I am not sure if I understand how the creating cores dynamically
functionality is supposed to work. From what I have sort of figured out is
that I need to specify the instanceDir as the path to a directory which
contains the conf file. So I have directory as template for configuration
files but whe
Well this is all useful information but not sure if it really answers my
question. Let me rephrase what exactly I am trying to do. Lets say I start
with core0 so this is how the directory structure looks like
solr.home
-> solr.xml
-> core0
-> conf
-> data
now when I want to dynamically add co
hi there
i am trying to get familiar with solr while setting it up on my local pc and
indeing and retrieving some sample data .. a couple of things i am having
trouble with
1 - in my schema if i dont use the copyField to copy data from some fields
to the text field .. they are not searchable .. so
we are trying to setup solr for a website where data gets updated pretty
frequently and I want to have those changes reflected in solr indexes sooner
than nighly delta-imports .. so I am thinking we will probably want to set
it up to have delta imports running every 15 mins or so .. and solr searc
xing performance:
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl - search architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> On 14. feb. 2010, at 23.56, adeelmahmood wrote:
>
>>
>> we are trying to setup solr for a website where
if this is my schema
with this one being the catch all field
and I am copying all fields into the content field
my question is .. what if instead of that I change the title field to be
text as well and dont copy that into content field but still copy everything
else (all string fiel
terms
> in titles when you search the content field.
>
> But that's not very informative. What are you trying to accomplish?
> That is, what's the high-level issue you're trying to address with
> a change like that?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Feb 14,
simple question: I want to give a label to my facet queries instead of the
name of facet field .. i found the documentation at solr site that I can do
that by specifying the key local param .. syntax something like
facet.field={!ex=dt%20key='By%20Owner'}owner
I am just not sure what the ex=dt par
mean 'change the long query from {!ex=dt}docType to {!ex=dt
> key=mylabel}docType'
>
> 'tag=dt' creates a tag (name) for a filter query, and 'ex=dt' means
> 'exclude this filter query'.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, adeelmahmood
&g
I was gonna ask a question about this but you seem like you might have the
answer for me .. wat exactly is the omitNorms field do (or is expected to
do) .. also if you could please help me understand what termVectors and
multiValued options do ??
Thanks for ur help
Raimon Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Hi
hi
i am trying to get highlighting working and its turning out to be a pain.
here is my schema
here is the catchall field (default field for search as well)
here is how I have setup the solrconfig file
title pi status
0
content
content
cont
well ok I guess that makes sense and I tried changing my title field to text
type and then highlighting worked on it .. but
1) as far as not merging all fields in catchall field and instead
configuring the dismax handler to search through them .. do you mean then
ill have to specify the field I wa
hi there
I am having some trouble understanding delta import and how its different
from full import .. from what I can tell the only difference is that it has
the clean parameter set to false by default .. otherwise as far as setting
up your query to use the data_import_last_index_time .. you can
any ideas ???
adeelmahmood wrote:
>
> hi there
> I am having some trouble understanding delta import and how its different
> from full import .. from what I can tell the only difference is that it
> has the clean parameter set to false by default .. otherwise as far as
> set
we are trying to use solr for somewhat of a reporting system too (along with
search) .. since it provides such amazing control over queries and basically
over the data that user wants .. they might as well be able to dump that
data in an excel file too if needed .. our data isnt too much close to
I just want to clarify if its not obvious .. that the reason I am concerned
about the performance of solr is becaues for reporting requests I will
probably have to request all result rows at the same time .. instead of 10
or 20
adeelmahmood wrote:
>
> we are trying to use solr for somew
t; as such, but a problem generally of unrestricted adhoc reporting
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "adeelmahmood"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, 27 February, 2010 5:57:00 AM
> Subject: Re: solr for reporting purposes
17 matches
Mail list logo