[Bug ld/18448] New: Building Ruby gems with Bundler fails after binutils commit d4ae5fb0b5d1ae4270b3343509e8bd2d529aa291
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448 Bug ID: 18448 Summary: Building Ruby gems with Bundler fails after binutils commit d4ae5fb0b5d1ae4270b3343509e8bd2d529aa291 Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: infoman1985 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- After updating to binutils-2.25 I found that after bundle install command in one of my Ruby on Rails project it failed to start with en error message like: /home/infoman/work/dev/binutils-bisect/bundler-test/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/nokogumbo-1.4.2/lib/nokogumbo.rb:2:in `require': nokogiri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory - /home/infoman/work/dev/binutils-bisect/bundler-test/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/extensions/x86-linux/2.0.0/nokogumbo-1.4.2/nokogumboc.so (LoadError) After some research I found that the old binutils added full path to nokogiri.so, but in 2.25 it was just a library name that links to nowhere — because nokogiri.so is only installed under bundler and is not in any of the system paths. Then git bisect led me to commit d4ae5fb0b5d1ae4270b3343509e8bd2d529aa291, which changed behavior in -l:*.so processing. For a testcase you can create a simple Gemfile with the following content: source "https://rubygems.org"; gem 'nokogumbo' Then run: bundle install --path=vendor/bundle bundle console For binutils-2.24 this opens an IRB console with requested gems loaded to it. For binutils-2.25, git master and possibly any revision starting from d4ae5fb just an error message appears about nokogiri.so. Is this a bug in binutils or possibly nokogumbo (and other gems with binary extensions depending on another gems) must change something in their build process? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18446] Compilation error left shift of negative value in gas/read.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18446 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=29798047afaa22335a504280a5bbdbafe2b1b63d commit 29798047afaa22335a504280a5bbdbafe2b1b63d Author: Nick Clifton Date: Fri May 22 14:27:36 2015 +0100 Fixes: "gas/read.c:5087:12: error: left shift of negative" PR gas/18446 * read.c (output_big_sleb128): Use U suffix to prevent compile time warning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18446] Compilation error left shift of negative value in gas/read.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18446 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/18199] ld fails with -flto for mingw, wrong resolution for main
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18199 ismail at donmez dot ws changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at donmez dot ws -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug with binutils and gcc5
Hi team I am building binutils with gcc 5 ( also running the test suite ) and found an issue in these two tests: FAIL: Run with libnew1a.so FAIL: Run with libnew1b.so Is there any bugzila related to these problems ? Any help is more than welcome -- Victor Rodriguez Open Source Technology Center ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug with binutils and gcc5
Hi team I am building binutils with gcc 5 ( also running the test suite ) and found an issue in these two tests: FAIL: Run with libnew1a.so FAIL: Run with libnew1b.so Is there any bugzila related to these problems ? Any help is more than welcome -- Victor Rodriguez Open Source Technology Center ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18440] ICF depends on the section name to detect constructors and destructors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 Jevin Sweval changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsweval at arxan dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18440] ICF depends on the section name to detect constructors and destructors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 --- Comment #3 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:16 AM, rafael.espindola at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 > > --- Comment #2 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola com> --- >> > This unfortunately doesn't work if the compiler avoids producing the long >> > section names (as llvm now can). >> >> Can we use the symbol name directly? > > That would be nice. Which is why I asked: > >> > Is there a convenient pass over the symbols that could be used for this >> > instead? > > Looks like there is, could we use the walk done from > Symbol_table::add_from_relob to check if a section has just a constructor in > it? We already use that walk to mark symbols as gc roots. I agree, just like gc_mark_symbol, you could call mark_ctor_or_dtor(sym). Sri > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18450] New: Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450
Bug ID: 18450
Summary: Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails,
with gas/as-new not existing
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On a fresh Fedora 21 install:
sudo yum install git gcc gcc-c++ texinfo-tex flex bison mpfr-devel gmp-devel
libmpc-devel isl isl-devel
mkdir gcc.binutils.combined
cd gcc.binutils.combined
git clone git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git gcc.git
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git binutils-gdb.git
mkdir combined
cd combined
ln -s ../gcc.git/* .
ln --force -s ../binutils-gdb.git/* .
mkdir ../../gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc
cd ../../gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc
../gcc.binutils.combined/combined/configure --disable-multilib && make && sudo
make install
Wind up getting:
../gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc/./prev-gcc/as: line 106:
../gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc/./gas/as-new: No such file or directory
Line 106 is:
exec $original ${1+"$@"} # with $original coming from case "$original" in
With:
[gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc]$ find . | grep as-new
./prev-gas/as-new
Should gcc.binutils.combined.build.gcc/./prev-gcc/as:106 be calling
./prev-gas/as-new rather than ./gas/as-new ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18450] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Not a binutils bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: bug with binutils and gcc5
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:43:16PM +, Rodriguez Bahena, Victor wrote: > Hi team > > I am building binutils with gcc 5 ( also running the test suite ) and > found an issue in these two tests: > > FAIL: Run with libnew1a.so > FAIL: Run with libnew1b.so Look in ld.log to see why the failure is occurring. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18450] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450 --- Comment #2 from darlingm at gmail dot com --- To clarify, are you saying this is a GCC bug, then? Or, do you mean something else - like user error? (I think I'm following the proper procedure for a gcc/binutils combined build.) BTW, this happens on stage 2. Uncombined build works just fine... If I: mkdir binutils.build.gcc492 cd binutils.build.gcc492 ../gcc.binutils.combined/binutils-gdb.git/configure --disable-multilib && make && sudo make install ^^ this uses gcc 4.9.2 Or, even if I: mkdir gcc.build.gcc cd gcc.build.gcc ../gcc.binutils.combined/gcc.git/configure --disable-multilib && make && sudo make install hash -r // add /usr/local/lib64 to ldconfig, and run ldconfig mkdir ../binutils.build.gcc6 cd ../binutils.build.gcc6 ../gcc.binutils.combined/binutils-gdb.git/configure --disable-multilib && make && sudo make install ^^ case uses gcc6 // then I can even ldconfig mkdir ../gcc.build.gcc6.with.new.binutils cd ../gcc.build.gcc6.with.new.binutils ../gcc.binutils.combined/gcc.git/configure --disable-multilib && make && sudo make install -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
