Greetings. I have a fresh 1.4.2 install up on a RH 7.3 box and RH 9 box
as well, both with UW. Everything appears to be working just fine with
one notable acception. I'm sure it's some simple option I've overlooked
but I can't for the life of me find it. Neither SM installation seems to
be rea
I'm assuming you have enough users on your RH9 box to make doing this by
hand an unlikely task. In theory you should be able to read the contents
of ~/.mailboxlist via a shell or perl script, move each file listed in
.mailboxlist to ~/mail/, update your subscription list via .mailboxlist to
reflec
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Vijaya Kumar V wrote:
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:08:21 +0530 (IST)
> From: Vijaya Kumar V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SM-USERS] how to display user name inside squirrel mail login
>
> hi guys
>
> how to display the user name in the webmail page
Th
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Keith Hatfull wrote:
> Did anyone ever think about turing off the provider link and name by
> default and force the admin to add them if desired?
The SpamAssassin folks did this to SA to force the admins to define
$CONTACT_ADDRESS themselves rather than sending the users to
We've had trouble with the addressbook ever since we moved SM over to our
new mail system. Currently when a user tries to modify their addressbook
they get the error "ERROR: Could not lock datafile". The permissions on
/var/mail/suqirrelmail are fine. Same for each users' prefs, sig, abook,
etc.
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=nfs+locking+issues
> Results 1 - 10 of about 34,700
>
> check differences between older system and new one. nfs versions, fstab diffs
I don't think there are any locking problems. I'm running NFSv3 on all
these systems.