https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25750
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Jian,
> Sorry I just realized my question was misleading. What I really meant was if
> vararg would work on a macro taking as input multiple directives with
> arguments, such as the one below. vararg seemed to not work with such case
> in my experiment.
>
> .macro foo insn1, insn2
> \insn1
> \insn2
> .endm
>
> foo .section .sec1
> foo .section .sec2
Well now that particular example would not work[1], but then it is not using
the :vararg suffix either. You are correct however in assuming that you cannot
have two :vararg suffixes in a macro definition. So for example this does not
work:
.macro foo insn1:vararg insn2:vararg
\insn1
\insn2
.endm
foo .section .sec1 .section .sec2
In fact only the last macro argument can have the :vararg suffix, which is why
it can only be used once.
Cheers
Nick
[1] Just to be pedantic, your example would work if you put the two insns on
the same line. So this:
.macro foo insn1 insn2
\insn1 \insn2
.endm
foo .section .sec1
Does work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
