And we should probably add a doc note with this same advice since it is an
easy "mistake" to make.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search is slow for URL fields of type String.
There was just a thread on this, it's may be your
&image_url:*
try removing this clause just to test response time. If
that shows a vast improvement, try adding a boolean
field has_image_url, and then add a fq clause like
&fq=has_image_url:true
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM, srinalluri <nallurisr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
This is string fieldType:
<fieldType name="string" class="solr.StrField" sortMissingLast="true"
/>
These are the filelds using 'string' fieldType:
<field name="image_url" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
multiValued="true" />
<field name="url" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
multiValued="true" />
And this the sample query:
/select/?q=url:http\://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2012/08/10/social-change-coming-from-gas-prices-to-rent-prices-and-beyond/
AND image_url:*
Each query like this taking around 400 milli seconds. What are the change
I
can do to the fieldType to improve query performance?
thanks
Srini
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/search-is-slow-for-URL-fields-of-type-String-tp4002662.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
