Is there any checks and balances for closed users.
As it stores the prefs in the data directory, it has no way of knowing
if the user is deleted off the system.
This becomes a problem when a new system user of same name is added and is
allocated previous users prefs?
Might it not be easier to s
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, LuKreme wrote:
> On 21-Nov-2006, at 22:10, Res wrote:
>> Might it not be easier to store these and other user specific files
>> in the
>> users home dir to eliminate this problem?
>
> um... you want to give a web application permission to write to
eate what is needed.
>
> SquirrelMail doesn't create the folders - it tells the IMAP server to
> create them. That means that the web server doesn't need to have access to
*SIGH*
I did not say it made them, i know imap makes them, read what i said
it INITITATES its creation
ss to
>> the $HOME directories. The IMAP server need that access though.
>
> Depending on if the IMAP server store the mails in $HOME of course. Some
> IMAP servers store the mails in other places.
yes, used to usea most
e. [Personal address book]
Database error: extension not found
Any takers? I'm sure its something simple that you will all bitch-slap me
:)
--
Cheers
Res
Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition
:)
Thanks...
- --
Cheers
Res
Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today: http://techp.org/p/1/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGJqVRsWhAmSIQh7MRAliZAJ9BqOXI0XTn3EVy4tKiAZ06HzjzAwCgo8OQ
TeAzwSu1iS6J668ZBsjqJ
there a technical reason as to why they are different? If not, can we
look at adding a 'user' reference for the address table in the stable 1.5
branch?
- --
Cheers
Res
Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today: http://tec
r',
> then both tables are the same.
>
Thanks, I wanted to make sure there wasn't any tech reason before
doing things.
> It wouldn't be a bad idea to pull these into the configuration system
> that is being rebuilt.
That would be great :)
- --
Cheers
Res
Let No
sues even
with mbox's containing thousands of messages (albeit mailing list messages
where the largest single msg no doubt is under 100K)
- --
Cheers
Res
Vote for your favourite MTA at http://polls.ausics.net/v3.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
ups because of the use of NFS.
mbox is 30 odd years old, its tried and proven, and apart from locking
issues over NFS there is no real this way IS really better than THAT way.
it is all personal choices from our own experiences.
- --
Cheers
Res
Vote for your favourite MTA at http://polls.aus
will get him his own way/
/error/
/make user get off own ass and do it themself/
--
Cheers
Res
Vote for your favourite MTA at http://polls.ausics.net/v3.php
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2
ready active, still no go.
Any suggestions? I was guessing this should work with the default
calendar, or maybe I read it wrong and it only works with the
other calendar plugin (the extra shared one, not the supplied one) ?
TIA
- --
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
tune stuff.
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGfjTlsWhAmSIQh7MRAvvUAJ9bHoCW0t1FAFWbdXSQQh6nwWMVmwCfS0f5
vsbyK8J4iWprsiJtvkEWinQ=
=KfXc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.
carry out on packages. You only need to look at the
updates for RH, then Slackware to see which is the higher maintenance.
/rant :)
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGhYPOsWh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Res wrote:
> possible like Slackware, you have very few updates to worry about, only
> the security issues, which is higher because of the mutilation the likes
don't bring up
but postfix and vpopmail work together, yes, sure they do, so long as you
have installed qmail already so it can use its components, WTF would I
want to isntall 2 MTA's :)
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGh
f our userbase mail store is on FAS
units using maildir.
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGhd6isWhAmSIQh7MRApdGAJ9xvpuZL5H2/EfT9L0Icnf83m7t3gCgqqcN
8IhZETOJC8Img8tuDFbsINY=
=8GRR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ts really exclude
other regions, a few UK/US admins are on it, but not many...
http://polls.ausics.net/v3.php Even exim beats postfix :)
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGhd+dsWhAmSIQh7MRAoFfAJ9V5IUGNubV+BAYmD8j9CPItaK/fwCeN8wJ
qE1WTzuWbrp
t; even Exchange has as many votes very suspicious. ;-)
LOL, the problem with netop type lists is, it attracts many types,
including self appointed 'leet winblow$ weenies' in private enterprise.
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
weenies' in private enterprise.
>
> You don't blacklist them? ;-)
I'd love to blacklist them, but I dont control the list :( only host it.
I do however set them to list vacation mode if they send those fricken OoO
messages that exchange always sends :)
--
Cheers
Res
-
ir, even though the tests they
show use the most well known slowest imap server known to man kind :)
> Pretty far OT, sorry folks.
lol, indeed :)
Incidently there may be a new qmail release in the future, not by DJB of
course, in fact one quetions if he's even still alive.
--
Cheers
Res
of
>> course, in fact one quetions if he's even still alive.
>
> Huh.
There are some coders wanting to resurrect it as qmail2, so it is 'out of
the box' ready for todays environment since DJB gave up on it.
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
99r% of the users, and doing so
might have adverse afects elsewhere so you don't, but yet they continue to
voice their objections, well I say "no one is holding a gun at your head
making you use it"...
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
S spam, and normal real email which clearly is not spam, they mark AS
junk, nobody should be using hotmail anymore.
--
Cheers
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGn/rlsWhAmSIQh7MRArQLAJ9mTJBTRoI1BQ4MyD0C+8cflCp+jQCffGuv
OR8OjVfhxixDho/JClu+omQ=
=Y5gB
-
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is soemthing taking too long because the mailboxes are big possibly? Any
> ideas of what I need to check?
This is your php configuration issue.
Read the docs on the website and lok for php tuning
--
Chee
y
get private replies, through most likely no fault of their own.
Paul? Can you change this?
--
Cheers
Res
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Se
d not work with previous, but who knows..
--
Cheers
Res
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
--
Additonally, I set a fresh new install on a test box, used the same as
below except no sql databases, and still fails with same
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Res wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Firstly
>
> SQM 1.4.11
> compat P/I 2.0.8
> sent_confirmation P/I 1.6
> MySQL DBs in use an
so adds
the user to it.
Yes, I have read the README/INSTALL, 3 times over incase
I keep missing something :) but I'm sure I'm not, any suggestions muchly
appreciated.
--
Cheers
Res
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
one was 3 days ago unreleated to SM though.
php 5.2.4 and apache 2.2.6 (test server was 5.2.4 and 2.2.4)
>
>
> -Len
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Res wrote:
>
>>
>> Additonally, I set a fresh new install on a test box, used the same as
>> below except no sql database
ou may find when
> you add attachments or send messages.
I also can not reproduce these issues with 1.4.11, both test files
attached, sent and were received fine
--
Cheers
Res
Slackware -V- sloooUbuntu
http://lxer.c
EEs041027429:
> DSN: Local configuration error"
>
>
Sure, the postfix users list since you use postfix and this has nothing to
do with SM.
--
Cheers
Res
PGP - Just another way to assist preventing Roger Maynards impersonations,
even though
are pop)
I only came accross this myself, upgrading my desktop so i was using
webmail personally and thought WTF.. :)
Cheers
Res
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licens
>> Yes,
> default db_prefs rule we have that says X_Spam_Status: Yes is detecting
The problem is the comma is a db_prefs field delimiter, so is ignored,
even if escaped.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Res wrote:
Yes,
default db_prefs rule we have that says X_Spam_Status: Yes is detecting
The problem is the comma is a db_prefs field delimiter, so is ignored,
even if escaped.
Sounds like a bug to me
...)
Sloppy sloppy sloppy. To "fix" it and not break everyone's filters,
we'll have to add a terrible hack I'm afraid
drats, ok, let me now if you want it tested.
Res
-
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> Here's the ugly hack. I don't use client side filters, so please help
> test this.
>
Been running it overnight, sent a few tests to my own account to verify
it works, all is good, thanks greatly.
--
Res
-Beware
a way to know if it's safe to run the patch or not?
Yes it is fine, the general rule is, that if there is no specific match,
use the closest.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
--
Register Now fo
server. You need to contact your system
> administrator and have him/her fix forwarding at the mail server.
>
This reminds me of the techsupport comedy sketch that did the rounds years
ago, the reply to come back is "Oh but I am the system administrator"
*giggles*
--
Res
-Beware of
xy, which a great deal do.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer
ote the comma).
Perhaps the confusion is " to search for " should read " to add "
This works as Paul and I tested this, oh, I dunno, about 18 months ago
now, but as Paul said, read the archives and you would have found
your answer long before waiting for a list re
Hi.
getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
anyone else seeing this?
(yes, it does change the password, but then the return shows that error.
is related to the new token section in strings.php it seems.
--
Res
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Res wrote:
>
> Hi.
> getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
>
> This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
>
By disabling the security check this works fine, however it is not optimal
to leave in this state now since
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Res wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>> getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
>>
>> This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
>>
>> anyone
ri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Res wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Res wrote:
Hi.
getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
By disabling the security check this works fine, however it is not optimal
to leave in this
I
> look which files and finally add new user would be really helpful. Need
> badly to add new user. Thank you.
> --
perhaps you should seek out and join a debian list if you are after
hand-holding, this is *not* the list for that, adding users is not the job
of SM.
--
Res
"Wh
ystem free space with df.
>
> Note that the Lockout plugin could probably have prevented that situation.
>
That plugin is life saver, everyone should be using it, IMHO.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux
47 matches
Mail list logo
