[Bug c++/4882] fails to lookup a template specialization dependent of an outer template
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:46 --- Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4882 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 11:36 --- Created an attachment (id=7620) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7620&action=view) A bit simplified testcase A bit sim -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 11:40 --- A bit simpler testcase; no longer segfaults, but produces wrong output. The reason seems to be the same (both are due to fields of t after the second one not being initialized). .vars dump is misscompiled (body of the innermost loop is executed only in the first iteration of the outer loop), so the problem is on tree level. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)
-- What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot| |org | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:37 --- simplify_gen_subreg was seriously shaken recently. Would you mind updating and trying again? -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug target/18622] sparc64-linux bootstrap failure
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:37 --- simplify_gen_subreg was seriously shaken recently. Would you mind updating and trying again? -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18622 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:08 --- The misscompilation appears in the .t54.dom3 dump. With -fno-tree-dominator-opts the testcase is not misscompiled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:13 --- This is most likely related to PR 18241. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||18241 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Bug#264507: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: Upgrade the snapshot)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-snapshot upgraded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 06:56:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 23:56:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fe07.axelero.hu [195.228.240.95] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bu44l-00050p-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:56:07 -0700 Received: from fe07 (localhost-02 [127.0.2.1]) by fe07.axelero.hu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i796u5MU016565; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 08:56:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fe07.axelero.hu [127.0.2.1] via SMTP gateway by fe07 [195.228.240.95]; id A04090C3413 at Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:56:03 +0200 Received: from localhost (107.75-182-adsl-pool.axelero.hu [81.182.75.107]) by fe07.axelero.hu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i796u1KR016460; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 08:56:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daniel by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bu45J-xA-OZ; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:56:41 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-snapshot: Upgrade the snapshot X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:56:41 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030217) (fe07.axelero.hu) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040717-1 Severity: wishlist I'm not sure how often you usually upgrade to the latest version from CVS. When it's possible, it would be great to see this happen. I just had one of my bugs reported as fixed, and I'd like to check it and see if no new bugs are uncovered. TIA. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc-snapshot depends on: ii binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-01.6.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgmp34.1.3-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libgtk2.0-02.4.3-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.0-4 Layout and rendering of internatio ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 264507-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:11:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:11:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYWKn-00015D-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:11:54 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03658 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B751F21A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 10554-14 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:51 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iASLBocU006865; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:11:50 +0100 (MET) From: Ma
Bug#256041: marked as done (gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-snapshot/gcc-4.0 using updated libtool has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2004 15:43:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 24 08:43:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.85.92.182] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BdWNU-0007XJ-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7AC540AE for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10016-07 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65C59540AB; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040620-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1 on repeat.rfc822.org by > sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040621-0833 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: m4, autoconf2.13, automake1.7, libtool, gawk, dejagnu (>= > 1.4.3), bzip2, binutils (>= 2.14.90.0.7), debhelper (>= 4.0), gperf (>= > 2.7-3), bison (>= 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo, zlib1g-dev, xlibs-dev, > gnat-3.3 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k], libgtk2.0-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libgmp3-dev configure was built with an ancient version of libtool.m4 that doesn't correctly support mips, mipsel, arm, and possibly others. This problem was fixed for 3.2/3.3 without relibtoolizing, existed while gcc-snapshot was 3.4 (so is probably still in 3.4), and still exists now. --- Received: (at 256041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:14:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:14:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYWNl-0001Jc-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:14:57 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04045 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE67F21A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 10816-31 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:54 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iASLErR9008678; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:53 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:14:53 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-snapshot/gcc-4.0 using updated libtool X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)
Bug#278549: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-doc: bad ROFF `.so' request in 4 *stream manpages)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2004 17:45:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 27 10:45:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CMrrN-0005nG-00; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:45:21 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38313067C2; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5934D2C80FC; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23424-04; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 521FE2C80EC; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:46 +0200 From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: bad ROFF `.so' request in 4 *stream manpages X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:44:46 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc Version: 4.0-0pre0 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hi, here is the problem: mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::ofstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_ofstream.3: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::wofstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_fstream.3: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::fstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_fstream.3: No such file or directory mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::wfstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libstdc++6-4.0-doc depends on: ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0-0pre0 The GNU Compiler Collection (base -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 278549-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:24:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:24:29 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYWWz-0002A5-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:24:29 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05841; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7DCF21A; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29339-22; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iASLOKKg009535; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Versio
Bug#278548: marked as done (gfortran-4.0: 2 dangling symlinks instead of manpages)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2004 17:38:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 27 10:38:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CMrlB-0004Zt-00; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:38:57 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1E33067C2; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A112C80FC; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23424-02; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BE9EE2C80EC; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:22 +0200 From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gfortran-4.0: 2 dangling symlinks instead of manpages X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:38:22 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gfortran-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre0 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hi, here are the 2 dangling symlinks: mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g95-4.0.1 is a dangling symlink mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i486-linux-g95-4.0.1 is a dangling symlink They point to "g95-4.0.1" that does not exist. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gfortran-4.0 depends on: ii gcc-4.0 4.0-0pre0The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.0-base4.0-0pre0The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgfortran04.0-0pre0Runtime library for GNU Fortran ap ii libgmp3 4.1.4-4 Multiprecision arithmetic library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 278548-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:24:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:24:29 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYWWz-0002A5-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:24:29 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05841; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7DCF21A; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29339-22; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iASLOKKg009535; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 28
Bug#274096: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2004 19:31:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 29 12:31:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CCkAJ-0003s9-00; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:31:03 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144]) by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6100A6B2FB for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-211-254.mnet-online.de [62.245.211.254]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7413938E for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1CCkA8-0005Pj-JQ for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:52 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:52 +0200 From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in experimental Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre0 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, I think this is the main problem | 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file libffi/src/mips/ffi.c.r= ej | patching file libffi/src/mips/ffitarget.h | make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-libffi-mips] Error 1 Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0-0pre0 on sigrun by sbuild/mips 1.170.5 Build started at 20040929-2021 ***= *** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Need to get 29.1MB of source archives. Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (dsc) [6340B] Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (tar) [26.3MB] Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (diff) [2786kB] Fetched 29.1MB in 39s (742kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libc6.1-dev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) [alpha ia64] | libc0.3-dev (= >=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc0.1-dev | libc12-dev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc6-d= ev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], libc6-dev-s390x [s390], = amd64-libs-dev [i386], ia32-libs-dev [amd64], m4, autoconf, automake1.9, li= btool, gawk, dejagnu (>=3D 1.4.3) [alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 = hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68= k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc s= parc64 amd64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 i386 netbsd= -i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x = sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], expect (>=3D 5.38.0) [alpha arm h= ppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netb= sd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390= x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freeb= sd-i386 hurd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwi= n-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], bzip= 2, binutils (>=3D 2.15-2), binutils-hppa64 [hppa], debhelper (>=3D 4.1), gp= erf (>=3D 2.7-3), bison (>=3D 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo (>=3D 4.3= ), zlib1g-dev, libgc-dev [alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386= kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mi= psel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 am= d64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 i386 n= etbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-p
Bug#273004: marked as done (Minor kbsd-gnu fixes)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 11:26:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 04:26:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 86.red-80-24-13.pooles.rima-tde.net (khazad.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CARkB-00046z-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:26:35 -0700 Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.1] helo=khazad.dyndns.org) by khazad.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CARsD-Mk-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:34:53 +0200 Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CARiT-000GCZ-SY; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:24:50 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1609337978==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Minor kbsd-gnu fixes X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:24:49 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1609337978== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: gcc-4.0 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi! I'm attaching a few minor kbsd-gnu fixes for rules.defs: - Enable java for kfreebsd-gnu - Enable ffi for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu - Enable checks for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu - Fix typo I introduced in one of my previous patches (s/netbsd-elf-gnu/netbsdelf-gnu/g) Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i386) Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.2.1-6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --===1609337978== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="kbsd-gnu.diff" diff -ur gcc-4.0-4.0.old/debian/rules.defs gcc-4.0-4.0/debian/rules.defs --- gcc-4.0-4.0.old/debian/rules.defs 2004-09-23 13:10:05.0 +0200 +++ gcc-4.0-4.0/debian/rules.defs 2004-09-23 13:17:00.0 +0200 @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ with_java := yes endif -java_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu +java_no_systems := hurd-i386 knetbsd-gnu netbsdelf-gnu ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM),$(java_no_systems))) with_java := disabled for $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM) endif @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ ifeq ($(with_common_libs),yes) with_libffi := yes no_ffi_cpus := - no_ffi_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu + no_ffi_systems := hurd-i386 netbsdelf-gnu ifneq ($(with_java),yes) ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),$(no_ffi_cpus))) with_libffi := disabled for architecure $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU) @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ with_libgnat := yes ada_no_cpus := arm m68k -ada_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsd-elf-gnu +ada_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu netbsdelf-gnu ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),$(ada_no_cpus))) with_ada := disabled for architecure $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU) endif @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ ifdef DEB_CROSS with_check := disabled for cross compiler package endif -check_no_systems := hurd-i386 kfreebsd-gnu knetbsd-gnu +check_no_systems := hurd-i386 ifneq (, $(filter $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM),$(check_no_systems))) with_check := disabled for $(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM) endif --===1609337978==-- --- Received: (at 273004-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:24:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:24:29 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYWWz-0002A5-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:24:29 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berli
Bug#275408: marked as done ([fixed in 4.0-0pre1] ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12375)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2004 22:06:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 07 15:06:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFgPS-0003ev-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:06:50 -0700
Received: from p5086289b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (terra.local) [80.134.40.155]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFgPR-kH-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:06:49 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Andre Woebbeking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12375
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:06:47 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I get the mentioned ICE if I compile the following code with -g
(gcc < 4 works fine):
struct A
{
virtual int foo();
double d;
};
struct B : public A
{
A::d;
};
int main()
{
return 0;
}
Cheers,
André
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii gcc-4.0 4.0-0pre0The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0-base4.0-0pre0The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++6-4.0-dev 4.0-0pre0The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 275408-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 21:24:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 28 13:24:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CYWWz-0002A5-00; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:24:29 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05841;
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7DCF21A;
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 29339-22; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id iASLOKKg009535;
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:24:20 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
bugs fixed in gcc-4.0-4.0-0pre1
Bug#281382: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:21:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#281382: FTBFS in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 14:12:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 15 06:12:26 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CThaj-0002My-00; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:12:25 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [192.168.3.138]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCFA5623 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:12:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-161-146.mnet-online.de [62.245.161.146]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:12:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1CThaa-0008LI-G5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:12:16 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:12:16 +0100 From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in experimental Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre0 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | configure: error: GMP with MPFR support is required to build f95 Automatic build of gcc-4.0_4.0-0pre0 on swawa by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 Build started at 20041115-1355 ***= *** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Need to get 29.1MB of source archives. Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (dsc) [6340B] Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (tar) [26.3MB] Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main gcc-4.0 4.0-= 0pre0 (diff) [2786kB] Fetched 29.1MB in 31s (921kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libc6.1-dev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) [alpha ia64] | libc0.3-dev (= >=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc0.1-dev | libc12-dev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16) | libc6-d= ev (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-16), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], libc6-dev-s390x [s390], = amd64-libs-dev [i386], ia32-libs-dev [amd64], m4, autoconf, automake1.9, li= btool, gawk, dejagnu (>=3D 1.4.3) [alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 = hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68= k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc s= parc64 amd64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 i386 netbsd= -i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x = sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], expect (>=3D 5.38.0) [alpha arm h= ppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netb= sd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390= x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freeb= sd-i386 hurd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwi= n-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], bzip= 2, binutils (>=3D 2.15-2), binutils-hppa64 [hppa], debhelper (>=3D 4.1), gp= erf (>=3D 2.7-3), bison (>=3D 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo (>=3D 4.3= ), zlib1g-dev, libgc-dev [alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386= kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 i386 netbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mi= psel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 am= d64 alpha arm hppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 i386 n= etbsd-i386 openbsd-i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel darwin-powerpc powerpc s390 s= 390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], xlibs-dev, gnat-3.3 [alpha h= ppa darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386
[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28
22:13 ---
{ .__data = { .__kind = PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP } }
This is a bug in glibc's headers, there is a dup of this bug somewhere.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- Yes there is PR 17364. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17364 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug bootstrap/17364] [4.0 Regression] c99 designators in nptl break libstdc++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- *** Bug 18709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17364 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Results for 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) testsuite on i486-linux
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 28 07:33:40 UTC 2004 Native configuration is i486-linux (cachaca) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3952 # of unsupported tests1 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/xgpc version 20040516, based on gcc-3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === acats tests === FAIL: c64105a === acats Summary === # of expected passes2321 # of unexpected failures1 === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE: XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable === g++ Summary === # of expected passes9734 # of unexpected successes 3 # of expected failures 71 # of unsupported tests 43 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1812 # of unsupported tests 6 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os FAIL: gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c scan-assembler-not L\$?C[^A-Z] === gcc Summary === # of expected passes24946 # of unexpected failures2 # of expected failures 70 # of untested testcases 7 # of unsupported tests 200 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes1352 # of unsupported tests 8 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes212 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: linking simple === libjava Summary === # of expected passes3260 # of unexpected failures1 # of expected failures 11 # of untested testcases 8 === libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary === # of added symbols: 11 # of missing symbols:0 # of incompatible symbols: 0 using: /home/packages/gcc/3.4/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/i486-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread.cc execution test XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes2731 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 5 Compiler version: 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) Platform: i486-linux configure flags: -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.4 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --program-suffix=-3.4 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-werror i486-linux BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 Build Dependencies: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea Patches that Debian applied in this version: cvs-updates: CVS updates from the 3.4 branch upto 20041128 gcc-version: Add "(Debian )" to the gcc version string gcc-textdomain: Set gettext's domain and textdomain to the versioned package name. rename-info-files: Allow transformations on info file names. Reference the transformed info file names in the texinfo files. libstdc++-pic: Build and install libstdc++_pic.a library. libstdc++-doclink: adjust hr
Results for 3.4.4 20041127 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) testsuite on mipsel-linux
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 27 06:59:15 UTC 2004 Native configuration is mipsel-linux (solitude) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: adam3i.pas FAIL: adam3j.pas FAIL: adam3o.pas FAIL: adam3p.pas FAIL: assumptions.pas FAIL: binrdwt.pas FAIL: bitfields.pas FAIL: chris4.pas FAIL: chuck3.pas FAIL: couper12.pas FAIL: daj23.pas FAIL: dosunixtest.pas FAIL: eike3a.pas FAIL: emil15.pas FAIL: emil16.pas FAIL: emil23d.pas FAIL: expon.pas FAIL: fjf124.pas FAIL: fjf127.pas FAIL: fjf131.pas FAIL: fjf133.pas FAIL: fjf145.pas FAIL: fjf158.pas FAIL: fjf165a.pas FAIL: fjf165b.pas FAIL: fjf175d.pas FAIL: fjf175e.pas FAIL: fjf189.pas FAIL: fjf207.pas FAIL: fjf219a.pas FAIL: fjf219b.pas FAIL: fjf219c.pas FAIL: fjf226u.pas FAIL: fjf252.pas FAIL: fjf257a.pas FAIL: fjf257b.pas FAIL: fjf257c.pas FAIL: fjf264.pas FAIL: fjf3.pas FAIL: fjf401.pas FAIL: fjf40e.pas FAIL: fjf416a.pas FAIL: fjf422.pas FAIL: fjf432.pas FAIL: fjf434a.pas FAIL: fjf434c.pas FAIL: fjf438a.pas FAIL: fjf438b.pas FAIL: fjf438c.pas FAIL: fjf444a.pas FAIL: fjf458a.pas FAIL: fjf458b.pas FAIL: fjf458c.pas FAIL: fjf458d.pas FAIL: fjf484a.pas FAIL: fjf485.pas FAIL: fjf488o2.pas FAIL: fjf488p2.pas FAIL: fjf490.pas FAIL: fjf491.pas FAIL: fjf492.pas FAIL: fjf496a4.pas FAIL: fjf496b4.pas FAIL: fjf496d4.pas FAIL: fjf496f4.pas FAIL: fjf499a.pas FAIL: fjf499b.pas FAIL: fjf499c.pas FAIL: fjf524a.pas FAIL: fjf526a.pas FAIL: fjf526b.pas FAIL: fjf526c.pas FAIL: fjf526d.pas FAIL: fjf526e.pas FAIL: fjf526f.pas FAIL: fjf543a.pas FAIL: fjf543d.pas FAIL: fjf543f.pas FAIL: fjf564a.pas FAIL: fjf564b.pas FAIL: fjf564c.pas FAIL: fjf564d.pas FAIL: fjf564e.pas FAIL: fjf564f.pas FAIL: fjf569c.pas FAIL: fjf576l.pas FAIL: fjf577l.pas FAIL: fjf617.pas FAIL: fjf629g.pas FAIL: fjf636e.pas FAIL: fjf64.pas FAIL: fjf651a.pas FAIL: fjf654b.pas FAIL: fjf664.pas FAIL: fjf669a.pas FAIL: fjf669b.pas FAIL: fjf675.pas FAIL: fjf707a.pas FAIL: fjf712a.pas FAIL: fjf821a.pas FAIL: fjf895.pas FAIL: fjf914b.pas FAIL: fjf924.pas FAIL: fjf929.pas FAIL: fjf930a.pas FAIL: fjf930b.pas FAIL: fjf936.pas FAIL: fjf95.pas FAIL: fjf95a.pas FAIL: fjf95b.pas FAIL: george1.pas FAIL: getopt1.pas FAIL: getopt2.pas FAIL: getopt3.pas FAIL: gpctest.pas FAIL: knuth1.pas FAIL: knuth1a.pas FAIL: lastpos.pas FAIL: lrbug2.pas FAIL: martin2a.pas FAIL: matt1.pas FAIL: maur11.pas FAIL: md5test.pas FAIL: mir003.pas FAIL: mir006.pas FAIL: nick1.pas FAIL: numericio.pas FAIL: pcextn.pas FAIL: piextn.pas FAIL: pvs2.pas FAIL: pvs3.pas FAIL: rdwt.pas FAIL: readb1.pas FAIL: readb10.pas FAIL: readb11.pas FAIL: readb12.pas FAIL: readb13.pas FAIL: readb14.pas FAIL: readb15.pas FAIL: readb16.pas FAIL: readb2.pas FAIL: readb3.pas FAIL: readb4.pas FAIL: readb5.pas FAIL: readb6.pas FAIL: readb7.pas FAIL: readb8.pas FAIL: readb9.pas FAIL: readc1.pas FAIL: readc10.pas FAIL: readc11.pas FAIL: readc12.pas FAIL: readc13.pas FAIL: readc14.pas FAIL: readc15.pas FAIL: readc16.pas FAIL: readc2.pas FAIL: readc3.pas FAIL: readc4.pas FAIL: readc5.pas FAIL: readc6.pas FAIL: readc7.pas FAIL: readc8.pas FAIL: readc9.pas FAIL: reade1.pas FAIL: reade10.pas FAIL: reade11.pas FAIL: reade12.pas FAIL: reade13.pas FAIL: reade14.pas FAIL: reade15.pas FAIL: reade16.pas FAIL: reade2.pas FAIL: reade3.pas FAIL: reade4.pas FAIL: reade5.pas FAIL: reade6.pas FAIL: reade7.pas FAIL: reade8.pas FAIL: reade9.pas FAIL: readg1.pas FAIL: readg10.pas FAIL: readg11.pas FAIL: readg12.pas FAIL: readg13.pas FAIL: readg14.pas FAIL: readg15.pas FAIL: readg16.pas FAIL: readg2.pas FAIL: readg3.pas FAIL: readg4.pas FAIL: readg5.pas FAIL: readg6.pas FAIL: readg7.pas FAIL: readg8.pas FAIL: readg9.pas FAIL: redef.pas FAIL: scott1.pas FAIL: seekrd.pas FAIL: sets5.pas FAIL: testeoln.pas FAIL: tfddtest.pas FAIL: tom4.pas FAIL: writereal.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3744 # of unexpected failures 204 # of unsupported tests5 /home/doko/gcc/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/xgpc version 20040516, based on gcc-3.4.4 20041127 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === acats tests === FAIL: c37213f FAIL: c37215f FAIL: ce2102d === acats Summary === # of expected passes1962 # of unexpected failures3 # of unsupported tests 357 === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE: XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrflags.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrflags.C compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/catchptr1.C execution test XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable
Results for 3.4.4 20041127 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) testsuite on mips-linux
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 27 06:59:15 UTC 2004 Native configuration is mips-linux (hattusa) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: adam3i.pas FAIL: adam3j.pas FAIL: adam3o.pas FAIL: adam3p.pas FAIL: assumptions.pas FAIL: binrdwt.pas FAIL: bitfields.pas FAIL: chris4.pas FAIL: chuck3.pas FAIL: couper12.pas FAIL: daj23.pas FAIL: dosunixtest.pas FAIL: eike3a.pas FAIL: emil15.pas FAIL: emil16.pas FAIL: emil23d.pas FAIL: fjf124.pas FAIL: fjf127.pas FAIL: fjf131.pas FAIL: fjf133.pas FAIL: fjf145.pas FAIL: fjf158.pas FAIL: fjf165a.pas FAIL: fjf165b.pas FAIL: fjf175d.pas FAIL: fjf175e.pas FAIL: fjf189.pas FAIL: fjf207.pas FAIL: fjf219a.pas FAIL: fjf219b.pas FAIL: fjf219c.pas FAIL: fjf226u.pas FAIL: fjf252.pas FAIL: fjf257a.pas FAIL: fjf257c.pas FAIL: fjf264.pas FAIL: fjf3.pas FAIL: fjf401.pas FAIL: fjf40e.pas FAIL: fjf416a.pas FAIL: fjf422.pas FAIL: fjf432.pas FAIL: fjf434a.pas FAIL: fjf434c.pas FAIL: fjf438a.pas FAIL: fjf438b.pas FAIL: fjf438c.pas FAIL: fjf444a.pas FAIL: fjf458a.pas FAIL: fjf458b.pas FAIL: fjf458c.pas FAIL: fjf458d.pas FAIL: fjf484a.pas FAIL: fjf485.pas FAIL: fjf488i2.pas FAIL: fjf488o2.pas FAIL: fjf488p2.pas FAIL: fjf490.pas FAIL: fjf491.pas FAIL: fjf492.pas FAIL: fjf496a4.pas FAIL: fjf496b4.pas FAIL: fjf496d4.pas FAIL: fjf496f4.pas FAIL: fjf499a.pas FAIL: fjf499b.pas FAIL: fjf499c.pas FAIL: fjf524a.pas FAIL: fjf526a.pas FAIL: fjf526b.pas FAIL: fjf526c.pas FAIL: fjf526d.pas FAIL: fjf526e.pas FAIL: fjf526f.pas FAIL: fjf543a.pas FAIL: fjf543d.pas FAIL: fjf543f.pas FAIL: fjf564a.pas FAIL: fjf564b.pas FAIL: fjf564c.pas FAIL: fjf564d.pas FAIL: fjf564e.pas FAIL: fjf564f.pas FAIL: fjf569c.pas FAIL: fjf576l.pas FAIL: fjf577l.pas FAIL: fjf617.pas FAIL: fjf636e.pas FAIL: fjf64.pas FAIL: fjf651a.pas FAIL: fjf654b.pas FAIL: fjf664.pas FAIL: fjf669a.pas FAIL: fjf669b.pas FAIL: fjf675.pas FAIL: fjf707a.pas FAIL: fjf712a.pas FAIL: fjf821a.pas FAIL: fjf895.pas FAIL: fjf914b.pas FAIL: fjf924.pas FAIL: fjf929.pas FAIL: fjf930a.pas FAIL: fjf930b.pas FAIL: fjf936.pas FAIL: fjf95.pas FAIL: fjf95a.pas FAIL: fjf95b.pas FAIL: george1.pas FAIL: getopt1.pas FAIL: getopt2.pas FAIL: getopt3.pas FAIL: gpctest.pas FAIL: knuth1.pas FAIL: knuth1a.pas FAIL: lastpos.pas FAIL: lrbug2.pas FAIL: martin2a.pas FAIL: matt1.pas FAIL: maur11.pas FAIL: md5test.pas FAIL: mir003.pas FAIL: mir006.pas FAIL: nick1.pas FAIL: numericio.pas FAIL: pcextn.pas FAIL: piextn.pas FAIL: pvs2.pas FAIL: pvs3.pas FAIL: rdwt.pas FAIL: readb1.pas FAIL: readb10.pas FAIL: readb11.pas FAIL: readb12.pas FAIL: readb13.pas FAIL: readb14.pas FAIL: readb15.pas FAIL: readb16.pas FAIL: readb2.pas FAIL: readb3.pas FAIL: readb4.pas FAIL: readb5.pas FAIL: readb6.pas FAIL: readb7.pas FAIL: readb8.pas FAIL: readb9.pas FAIL: readc1.pas FAIL: readc10.pas FAIL: readc11.pas FAIL: readc12.pas FAIL: readc13.pas FAIL: readc14.pas FAIL: readc15.pas FAIL: readc16.pas FAIL: readc2.pas FAIL: readc3.pas FAIL: readc4.pas FAIL: readc5.pas FAIL: readc6.pas FAIL: readc7.pas FAIL: readc8.pas FAIL: readc9.pas FAIL: reade1.pas FAIL: reade10.pas FAIL: reade11.pas FAIL: reade12.pas FAIL: reade13.pas FAIL: reade14.pas FAIL: reade15.pas FAIL: reade16.pas FAIL: reade2.pas FAIL: reade3.pas FAIL: reade4.pas FAIL: reade5.pas FAIL: reade6.pas FAIL: reade7.pas FAIL: reade8.pas FAIL: reade9.pas FAIL: readg1.pas FAIL: readg10.pas FAIL: readg11.pas FAIL: readg12.pas FAIL: readg13.pas FAIL: readg14.pas FAIL: readg15.pas FAIL: readg16.pas FAIL: readg2.pas FAIL: readg3.pas FAIL: readg4.pas FAIL: readg5.pas FAIL: readg6.pas FAIL: readg7.pas FAIL: readg8.pas FAIL: readg9.pas FAIL: redef.pas FAIL: scott1.pas FAIL: seekrd.pas FAIL: sets5.pas FAIL: testeoln.pas FAIL: tfddtest.pas FAIL: tom4.pas FAIL: writereal.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3746 # of unexpected failures 202 # of unsupported tests5 /home/ths/colo/doko/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/build/gcc/xgpc version 20040516, based on gcc-3.4.4 20041127 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-2) === acats tests === FAIL: c37213f FAIL: c37215f === acats Summary === # of expected passes1963 # of unexpected failures2 # of unsupported tests 357 === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE: XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrflags.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrflags.C compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/catchptr1.C execution test XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable
