[no subject]

2002-05-03 Thread officegirl



 


 
 

가브리엘향수
파운데이션
총알청바지

\25,000
\39,000
\31,500

허락 없이 메일을 보내드려 죄송합니다.
원치 않으시면 옆의 버튼을 눌러주세요. 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#144858: gcc-3.0: A better patch

2002-05-03 Thread Jeff Bailey
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-6
Followup-For: Bug #144858

That last patch probably isn't what you want. =) This patch resolves
both the bad link against libc6-dev, removes ffi (I need to resolve
this upstream), and enables libgc6.  This fixes all current packaging
bugs for hurd-i386.

diff -r gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3/debian/rules.conf 
gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3.new/debian/rules.conf
65,66c65,66
< ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),hurd-i386)
<   ctrl_flags += -DLIBC_DEV=libc0.2-dev
---
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),i386-gnu)
>   ctrl_flags += -DLIBC_DEV=libc0.3-dev
diff -r gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3/debian/rules.defs 
gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3.new/debian/rules.defs
112c112
< no_ffi_archs := hppa mips mipsel
---
> no_ffi_archs := hppa mips mipsel hurd-i386
165c165
< libgc6_no_archs := avr hppa hurd-i386
---
> libgc6_no_archs := avr hppa
180c180
< # If you don't want to run the gcc testsuite, set `with_check' to `no'
---
> # If you don't want to run the gcc testsuite, set `with_checkx' to `no'


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux outpost 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8

Versions of packages gcc-3.0 depends on:
ii  binutils   2.12.90.0.1-4 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-3.01:3.0.4-6 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  gcc-3.0-base   1:3.0.4-6 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6  2.2.5-4   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc11:3.0.4-6 GCC support library.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: gcc-3.1 for hurd-i386

2002-05-03 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Considering the "confusion" of having gcc272 as default C compiler
> and egcs as default C++ compiler in slink and the arch by arch
> switch to new compiler versions, I would propose to switch all
> architectures at once, if that's possible. So maybe it's reasonable
> to: upload 3.1 after the woody release, make it the default with the
> gcc-3.1.1 release? Is this too late for the hurd?

Have you come to a decision on what you want to happen for hurd-i386?
Now that unstable doesn't push into Woody anymore, I'd like to file
the bug report to request gcc-defaults to get it updated and need to
know if I should tell them gcc-3.0 or gcc-3.1.

Note that we haven't got a gcc in the archive yet, so if you choose
3.1, we probably won't build 3.0 officially.  We don't plan on
uploading gcc-2.95 at this point.  If it works better to switch all at
once to 3.1.1 that's fine too.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
 One of the great things about books is sometimes
 there are some fantastic pictures.
 -- George W. Bush 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#145447: gij: Here's a fix

2002-05-03 Thread Michael Zehrer
Package: gij
Version: 2:3.0.4-5
Followup-For: Bug #145447

This postinst should work:

#! /bin/sh -e

update-alternatives --quiet --install /usr/bin/java java
/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0 30 --slave /usr/share/man/man1/java.1.gz
java.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/gij-wrapper-3.0.1.gz || true

# dh_doclink
if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
  if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/gij-3.0 -a -d /usr/share/doc/gij-3.0
  ]; then
  ln -sf ../share/doc/gij-3.0 /usr/doc/gij-3.0
fi
fi


exit

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux micha 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages gij depends on:
ii  cpp  2:2.95.4-14 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  gij-3.0  1:3.0.4-8   The GNU Java bytecode interpreter.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]