[Bug gprof/4283] New: update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX
I wanted to be able to output to a file other than gmon.out, and this environment variable did the trick. However the manual didn't tell me about it -- I had to go rummaging through the code. I will be following up with a patch. -- Summary: update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprof AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: benasselstine at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4283 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/4283] update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX
--- Additional Comments From benasselstine at gmail dot com 2007-03-26 20:49 --- Created an attachment (id=1652) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1652&action=view) add note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX to the manual (first iteration) Here's my first try at a patch that fixes this problem. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4283 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4284] New: Linker "relax" option results in bad subroutine calls
I am compiling and linking C for an ATmega2560. When I use the default options, the resulting code works fine. When I try to remove unused trampoline entries by placing -W,--relax in the ld options, the resulting code seems to have bad subroutine calls. Not all subroutine calls are bad, nor are all "bad" call targets always called with a bad address. Since the code image is around 120KBytes, this is a complex problem and my code would not serve as a reasonable debugging case. I will try to come up with a simple example that shows the problem. I will attach more information as I get it. -- Summary: Linker "relax" option results in bad subroutine calls Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: sbell at dataplay dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: avr http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4284 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4284] Linker "relax" option results in bad subroutine calls
-- What|Removed |Added CC||eweddington at cso dot atmel ||dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4284 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3990] [PATCH] IA64 gas DV: reports spurious WAW hazards
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2007-03-27 01:23 --- This looks right to me. The bug is curious, but apparently we only handle or.andcm and and.orcm because these are the only parallel compares that gcc is smart enough to emit. So when we added support for these parallel compare types to gcc, we only extended gas to handle these, and forgot to handle the others at the same time. The code could maybe be a bit more efficient. We have 4 strstr calls, then a conditional expression with 4 ? tests. This isn't a reason to refuse it though. There is one important consideration here about copyright assignments. This was originally sent from an in.ibm.com address, and then from a freenet.de address. I need to be sure about who wrote the patch, and that they have a valid copyright assignment. If this was written by an IBM employee, then it presumably falls under the IBM corporate assignment. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
