I know the following drawbacks of EmbServer:
- org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.UpdateRequest.getContentStreams()
which is called on handling update request, provides a lot of garbage in
memory and bloat it by expensive XML.
-
org.apache.solr.response.BinaryResponseWriter.getParse
Hello Kiran,
I think you can try turning grouping on and group "on", and ask solr to
group on the "Category" field.
Nevertheless, this will *not* ensure you that groups are returned in facet
counts order. This will *not* ensure you the mincount per group neither.
Hope this helps,
--
Tanguy
201
Hi. We're trying to use the following Curl command to perform an "extract only"
of *.MSG file, but it blows up:
curl "http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?extractOnly=true"; -F
"myfile=@92.msg"
If we do this, it works fine:
curl "http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.
There is no spec documented anywhere . It is all in this single file
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/util/JavaBinCodec.java
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > Sorry, but I could not find any spec on the binary for
i am not find where to set dataimport.properties in solr4.0 beta
who can help me ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/in-solr4-0-where-to-set-dataimport-properties-tp4002766.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
dataimport.properties :
interval=1
port=
server=localhost
doc.id=
params=/select?qt\=/dataimport&command\=delta-import&clean\=false&commit\=true
webapp=solr
syncEnabled=1
last_index_time=2012-06-27 13\:05\:18
doc.last_index_time=2012-06-27 13\:05\:18
syncCores=
how to set these in solr4.0 , Please
Srini,
Whats the size of your index? You are saying that searching on
'string' fieldType takes 400 milli seconds but did you try searching on any
other fieldType other than string? If so, how much time did it take?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM, srinalluri wrote:
> This is string fiel
First, I'm no Tomcat expert here's the Tomcat Solr
page, but you've probably already seen it:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
But I'm guessing that you may have old jars around
somewhere and things are getting confused. I'd
blow away the whole thing and start over, whenever
I start copy
Not sure if this can help. But once I had a similar problem with Solr 3.6.0
where tomcat refused to find one of the classes that existed. I deleted the
tomcat's webapp directory and then it worked fine.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> First, I'm no Tomcat expert here'
What do you get when you specify &debugQuery=on (&debug=query in 4.x)?
In other words, what does the parsed query look like?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, amitesh116 wrote:
> Hi I am experiencing 2 strange behavior in edismax:
> edismax is configured to behave default OR (using mm=
I am aware that IDF is not distributed. Suppose I have to boost or give higher
rank to documents which are matching in a specific/particular shard, how can I
accomplish that?
**
This message may contain conf
Tom:
I thin my comments were that grouping on a field where there was
a unique value _per document_ chewed up a lot of resources.
Conceptually, there's a bucket for each unique group value. And
grouping on a file path is just asking for trouble.
But the memory used for grouping should max as a fu
There was just a thread on this, it's may be your
&image_url:*
try removing this clause just to test response time. If
that shows a vast improvement, try adding a boolean
field has_image_url, and then add a fq clause like
&fq=has_image_url:true
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM, srinal
Maybe you can spoof this by using an "fq" clause instead?
as &fq=body:*?
The first one will be slow, but after that it'll use the filterCache.
FWIW,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, david3s wrote:
> Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the
> wildcard searche
Hi,
How sorting is done in SOLR with multiple cores .. say 20 cores.. because in
multi core search it should search in all cores then on complete results it
should sort... please correct me if i am wrong.
In our scenario we are executing same query on 4 cores and finally sorting
the results based
And we should probably add a doc note with this same advice since it is an
easy "mistake" to make.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search is slow for URL fields of type Strin
You could add a default value in your field via the schema :
and then your query could be :
-body:mynuvalue
but I prefer the Chris's solution which is what I usually do.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-que
Hello all!
I already posted this question to Stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12027451/solr-net-query-argumentexception-in-windows-forms)
but as is, either my question is too specific or just too trivial. I
don't know. But maybe I'm just trying to put the cart before the horse
Hi guys, i'm getting an error when using the GeoDistance component from jteam
(http://info.orange11.nl ) when fireing a query with a spatial tag:
error:
~~~
SEVERE: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: rsp
at
nl.jteam.search.solrext.spatial.GeoDistanceComponent.process(GeoDistanceComponent.java:64)
Hello,
I have a problem using grouped queries and the 'group.ngroups' parameter.
When I run the following request
/select?q=&group=true&group.field=personId&group.ngroups=true&wt=xml
the response looks like this:
11
6
106.12345
...
1
Hi
You might add an int field "Search Rule" that identifies the type of
search.
example
Search Rule Description
0 Unpaid Search
1 Paid Sear
Thank you, but I don't want to filter those ads.
For example, when user make a search like q=Car
Result list:
1. Ford Automobile (score 10)
2. Honda Civic (score 9)
...
...
...
99. Paid Ads (score 1, Ad has own field to identify it's an Ad)
What I want to find is a way to make the score of "Paid
Also note, emphasizing what Erick said below, that with this type of "has a
value in field" type clause, it works fine as an fq as that gets cached so you
only take the performance hit once on it. Generally this is a clause that is
reused so be sure to peel it off as an fq rather than AND'ing i
I am using the jetty container from the example. The only thing I have done is
change the schema to match up my documents rather than the example
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hello,
I was able to get the DIH working in SOLR 3.6.1 (placed the sqljdbc4.jar
file in the lib directory, etc). Everything worked great. Tried to get
everything working in SOLR 4 beta (on the same dev machine connecting to
same db, etc) and was unable to due to the sql driver not loading.
What i
...FYI: works fine with 3.6.0
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-java-lang-NoSuchFieldError-rsp-when-using-jteam-spatial-search-module-tp4002884p4002904.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I removed the string "collection1" from my solr.xml file in solr home and
modified my solr.xml file as follows:
Then I restarted Solr.
However, I keep getting messages about
"Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or
'/l/solrs/dev/solrs/4.0/1/collection1/conf/'"
And the log
update:
as an experiment - i changed the query to a wildcard (9030*) instead of an
explicit value (9030)
example:
QUERY="http://$SERVER.intra.searshc.com:${PORT}/solrpartscat/core1/select?qt=itemNoProductTypeBrandSearch&q=9030*&rows=2000&debugQuery=on&fl=*,score";
this resulted in a results lis
looks like the original complete list of the results did not get attached to
this thread
here is a snippet of the list.
what i am trying to demonstrate, is the difference in scoring and
ultimately, sorting - and the breadth of documents (a few hundred) between
the two documents of interest (9030
I did not describe the problems correctly.
I have 3 solr shards with solr homes .../solrs/4.0/1 .../solrs/4.0/2 and
.../solrs/4.0/2solrs/3
For shard 1 I have a solr.xml file with the modifications described in the
previous message. For that instance, it appears that the problem is that
the sema
I cant think of a way you can achieve this in one request. Can you make two
different solr requests? If so, you can make on with fq=PaidSearch:0 &
other with fq=padidSearch:[1:*] .
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nicholas Ding wrote:
> Thank you, but I don't want to filter those ads.
>
> For ex
I made this instalation on a new tomcat.
With Solr 3.4.*, 3.5.*, 3.6.* works with jars into
$TOMCAT_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib, but with solr 4.0 beta doesn´t work. I
needed to add the jars into $TOMCAT_HOME/lib.
The problem with the cast seems to be in the source code.
-Mensagem origin
The answer is yes. "collection1" is defined as the default core name in
CoreContainer.java on line 94 or so. I have opened a jira issue for this
and other issues related to the documentation of solr.xml and Solr core
configuration issues for Solr 4.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-
Tom,
Feel free to find my benchmark results for two alternative joining
approaches.
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2012/08/block-join-query-performs.html
Regards
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Tom:
>
> I thin my comments were that grouping on a field where there was
> a u
Andy,
we are not running solr 4.0 here in production.
can you elaborate on your comment related to your polling script written in
ruby and how the new data import status screen makes your polling app
obsolete?
i wrote my own polling app (in shell) to work around the very same issues:
http://luc
> can you elaborate on your comment related to your polling script written in
> ruby and how the new data import status screen makes your polling app
> obsolete?
The 4.0 admin tools have a screen that give the status in the web app so I
don't have to run the CLI tool to check the indexing status.
Hello all,
this "more specific" question is related to my earlier post at:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-help-understanding-an-issue-with-scoring-td4002897.html
i am reading here about the tie parameter:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax?highlight=%28edismax%29#tie_.28Tie_brea
hello,
i am trying to understand the "debug" output from a query, and specifically
- how scores for two (2) documents are derived and why they are so far
apart.
the user is entering 9030 for the search
the search is rightfully returning the top document, however - the question
is why is the docu
I would create two indices, one with your content and one with your ads. This
approach would allow you to precisely control how many ads you pull back and
how you merge them into the results, and you would be able to control schemas,
boosting, defaults fields, etc for each index independently.
What is your query and "qf"?
The first doc gets its high score due to a match on the
"itemNoExactMatchStr" field which the second doc doesn't have:
12.014634 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(itemNoExactMatchStr:9030 in 2308681),
With a low document frequency (inverts to high inverse document frequency):
On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Rohit Harchandani wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there any way to have a bitmap field in Solr??
> I have a use case where I need to search specific attributes of a document.
> Rather than having an is_A, is_B, is_C (all related to each other)etc...how
> would i store all this
hello,
this is the query i am using:
cat goquery.sh
#!/bin/bash
SERVER=$1
PORT=$2
QUERY="http://$SERVER.blah.blah.com:${PORT}/solrpartscat/core1/select?qt=itemNoProductTypeBrandSearch&q=9030&rows=2000&debugQuery=on&fl=*,score";
curl -v $QUERY
--
View this message in context:
http://luc
Hi
Is there a SSD brand and spec that the community recommends for an index of
size 56G with mostly reads? We are evaluating this one
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227706
thank you
Peyman
Could you not apply this logic in your solr client prior to displaying
the results?
On 23 August 2012 20:56, François Schiettecatte
wrote:
> I would create two indices, one with your content and one with your ads. This
> approach would allow you to precisely control how many ads you pull back an
You should check this at pcper.com:
http://pcper.com/ssd-decoder
http://pcper.com/content/SSD-Decoder-popup
Specs for a wide range of SSDs.
Best regards
François
On Aug 23, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Peyman Faratin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a SSD brand and spec that the community re
Tom -
I corrected, on both trunk and 4_x, a reference to solr/conf (to
solr/collection1/conf) in tutorial.html. I didn't see anything in
example/README that needed fixing. Was there something that is awry there that
needs correcting that I missed? If so, feel free to file a JIRA marked for
Yes, I think do two separate calls to Solr could solve my problem. But I
really want to reduce the HTTP requests to Solr, if I could write a Solr
extension and place my ranking logics to inside, that could be perfect.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis <
savvas.andreas.moysi.
Thank you Tanguy. This seems to work:
group = true
group.field = Category
group.limit = 5
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
group.limit
[number]
The number of results (documents) to return for each group. Defaults to 1.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Tanguy Moal wrote:
> Hello K
Can you post your solr.xml file?
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, Buttler, David wrote:
> I am using the jetty container from the example. The only thing I have
> done is change the schema to match up my documents rather than the example
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:ma
Hi,
I have setup Solr to index data from Oracle DB through DIH handler. However
through Solr admin I could see the DB connection is successfull, data
retrieved from DB to Solr but not added into index. The message is that "0
documents added" even when I am able to see that 9 records are returned
b
On Aug 23, 2012, at 4:46 PM, ranmatrix S wrote:
> The schema and fields in db-data-config.xml are one and the same.
Please attach or post both the schema and the DIH config XML files so we can
see them. The DIH can be pretty tricky.
You say you can see 9 records are returned back. How do yo
Are you committing? You have to commit for them to be actually added
-Original Message-
From: ranmatrix S [mailto:ranmat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Index problem
Hi,
I have setup Solr to index data from Oracle
Thanks Erik!
What confused me in the README is that it wasn't clear what
files/directorys need to be in Solr home and what files/directories need to
be in SolrHome/corename. For example the /conf and /data directories are
now under the core subdirectory. What about /lib and /bin? Will a core
u
Can someone please point to some samples on how to implement custom
SolrEventListeners?
Whats the default behavior of Solr when no SolrEventListeners are configured
in solrconfig.xml.
I am trying to understand how does custom listener fit in with default
listeners (if there are any)
Thanks
-K'Ri
54 matches
Mail list logo
