どんどんエッチな汁があふれ出る!

2005-03-08 Thread 可愛く気持ちく喘いで

ƒ}ƒKƒWƒ“EƒXƒ^[ƒ_ƒXƒg™ß=

¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤

.EEEEE.EEEEEEEƒƒP‚ ‚è–º‚̃iƒ}‰æ‘œEE.EEEEE.EEEEE.

¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@

ƒAƒiƒ^‚Ì’m‚肽‚¢‚±‚Ɖ½‚Å‚à‹³‚¦‚ăAƒQƒ‹‚Áô:::

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@http://ura.polty.cc/?igrnfy2l9e

@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@¡@ 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@¡

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@ƒtƒFƒ`EEE“ŽBEEE–ìŠO˜IoEEE—ŒðEEEƒRƒXƒvƒŒetc/

 

[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@™Œ»–ðŠÅŒìŽtƒƒP‚ ‚蓊eƒRƒŒƒNƒVƒ‡ƒ“EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@“à‚ł̐ԗ‡X”’‚Æ

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@–â‘è‚̃tƒHƒgƒRƒŒƒNƒVƒ‡ƒ“

 

[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@™‹É”éƒvƒ‰ƒCƒx[ƒgŽB‰eƒrƒfƒIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@•ҏW‹Ç‚ÉŠñ‚¹‚ç‚ꂽ”‘½‚­‚̃vƒ‰ƒCƒx[ƒgƒrƒfƒI‚Ì’†‚©‚çA‘I‚è‚·‚®‚è‚Ì‚à‚Ì‚ð

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@‹É”éŒöŠJII‘fl‚½‚¿‚̐¶X‚µ‚¢‰f‘œ‚̐”XcB

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]://ura.polty.cc/?igrnfy2l9e

@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@¡@ 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@¡

 

¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤š¤¤¤¤

.EEEEE..EEEEE.EE 
‚í‚©‚Á‚Ä‚¢‚邯‚ÇŽ~‚ß‚ç‚ê‚È‚¢EE..EEEEE..EEEEE.

¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢š¢¢¢¢@

@ 

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ --š

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@ 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@   ƒXƒgƒŒƒX‚à—­‚܂肪‚¿c 
 ¥

¥@  ‚»‚ñ‚ȃGƒXƒeƒeƒBƒVƒƒƒ“‚Ì---¥

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@   —Bˆê‚ÌŽï–¡‚Ƃ́cB 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ ‰ñ‰ñ‰ñ[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@@   š- ’N‚©‚ƘA—‚ðŽæ‚Á‚Ä‚Í

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@‚Ç‚±‚©‚ւƏÁ‚¦‚Ä‚¢‚­—‚ÌŽq’B--š---

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ 
‚»‚Ì—lŽq‚ð’Ç‚Á‚½ŽæÞ”Ç‚ª

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@‰w‚̃gƒCƒŒ‚Å–Ú‚É‚µ‚½‚à‚̂Ƃ́cB ¥

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@

  http://ura.polty.cc/?igrnfy2l9e

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@¥

š-Šù¥ŽÒ‚È‚ç‚ł͂Ì[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@  

Yahoo! Auto Response

2005-03-08 Thread bustamam98
This email address is no longer valid.




Original Message:


X-YahooFilteredBulk: 213.221.3.178
Authentication-Results: mta119.mail.dcn.yahoo.com
  from=gnu.org; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
X-Originating-IP: [213.221.3.178]
Return-Path: 
Received: from 213.221.3.178  (EHLO yahoo.com) (213.221.3.178)
  by mta119.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 04:23:05 -0800
From: bug-bash@gnu.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deliver Mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:25:31 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016"
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: High

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Mail Delivery Failed - This mail couldn't be represented

- failed message -
c8wD0jxr$V'pQQo)*fMQ0I2YUTRiAp9~0E
_
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


compiler warnings

2005-03-08 Thread Tim Waugh
When compiling bash with GCC there are a number of alarming-looking
warnings, and several of them could be avoided by minor changes to the
code.  For example:

bashline.c:2976: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used
as truth value

  for (passc = 0; c = string[i]; i++)

This could more readably be written:

  for (passc = 0; (c = string[i]) != '\0'; i++)

Would you be willing to accept patches to make changes such as this?

Thanks,
Tim.
*/


pgpgihAgw6o76.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


control may reach end of non-void function

2005-03-08 Thread Tim Waugh
Hi,

In bash-3.0, bashline.c gives this warning during compilation:

bashline.c:1418: warning: control may reach end of non-void function
'bash_directory_expansion' being inlined

Since that function is only used once, and in that instance the return
value is not examined---and since there are no return statements in the
function at all---perhaps it should have its return type changed from
int to void.

Tim.
*/

--- bash-3.0/bashline.c.badcode 2005-03-08 13:16:39.0 +
+++ bash-3.0/bashline.c 2005-03-08 13:17:56.0 +
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
 #endif
 
 /* Helper functions for Readline. */
-static int bash_directory_expansion __P((char **));
+static void bash_directory_expansion __P((char **));
 static int bash_directory_completion_hook __P((char **));
 static int filename_completion_ignore __P((char **));
 static int bash_push_line __P((void));
@@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@
 /* Simulate the expansions that will be performed by
rl_filename_completion_function.  This must be called with the address of
a pointer to malloc'd memory. */
-static int
+static void
 bash_directory_expansion (dirname)
  char **dirname;
 {


___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


Re: compiler warnings

2005-03-08 Thread Chet Ramey
> When compiling bash with GCC there are a number of alarming-looking
> warnings, and several of them could be avoided by minor changes to the
> code.  For example:
> 
> bashline.c:2976: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used
> as truth value
> 
>   for (passc = 0; c = string[i]; i++)
> 
> This could more readably be written:
> 
>   for (passc = 0; (c = string[i]) != '\0'; i++)
> 
> Would you be willing to accept patches to make changes such as this?

No, the former is my preferred style.  The latter is less readable and
reduces clarity.

Chet

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Live...Laugh...Love
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://tiswww.tis.cwru.edu/~chet/


___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


reading ascii-0

2005-03-08 Thread Davy Durham
Hey,
 I was wondering if it's possible to make the build-in 'read' command 
not always stop at ascii 0.

I've got a file "foo" with "asdf\0qwer\n" in it and when I do:
  read x < foo
then
  echo ${#x}
always returns 4 instead of 9 or 10 because it stopped after "asdf" at 
the null char

I've played with setting $IFS, and with -r and -d on the read command 
itself, but nothing seems to work.

Is this possible?
Thanks,
 Davy

___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


Re: reading ascii-0

2005-03-08 Thread William Park
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:26:37PM -0600, Davy Durham wrote:
> Hey,
>  I was wondering if it's possible to make the build-in 'read' command 
> not always stop at ascii 0.
> 
> I've got a file "foo" with "asdf\0qwer\n" in it and when I do:
>   read x < foo
> then
>   echo ${#x}
> always returns 4 instead of 9 or 10 because it stopped after "asdf" at 
> the null char
> 
> I've played with setting $IFS, and with -r and -d on the read command 
> itself, but nothing seems to work.
> 
> Is this possible?

Try
x=`< foo`

-- 
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because it works.


___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


Re: reading ascii-0

2005-03-08 Thread Paul Jarc
Davy Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I was wondering if it's possible to make the build-in 'read' command 
> not always stop at ascii 0.

Shell variable values are null-terminated; they can't hold internal
nulls.  Even if bash were changed, it's still not possible to pass
such values as arguments to external commands, since arguments are
null-terminated for execve().


paul


___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


Re: compiler warnings

2005-03-08 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hi,

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:31:15 +0100, Chet Ramey wrote:
...
> >   for (passc = 0; c = string[i]; i++)
> > 
> > This could more readably be written:
> > 
> >   for (passc = 0; (c = string[i]) != '\0'; i++)
...
> No, the former is my preferred style.  The latter is less readable and
> reduces clarity.

What about some compromise:
  for (passc = 0; (c = string[i]); i++)

If you use the first style you do need to always use -Wno-parentheses .
It has also further implications which may not be wised. :-?


Regards,
Lace


___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash


File was infected with a virus

2005-03-08 Thread KDDI-INFO

(BNote: JP stands for Japanese.
(B
(BALERT!!
(BThis e-mail contained one or more virus-infected files and have been rejected.
(B(JP:$B%3%s%T%e!<%?%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?$N$G!"%a!<%k$NAw?.$rCf;_$7$^$7$?!#(J)
(B
(BThe following attachments were infected:
(B(JP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<$N$H$*$j!#(J) 
(Bfile=,status=deleted,virus-id=37368,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(BThank you,
(B
(BKDDI Corporation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B
(B-- Original message text follows ---
(BSubject:  Re: thanks!
(BMessage-ID:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BDate: 2005/03/09
(BFrom: bug-bash@gnu.org
(BTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B
(B
(B___
(BBug-bash mailing list
(BBug-bash@gnu.org
(Bhttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash