[Bug binutils/941] New: gas test macros fails
in version 2.16.90.0.2 the following test fails: Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.16.90.0.2/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/ma cros.exp ... FAIL: macros dot This still worked in 2.16.90.0.1 -- Summary: gas test macros fails Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: b dot gunreben at web dot de CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-suse-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-suse-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-suse-linux http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=941 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/936] sh64-elf is broken
--- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-05-09 13:54 --- Subject: Re: sh64-elf is broken hjl at lucon dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:25 --- >Joern, does the patch work for you? > > > Yes, thanks, I did a sh64 build/regtest with the patch, and it finished Saturday morning. Most of the regression tests passed, and the ones that failed can be explained by the known brokenness in the compiler. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/936] sh64-elf is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:46 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/883] Linker creates unnecessary R_IA64_FPTR64LSB relocations
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:51 --- R_IA64_FPTR64LSB is needed for function pointer reference from a dlopened DSO. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=883 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/941] gas test macros fails
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:47 --- Jan, is this caused by your patch? -- What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at novell dot com http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=941 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
GNU binutils strip and option -s (strip debuginfo) from ld don't work.
It is a known issue that the GNU binutils strip and option -s (strip debuginfo) from ld don't work. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/941] gas test macros fails
--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2005-05-09 15:42 --- cross reference: bug #848 -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=941 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/941] gas test macros fails
--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2005-05-09 15:40 --- Yes, a similar issue was reported against sparc; this needs to be fixed in the hppa code. There was some discussion regarding that on the mailing list, and since a few more targets are affected by this I actually asked the maintainers of those targets to respond and/or fix this. The bottom line is that it is highly questionable practice in these targets to use as_fatal (rather than as_bad) on unrecognized opcodes. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=941 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: GNU binutils strip and option -s (strip debuginfo) from ld don't work.
Hi Jernej, It is a known issue that the GNU binutils strip and option -s (strip debuginfo) from ld don't work. No. Can you provide some more information about the failure please ? * Which version of strip and ld ? * What is the failure ? * For which host and for which target ? * Can you provide a small testcase that demonstrates the failure ? Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
