Re: packaging feedback
On Friday 02 December 2011, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > That said, it is a private
> > library, but I don't think cmake has a way to prevent installation of .so
> > symlinks.
>
> Turns out there is, using cmake's NAMELINK_SKIP magic:
>
> install(TARGETS foo ${INSTALL_TARGETS_DEFAULT_ARGS} LIBRARY NAMELINK_SKIP)
Thanks, applied in 4a03892d90879ab7f62bc4dd515cc897e66023ee.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.
On Saturday 03 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > "Not supporting Qt5" is obviously suicidal, I did not propose to even > delay working on having the code build with it. > What I said that for cases where no important features new in Qt 5 are > used, there is no need to drop support for Qt 4, especially if there > is evidence that Qt 4 support makes sense. Certain transitional period > when both are supported, (i.e. what you proposed) is a good idea, > consistent with what I said. Hope it's more clear now. Then we all agree. But you do have to realize that there is a point a time when the people who still want to support Qt4 will have to step in and do the maintenance work. -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
2.4 Beta 5
Hi, If there are no objections, here is the Beta 5 planning: Friday 9th -> tag Wednesday 14th -> release Next release slot (hopefully for a RC :) ): Friday 6th January -> tag Wednesday 11th January -> Release -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: 2.4 Beta 5
are all the release-blocker bugs in words fixed yet? On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > If there are no objections, here is the Beta 5 planning: > > Friday 9th -> tag > Wednesday 14th -> release > > Next release slot (hopefully for a RC :) ): > > Friday 6th January -> tag > Wednesday 11th January -> Release > > > -- > Cyrille Berger Skott > ___ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: 2.4 Beta 5
On Sunday 04 December 2011, Adam Pigg wrote: > are all the release-blocker bugs in words fixed yet? According to http://quality.calligra-suite.org/, we still have 11 release blockers, many of those coming from words and a sharply raising number of test failures. > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If there are no objections, here is the Beta 5 planning: > > > > Friday 9th -> tag > > Wednesday 14th -> release > > > > Next release slot (hopefully for a RC :) ): > > > > Friday 6th January -> tag > > Wednesday 11th January -> Release > > > > > > -- > > Cyrille Berger Skott > > ___ > > calligra-devel mailing list > > calligra-devel@kde.org > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: Calligra Logo and Usage Guidelines published
And here is a mockup for the official website: http://cyrille.diwi.org/tmp/calligra/website-logo-mockup.png On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Hello, > After many improvements and thanks to community participation the > Logos page [1] is now published as official. > You can find SVG on this page too. > > [1] http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Logos > > PS: Cyrille, could we have redirection to this page from > http://calligra.org/logo/ ? -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Fwd: 2.4 Beta 5
-- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Pigg Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:38 AM Subject: Re: 2.4 Beta 5 To: Cyrille Berger Skott in that case, surely we cant make the next release an RC if there are blockers ;) 2011/12/4 Cyrille Berger Skott > On Sunday 04 December 2011, Adam Pigg wrote: > > are all the release-blocker bugs in words fixed yet? > > According to http://quality.calligra-suite.org/, we still have 11 release > blockers, many of those coming from words and a sharply raising number of > test > failures. > > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott > > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > If there are no objections, here is the Beta 5 planning: > > > > > > Friday 9th -> tag > > > Wednesday 14th -> release > > > > > > Next release slot (hopefully for a RC :) ): > > > > > > Friday 6th January -> tag > > > Wednesday 11th January -> Release > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cyrille Berger Skott > > > ___ > > > calligra-devel mailing list > > > calligra-devel@kde.org > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > > > -- > Cyrille Berger Skott > ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: Fwd: 2.4 Beta 5
On Sunday 04 December 2011, Adam Pigg wrote: > in that case, surely we cant make the next release an RC if there are > blockers ;) Exactly, that is why I am suggesting a beta 5 ;) And hope for RC in early January. -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
"Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?
Hey there. The website currently has contradictory statements: Right on the homepage it says "Calligra Suite" at the top but below that "Calligra 2.4". The project was announced as Calligra Suite with capital C: http://www.calligra.org/news/announcements/stable/calligra-suite-goes-active/ Later the word "Suite" was usually dropped from news postings but then again prominently featured in the snapshot tour: http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-2-4-snapshot-1-tour/ So which is it? "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"? Personally, I'm in favour of simply "Calligra" since calligra.org is now secured. Markus ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?
On 4 December 2011 16:22, Markus Slopianka wrote: > Hey there. > The website currently has contradictory statements: > Right on the homepage it says "Calligra Suite" at the top but below that > "Calligra 2.4". > The project was announced as Calligra Suite with capital C: > http://www.calligra.org/news/announcements/stable/calligra-suite-goes-active/ > Later the word "Suite" was usually dropped from news postings but then again > prominently > featured in the snapshot tour: > http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-2-4-snapshot-1-tour/ > > So which is it? "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"? > Personally, I'm in favour of simply "Calligra" since calligra.org is now > secured. This is already not actual concern, please see the info from Cyrille: > And here is a mockup for the official website: > http://cyrille.diwi.org/tmp/calligra/website-logo-mockup.png So we seem to go with shorter Calligra that would be anyway used by most anyway. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Calligra Logo and Stencils
Hello, I want to contribute in developing Logo and Stencils part of the project. I'm looking for contact info of graphic designers who can guide me. Can anyone give me some more details. I'm not sure if this mailing list is right place to ask this or not. Thanks, Gajendra > ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?
Hi, Well actually, the idea is that "Calligra" is the "project", while "Calligra Suite" is the name of the suite of applications. But we have never really formalized that, nor wrote specified specific guide lines. And we should. On Sunday 04 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 4 December 2011 16:22, Markus Slopianka wrote: > > Hey there. > > The website currently has contradictory statements: > > Right on the homepage it says "Calligra Suite" at the top but below that > > "Calligra 2.4". The project was announced as Calligra Suite with capital > > C: > > http://www.calligra.org/news/announcements/stable/calligra-suite-goes-act > > ive/ Later the word "Suite" was usually dropped from news postings but > > then again prominently featured in the snapshot tour: > > http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-2-4-snapshot-1-tour/ > > > > So which is it? "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"? > > Personally, I'm in favour of simply "Calligra" since calligra.org is now > > secured. > > This is already not actual concern, please see the info from Cyrille: > > And here is a mockup for the official website: > > http://cyrille.diwi.org/tmp/calligra/website-logo-mockup.png > > So we seem to go with shorter Calligra that would be anyway used by most > anyway. -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?
Heh I was about to reply exactly the same On Sunday 04 December 2011 18:56:03 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Well actually, the idea is that "Calligra" is the "project", while > "Calligra Suite" is the name of the suite of applications. But we have > never really formalized that, nor wrote specified specific guide lines. > And we should. > > On Sunday 04 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 4 December 2011 16:22, Markus Slopianka wrote: > > > Hey there. > > > The website currently has contradictory statements: > > > Right on the homepage it says "Calligra Suite" at the top but below > > > that "Calligra 2.4". The project was announced as Calligra Suite with > > > capital C: > > > http://www.calligra.org/news/announcements/stable/calligra-suite-goes-a > > > ct ive/ Later the word "Suite" was usually dropped from news postings > > > but then again prominently featured in the snapshot tour: > > > http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-2-4-snapshot-1-tour/ > > > > > > So which is it? "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"? > > > Personally, I'm in favour of simply "Calligra" since calligra.org is > > > now secured. > > > > This is already not actual concern, please see the info from Cyrille: > > > And here is a mockup for the official website: > > > http://cyrille.diwi.org/tmp/calligra/website-logo-mockup.png > > > > So we seem to go with shorter Calligra that would be anyway used by most > > anyway. ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: Calligra Logo and Stencils
On Sunday 04 December 2011 17:27:00 Gajendra Agrawal wrote: > Hello, > I want to contribute in developing Logo and Stencils part of the project. > I'm looking for contact info of graphic designers who can guide me. Can > anyone give me some more details. > I'm not sure if this mailing list is right place to ask this or not. > > Thanks, > Gajendra Correct place but logo has already been decided, but i'm sure stencils are very welcome. ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: Calligra Logo and Stencils
On 4 December 2011 17:27, Gajendra Agrawal wrote: > Hello, > I want to contribute in developing Logo and Stencils part of the project. > I'm looking for contact info of graphic designers who can guide me. Can > anyone give me some more details. > I'm not sure if this mailing list is right place to ask this or not. Hello and welcome, Gajendra, After looking at your impressive design works at http://www.gajendraagrawal.com I think there are many tasks you would be interested. One big area: various templates and themes for Calligra documents (of many types). We have to define the details for potential contributors to make work of organized. Would you be interested in this kind of work that employ both technical skills and creativity? -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Re: "Calligra" or "Calligra Suite"?
On 4 December 2011 18:56, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Well actually, the idea is that "Calligra" is the "project", while "Calligra > Suite" is the name of the suite of applications. But we have never really > formalized that, nor wrote specified specific guide lines. And we should. Yes, small 'dictionary' of the project could be drafted somewhere near the Project's FAQ. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
