If I've copied the solr.war under tomcat/webapps directory, after
restarting it the archive extracts itself and I get solr directory.
Why do I need to set example-solr-home/solr, which is not in the
/webapps directory, as home directory?
Quoting Shalin Shekhar Mangar : No, the steps are as follows
ttp://localhost:8983/solr/update ?): java.io.IOException: S
erver returned HTTP response code: 400 for URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/update
C:\test\output>
Regards Thomas Lauer
__ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version 3175
(20080611) __
E-Mail wurde g
Mihails,
Put the solr.war into the webapps directory and restart tomcat, then follow up
the console and you'll see messages saying solr.war is getting deployed.
Use a recent nightly build as that has the dataimport related patch included.
Regards
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Mihail
I've already done that, but cannot access solr via web, and apache log
says something wrong with solr home directory.
-
Couldn't start SOLR. Check solr/home property.
-
Quoting "Chakraborty, Kishore K." : Mihails,
Put the solr.war into the webapps directory and restart tomcat, then
follow
There are two parts of solr application. Solr.war is only the web app.
Then there is the example-solr which you need to download and unpack in a
different folder. There are 3 ways to make the example-solr visible to the solr
webapp.
Refer to these pages : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall
Hi Mihails,
The solr home is a directory which contains the conf/ and data/ folders. The
conf folder contains solrconfig.xml, schema.xml and other such configuration
files. The data/ folder contains the index files.
Other than adding the war file to tomcat, you also need to designate a
certain fo
I'm stuck...
I now have /tomcat5.5/webapps/solr (exploded solr.war),
/tomcat5.5/webapps/solr/solr-example/.
I've ran
export
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS-Dsolr.solr.home=/usr/share/tomcat5.5/webapps/solr/example/solr/
to make /example/solr/ as a home directory.
What am I doing wrong?
Quoting Shalin Sh
Thanks a million for your time and help.
It indeed works smoothly now.
I also, by the way, had to apply the "patch" attached to the
following message :
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-to-describe-2-entities-in-dataConfig-
for-the-DataImporter--p17577610.html
in order to have the TemplateTransf
We are cutting a a patch which incorporates all the recent bug fixes,
so that you guys do not have to apply patches over patches
--Noble
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Nicolas Pastorino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a million for your time and help.
> It indeed works smoothly now.
>
> I a
is von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-
Version 3175 (20080611) __
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerfo
Solr allows you to specify filters in separate parameters that are
applied to the main query, but cached separately.
q=the user query&fq=folder:f13&fq=folder:f24
I've been wanting more explanation around this for a while, so maybe now
is a good time to ask :)
the "cached separately" verbi
Ok, let's start again from scratch with a clean Tomcat installation.
1. Download example-solr-home.jar from the wiki and extract it to a local
folder for example to /home//
2. You will now see a folder called example-solr-home where you extracted
the jar file in the above step
3. Copy /home//examp
"Exception in Lucene Index Updater".
Anyway, for some reasons I'm able to start Solr only using its own
Jetty. Everything else works fine on my Tomcat, except Solr.
Quoting Shalin Shekhar Mangar : Ok, let's start again from scratch
with a clean Tomcat installation.
1. Download example-solr-home.
Hi,
I'm using solr built from trunk and highlighting for range queries doesn't
work.
If I search for "2008" everything works as expected but if I search for
"[2000 TO 2008]" nothing gets highlighted.
The field I'm searching on is a TextField and I've confirmed that the query
and index analyzers ar
Shalin,
Thanks for consolidating the patch.
Any idea, when the dB Import request handler will be part of the nightly
build?
Thanks again
** julio
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Julio,
That was fast! I just uploaded a patch :)
Actually, it is waiting on SOLR-563 (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-563) which deals with modifying
the build scripts to create a contrib project area in Solr. I'm planning to
work on that this week. Once that is done, it would be up
It's a known deficiency... ConstantScoreRangeQuery and
ConstantScorePrefixQuery which Solr uses rewrite to a
ConstantScoreQuery and don't expose the terms they match.
Performance-wise it seems like a bad idea if the number of terms
matched is large (esp when used in a MultiSearcher or later in
glo
Hi,
Does SOLR have .csv output? I can find references to .csv input, but
not output.
Thank you,
Marshall
Hi Marshall,
I don't think there is a CSV Writer, but here are some pointers for writing one:
$ ff \*Writer\*java | grep -v Test | grep request
./src/java/org/apache/solr/request/PHPResponseWriter.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/request/XSLTResponseWriter.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/request/J
I recommend using the OpenCSV package. Works fine, Apache 2.0 license.
http://opencsv.sourceforge.net/
wunder
On 6/11/08 10:00 AM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
>
> I don't think there is a CSV Writer, but here are some pointers for writing
> one:
>
> $ ff \*Wri
Hi,
I've just changed the stemming algorithm slightly and am running a few
tests against the old stemmer versus the new stemmer. I did a query
for 'hanger' and using the old stemmer I get the following scoring for
a document with the title: Converter Hanger Assembly Replacement
6.4242806
We are using Solr as the search engine for our public access library
catalog. In testing I did a search for a French movie that I know is in
the catalog named: "Kirikou et la sorcière" and nothing was returned.
If I search for just the work "Kirikou" several results are returned,
and the pr
When I was asked for something similar I quickly cobbled together a
stylesheet (I'm no xsl expert so it's probably pretty bad).
Invoked like this:
http://localhost:8982/solr/select?q=testing&fl=id,title_t,score&&wt=xslt&tr=csv.xsl&rows=10
YMMV, but feel free to use it if it helps, I've attach
That is strange... did you re-index or change the index? If so, you
might want to verify that docid=3454 still corresponds to the same
document you queried earlier.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Brendan Grainger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just changed the stemming algorithm sli
Hi Yonik,
Yes I did rebuild the index and they are the same document (just
verified). The only thing that changed was the stemmer, but that makes
no sense to me. Also, if the equation for the fieldNorm is:
fieldBoost * lengthNorm = fieldBoost * 1 /sqrt(numTermsForField)
Then that would mea
Sure, use the fl parameter to specify the fields that you want
(comma-separated)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Yves Zoundi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
>Is it possible to remove some fields from the XML response?
> I have a field which can contains a huge amount of
Yves - you can control which fields are returned from a search using
the fl (field list) parameter. &fl=* provides all fields except
score. &fl=id,title,score provides only those selected fields, etc.
Erik
On Jun 11, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Yves Zoundi wrote:
Hi guys,
Is
Hi Yonik,
I just realized that the stemmer does make a difference because of
synonyms. So on indexing using the new stemmer "converter hanger
assembly replacement" gets expanded to: "converter hanger assembly
assemble replacement" so there are 5 terms which gets a length norm of
0.4472136
Thank you guys!
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 11 juin 2008 14:07
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Ignore fields in XML response
Yves - you can control which fields are returned from a search using
the fl (field list) parameter. &fl
Field norms have limited precision (it's encoded as an 8 bit float) so
you are probably seeing rounding.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Brendan Grainger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> I just realized that the stemmer does make a difference because of synonyms.
> So on indexin
Thanks so much, that explains it.
Brendan
On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Field norms have limited precision (it's encoded as an 8 bit float) so
you are probably seeing rounding.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Brendan Grainger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Yonik,
Hi Robert,
Did you rebuild the index after changing your config? The index time
analyzer is only applied when a document is indexed, changing it has no
effect on already indexed documents.
Tom
Robert Haschart wrote:
>
> We are using Solr as the search engine for our public access library
>
Hi,
I've noticed that currently the SynonymFilter replaces the original
token with the configured tokens list (which includes the original
matched token) and each one of these tokens is of type "word". Wouldn't
it make more sense to only mark the original token as type "word" and
the the othe
Hi,
The product I'm working on requires new documents to be searchable
very quickly (inside 60 seconds is my goal). The corpus is also going
to grow very large, although it is perfectly partitionable by user.
The approach I tried first was to have write-only masters and read-
only slaves wi
Hi Uri,
Yes, I think that would make sense (word vs. synonym token types). Custom
boosting/weighting of original token vs. synonym token(s) also makes sense. Is
this something you can provide a patch for?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Messa
Hi James,
Yes, this makes sense. I've recommended doing the same to others before. It
would be good to have this be a part of Solr. There is one person (named
Jason) working on adding more real-time search support to both Lucene and Solr.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene -
It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often since it will be cached
separately from the query. The first query occuppies one cache entry while
the second one occuppies two cache entries, one in queryCache and one in
filteredCa
Just correct myself, in the last setence, the first query is better if
fieldb:bar isn't reused often
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:02 PM, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
> fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often si
Hi,
I am new to Solr Lucene I have only one defaule core i am working on creating
multiple core.
Can you help me in this matter.
with regards
Rohit Arora
--- On Thu, 6/12/08, James Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: James Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Strategy for presenting fresh
Hi,
I'm playing with the Solr Data Import Handler, and everything looks
great so far!
Hopefully we will be able to replace our homegrown ODBC indexing service
[using camping+ferret] with Solr!
The wiki page mentions "scheduling full imports and delta imports" but I
couldn't find any further det
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Neville Burnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing with the Solr Data Import Handler, and everything looks
> great so far!
thanks
>
> Hopefully we will be able to replace our homegrown ODBC indexing service
> [using camping+ferret] with Solr!
>
> The
41 matches
Mail list logo
