed mode, sharing)
2) Run the program on this Debian 'testing' system (i686) using gij.
$ java -version
java version "1.4.2"
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.1.2 20061020 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-17)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
$
$ java test1
TS1: 1516335999794, TS2: 1515337000426
This may take some seconds to show up, but it indicates that the second time
stamp
is before the first time stamp.
I think System.nanoTime() is implemented on top of the C function
clock_gettime() but
uses the returned information with wrong alignment (clock_gettime() returns
nano-seconds
not micro-seconds). Test case:
- test case 2 -
public class test2 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(System.nanoTime());
}
}
---
Compiling this program as before and using strace (strace -o /tmp/test2.strace
java test2) shows:
...
...
mmap2(NULL, 12288, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb6209000
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {1515537, 182512429}) = 0
write(1, "1515719512429\n", 14) = 14
exit_group(0) = ?
While clock_gettime() returns (1515537, 182512429), the System.nanoTime() gives
1515719512429.
This is an alignment error:
clock_gettime:
1515537.0
.182512429
-
1515537.182512429
System.nanoTime():
1515.53700
.182512429
-
1515.719512429
Best regards,
-andi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.2-14
Fixed in gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 as found in unstable.
--- End Message ---
Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces
tag 405937 + moreinfo thanks - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. - please provide a testcase -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#414983: marked as done (gcj-4.1: Compilation bug with java.awt.Component.x)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:19:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414983: gcj-4.1: Compilation bug with java.awt.Component.x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-20
Severity: normal
Hi,
The following program gives error at compilation:
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
public class B
{
int x = 0;
class MonJPanel extends JPanel{
protected void paintComponent (Graphics g){
g.fillOval(x-1,9,52,52);
}
}
}
The error is:
snoopy:~/Balle$ javac B.java
B.java: In class 'B$MonJPanel':
B.java: In method 'B$MonJPanel.paintComponent(java.awt.Graphics)':
B.java:9: error: Can't access package-private field
'java.awt.Component.x' from 'B$MonJPanel'.
g.fillOval(x-1,9,52,52);
^
1 error
Why does it try to use x from class Component instead of class B?
If I change x by xx, the compilation is ok.
Cheers,
Eugen Dedu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gcj-4.1 depends on:
ii gcc-4.1 4.1.1-21 The GNU C compiler
ii gcj-4.1-base4.1.1-20 The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b
ii gij-4.1 4.1.1-20 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii java-common 0.25 Base of all Java packages
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libc6-dev 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20060923-1 GCC support library
ii libgcj7-0 4.1.1-20 Java runtime library for use with
ii libgcj7-dev 4.1.1-20 Java development headers and stati
ii libgcj7-jar 4.1.1-20 Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages gcj-4.1 recommends:
ii fastjar 1:4.1.1-21 Jar creation utility
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.2-14
fixed in gcj-4.1 and gcj-4.2 in unstable.
Eugen Dedu writes:
> Package: gcj-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-20
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The following program gives error at compilation:
>
> import javax.swing.*;
> import java.awt.*;
>
> public class B
> {
> int x = 0;
> class MonJPanel extends JPanel{
> protected void paintComponent (Graphics g){
> g.fillOval(x-1,9,52,52);
> }
> }
> }
>
> The error is:
>
> snoopy:~/Balle$ javac B.java
> B.java: In class 'B$MonJPanel':
> B.java: In method 'B$MonJPanel.paintComponent(java.awt.Graphics)':
> B.java:9: error: Can't access package-private field
> 'java.awt.Component.x' from 'B$MonJPanel'.
> g.fillOval(x-1,9,52,52);
--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#415109: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 415109 + upstream Bug#415109: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 415109 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32861 Bug#415109: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32861. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 418358 libhsqldb-java Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup Bug reassigned from package `gij-4.1' to `libhsqldb-java'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup
reassign 418358 libhsqldb-java thanks not a bug in gij-4.1. gij-4.1 recommends libgcj7-1-awt which contains the graphical toolkit. it is not a dependency so that the jvm can be installed without dependencies on X. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415110: marked as done (/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) does not detect EOF on a non-blocking socket)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:29:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415110: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1:
SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) does not detect EOF on a non-blocking socket
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-20
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1
This bug report is a variation of bug:
http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281602
I've confirmed that bug 281602 was fixed... the source code in that
example used a blocking socket, this example uses a non-blocking socket.
To run:
===
# compile
javac test.java
# start server
java test
# connect a client, send "foo" and close after 3 seconds
echo "foo" | nc -q 3 localhost 2003
===
If you strace the java test process you should see a bunch of this after
the socket is closed:
===
ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
===
GIJ never actually calls read to determine if the socket was closed,
it just assumes that because no bytes are available to read now, that
it can return 0 to caller.
sample source code:
===
import java.net.*;
import java.nio.*;
import java.nio.channels.*;
import java.util.Iterator;
public class test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
Selector serverSelector;
serverSelector = Selector.open();
ServerSocketChannel ssc = ServerSocketChannel.open();
ssc.configureBlocking(true);
ssc.socket().bind(new InetSocketAddress(2003));
SocketChannel sc = ssc.accept();
sc.configureBlocking(false);
while (true) {
ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.allocate(100);
int i = sc.read(bb);
if (i > 0) {
System.out.println("Read : " + i + " bytes.");
for(int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
System.out.print((char)bb.get(j));
}
}
if (i < 0) {
System.out.println("Closing : " + i);
sc.close();
return;
}
}
} catch(Exception ex) {
}
}
}
===
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-blitz8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gij-4.1 depends on:
ii gcj-4.1-base4.1.1-20 The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library
ii libgcj7-0 4.1.1-20 Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
gij-4.1 recommends no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.2-14
Fixed in gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 in unstable.
Mike Simons writes:
> Package: gij-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-20
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1
>
> This bug report is a variation of bug:
> http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281602
> I've confirmed that bug 281602 was fixed... the source code in that
> example used a blocking socket, this example uses a non-blocking socket.
>
>
> To run:
> ===
> # compile
> javac test.java
>
> # start server
> java test
>
> # connect a client, send "foo" and close after 3 seconds
> echo "foo" | nc -q 3 localhost 2003
> ===
>
>
> If you strace the java test process you should see a bunch of this after
> the socket is closed:
> ===
> ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
> ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
> ioctl(6, FIONREAD, [0]) = 0
> ===
>
> GIJ never actually calls read to determine if the socket was closed,
> it just assumes that because no bytes are available to read now, that
> it can return 0 to caller.
--- End Message ---
Processed: tag gcj reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 422569 + upstream Bug#422569: gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits "line 0" There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 422569 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31900 Bug#422569: gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits "line 0" Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31900. > forwarded 40 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32846 Bug#40: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32846 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32846. > forwarded 421098 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28340 Bug#421098: java.security.manager property is ignored or causes segfaults Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28340 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28340. > forwarded 386443 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28977 Bug#386443: gcj-4.1: UTF-16 endianness differs between gcj and Sun JDK Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28977. > forwarded 399251 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29869 Bug#399251: error instantiating 'org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager' Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29869. to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29869. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#426742: gcj-4.1: FTBFS: "/usr/bin/ld: gnu/java/: No such file"
tag 426742 + moreinfo thanks please update and recheck for gcj-4.2. if debuild doesn't work, maybe just use dpkg-buildpackage? Marcus Better writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > works for me. > > Strange. > > The attached patch is supposed to fix a bug triggered by jsvc (needed for > Tomcat). I applied a work-around in the latest commons-daemon, but would like > to get rid of that. Upstream wants me to test the patch before committing it. > I would appreciate if someone can build gcj-4.1 for me with this patch, so I > can test it. > > Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#426739: marked as done (gcj-4.1: FTBFS: undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url')
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:49:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426739: gcj-4.1: FTBFS: undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: gcj-4.1 Version: 4.1.2-8 Severity: important I cannot build the package from source on my system. The build fails as follows. I have gcc-4.1-source 4.12-9. $ apt-src install gcj-4.1 $ apt-src build gcj-4.1 <...stuff deleted...> -o insn-recog.o stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/ -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o gcj gcc.o opts-common.o options.o jvspec.o \ java/jcf-path.o prefix.o intl.o \ version.o ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a gcc.o: In function `execute': gcc.c:(.text+0x6f1b): undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url' gcc.o: In function `main': gcc.c:(.text+0xbc2b): undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url' gcc.c:(.text+0xc342): undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [gcj] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/marcus/src/debian/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/gcc' make[3]: *** [stage3_build] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-rc2-melech (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gcj-4.1 depends on: ii ecj 3.3~M7-2 standalone version of the Eclipse ii gcc-4.1 4.1.2-8 The GNU C compiler ii gcj-4.1-base4.1.2-8 The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b ii gij-4.1 4.1.2-8 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii java-common 0.25 Base of all Java packages ii libc6 2.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-dev 2.5-9GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070528-1 GCC support library ii libgcj-bc 4.1.2-2 Link time only library for use wit ii libgcj7-1 4.1.2-8 Java runtime library for use with ii libgcj7-dev 4.1.2-8 Java development headers and stati ii libgcj7-jar 4.1.2-8 Java runtime library for use with ii libmagic1 4.20-8 File type determination library us ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gcj-4.1 recommends: ii ecj-gcj 3.3~M7-2 standalone version of the Eclipse ii fastjar 1:4.1.1-21 Jar creation utility -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- closing this report; see the buildd logs that this is built fine. maybe a problem with your local setup? Matthias --- End Message ---
Bug#433636: needs validation with gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 from unstable
tag 433636 + moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: needs validation with gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 from unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433636 + moreinfo Bug#433636: gcj-4.1: java.util.Calendar.setTimeZone fails to set ZONE_OFFSET There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433051: gappletviewer-4.1: Takes up all available memory and CPU cycles and does nothing
May be related to http://bugs.debian.org/433391 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: forwarded gcj report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423160 + upstream Bug#423160: gij-4.1: bug in EnumMap implementation There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 423160 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32862 Bug#423160: gij-4.1: bug in EnumMap implementation Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32862. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 427677 + moreinfo Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav
tag 427677 + moreinfo
thanks
please recheck with gcj-4.2 from unstable.
Marcus Better writes:
> Package: gcj-4.1
> Version: 4.1.2-8
> Severity: normal
>
> rmic fails with the following error:
>
> ~$ grmic-4.1 -d classes/core -classpath
> /home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/classes/core:/home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/lib:/home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/dist/lib/mx4j-impl.jar:/home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/dist/lib/mx4j-jmx.jar:/home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/dist/lib/mx4j.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar:/usr/share/java/servlet-api-2.4.jar:/usr/share/java/bcel.jar:/usr/share/java/jython.jar:/usr/share/java/gnumail.jar:/usr/share/java/activation.jar:/usr/share/java/axis.jar:/usr/share/java/jaxrpc.jar:/usr/share/java/saaj.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/lib/tools.jar
> --iiop -g -always -verbose javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl
> Package javax.management.remote.rmi, name RMIServer impl RMIServerImpl
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError:
> gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.SourceGiopRmicCompiler: no resource
> templates/Stub.jav
>at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.Generator.getResource(libgcj-tools.so.71)
>at
> gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.SourceGiopRmicCompiler.generateStub(libgcj-tools.so.71)
>at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.SourceGiopRmicCompiler.run(libgcj-tools.so.71)
>at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.Main.run(libgcj-tools.so.71)
>at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.Main.main(libgcj-tools.so.71)
>
> Looking at the source file
> libjava/classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/rmic/SourceGiopRmicCompiler.java,
> it does try to load the resource:
>
> public String generateStub()
> {
> String template = getResource("Stub.jav");
>
> There is a templates/Stub.jav resource in the sources as well.
>
> (Note: the -force option to rmic above is needed in my case as a
> workaround for PR32198.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug classpath/32861] SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException
--- Comment #1 from dog at gnu dot org 2007-07-23 08:07 --- Hi Mark, this shouldn't be in the inetlib component, please reassign to whoever is dealing with NIO. -- dog at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dog at gnu dot org |mark at gcc dot gnu dot org Component|inetlib |classpath http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32861 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 418358 gij-4.1 Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup Bug reassigned from package `libhsqldb-java' to `gij-4.1'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#398129: marked as done ([fixed in 4.2] keytool fails where keytool from sun java 1.5 works)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:33:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gkeytool fails where keytool from sun java 1.5 works has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: gij-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-17 Severity: important tried running keytool -genkey -keysize 1024 -alias jspwiki -keystore /home/alex/src/java/jspwiki/JSPWiki/etc/jspwiki.jks -storepass password -keypass password -dname "cn=Alexander Samad,ou=JSPWiki Code Signing Division,o=samad,c=AU" with the eytool from gij-4.1 and it files, illegal char: tried with the sun java 1.5 keytool and it works. Alex -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (250, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gij-4.1 depends on: ii gcj-4.1-base 4.1.1-17The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b ii libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-19 GCC support library ii libgcj7-04.1.1-17Java runtime library for use with ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime gij-4.1 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.2-14 Fixed in unstable (gij-4.1 and gij-4.2) --- End Message ---
Bug#377210: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect
tag 377210 + moreinfo thanks Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#123468: SOFTWARE SUITE
Have you ever wanted a costly Watch? We have the problem solved for you! We have all the top quality for a very small fraction of the expense. www.weggtre.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors
tag 414178 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with g++-4.1, g++-4.2, gcc-snapshot from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393275: -O2 on Alpha makes code crash
tag 393275 + moreinfo thanks Please recheck with g++-4.1, g++-4.2 and gcc-snapshot from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#419508: marked as done (/usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib32/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib32/libc.a(errno.o)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:02:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line /usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition ... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: g++ Version: 4.1.1-15 When compiling a simple C++ file on x86_64 for the i386 architecture using -export-dynamic, I got this error: $ g++ -m32 -export-dynamic -o test test.cpp /usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib32/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib32/libc.a(errno.o) section .bss /lib32/libc.so.6: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status After installing libc6-dev-i386, the error went away. I'm not really sure how to handle this problem (maybe a package-dependency). I just wanted to file it here. - twisti --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.1.2-14 This is fixed by introduction of the g++-multilib package. --- End Message ---
Bug#414332: marked as done (fail to build madwifi with gcc 4.1)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:01:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414332: fail to build madwifi with gcc 4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/modules/madwifi modules \
KERNELPATH=/lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/build
KERNELRELEASE=2.6.18-4-686 KERNELCONF=/lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/build/.config
ATH_RATE=ath_rate/sample
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi'
Checking requirements... ok.
Checking kernel configuration... ok.
/usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/build
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/madwifi modules
:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
strace log
stat64("/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-686/scripts", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755,
st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
open("/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-686/scripts",
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
getdents64(3, /* 33 entries */, 4096) = 1136
getdents64(3, /* 0 entries */, 4096)= 0
close(3)= 0
pipe([3, 5])= 0
fork() = 6852
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
close(5)= 0
read(3, "2.6.18-4-686\n", 200) = 13
read(3, "", 187)= 0
close(3)= 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6852
pipe([3, 5])= 0
fork() = 6854
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
close(5)= 0
read(3, "2.6.18-4-686\n", 200) = 13
read(3, "", 187)= 0
close(3)= 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6854
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT QUIT TERM XCPU XFSZ], NULL, 8) = 0
fork() = 6856
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [HUP INT QUIT TERM
XCPU XFSZ])
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6856
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT QUIT TERM XCPU XFSZ], NULL, 8) = 0
fork() = 6857
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [HUP INT QUIT TERM
XCPU XFSZ])
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6857
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT QUIT TERM XCPU XFSZ], NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
pipe([3, 5])= 0
fork() = 6859
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
close(5)= 0
read(3, "2.6.18-4-686\n", 200) = 13
read(3, "", 187)= 0
close(3)= 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6859
pipe([3, 5])= 0
fork() = 6861
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
close(5)= 0
read(3, "2.6.18-4-686\n", 200) = 13
read(3, "", 187)= 0
close(3)= 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6861
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT QUIT TERM XCPU XFSZ], NULL, 8) = 0
fork() = 6863
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [HUP INT QUIT TERM XCPU
XFSZ])
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 6863
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HU
Processed: Re: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 414178 + moreinfo Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 377210 + moreinfo Bug#377210: g++: std::basic_filebuf::pubseekoff works incorrect on amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#421252: lapack build problem
see the recent threads on debian-toolchain about migrating from g77 to gfortran. B. Lazarov writes: > > Package: gfortran > Version: 4.1.1-21 > > When I try to compile lapack 3.1.1 from netlib I am getting serious errors in > the testing routines. These problems does not exists in SUSE 10.1 with > gfortran 4.1.0. I tried also to install different versions of gcc/gfortran > and compile lapack with them and it seems that the problem exists in all > versions 4.xx. The testing fails in the single complex routines. If > necessary I can send also the output. I have tested the compilation with > both BLAS suplied with the lapack library and GotoBLAS. > > I guess the problem is in some of the libraries outside of the gcc/gfortran > but I can not understand in which one. > > I have tried compilation on Debian Etch 4 installed from dvd iso image on AMD > Opteron x2 and also on Intel Core2 Duo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge gcc-defaults report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 427442 minor Bug#427442: /usr/share/doc/libgcj-common/changelog.Debian.gz overwrites gcj-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > merge 427442 396583 Bug#396583: libgcj-common: Link to gcj-4.1-base makes checksums mismatch Bug#427442: /usr/share/doc/libgcj-common/changelog.Debian.gz overwrites gcj-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz Merged 396583 427442. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#431045: marked as done (g++-4.2: Template arguments to template functions not working)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:20:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431045: Question about validity of wfmath template code
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070627-1
Severity: normal
I condensed the wfmath build failure with gcc-4.2 (#361815) into a small test
case:
frobnitz:/tmp# cat test.cc
#include
template class container>
int sum(const container& x) {
int result = 0;
for (typename container::const_iterator i = x.begin(); i != x.end();
i++) result += *i;
return result;
}
int test() {
std::vector x;
return sum(x);
}
frobnitz:/tmp# g++-4.1 -c test.cc
frobnitz:/tmp# g++-4.2 -c test.cc
test.cc: In function 'int test()':
test.cc:12: error: no matching function for call to 'sum(std::vector >&)'
frobnitz:/tmp# /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c test.cc
test.cc: In function 'int test()':
test.cc:12: error: no matching function for call to 'sum(std::vector >&)'
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Daniel Schepler writes:
> After analyzing a build failure of wfmath with gcc-4.2, I condensed the issue
> it was having to the following test case:
>
> template class A { public: T x1; U x2; };
> template class container_with_x1>
> int f(const container_with_x1& y) {
> return y.x1;
> }
> int g() {
> A y;
> return f(y);
> }
>
> This code compiles with g++-4.1, but fails with g++-4.2 and the snapshot of
> g++-4.3 currently in Debian's gcc-snapshot package. My question is: is this
> valid code or not?
Brian M. Carlson writes:
> According to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html (second bullet
> point under C++), I don't believe this is valid. The example you gave
> and the example on the changes page look very, very similar, and are
> probably isomorphic, which does not bode well for wfmath.
--- End Message ---
Bug#432489: marked as done (gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea')
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:25:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many
memory references for `lea'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070707-1
Severity: normal
I unable to compile released kernel 2.6.22 with gcc-4.2:
gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 20070707 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2-20070707-1)
The compilation ends up with the following error:
CC fs/binfmt_misc.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:697: Error: too many memory references for `lea'
make[1]: *** [fs/binfmt_misc.o] Error 1
make: *** [fs] Error 2
The very same kernel sources with the very same configuration are compiled with
gcc-4.1 without any errors.
So, it must be some kind of regression.
Regards,
Max
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gcc-4.2 depends on:
ii binutils 2.17cvs20070426-8 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-4.24.2-20070707-1The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-4.2-base 4.2-20070707-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.5-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc11:4.2-20070707-1 GCC support library
ii libgomp1 4.2-20070707-1GCC OpenMP (GOMP) support library
Versions of packages gcc-4.2 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.5-11 GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn libmudflap0-4.2-dev(no description available)
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.2.1-0
Unreproducible with 4.2.1-0
--- End Message ---
Processed: forwarded gcj report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 399833 gij-4.2 Bug#399833: libgcj8: JLabel.setCursor does not work Bug reassigned from package `libgcj8' to `gij-4.2'. > tag 399833 + upstream Bug#399833: libgcj8: JLabel.setCursor does not work There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 399833 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32863 Bug#399833: libgcj8: JLabel.setCursor does not work Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32863. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433629 + moreinfo Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid
tag 433629 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc 4.2.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377210: Re[2]: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect
> > tag 377210 + moreinfo > thanks > > Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and > with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). > Ok, installed g++-4.2 as you asked - in my etch did 'apt-get install g++-4.2' and it also installed dependencies: libc6, binutils, removed tzdata, util-linux and now i can not boot my machine with messages "INIT: cannot execute /sbin/getty". So now i need to time to fix this somehow, then i will test it Best Regards Sergey Nivarov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377210: Re[2]: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect
Sergey Nivarov writes: > > > > tag 377210 + moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and > > with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). > > > > Ok, installed g++-4.2 as you asked - in my etch did 'apt-get install g++-4.2' > and it also installed dependencies: libc6, binutils, removed tzdata, > util-linux and now i can not boot my machine with messages "INIT: cannot > execute /sbin/getty". So now i need to time to fix this somehow, then i will > test it there is no g++-4.2 in etch; just create a chroot and install sid into the chroot. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug cp-tools/32864] keytool is not compatible with sun-java5 keytool
-- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32864 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces
Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. If libgcj7-jar or libgcj8-jar are installed, the reported issue occurs (with java|gij-4.1|gij-4.2). Removing these packages makes the command work. > - please provide a testcase As mentioned, the issue occurs independent from the document, that is processed or the stylesheet that is used. Process the attached file (a simple test article taken from the docbook-xsl test files) with the following command: $ /usr/bin/java \ -Djava.endorsed.dirs=/usr/share/java \ org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process \ -out myfile.html \ -in article.001.xml \ -xsl /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/html/docbook.xsl Instead of /usr/bin/java you can of course directly use /usr/bin/gij-4.x or Sun's java executable. Regards, Daniel article.001.xml Description: application/docbook
Processing of gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes
gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0-awt_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-dev_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-dbg_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0-awt_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/libgcj8-0-awt_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/libgcj8-0_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-dbg_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/libgcj8-dbg_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-dev_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/libgcj8-dev_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb Override entries for your package: gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional utils gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional libs gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional devel gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional devel libgcj8-0-awt_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional libs libgcj8-0_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional libs libgcj8-dbg_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - extra libdevel libgcj8-dev_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb - optional libdevel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/32862] bug in EnumMap implementation
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 16:11 --- I have a fix I'm testing. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-23 16:11:28 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32862 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug fortran/31639] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in gfc_conv_constant, at fortran/trans-const.c:348 with len
--- Comment #12 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 20:35 --- Subject: Bug 31639 Author: dfranke Date: Mon Jul 23 20:35:03 2007 New Revision: 126858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126858 Log: gcc/fortran: 2007-07-23 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/25104 PR fortran/31639 * expr.c (check_transformational): Reject valid transformational intrinsics to avoid ICE. (check_inquiry): Report error for assumed character lengths for all supported standards. (check_init_expr): Whitespace fix. gcc/testsuite: 2007-07-23 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/31639 * gfortran.dg/initialization_9.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_9.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31639 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug fortran/31639] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in gfc_conv_constant, at fortran/trans-const.c:348 with len
--- Comment #13 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 20:45 --- Closing again. The orginal testcase is now correctly handled for all standards. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31639 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces
Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > > - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. > > If libgcj7-jar or libgcj8-jar are installed, the reported issue occurs > (with java|gij-4.1|gij-4.2). Removing these packages makes the command > work. > > > - please provide a testcase > > As mentioned, the issue occurs independent from the document, that is > processed or the stylesheet that is used. Process the attached file (a > simple test article taken from the docbook-xsl test files) with the > following command: > > $ /usr/bin/java \ > -Djava.endorsed.dirs=/usr/share/java \ > org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process \ > -out myfile.html \ > -in article.001.xml \ > -xsl /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/html/docbook.xsl ^^ Please use the online location here. The docbook-xsl package has a bug inside glossary.xsl (the language variable is undefined in the glosslist template). So this must be: -xsl http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/docbook.xsl Then you should be able to observe the issue I reported. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
