[Bug binutils/25750] GNU as has inconsistent behavior when expanding .macro that takes as input directives with arguments
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25750 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jian, > Sorry I just realized my question was misleading. What I really meant was if > vararg would work on a macro taking as input multiple directives with > arguments, such as the one below. vararg seemed to not work with such case > in my experiment. > > .macro foo insn1, insn2 > \insn1 > \insn2 > .endm > > foo .section .sec1 > foo .section .sec2 Well now that particular example would not work[1], but then it is not using the :vararg suffix either. You are correct however in assuming that you cannot have two :vararg suffixes in a macro definition. So for example this does not work: .macro foo insn1:vararg insn2:vararg \insn1 \insn2 .endm foo .section .sec1 .section .sec2 In fact only the last macro argument can have the :vararg suffix, which is why it can only be used once. Cheers Nick [1] Just to be pedantic, your example would work if you put the two insns on the same line. So this: .macro foo insn1 insn2 \insn1 \insn2 .endm foo .section .sec1 Does work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25665] aarch64 veneers not inserted with large .text object between caller and target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25665 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at sourceware dot org Last reconfirmed||2020-04-03 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |tnfchris at sourceware dot org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- I'll take a look at this next week, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25371] [objcopy] add support for setting SHF_EXCLUDE flag for sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25371 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- The patch has now been applied. (Commit: 3a5d12fbb4f) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 21011 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Heap-double-free in alpha_vms_free_private
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #4 on issue 21011 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Heap-double-free in alpha_vms_free_private https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21011#c4 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 21034 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Null-dereference READ in objalloc_free
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #2 on issue 21034 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Null-dereference READ in objalloc_free https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21034#c2 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 21014 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Abrt in alpha_vms_free_private
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 21014 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Abrt in alpha_vms_free_private https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21014#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug ld/25767] Zero-sized relocation section causes linker assert
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25767 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3349112e380712432d5818154d67ab4660af056f commit 3349112e380712432d5818154d67ab4660af056f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Apr 3 19:06:29 2020 -0700 elf: Remove zero-sized relocation section from section group Remove zero-sized relocation section from a section group since it has been removed from the output. PR ld/25767 * elf.c (_bfd_elf_fixup_group_sections): Remove zero-sized relocation section from section group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25767] Zero-sized relocation section causes linker assert
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25767 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.35 Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.35. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
