Bug#149097: marked as done (gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ??? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2002 09:00:29 + >From egm2@jps.net Wed Jun 05 04:00:29 2002 Return-path: Received: from sire.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.182] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17FWeb-0007Yj-00; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 04:00:29 -0500 Received: from 216-119-23-172.o1.jps.net ([216.119.23.172] helo=localhost) by sire.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17FWeZ-00033G-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:00:27 -0700 Received: from felix by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17FWgP-00043Z-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:02:21 -0700 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 02:02:21 -0700 From: "Eric G. Miller" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ??? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: "Eric G. Miller" Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gnat-3.1-doc Version: 3.1-2 Severity: wishlist The gnat-doc package included the Ada95 Reference Manual in info format, however this is not included in gnat-3.1-doc. It'd be desirable to make this document available, possibly as it's own package to avoid the conflict between gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc ?? The document specifies the language and is therefore the definitive reference. The docs in the current gnat-3.1-doc supplement the "ARM" but don't provide the same information. Thanks, -- Eric G. Miller --- Received: (at 149097-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 11:04:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 06:04:55 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17ThBO-sz-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 06:04:55 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02496; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EB3D905183; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 To: "Eric G. Miller" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ??? In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is included: gnat-rm-3.1 Eric G. Miller writes: > Package: gnat-3.1-doc > Version: 3.1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > The gnat-doc package included the Ada95 Reference Manual in info format, > however this is not included in gnat-3.1-doc. It'd be desirable to > make this document available, possibly as it's own package to avoid the > conflict between gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc ?? The document specifies > the language and is therefore the definitive reference. The docs in the > current gnat-3.1-doc supplement the "ARM" but don't provide the same > information. > > Thanks, > -- > Eric G. Miller > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcj-3.1 ICE
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"Richard Braakman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: java
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
Architecture: i686
host: i386-linux
configured with: /mnt/data/gcc-3.1/gcc-3.1-3.1ds2/src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc,ada --prefix=/usr
--mandir=$\(prefix\)/share/man --infodir=$\(prefix\)/share/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=$\(prefix\)/include/g++-v3-3.1 --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-objc-gc i386-linux
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #152501.
Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] on replies.
Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/152501 ]
Rechecked with gcc-3_1-branch 20020606.
Hello, I found code on which gcj crashes. I reduced it to a minimal test
case, and in the process found a workaround, so I'm happy :) But here's
the test case:
File Main.java:
import pkg.sub;
class Main {
public static void progressMessage(String msg) {
System.out.println(msg);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new sub();
}
}
File pkg/sub.java:
package pkg;
public class sub {
public sub() {
Main.progressMessage("Foo");
}
}
Compilation:
% gcj-3.1 -I. -c Main.java -o Main.o
% gcj-3.1 -I. -c pkg/sub.java -o pkg/sub.o
pkg/sub.java:5: internal error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
I think the problem is also present upstream, because I got the same crash
with a non-debian version of gcj 3.1. Changing "class Main" to
"public class Main" will make the crash go away.
Richard Braakman
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install path for libgcj header files
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Matthias Klose >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Install path for libgcj header files >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: libgcj >Class: change-request >Release: 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) (Debian testing/unstable) >Environment: System: Linux gate.local 2.4.18-xfs #1 Tue Mar 12 22:42:02 CET 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Architecture: i686 host: i386-pc-linux-gnu build: i386-pc-linux-gnu target: i386-pc-linux-gnu configured with: /mnt/data/gcc-3.1/gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds2/src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc,ada --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++-v3-3.1 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-objc-gc i386-linux >Description: The installation path for the C++ headers recently changed in the HEAD, so that different gcc versions can be installed under the same prefix, i.e. /usr/include/c++/. It would be nice to do the same for gcj/libgcj, so that more than one gcj/libgcj-dev package can be installed concurrently under the same prefix. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152501: java/7304: gcj-3.1 ICE
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `java/7304'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: java >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: gcj-3.1 ICE >Arrival-Date: Sun Jul 14 04:36:01 PDT 2002 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #152501 to gcc-gnats as PR java/7304
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 152501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#152501: gcj-3.1: segfault with test case Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 152501 [PR java/7304] gcj-3.1 ICE Bug#152501: gcj-3.1: segfault with test case Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"Stephane Magnenat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
Architecture: i686
host: i386-linux
configured with: /mnt/data/gcc-3.1/gcc-3.1-3.1ds2/src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc,ada --prefix=/usr
--mandir=$\(prefix\)/share/man --infodir=$\(prefix\)/share/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=$\(prefix\)/include/g++-v3-3.1 --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-objc-gc i386-linux
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #151357.
Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] on replies.
Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/151357 ]
Stephane Magnenat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reports:
When I try to compile C++ code with virtual inheritance and variable number of
argument method, the compilation fails with the following message :
bugreport.cpp:35: generic thunk code fails for method `virtual void
Virt::p(const char*, ...)' which uses `...'
It is working fine with gcc 2.95.x
#include
#include
class Base
{
public:
Base() { }
virtual void p(const char *format, ...)=0;
};
class Der1: public virtual Base
{
public:
Der1():Base() { }
virtual void p(const char *format, ...)=0;
};
class Der2: public virtual Base
{
public:
Der2():Base() { }
virtual void p(const char *format, ...)=0;
};
class Virt:public virtual Der1, public virtual Der2
{
public:
Virt():Der1(),Der2() { }
virtual void p(const char *format, ...)
{
va_list arglist;
va_start(arglist,format);
vprintf(format, arglist);
va_end(arglist);
}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
Virt v;
v.p("Hello %d\n", 10);
}
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151357: c++/7306: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c++/7306'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c++ >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with >variable number of argument methode >Arrival-Date: Sun Jul 14 04:56:00 PDT 2002 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149561: bad pathnames coded into the libs
Philip Blundell writes: > The binaries have to be built in some directory, and whatever pathname > is used will end up embedded in the debug information. There's not a > lot we can do about this. therefore closing the repot. adding a paragraph about debugging libstdc++ for the next upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #151357 to gcc-gnats as PR c++/7306
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 151357 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#151357: gcc-3.0 fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 151357 [PR c++/7306] gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance > with variable number of argument methode Bug#151357: gcc-3.0 fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#148725: marked as done (gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2002 08:27:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 01 03:27:00 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail2.ewetel.de [212.6.122.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17E4E0-0002sg-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 03:27:00 -0500 Received: from mail.konqueror.de (dsl-ler-213-170-182-126.ewetel.net [213.170.182.126]) by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g518QR6S007198; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:26:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: from asterix.konqueror.de (asterix.konqueror.de [192.168.1.100]) by mail.konqueror.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A055AF12; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:26:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mkoch by asterix.konqueror.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17E4DR-0001SX-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:26:25 +0200 Subject: gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2 From: "Michael Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.30 Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:26:25 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-CheckCompat: OK Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gij-3.1 Version: 1:3.1-2 Severity: normal gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2. I found that I cant install libbtools-java because no package provides java-runtime2 except j2sdk1.3. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages gij-3.1 depends on: ii gcc-3.1-base 1:3.1-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.1-2GCC support library. ii libgcj3 1:3.1-2Java runtime library for use with ii zlib1g1:1.1.4-1 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 148725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 12:39:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 07:39:34 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Tiez-0003e2-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 07:39:33 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA10894; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6ECclu10306; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 To: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, closing the report. swing isn't supported by gcj-3.1. Ben Burton writes: > > Just wrt the libbtools-java issue that spawned this bug report: > > > Most of the core packages in libgcj 3.1 are JDK 1.2 compatible, and in > > many cases they are already JDK 1.3 or 1.4 compatible. However, we do > > not yet have complete implementations of every package that makes up JDK > > 1.2 (for example Swing is missing and AWT is incomplete). > > It's primarily the requirement on javax.swing that forces libbtools-java to > depend on java2-runtime. > > Ben. > > -- > > Ben Burton > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/ > Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Arguments are to be avoided; they are always vulgar and often convincing. > - Oscar Wilde > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #148529 to gcc-gnats as PR ada/6911
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 148529 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#148529: gnat-3.1: sin broken Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 148529 [PR ada/6911] gnat-3.1: sin broken Bug#148529: gnat-3.1: sin broken Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #147864 to gcc-gnats as PR ada/5679
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 147864 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#147864: gnat-3.1 fails to compile libgtkada Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 147864 [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning > unconstrained type conversion Bug#147864: gnat-3.1 fails to compile libgtkada Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#148664: g++-3.1: can not compile code with std::assert in it
reassign 148664 glibc thanks Sean Perry writes: > Package: g++-3.1 > Version: 1:3.1-2 > Severity: normal > > in modern C++ the style is: > > #include > std::assert(this_should_be_true); > > however this fails to compile under 3.1 claiming: > > parse error before `static_cast' > > my code is not casting. The cast is coming from assert.h provided by > glibc. This may indeed be a glibc bug, if so feel free to reassign it. > > For now I can work around this by using the C header assert.h which > causes assert.h to be interpreted as C, not C++ code. > > -- System Information > Debian Release: 3.0 > Architecture: i386 > Kernel: Linux one 2.4.18 #1 Sat Mar 9 08:43:28 PST 2002 i686 > Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set) > > Versions of packages g++-3.1 depends on: > ii gcc-3.1 1:3.1-2The GNU C compiler. > ii gcc-3.1-base 1:3.1-2The GNU Compiler Collection > (base > ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libstdc++4-dev1:3.1-2The GNU stdc++ library version 3 > ( > > -- no debconf information > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#148664: g++-3.1: can not compile code with std::assert in it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 148664 glibc Bug#148664: g++-3.1: can not compile code with std::assert in it Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.1' to `glibc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151618: marked as done (g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#151618: g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2002 22:44:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 01 17:44:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from florence.buici.com [206.124.142.26] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17P9uD-0004zK-00; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:44:25 -0500
Received: (qmail 1294 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Jul 2002 22:44:16 -
Date: 1 Jul 2002 22:44:16 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: g++-3.1
Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre2
Severity: normal
This code compiled in gcc-3.0 and fails in gcc-3.1 claiming that class
rope is not to be found in std.
#include
#include
#include
int main (int, char**)
{
std::rope r;
char sz[] =
"Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.\n"
"Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.\n"
"Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.\n"
"Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.\n";
r.append (sz, strlen (sz));
while (r.size ()) {
printf ("%d\n", r.size ());
r.erase (0,50);
}
exit (0);
}
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux florence 2.4.17 #2 SMP Sun Jan 6 11:01:58 PST 2002 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages g++-3.1 depends on:
ii gcc-3.13.1.1-0pre2The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-3.1-base 3.1.1-0pre2The GNU Compiler Collection (base package).
ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++4-dev 3.1.1-0pre2The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (developmen
---
Received: (at 151618-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 13:24:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 08:24:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17TjMS-0005S4-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 08:24:28 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15108;
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EDLsj11361;
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:54 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:54 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#151618: g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I suspected that, but
>
> using namespace __gnu_cxx;
>
> reports that the namespace '__gnu_cxx' is undeclared. Explicitly
> referencing that namespace does work.
Rechecked with the current 0pre3 packages. 'using' works ok. Closing
the report.
Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 06:59:25PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:44:16PM -, Marc Singer wrote:
> > > Package: g++-3.1
> > > Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre2
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > >
> > > This code compiled in gcc-3.0 and fails in gcc-3.1 claiming that class
> > > rope is not to be found in std.
> >
> > Yep. Extensions not actually in the standard ISO namespace are getting
> > moved into __gnu_cxx, starting with 3.1.
> >
> > file:///usr/share/doc/libstdc++4-doc/libstdc++/html_user/namespacegnu__cxx.html#_details
> >
> > The SGI rope class is not listed on the above page, but only because
> > nobody's
> > volunteered to document it. I don't plan to (but I should probably at
> > least add the hooks so it'll show up in the list).
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > --
> > If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
> > than the animating contest for freedom,
Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency
severity 150357 wishlist tags 150357 + wontfix thanks Ben Pfaff writes: > Package: gcc-3.1-doc > Version: 3.1.1-0pre2 > > The Info files for GCC 2.95 have names beginning with gcc-295. > The Info files for GCC 3.0 have names beginning with gcc-300. > But the Info files for GCC 3.1 have names beginning with gcc-3.1. > Some consistency would be nice. we are getting consistent with 3.1 (same suffixes as for the binaries). I won't fix this for the older compiler versions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 150357 wishlist Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency Severity set to `wishlist'. > tags 150357 + wontfix Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
reassign 151675 gcc-2.95
tags 151675 + fixed
retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
thanks
Gerrit Pape writes:
> Package: gcc
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> compiling tryulong32.c on arm with gcc-2.95.2-13.1 and the -O option seems
> to cause an infinite loop in cc1, it compiles fine without -O, it also
> compiles fine on other architectures:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bglibs-1.001$ gcc -W -Wall -o tryulong32.o -c
> tryulong32.c
> tryulong32.c:2: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bglibs-1.001$
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bglibs-1.001$ gcc -W -Wall -O -o tryulong32.o -c
> tryulong32.c &
> tryulong32.c:2: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
> [...wait...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bglibs-1.001$ ps
> PID TTY TIME CMD
> 31587 pts/100:00:00 bash
> 31835 pts/100:00:00 gcc
> 31837 pts/100:29:40 cc1
> 31874 pts/100:00:00 ps
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bglibs-1.001$
>
> This also seems to be an issue with gcc-2.95.4, please see this build log:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=bglibs&ver=1.001-1&arch=arm&stamp=1025238522&file=log&as=raw
>
> tryulong32.c
> ---
> void main()
> {
> unsigned long u;
> u = 1;
> u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u;
> u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u;
> u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u;
> u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u; u += u;
> if (!u) _exit(0);
> _exit(1);
> }
> ---
>
> Regards, Gerrit.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 151675 gcc-2.95 Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'. > tags 151675 + fixed Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Tags added: fixed > retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
struct problems
> Version 2.95 got it right: This is no valid C++ (What happens if someone > adds a constructor to the struct?). While this is indeed not well-formed C++ 98, this is a defect in C++ itself (as it breaks C compatibility). Defect Report 80 (which will be included in the upcoming technical corrigendum) restores C compatibility again, and makes your example well-formed; see http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#80 g++ already incorporates the resolution to this issue. The case where a constructor for this class is also present is an entirely different issue (see the DR). Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151357: c++/7306: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode
Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 08:23:28 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. A regression from GCC 2.95. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7306 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 150966 general Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `general'. > tags 150966 + moreinfo Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 150558 + fixed Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' Tags added: fixed > retitle 150558 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: > suffix or operands invalid for `div' Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report
reassign 150966 general tags 150966 + moreinfo thanks you don't give much information. I suspect, this is an error in some other package. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: g++ > Version: N/A > Severity: normal > > Here's my list of installed packages... I'm not sure exactly where the > problem lies. All software has been installed vi apt-get. I have a > daily cron job that does apt-get dist-upgrade -y. All software on > the system has been installed via apt-get. The system was a fresh > install on a clean disk about two months ago. > > I have been running apt-get install g++ as a daily cron job for at > least a month and at no time has g++ been able to install. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --list | more > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name VersionDescription > +++-==-==- > ri adduser3.47 Add and remove users and groups > ii apt0.5.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg > ii apt-utils 0.5.4 APT utility programs > ri at 3.1.8-11 Delayed job execution and batch processing > ri base-config1.33.18Debian base configuration package > ii base-files 3.0.2 Debian base system miscellaneous files > ii base-passwd3.4.1 Debian Base System Password/Group Files > ii bash 2.05a-11 The GNU Bourne Again SHell > ii binutils 2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary > utiliti > ri bsdmainutils 5.20020211-4 More utilities from FreeBSD. > ri bsdutils 2.11n-4Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite. > ii bug3.2.10 Bug Reporting Tool interfacing with the > Bug > ii bzip2 0.9.5d-2 A high-quality block-sorting file > compressor > ri console-common 0.7.14 Basic infrastructure for text console > config > ri console-data 1999.08.29-24 Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fallback > table > ri console-tools 0.2.3-23.3 Linux console and font utilities. > ii console-tools- 0.2.3-23.3 Shared libraries for Linux console and > font > ii cpio 2.4.2-39 GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives > of > ii cpp2.95.2-13.1The GNU C preprocessor. > ii cracklib-runti 2.7-8 A pro-active password checker library > ii cracklib2 2.7-8 A pro-active password checker library > ri cron 3.0pl1-72 management of regular background > processing > ii cvs1.10.7-9 Concurrent Versions System > ii debconf1.0.32 Debian configuration management system > ii debianutils1.16 Miscellaneous utilities specific to > Debian. > ii dhcp-client2.0pl5-11 DHCP Client > ii diff 2.7-29 File comparison utilities > ii dosfstools 2.5-1 Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT > fil > ii dpkg 1.9.20 Package maintenance system for Debian > ii e2fsprogs 1.27-2 The EXT2 file system utilities and > libraries > ii ed 0.2-19 The classic unix line editor > ri exim 3.35-1 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) > ii fdutils5.3-7 Linux floppy utilities > ii file 3.28-1 Determines file type using "magic" numbers > ii fileutils 4.1-10 GNU file management utilities > ii findutils 4.1.7-2utilities for finding files--find, xargs, > an > ii gcc2.95.2-13.1The GNU C compiler. > ii gettext-base 0.10.40-5 GNU Internationalization utilities for the > b > ii gnupg 1.0.6-0potato1 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP > replacement. > ii grep 2.4.2-3GNU grep, egrep and fgrep. > ii groff-base 1.17.2-15.wood GNU troff text-formatting system (base > syste > ii gzip 1.3.2-3The GNU compression utility. > ii hostname 2.09 A utility to set/show the host name or > domai > ii ifupdown 0.6.4-4High level tools to configure network > interf > ii info 4.1-2 Standalone GNU Info documentation browser > ri ipchains 1.3.10-15 Network firewalling for Linux 2.2.x > ri iptables 1.2.6a-5 IP packet filter administration tools for > 2. > ii klogd 1.4.1-10 Kernel Logging Daemon > ii ldso 1.9.11-9 The Linux dynamic linker, library and > utilit > ii libbz2 0.9.5d-2 A high-quality block-sorting file > compressor > ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries and > Timezone > ii libcap11.10-12support for getting/setting POSIX.1e > capabil > ii libdb2 2.7.7.0-7 The Berkeley database routines (run-time > fil > ii libdb3
Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div'
tags 150558 + fixed retitle 150558 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 1:2.95.2-13.1 > Severity: normal > > Included are ``mp.i'' and ``mp.c'' which produced the error. The > problem was encountered whilst compiling pari-2.1.3 on > Debian-2.2/stable. > > Michael > > - -- System Information > Debian Release: 2.2 > Kernel Version: Linux localhost 2.2.21 #1 Fri May 31 22:07:58 BST 2002 i686 > unknown > > Versions of the packages gcc depends on: > ii binutils 2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti > ii cpp2.95.2-13.1The GNU C preprocessor. > ii libc6 2.1.3-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone > > > > Script started on Thu Jun 20 16:47:33 2002 > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# /usr/bin/gcc -c > -DMEMSTEP=1048576 -O3 -g2 -Wall -Wno-implicit -I. -I../src/headers -o mp.o > ../src/kernel/none/mp.c > /tmp/cc8ddKkA.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/cc8ddKkA.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# /usr/bin/gcc -c > -DMEMSTEP=1048576 -O2 -g2 -Wall -Wno-implicit -I. -I../src/headers -o mp.o > ../src/kernel/none/mp.c #works ok > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# /usr/bin/gcc -c > -DMEMSTEP=1048576 -O3 -g2 -Wall -Wno-implicit -I. -I../src/headers -o mp.o > ../src/kernel/none/mp.c -save-temps -v > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/specs > gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux) > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/cpp -lang-c -v -I. -I../src/headers > -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=95 -D__ELF__ -Dunix -D__i386__ -Dlinux > -D__ELF__ -D__unix__ -D__i386__ -D__linux__ -D__unix -D__linux > -Asystem(posix) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -g2 -Wall -Wno-implicit -Acpu(i386) > -Amachine(i386) -Di386 -D__i386 -D__i386__ -DMEMSTEP=1048576 > ../src/kernel/none/mp.c mp.i > GNU CPP version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux) (i386 Linux/ELF) > #include "..." search starts here: > #include <...> search starts here: > . > ../src/headers > /usr/local/include > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/include > /usr/include > End of search list. > The following default directories have been omitted from the search path: > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/../../../../include/g++-3 > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/../../../../i386-linux/include > End of omitted list. > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/cc1 mp.i -quiet -dumpbase mp.c -g2 -O3 > -Wall -Wno-implicit -version -o mp.s > GNU C version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux) (i386-linux) compiled by GNU > C version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux). > as -V -Qy -o mp.o mp.s > GNU assembler version 2.9.5 (i386-linux) using BFD version 2.9.5.0.37 > mp.s: Assembler messages: > mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# ls -l mp.* > - -rw-r--r--1 root root 284390 Jun 20 16:48 mp.i > - -rw-r--r--1 root root 420269 Jun 20 16:48 mp.s > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# sed -ne 9605p mp.s > divl $10 > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# grep divl !$ > grep divl mp.s > divl %ebx > divl %ebx > divl 8(%ecx) > divl -20(%ebp) > divl -40(%ebp) > divl -40(%ebp) > divl $10 > divl 12(%ebp) > divl -8(%ebp) > divl -8(%ebp) > divl -4(%ebp) > divl -8(%ebp) > divl -4(%ebp) > divl %ebx > divl %ebx > divl %ecx > divl %ebx > divl %esi > divl %ebx > divl -32(%ebp) > divl %edi > divl %esi > divl %edi > divl %ecx > divl %ebx > divl 8(%esi) > divl %esi > divl %esi > divl %esi > divl %ebx > divl %ecx > divl %esi > divl %ebx > localhost:/usr/local/src/pari/pari-2.1.3/Olinux-i686.dbg# exit > > Script done on Thu Jun 20 16:49:29 2002 > > > > begin 644 data.tar.bz2 > M0EIH.3%!629362C=2&T"+`M_E?W___\&P```"&%' > M_O?-:R&VC/JW0XQESH``525%`""/KI09MUW4U?;;LZ*>E*-%;.W>,RE\V4I; > M[=;H]\KMO'7U;=/NQ$WK#M=UNRZ< MV$ONW2H/8-*4]L]Y=OM.CNR^]5\?!'OD&UN^T=UB^+1/.[J/O;TZ^16V > M>NYMF;5K[2,;V=U%VRS8.]V[8)L=3>[B";X%Y]]0?9E6S'3=UX.U3T>]U7GN > MT9K?6Y*,FJ?;=\NZLCW9Z]VA-CSLMF[L7PXZ'7WGN!K[YN]L3JHJOI5[=39W > MGCEEUU5>!\HBJ&=8OK=C/;I5=YN[?=]RWNS#IRP%X]ZJV[L<,YWC'3LWN^GO > MK)7TAT"5"014*CTQ[R^^1-NTY!H]]L:EH#3NWNWD-#UUT#70*:5JC:NA]MV> > MEEOK<-\+Z^WNU\[C.=QEV^YKV]=YEUMM)=NS)2[LR7WN[Z > MJ:FCH`^V]=<<[N%N[NI[FY.>^W.\RRU/LWU]LU+[)I`:5(`2(>/;HO,@` > M./>II[O<]25Z>KZV97=R][NT]X]79RMKM1V]<,O.X8=\^'"UFS;,T!WGN]!O > MM\GUQG*;LAWMWK7MXL]GO8Z.O5-[MZ'[EMAIL PROTECTED]<^;S[?';
Re: Testsuite failure
yes, some gcc-2.95 uploads were tested against the gcc-3.0 testsuite. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > I mailed earlier about the testsuite failing. I've found a similar output > from somebody else on > http://kebo.vlsm.org/debian-extra/dists/stable/dhidhel/experimental/gcc-2.95-4/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds7/build-native/gcc/testsuite/gcc.log > Is this the normal testsuite result? > > Regards, > Bart > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign to kdelibs for proper bug report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 143138 kdelibs Bug#143138: artsd crashes caused by -fomit-frame-pointer ! Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kdelibs'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: #64832 fixed in gcc-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 64832 + fixed Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k Tags added: fixed > retitle 64832 [fixed in gcc-3.1] gcc optimizer bug on m68k Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#122511: gcc: illegal instructions and bad jump offsets when VMA != LMA
Please could you retry this with the current gcc-3.1 version found in
unstable?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2:2.95.4-4
> Severity: normal
>
> This one's not easy to diagnose on my end. I'll cut and paste objdump's
> with --source to give an idea of the flavor. Similar bugs happen on all
> combinations of binutils and gcc I've tried, which are gcc2.95.4 packages
> of several versions and gcc3.0 packages of several versions, and a couple
> of versions of binutils I forgot plus the latest (2.11.90.0.31).
>
> I've got the source for the thing where this happens up on
> klecker:/org/home/wli/x86init.tar.gz
>
> I'll arrange the sources so that #defining MISCOMPILE causes this
> code to be generated.
>
> First, the miscompiled code:
>
> for(k = 0U; k < 4096U; ++k) {
> 111076: c7 45 f8 00 00 00 00movl $0x0,0xfff8(%ebp)
> 11107d: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 11107f: 00 81 7d f8 ff 0f add%al,0x87d(%ecx)
> 111085: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 111087: 76 07 jbe111090
> _addressing+0x38>
> 111089: eb 55 jmp1110e0
> _addressing+0x88>
> 11108b: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 11108d: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 11108f: 00 8b 45 f8 89 c2 add%cl,0xc289f845(%ebx)
> low_page_table_entries[k]
> 111095: 8d 04 95 00 00 00 00lea0x0(,%edx,4),%eax
> 11109c: ba 00 30 11 00 mov$0x113000,%edx
> 1110a1: 8b 4d f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%ecx
> 1110a4: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 1110a6: 89 d9 mov%ebx,%ecx
> 1110a8: c1 e1 0cshl$0xc,%ecx
> 1110ab: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 1110ad: 83 cb 07or $0x7,%ebx
> 1110b0: 89 1c 10mov%ebx,(%eax,%edx,1)
> = (4096*k)
> | PAGE_PRESENT_FIELD
> | PAGE_SUPERVISOR_FIELD
> | PAGE_WRITABLE_FIELD;
> high_page_table_entries[k]
> 1110b3: 8b 45 f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%eax
> 1110b6: 89 c2 mov%eax,%edx
> 1110b8: 8d 04 95 00 00 00 00lea0x0(,%edx,4),%eax
> 1110bf: ba 00 70 11 00 mov$0x117000,%edx
> 1110c4: 8b 4d f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%ecx
> 1110c7: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 1110c9: 89 d9 mov%ebx,%ecx
> 1110cb: c1 e1 0cshl$0xc,%ecx
> 1110ce: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 1110d0: 83 cb 07or $0x7,%ebx
> 1110d3: 89 1c 10mov%ebx,(%eax,%edx,1)
> 1110d6: ff 45 f8incl 0xfff8(%ebp)
> 1110d9: eb a5 jmp111080
> _addressing+0x28>
> 1110db: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 1110dd: 00 00 add%al,(%eax)
> 1110df: 00 c7 add%al,%bh
> = (4096*k)
> | PAGE_PRESENT_FIELD
> | PAGE_SUPERVISOR_FIELD
> | PAGE_WRITABLE_FIELD;
> }
> #endif
>
>
> Note that 0x111080 is not on an instruction boundary.
> An equivalent loop coded with gotos (the while is similarly miscompiled):
>
> #if 1
> k = 0U;
> 111076: c7 45 f8 00 00 00 00movl $0x0,0xfff8(%ebp)
> level_2_page_table_loop: {
> low_page_table_entries[k]
> 11107d: 8b 45 f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%eax
> 111080: 89 c2 mov%eax,%edx
> 111082: 8d 04 95 00 00 00 00lea0x0(,%edx,4),%eax
> 111089: ba 00 30 11 00 mov$0x113000,%edx
> 11108e: 8b 4d f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%ecx
> 111091: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 111093: 89 d9 mov%ebx,%ecx
> 111095: c1 e1 0cshl$0xc,%ecx
> 111098: 89 cb mov%ecx,%ebx
> 11109a: 83 cb 07or $0x7,%ebx
> 11109d: 89 1c 10mov%ebx,(%eax,%edx,1)
> = (4096*k)
> | PAGE_PRESENT_FIELD
> | PAGE_SUPERVISOR_FIELD
> | PAGE_WRITABLE_FIELD;
> high_page_table_entries[k]
> 1110a0: 8b 45 f8mov0xfff8(%ebp),%eax
> 1110a3: 89 c2 mov%eax,%edx
> 1110a5: 8d 04 95 00 00 00 00lea0x0(,%edx,4),%eax
> 1110ac:
Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch
Philip Blundell writes: > On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 20:26, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > I don't think that a Debian bug report is the right place to "push" a > > patch into gcc (i.e. to lobby for it). > > > > Instead, you should assume that all patches that have been submitted > > to gcc-patches are implicitly Debian bug reports which already have > > been forwarded upstream. The status of such a report changes when GCC > > maintainers act on the patch (e.g. reject it). > > That's not strictly true. The version of GCC shipped with Debian does > have extra patches applied to it, and lobbying to have another one added > is a reasonable enough thing to do. Closing the report. We are moving to gcc-3.1 as the default compiler. Better to keep gcc-2.95 unchanged in this situation for a fallback. Maybe you want to test/evaluate the patch for gcc-3.1 or the current HEAD banch and re-submit it upstream? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149463: marked as done (There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack protectionpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2002 17:39:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 09 12:39:36 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-213-023-053-059.arcor-ip.net (datas-world.dyndns.org) [213.23.53.59] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17H6f9-0002mZ-00; Sun, 09 Jun 2002 12:39:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1001) by datas-world.dyndns.org with local; Sun, 09 Jun 2002 19:38:46 +0200 Subject: There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch From: "Torsten Knodt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.36 Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 19:38:45 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-9 Severity: wishlist Hello, I think there should be a gcc version with stack protection patch included. The patch was sent in the gcc patches mailing list. Perhaps a single version is enough, as the patch can be (completly ?) disabled. With kind regards Torsten Knodt -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tk-hybrid-1 2.4.18 #1 Wed May 1 15:16:28 CEST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on: ii binutils 2.12.90.0.9-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.4-9The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc2:2.95.4-15 The GNU C compiler. ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 149463-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 16:35:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 11:35:09 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17TmKz-0004Ww-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:35:09 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03768; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EGXKI22750; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Torsten Knodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Philip Blundell writes: > On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 20:26, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > I don't think that a Debian bug report is the right place to "push" a > > patch into gcc (i.e. to lobby for it). > > > > Instead, you should assume that all patches that have been submitted > > to gcc-patches are implicitly Debian bug reports which already have > > been forwarded upstream. The status of such a report changes when GCC > > maintainers act on the patch (e.g. reject it). > > That's not strictly true. The version of GCC shipped with Debian does > have extra patches applied to it, and lobbying to have another one added > is a reasonable enough thing to do. Closing the report. We are moving to gcc-3.1 as the default compiler. Better to keep gcc-2.95 unchanged in this situation for a fallback. Maybe you want to test/evaluate the patch for gcc-3.1 or the current HEAD banch and re-submit it upstream? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151357: c++/7306: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode
Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan Responsible-Changed-By: nathan Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 10:59:24 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: working on a patch (implementing ASM_OUTPUT_VMI_THUNK) http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7306 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149097: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???)
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 06:18:08AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???, > which was filed against the gnat-3.1-doc package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > Received: (at 149097-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 11:04:55 + > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 06:04:55 2002 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) > by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) > id 17ThBO-sz-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 06:04:55 -0500 > Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) > by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02496; > Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MET DST) > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EB3D905183; > Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MEST) > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 > To: "Eric G. Miller" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ??? > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It is included: gnat-rm-3.1 I believe you're mistaken. The gnat-rm covers the implementation of portions of the Ada Reference Manual, along with some extensions, but it does not actually include the text of the Ada95 Reference Manual. Please compare the contents of gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc and you will see an arm95.info.gz file (as well as html and postscript versions). It is the arm95 doc that I was referring to (ANSI/ISO/IEC-8652:1995, Jan 1995). You will see the Ada 95 Reference Manual is mentioned in the gnat-rm under gnat-rm::About This Guide::Related Information > Eric G. Miller writes: > > Package: gnat-3.1-doc > > Version: 3.1-2 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The gnat-doc package included the Ada95 Reference Manual in info format, > > however this is not included in gnat-3.1-doc. It'd be desirable to > > make this document available, possibly as it's own package to avoid the > > conflict between gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc ?? The document specifies > > the language and is therefore the definitive reference. The docs in the > > current gnat-3.1-doc supplement the "ARM" but don't provide the same > > information. -- Eric G. Miller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Eric G. Miller writes: > > It is included: gnat-rm-3.1 > > I believe you're mistaken. The gnat-rm covers the implementation > of portions of the Ada Reference Manual, along with some extensions, > but it does not actually include the text of the Ada95 Reference Manual. > Please compare the contents of gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc and you will > see an arm95.info.gz file (as well as html and postscript versions). It > is the arm95 doc that I was referring to (ANSI/ISO/IEC-8652:1995, Jan > 1995). You will see the Ada 95 Reference Manual is mentioned in the > gnat-rm under > > gnat-rm::About This Guide::Related Information well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this manual ... Sam? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151196: gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
Petr Vandrovec writes: > On 12 Jul 02 at 9:22, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code > > tags 151196 + fixed > > thanks > > My system still runs 'gcc-2.95.4' when I type 'gcc', so how it > comes that you tag this fixed? I could understand 'wontfix', but > not 'fixed'. I tag all bugs, which are fixed in a newer gcc version, this way. "wontfix" is not correct as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libffi2 -> gcj = Java
Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes: > Hello All > > does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ? > to get a gcj on this port ... AFAIK nobody has started a port yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [parisc-linux] Re: libffi2 -> gcj = Java
> Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes: > > Hello All > > > > does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ? > > to get a gcj on this port ... > > AFAIK nobody has started a port yet. James Mc Parlane may be working on this. There was a question re calling conventions back on May 17. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken
reassign 150755 ccache
thanks
Michel LESPINASSE writes:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Ok, I didn't work with profiling before. Please could you send me a
> > small example program and a Makefile to show the problem?
>
> Yes. However in the mean time I have figured out that the problem was
> actually due to ccache (if I disable ccache everything is fine). Here
> is my small test case:
>
> foo.c
> #include
>
> int main (void)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> printf ("i = %d\n", i);
>
> return 0;
> }
> ---
>
> -- build script ---
> #! /bin/sh
>
> # build with -fprofile-arcs
> gcc-3.1 -fprofile-arcs foo.c -c -o foo.o
> gcc-3.1 -fprofile-arcs foo.o -o foo
>
> # create arcs information
> ./foo
>
> # rebuild with -fbranch-probabilities
> # (the build takes the arcs information into account)
> gcc-3.1 -fbranch-probabilities foo.c -c -o foo.o
> gcc-3.1 -fbranch-probabilities foo.o -o foo
> ---
>
> I have ccache installed, if I run ./build I get the warning message,
> if I run CCACHE_DISABLE=1 ./build everything works fine.
>
> Can you reassign the bug to ccache ? I'm not sure I can do it from my
> side. It'd be easy enough to workaround, ccache.c already has a check
> for bad options at line 564, it should be extended to also check for
> -fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities there. And the bug priority
> should probably be normal or maybe even only feature-request.
>
> --
> Michel "Walken" LESPINASSE
> Is this the best that god can do ? Then I'm not impressed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 150755 ccache Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `ccache'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g++-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb g77-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gcc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb gcc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.diff.gz gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.dsc gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gpc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb gpc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 146850 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ARM] > well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this > manual ... Sam? Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or Laurent Guerby. The current version of the manual (acutually, it's the ISO Ada standard without the official front page) is available from http://www.ada-auth.org/. -- Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#146850: marked as done (chill-2.95 leaves broken info link behind)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:32:33 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#146850: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds13-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2002 19:08:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 13 14:08:05 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail13.speakeasy.net (mail.speakeasy.net) [216.254.0.213] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 177LAz-0003Bq-00; Mon, 13 May 2002 14:08:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 13218 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 19:08:04 - Received: from unknown (HELO kronstadt) ([64.81.49.223]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by mail13.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 13 May 2002 19:08:04 - Received: from itz by kronstadt with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177LAx-0005yK-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 May 2002 12:08:03 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: chill-2.95 leaves broken info link behind From: Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 13 May 2002 12:08:02 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: chill-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-7 Severity: Normal The prerm for chill-2.95 contains this install-info --quiet --remove chill however the actuall info file is chill-295.info, so this doesn't work as expected. -- Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A. GPG: 433BA087 9C0F 194F 203A 63F7 B1B8 6E5A 8CA3 27DB 433B A087 EngSoc adopts market economy: cheap is wasteful, efficient is expensive. --- Received: (at 146850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 21:39:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 16:39:10 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Tr5B-00077K-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:39:10 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Tqyn-0006PR-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:32:33 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.25 $ Subject: Bug#146850: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds13-10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:32:33 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-2.95, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g++-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb g77-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gcc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb gcc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.diff.gz gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds13-10.dsc gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb gpc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb gpc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-dbg_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.4-10_i386.deb libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.4-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Than
Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ARM] > >> well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this >> manual ... Sam? > > Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or > Laurent Guerby. Laurent Guerby did the work for the Rationale. In the case of the ARM, it was Jerry van Dijk: @c - @c version 1.1 @c @c This texinfo document is a direct translation from the ascii version @c of the Ada Reference Manual. This translation has been done by: @c @cJerry van Dijk @cBillie Holidaystraat 28 @c2324 LK Leiden @cThe Netherlands @cemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @c @c This translation was done before I joined ACT-Europe, any possible @c ACT copyrights thus do not apply to this version. @c - (This is a quote from a newer version of the manual.) -- Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Florian Weimer writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ARM] > > > well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this > > manual ... Sam? > > Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or > Laurent Guerby. > > The current version of the manual (acutually, it's the ISO Ada > standard without the official front page) is available from > http://www.ada-auth.org/. ok, and how did he convert it to info format? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The current version of the manual (acutually, it's the ISO Ada >> standard without the official front page) is available from >> http://www.ada-auth.org/. > > ok, and how did he convert it to info format? IIRC, Jerry did it by hand, using ad-hoc scripts and a text editor, but I can't find the message in which the approach is described right now. (AFAIK, Scribe itself is a proprietary document processor, but it wasn't used for preparing this version.) -- Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot_20020714.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
